Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 94
Filtrar
1.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 54(1): 96-104, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28552830

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Achieving adequate response rates from family members of critically ill patients can be challenging, especially when assessing psychological symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with completion of surveys about psychological symptoms among family members of critically ill patients. METHODS: Using data from a randomized trial of an intervention to improve communication between clinicians and families of critically ill patients, we examined patient-level and family-level predictors of the return of usable surveys at baseline, three months, and six months (n = 181, 171, and 155, respectively). Family-level predictors included baseline symptoms of psychological distress, decisional independence preference, and attachment style. We hypothesized that family with fewer symptoms of psychological distress, a preference for less decisional independence, and secure attachment style would be more likely to return questionnaires. RESULTS: We identified several predictors of the return of usable questionnaires. Better self-assessed family member health status was associated with a higher likelihood and stronger agreement with a support-seeking attachment style with a lower likelihood, of obtaining usable baseline surveys. At three months, family-level predictors of return of usable surveys included having usable baseline surveys, status as the patient's legal next of kin, and stronger agreement with a secure attachment style. The only predictor of receipt of surveys at six months was the presence of usable surveys at three months. CONCLUSION: We identified several predictors of the receipt of surveys assessing psychological symptoms in family of critically ill patients, including family member health status and attachment style. Using these characteristics to inform follow-up mailings and reminders may enhance response rates.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Familia/psicología , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Comunicación en Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apego a Objetos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estrés Psicológico , Factores de Tiempo
2.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 5(4): e156, 2016 Oct 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27707688

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adherence to antiretroviral medications is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. Many adherence intervention trials investigated the effects of time-intensive or costly interventions that are not feasible in most clinical care settings. OBJECTIVE: We set out to evaluate a collaborative care approach as a feasible intervention applicable to patients in clinical care including those with mental illness and/or substance use issues. METHODS: We developed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating an integrated, clinic-based care management approach to improve clinical outcomes that could be integrated into the clinical care setting. This is based on the routine integration and systematic follow-up of a clinical assessment of patient-reported outcomes targeting adherence, depression, and substance use, and adapts previously developed and tested care management approaches. The primary health coach or care management role is provided by clinic case managers allowing the intervention to be generalized to other human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinics that have case managers. We used a stepped-care approach to target interventions to those at greatest need who are most likely to benefit rather than to everyone to maintain feasibility in a busy clinical care setting. RESULTS: The National Institutes of Health funded this study and had no role in study design, data collection, or decisions regarding whether or not to submit manuscripts for publication. This trial is currently underway, enrollment was completed in 2015, and follow-up time still accruing. First results are expected to be ready for publication in early 2017. DISCUSSION: This paper describes the protocol for an ongoing clinical trial including the design and the rationale for key methodological decisions. There is a need to identify best practices for implementing evidence-based collaborative care models that are effective and feasible in clinical care. Adherence efficacy trials have not led to sufficient improvements, and there remains little guidance regarding how adherence interventions should be implemented into clinical care. By focusing on improving adherence within care settings using existing staff, routine assessment of key domains, such as depression, adherence, and substance use, and feasible interventions, we propose to evaluate this innovative way to improve clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01505660; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01505660 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation/ 6ktOq6Xj7).

3.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 193(2): 154-62, 2016 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26378963

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Communication with family of critically ill patients is often poor and associated with family distress. OBJECTIVES: To determine if an intensive care unit (ICU) communication facilitator reduces family distress and intensity of end-of-life care. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial at two hospitals. Eligible patients had a predicted mortality greater than or equal to 30% and a surrogate decision maker. Facilitators supported communication between clinicians and families, adapted communication to family needs, and mediated conflict. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcomes included depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among family 3 and 6 months after ICU and resource use. We identified 488 eligible patients and randomized 168. Of 352 eligible family members, 268 participated (76%). Family follow-up at 3 and 6 months ranged from 42 to 47%. The intervention was associated with decreased depressive symptoms at 6 months (P = 0.017), but there were no significant differences in psychological symptoms at 3 months or anxiety or PTSD at 6 months. The intervention was not associated with ICU mortality (25% control vs. 21% intervention; P = 0.615) but decreased ICU costs among all patients (per patient: $75,850 control, $51,060 intervention; P = 0.042) and particularly among decedents ($98,220 control, $22,690 intervention; P = 0.028). Among decedents, the intervention reduced ICU and hospital length of stay (28.5 vs. 7.7 d and 31.8 vs. 8.0 d, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Communication facilitators may be associated with decreased family depressive symptoms at 6 months, but we found no significant difference at 3 months or in anxiety or PTSD. The intervention reduced costs and length of stay, especially among decedents. This is the first study to find a reduction in intensity of end-of-life care with similar or improved family distress. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00720200).


