The SelfSTarT intervention for low back pain patients presenting to first contact physiotherapists: A mixed methods service evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Globally, back pain is the leading cause of years of disability. In the United Kingdom, over 20 million people live with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain, with low back pain being one of the most common causes. National strategies promote self-management and the use of digital technologies to empower populations. AIMS: To evaluate the uptake and impact of providing the SelfSTart approach (STarT Back and SelfBACK App) when delivered by a First Contact Physiotherapist (FCP) to people presenting with low back pain in primary care. METHODS: Patients presenting with a new episode of low back pain underwent routine assessment and completion of a STarT Back questionnaire. Patients with low/medium scores were offered the SelfBACK App. A control population was provided by the MIDAS-GP study. Patient Experience, outcome measures, healthcare utilisation and retention were captured through the app and clinical systems (EMIS). Interviews with five FCPs explored the experiences of using the SelfSTart approach. RESULTS: SelfSTarT was taken up by almost half (48%) of those to whom it was offered. Compared to MIDAS-GP, users were more likely to be younger, male, in work, and with higher health literacy. SelfSTarT users reported significant improved experiences relating to receiving an agreed care plan and receiving sufficient information. There were no significant differences in treatments offered. FCPs were positive about the app and felt it had value but wanted feedback on patient progress. They recognised that a digital solution would not be suitable for all. CONCLUSION: This approach offers an opportunity to empower and support self-management, using robustly evaluated digital technology.

Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain from the five most common presentations to primary care (back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain), where the majority of patients are managed, is a costly global health challenge. At present, first-line decision-making is based on clinical reasoning and stratified models of care have only been tested in patients with low back pain. We therefore, examined the feasibility of; a) a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), and b) General Practitioners (GPs) providing stratified care at the point-of-consultation for these five most common MSK pain presentations. METHODS: The design was a pragmatic pilot, two parallel-arm (stratified versus non-stratified care), cluster RCT and the setting was 8 UK GP practices (4 intervention, 4 control) with randomisation (stratified by practice size) and blinding of trial statistician and outcome data-collectors. Participants were adult consulters with MSK pain without indicators of serious pathologies, urgent medical needs, or vulnerabilities. Potential participant records were tagged and individuals sent postal invitations using a GP point-of-consultation electronic medical record (EMR) template. The intervention was supported by the EMR template housing the Keele STarT MSK Tool (to stratify into low, medium and high-risk prognostic subgroups of persistent pain and disability) and recommended matched treatment options. Feasibility outcomes included exploration of recruitment and follow-up rates, selection bias, and GP intervention fidelity. To capture recommended outcomes including pain and function, participants completed an initial questionnaire, brief monthly questionnaire (postal or SMS), and 6-month follow-up questionnaire. An anonymised EMR audit described GP decision-making. RESULTS: GPs screened 3063 patients (intervention = 1591, control = 1472), completed the EMR template with 1237 eligible patients (intervention = 513, control = 724) and 524 participants (42%) consented to data collection (intervention = 231, control = 293). Recruitment took 28 weeks (target 12 weeks) with > 90% follow-up retention (target > 75%). We detected no selection bias of concern and no harms identified. GP stratification tool fidelity failed to achieve a-priori success criteria, whilst fidelity to the matched treatments achieved "complete success". CONCLUSIONS: A future definitive cluster RCT of stratified care for MSK pain is feasible and is underway, following key amendments including a clinician-completed version of the stratification tool and refinements to recommended matched treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of the registry: ISRCTN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 15366334. Date of registration: 06/04/2016.

Time to surgery after hip fracture across Canada by timing of admission.

The extent of Canadian provincial variation in hip fracture surgical timing is unclear. Provinces performed a similar proportion of surgeries within three inpatient days after adjustment. Time to surgery varied by timing of admission across provinces. This may reflect different approaches to providing access to hip fracture surgery. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare whether time to surgery after hip fracture varies across Canadian provinces for surgically fit patients and their subgroups defined by timing of admission. METHODS: We retrieved hospitalization records for 140,235 patients 65 years and older, treated surgically for hip fracture between 2004 and 2012 in Canada (excluding Quebec). We studied the proportion of surgeries on admission day and within 3 inpatient days, and times required for 33%, 66%, and 90% of surgeries across provinces and by subgroups defined by timing of admission. Differences were adjusted for patient, injury, and care characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, provinces performed similar proportions of surgeries within the recommended three inpatient days, with all provinces requiring one additional day to perform the recommended 90% of surgeries. Prince Edward Island performed 7.0% more surgeries on admission day than Ontario irrespective of timing of admission (difference = 7.0; 95% CI 4.0, 9.9). The proportion of surgeries on admission day was 6.3% lower in Manitoba (difference = - 6.3; 95% CI - 12.1, - 0.6), and 7.7% lower in Saskatchewan (difference = - 7.7; 95% CI - 12.7, - 2.8) compared to Ontario. These differences persisted for late weekday and weekend admissions. The time required for 33%, 66%, and 90% of surgeries ranged from 1 to 2, 2-3, and 3-4 days, respectively, across provinces by timing of admission. CONCLUSIONS: Provinces performed similarly with respect to recommended time for hip fracture surgery. The proportion of surgeries on admission day, and time required to complete 33% and 66% of surgeries, varied across provinces and by timing of admission. This may reflect different provincial approaches to providing access to hip fracture surgery.