Asunto(s)
Depresión/prevención & control , Familia/psicología , Negociación/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comunicación , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Toma de Decisiones , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Negociación/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/economía , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Privación de Tratamiento/economía , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
PLoS One ; 10(9): e0136723, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26381140

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Self-management strategies are essential elements of evidence-based treatment in patients with chronic conditions in primary care. Our objective was to analyse different self-management skills and behaviours and their association to adult attachment in primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions. METHODS: In the apricare study (Adult Attachment in Primary Care) we used a prospective longitudinal design to examine the association between adult attachment and self-management in primary care patients with multimorbidity. The attachment dimensions avoidance and anxiety were measured using the ECR-RD. Self-management skills were measured by the FERUS (motivation to change, coping, self-efficacy, hope, social support) and self-management-behaviour by the DSMQ (glucose management, dietary control, physical activity, health-care use). Clinical diagnosis and severity of disease were assessed by the patients' GPs. Multivariate analyses (GLM) were used to assess the relationship between the dimensions of adult attachment and patient self-management. RESULTS: 219 patients in primary care with multiple chronic conditions (type II diabetes, hypertension and at least one other chronic condition) between the ages of 50 and 85 were included in the study. The attachment dimension anxiety was positively associated with motivation to change and negatively associated with coping, self-efficacy and hope, dietary control and physical activity. Avoidance was negatively associated with coping, self-efficacy, social support and health care use. CONCLUSION: The two attachment dimensions anxiety and avoidance are associated with different components of self-management. A personalized, attachment-based view on patients with chronic diseases could be the key to effective, individual self-management approaches in primary care.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Hipertensión/psicología , Apego a Objetos , Autocuidado/psicología , Autoeficacia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Esperanza , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Apoyo Social
5.
Epilepsia ; 56(8): 1264-74, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26122460

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Self-management challenges facing adults with epilepsy include limited understanding of the condition and treatment, associated psychosocial issues, and lack of community integration. Self-management interventions improve patients' medical, life role, and emotional management. Previous interventions, developed from expert opinion, indicated issues with participant engagement/retention, and limited follow-up periods. PACES in Epilepsy addressed methodologic concerns by utilizing patient needs assessment data (n = 165) to derive self-management content and program features for evaluation via randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: Participants were adults with chronic epilepsy (n = 83), without serious mental illness or substantive intellectual impairment, who were recruited from two epilepsy centers. Participants were assigned randomly to intervention or treatment-as-usual groups. Outcomes included the Epilepsy Self-Management Scale (ESMS), Epilepsy Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES), Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), administered at baseline, postintervention (8 weeks), and 6 months postintervention. The intervention was an 8-week group of 6-8 adults co-led by a psychologist and trained peer with epilepsy that met one evening per week at a hospital for 75 min. Topics included medical, psychosocial, cognitive, and self-management aspects of epilepsy, in addition to community integration and optimizing epilepsy-related communication. The treatment group provided satisfaction ratings regarding program features. RESULTS: PACES participants (n = 38) improved relative to controls (n = 40) on the ESMS (p < 0.001) and subscales [Information (p < 0.001); Lifestyle (p < 0.002)]; ESES (p < 0.001); and QOLIE-31 (p = 0.002). At 6-month follow up, PACES participants remained improved on the ESMS (p = 0.004) and Information subscale (p = 0.009); and Energy/Fatigue (p = 0.032) and Medication Effects (p = 0.005) of the QOLIE-31. Attrition in both groups was low (8% in each group) and all program satisfaction ratings exceeded 4.0/5.0, with leadership (4.76), topics (4.53), and location (4.30) as the most highly rated aspects. SIGNIFICANCE: A consumer generated epilepsy self-management program appears to be a promising intervention from multiple perspectives, particularly in relation to disability management.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Epilepsia/rehabilitación , Evaluación de Necesidades , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Autocuidado , Autoeficacia , Adulto , Epilepsia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Satisfacción del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Am J Manag Care ; 20(11): 887-95, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495109

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A patient-centered collaborative care program for depression and uncontrolled diabetes and/or coronary heart disease (CHD) demonstrated improved clinical outcomes relative to usual care. We report clinically stratified analyses of patient outcomes to inform the duration and targeting of care management services for complex patients with multimorbidity. METHODS: A 12-month randomized controlled trial of a multimorbidity collaborative care program followed patients at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for diabetes (glycated hemoglobin [A1C]), blood pressure (systolic; SBP), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and depression (Symptoms Check List-20 score). Depressed patients with less favorable medical control (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score > 10, A1C > 8.0 %, SBP > 140 mm Hg, and LDL cholesterol > 120 mg/dL) were compared with depressed patients with more favorable medical control to describe differential intervention benefits over time. RESULTS: In contrast to patients with more favorable baseline control, patients with depression and unfavorable control of A1C, SBP, and LDL at baseline showed improved outcomes as early as the 6-month follow-up assessment. Clinical benefits in the intervention group were largely sustained over the 24-month follow-up, except for some deterioration of glycemic control in intervention patients and trends toward improvement among controls over time. Among patients with depression and more favorable medical control at baseline, there were minimal between-group differences in medical disease outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical benefits of a multimorbidity collaborative care management program occurred early, and were only found among patients with poor control of baseline diabetes and CHD risk factors. Targeting may maximize reach and improve affordability of complex care management.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Depresión/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Depresión/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/organización & administración , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Psychosomatics ; 55(6): 548-54, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25016357

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression and diabetes are highly comorbid, with depression increasing risk of diabetes-related complications and mortality. Few studies have examined the relationship between depression and diabetes in safety-net populations with high rates of trauma exposure, anxiety, and substance use disorders. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional survey of 261 patients with diabetes attending safety-net clinics, associations between depression and key diabetes control parameters were examined in bivariate and multivariable analyses adjusting for relevant confounders and significant interactions. RESULTS: Among the participants, 57% were men, 51% were white, and the average age was 57 years. Most respondents were unemployed (81%) and earned less than $10,000 per year (51%). Overall, 28% screened positive for depression, with a high overlap of posttraumatic stress (58%) and generalized anxiety (77%) symptoms. After adjustment for socioeconomic and clinical variables, depression was associated with higher mean body mass index (p = 0.01), severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 35kg/m(2)) (odds ratio = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.09-5.04, p = 0.03) and uncontrolled diastolic blood pressure (odds ratio = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.15-5.39, p = 0.02). There was a nonsignificant trend for those with depression to have worse control of blood glucose. Associations with depression and diabetes clinical outcomes were not significantly worsened in the presence of comorbid anxiety disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Within a highly comorbid safety-net population, significant associations between depression and key diabetes outcomes remained after accounting for relevant covariates. Further research will help elucidate the relationship between depression and diabetes control measures in safety-net populations.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Glucemia/análisis , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología
9.
Perspect Med Educ ; 2(2): 72-86, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23670695