Older adults' quality of life - Exploring the role of the built environment and social cohesion in community-dwelling seniors on low income.

The built environment and social cohesion are increasingly recognized as being associated with older adults' quality of life (QoL). However, limited research in this area still exists and the relationship has remained unexplored in the area of Metro Vancouver, Canada. This study examined the association between the built environment and social cohesion with QoL of 160 community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥ 65 years) on low income from Metro Vancouver. Cross-sectional data acquired from the Walk the Talk (WTT) study were used. Health-related QoL (HRQoL) and capability wellbeing were assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and the ICECAP-O, respectively. Measures of the environment comprised the NEWS-A (perceived built environment measure), the Street Smart Walk Score (objective built environment measure), and the SC-5PT (a measure of social cohesion). The primary analysis consists of Tobit regression models to explore the associations between environmental features and HRQoL as well as capability wellbeing. Key findings indicate that after adjusting for covariates, older adults' capability wellbeing was associated with street connectivity and social cohesion, while no statistically significant associations were found between environmental factors and HRQoL. Our results should be considered as hypothesis-generating and need confirmation in a larger longitudinal study.

Patient and system factors of mortality after hip fracture: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Several patient and health system factors were associated with the risk of death among patients with hip fracture. However, without knowledge of underlying mechanisms interventions to improve survival post hip fracture can only be designed on the basis of the found statistical associations. METHODS: We used the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. for synthesis of factors and mechanisms of mortality post low energy hip fracture in adults over the age of 50 years, published in English, between September 1, 2009 and October 1, 2014 and indexed in MEDLINE. Proposed mechanisms for reported associations were extracted from the discussion sections. RESULTS: We synthesized the evidence from 56 articles that reported on 35 patient and 9 system factors of mortality post hip fracture. For 21 factors we found proposed biological mechanisms for their association with mortality which included complications, comorbidity, cardiorespiratory function, immune function, bone remodeling and glycemic control. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patient and system factors of mortality post hip fracture were reported by only one or two articles and with no proposed mechanisms for their effects on mortality. Where reported, underlying mechanisms are often based on a single article and should be confirmed with further study. Therefore, one cannot be certain whether intervening on such factors may produce expected results.

Soluble HLA class I molecules exert differentiated influence on renal graft condition.

The function of soluble HLA (sHLA) antigens in the process of immunoregulation and especially in graft tolerance versus rejection has not yet been established. It has been suggested that donor-derived sHLA may exert an immunotolerant influence on the graft. We sought to determine the role of sHLA class I in kidney graft survival by evaluating the influence of these molecules on allotypic lymphocytotoxic antibodies and the concentration of gamma interferon (INF-gamma). Analysis of sHLA was performed indirectly utilizing their ability to inhibit lymphocytotoxic reaction dependent on complement activation. To demonstrate the inhibitory properties of sHLA, we modified the NIH microcytotoxic test. Furthermore, we determined the concentration of INF-gamma in all sera samples for comparison with the intensity of the cytotoxic test. The comparison of the intensity of cytotoxic test inhibition with the concentration of INF-gamma revealed that high concentrations of this cytokine were associated with stronger inhibition of the cytotoxic test, thus with higher concentrations of sHLA class I molecules in recipient sera. We observed that high concentrations of sHLA class I molecules in recipient sera significantly inhibited cytotoxic reactions, which could contribute to a protective influence of sHLA on renal grafts. On the other hand, the observed increase of INF-gamma concentration might be caused by sHLA themselves, which would produce a detrimental influence on a transplanted organ. Therefore we concluded that the role of sHLA class I molecules in renal graft condition remains ambiguous.

Factors that impact on immediate graft function in patients after renal transplantation.

Kidney transplantation has become therapy of choice for patients with end-stage renal failure. However, many factors may cause graft rejection or delayed graft function, both of which decrease the prognosis for graft survival. For transplantologists the most important endeavor is to eliminate factors responsible for shortening graft function and to find those predictive of immediate graft function. The aim of the study was to investigate which factors influence early graft function. We retrospectively reviewed 442 renal transplant patients performed between 1990 and 1995 in two Szezecin units. All patients received an identical immunosuppressive drug schedule. Three hundred twelve patients who displayed immediate graft function were included in the study group to analyze donor and recipient age and sex, etiology of ESRD, HLA compatibility AB0 and Rh compatibility cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, antileukocytes antibodies (PRA), and period of dialysis therapy before transplantation. We observed statistical significance for HLA and AB0 compatibility, younger donor age, and shorter cold ischemia time as the most important factors predictive of early graft function and an improved prognosis for graft survival.

Impact of selected factors on early graft function in patients after renal transplantation.

Transplantation is the best treatment for end-stage renal diseases. For transplantologists, it is most important to know the factors that worsen graft survival prognosis. The aim of the study was to investigate factors predictive of graft loss and shortened graft survival. We retrospectively reviewed 442 renal transplant patients between 1990 and 1995 in two Szczecin units, all of whom received a triple-drug immunosuppressive regimen. One hundred thirty patients showed graft disorders such as delayed graft function or primary nonfunction. The occurrence of these disorders was examined as a function of donor and recipient age and sex, cause of ESRD, HLA compatibility, ABO and Rh compatibility, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, antileukocyte antibody level (PRA), and period of dialysis therapy before transplantation. The study showed that a high maximal PRA level, incompatibility for ABO group, and a longer warm ischemia time increase the probability of early graft function disorders.