RESUMEN

In medical education, behavioural definitions allow for more effective evaluation and supervision. Ownership of patient care is a complex area of trainee development that crosses multiple areas of evaluation and may lack clear behavioural definitions. In an effort to define ownership for educational purposes, the authors surveyed psychiatry teaching faculty and trainees about behaviours that would indicate that a physician is demonstrating ownership of patient care. Emerging themes were identified through analysis of narrative responses in this qualitative descriptive study. Forty-one faculty (54 %) and 29 trainees (52 %) responded. Both faculty and trainees identified seven core elements of ownership: advocacy, autonomy, commitment, communication, follow-through, knowledge and teamwork. These seven elements provide a consensus-derived behavioural definition that can be used to determine competency or identify deficits. The proposed two-step process enables supervisors to identify problematic ownership behaviours and determine whether there is a deficit of knowledge, skill or attitude. Further, the theory of planned behaviour is applied to better understand the relationship between attitudes, intentions and subsequent behaviour. By structuring the diagnosis of problems with ownership of patient care, supervisors are able to provide actionable feedback and intervention in a naturalistic setting. Three examples are presented to illustrate this stepwise process.

10.
Ann Fam Med ; 11(3): 245-50, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23690324

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although psychosocial and clinical factors have been found to be associated with hypoglycemic episodes in patients with diabetes, few studies have examined the association of depression with severe hypoglycemic episodes. This study examined the prospective association of depression with risk of hypoglycemic episodes requiring either an emergency department visit or hospitalization. METHODS: In a longitudinal cohort study, a sample of 4,117 patients with diabetes enrolled between 2000 and 2002 were observed from 2005 to 2007. Meeting major depression criteria on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was the exposure of interest, and the outcome of interest was an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision code for a hypoglycemic episode requiring an emergency department visit or hospitalization. Proportional hazard models were used to analyze the association of baseline depression and risk of one or more severe hypoglycemic episodes. Poisson regression was used to determine whether depression status was associated with the number of hypoglycemic episodes. RESULTS: After adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical measures of diabetes severity, non-diabetes-related medical comorbidity, prior hypoglycemic episodes, and health risk behaviors, depressed compared with nondepressed patients who had diabetes had a significantly higher risk of a severe hypoglycemic episode (hazard ratio = 1.42, 95% CI, 1.03-1.96) and a greater number of hypoglycemic episodes (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% CI, 1.03-1.74). CONCLUSION: Depression was significantly associated with time to first severe hypoglycemic episode and number of hypoglycemic episodes. Research assessing whether recognition and effective treatment of depression among persons with diabetes prevents severe hypoglycemic episodes is needed.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Depresión/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/diagnóstico , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos
11.
Behav Med ; 39(1): 1-6, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23398269

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to examine whether patients who received a multicondition collaborative care intervention for chronic illnesses and depression had greater improvement in self-care knowledge and efficacy, and whether greater knowledge and self-efficacy was positively associated with improved target outcomes. A randomized controlled trial with 214 patients with comorbid depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or coronary heart disease tested a 12-month team-based intervention that combined self-management support and collaborative care management. At 6 and 12 month outcomes the intervention group showed significant improvements over the usual care group in confidence in ability to follow through with medical regimens important to managing their conditions and to maintain lifestyle changes even during times of stress. Improvements in self care-efficacy were significantly related to improvements in depression, and early improvements in confidence to maintain lifestyle changes even during times of stress explained part of the observed subsequent improvements in depression.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Autocuidado/psicología , Autoeficacia , Anciano , Glucemia/fisiología , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Enfermedad Coronaria/sangre , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Depresión/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Lipoproteínas LDL/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
J Gen Intern Med ; 28(7): 921-9, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23325384

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs), conditions that should not require inpatient treatment if timely and appropriate ambulatory care is provided, may be an important contributor to rising healthcare costs and public health burden. OBJECTIVE: To examine if probable major depression is independently associated with hospitalization for an ACSC in patients with diabetes. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Population-based cohort of 4,128 patients with diabetes ≥ 18 years old seen in primary care, who were enrolled between 2000 and 2002 and followed for 5 years (through 2007). MAIN MEASURES: Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Outcomes of interest included time to initial hospitalization for an ACSC and total number of ACSC-related hospitalizations. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to ascertain an association between probable major depression and time to ACSC-related hospitalization, as well as Poisson regression for models examining probable major depression and number of ACSC-related hospitalizations. KEY RESULTS: Patients' mean age at study enrollment was 63.4 years (Standard Deviation: 13.4 years). Over the 5-year follow-up period, 981 patients in the study were hospitalized a total of 1,721 times for an ACSC, comprising 45.1 % of all hospitalizations. After adjusting for baseline demographic, clinical and health-risk behavioral factors, probable major depression was associated with initial ACSC-related hospitalization (Hazard Ratio: 1.41, 95 % Confidence Interval [95 % CI]: 1.15, 1.72) and number of ACSC-related hospitalizations (Relative Risk: 1.37, 95 % CI: 1.12, 1.68). CONCLUSIONS: Probable major depression in patients with diabetes is independently associated with hospitalization for an ACSC. Additional research is warranted to ascertain if effective interventions for depression in patients with diabetes could reduce the risk of hospitalizations for ACSCs and their associated adverse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Hospitalización/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
13.
Epilepsy Behav ; 25(2): 150-5, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23032121

RESUMEN

A consistent and serious empirical issue in the epilepsy self-management literature involves dropout and attrition in intervention studies. One explanation for this issue revolves around "top-down" intervention designs (i.e., interventions generated by epilepsy clinicians and researchers) and the potential for disparity with patient interests, capabilities, and perceived needs. The purpose of this study was to extend the work of Fraser et al. (2011) [19] by comparing perceptions regarding self-management problems, topics, and program design, between two subgroups of adult patients with epilepsy (n=165) and epilepsy clinicians (n=20). Results indicate differences in problem severity ratings, program emphasis (i.e., goal-setting, coping, education), and program leadership between clinicians and each patient subgroup to varying degrees. These findings highlight some of the differences in opinion between patients and clinicians and emphasize the need for patient-involved planning with regard to self-management programs. Implications and explanations are offered as points for consideration in self-management program development.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Epilepsia/terapia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Autocuidado/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 33(6): 1245-54, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22772089

RESUMEN

The intensive care unit (ICU), where death is common and even survivors of an ICU stay face the risk of long-term morbidity and re-admissions to the ICU, represents an important setting for improving communication about palliative and end-of-life care. Communication about the goals of care in this setting should be a high priority since studies suggest that the current quality of ICU communication is often poor and is associated with psychological distress among family members of critically ill patients. This paper describes the development and evaluation of an intervention designed to improve the quality of care in the ICU by improving communication among the ICU team and with family members of critically ill patients. We developed a multi-faceted, interprofessional intervention based on self-efficacy theory. The intervention involves a "communication facilitator" - a nurse or social worker - trained to facilitate communication among the interprofessional ICU team and with the critically ill patient's family. The facilitators are trained using three specific content areas: a) evidence-based approaches to improving clinician-family communication in the ICU, b) attachment theory allowing clinicians to adapt communication to meet individual family member's communication needs, and c) mediation to facilitate identification and resolution of conflict including clinician-family, clinician-clinician, and intra-family conflict. The outcomes assessed in this randomized trial focus on psychological distress among family members including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder at 3 and 6 months after the ICU stay. This manuscript also reports some of the lessons that we have learned early in this study.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Familia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Ansiedad/psicología , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Depresión/prevención & control , Depresión/psicología , Gastos en Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Tiempo de Internación , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 69(5): 506-14, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22566583

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Patients with depression and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease (CHD), or both have higher medical complication rates and higher health care costs, suggesting that more effective care management of psychiatric and medical disease control might also reduce medical service use and enhance quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a multicondition collaborative treatment program (TEAMcare) compared with usual primary care (UC) in outpatients with depression and poorly controlled diabetes or CHD. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial of a systematic care management program aimed at improving depression scores and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. SETTING: Fourteen primary care clinics of an integrated health care system. PATIENTS: Population-based screening identified 214 adults with depressive disorder and poorly controlled diabetes or CHD. INTERVENTION: Physician-supervised nurses collaborated with primary care physicians to provide treatment of multiple disease risk factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blinded assessments evaluated depressive symptoms, SBP, and HbA(1c) at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Fasting LDL-C concentration was assessed at baseline and at 12 and 24 months. Health plan accounting records were used to assess medical service costs. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed using a previously developed regression model based on intervention vs UC differences in HbA(1c), LDL-C, and SBP levels over 24 months. RESULTS: Over 24 months, compared with UC controls, intervention patients had a mean of 114 (95% CI, 79 to 149) additional depression-free days and an estimated 0.335 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.85) additional QALYs. Intervention patients also had lower mean outpatient health costs of $594 per patient (95% CI, -$3241 to $2053) relative to UC patients. CONCLUSIONS: For adults with depression and poorly controlled diabetes, CHD, or both, a systematic intervention program aimed at improving depression scores and HbA(1c), SBP, and LDL-C levels seemed to be a high-value program that for no or modest additional cost markedly improved QALYs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00468676


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Presión Sanguínea , LDL-Colesterol/análisis , Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Trastorno Depresivo/complicaciones , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
16.
J Psychosom Res ; 72(5): 364-70, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22469278

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between adult attachment style and health risk behaviors among adult women in a primary care setting. METHODS: In this analysis of a population of women enrolled in a large health maintenance organization (N=701), we examined the relationship between anxious and avoidant dimensions of adult attachment style and a variety of sexual, substance-related, and other health risk behaviors. After conducting descriptive statistics of the entire population, we determined the relationships between the two attachment dimensions and health behaviors using multiple regression analyses in which we controlled for demographic and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, the anxious dimension of attachment style was significantly associated with increased odds of self-report of having sex without knowing a partner's history, having multiple (≥2) male partners in the past year, and history of having a sexually transmitted infection (ORs [95% CIs]=1.11 [1.03, 1.20], 1.23 [1.04, 1.45]; and 1.17 [1.05, 1.30], respectively). The avoidant attachment dimension was associated with increased odds of being a smoker and not reporting regular seatbelt use (ORs [95% CIs]=1.15 [1.01, 1.30] and 1.16 [1.01, 1.33], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both anxious and avoidant dimensions of attachment were associated with health risk behaviors in this study. This framework may be a useful tool to allow primary care clinicians to guide screening and intervention efforts.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Apego a Objetos , Asunción de Riesgos , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Autoinforme , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control
17.
Psychosomatics ; 53(1): 21-9, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22221718

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between changes in depressive symptoms and disability status in patients with diabetes. METHODS: This 5-year prospective cohort study included 2733 patients with diabetes enrolled in the Pathways Epidemiologic Follow-Up Study who had completed depression and activities of daily living questionnaires at baseline and 5 years. Four depression groups were created using changes in depression scores over 5 years: no depression, improved depression, persistent depression, and development of depression. After controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, we examined the association between changes in depressive symptoms and incident disability at 5 years using Poisson regression. RESULTS: In patients nondisabled at baseline (n = 2155), the improved depression group had a risk of disability comparable to the no depression reference group [relative risk (RR): 0.70, 95% CI (0.44-1.12)]. The development of depression and persistent depression groups were significantly more likely to develop disability compared with the no depression group [RR: 2.86, 95% CI (2.12-3.86) and RR: 2.16, 95% CI (1.47-3.18), respectively]. Among those who were disabled at baseline, there was no significant change in the disability status of the three depression groups compared with disabled patients with no depressive symptoms at either time point. CONCLUSIONS: Among initially nondisabled patients with diabetes, those whose depression improved had functional outcomes comparable to those who were nondepressed at baseline and 5 years. Patients who developed depression and had persistent depression were more likely to experience disability at 5 years than those who were nondepressed at baseline and 5 years.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Estado de Salud , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus/fisiopatología , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autocuidado/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Washingtón/epidemiología
18.
Ann Fam Med ; 10(1): 6-14, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22230825

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Medication nonadherence, inconsistent patient self-monitoring, and inadequate treatment adjustment exacerbate poor disease control. In a collaborative, team-based, care management program for complex patients (TEAMcare), we assessed patient and physician behaviors (medication adherence, self-monitoring, and treatment adjustment) in achieving better outcomes for diabetes, coronary heart disease, and depression. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted (2007-2009) in 14 primary care clinics among 214 patients with poorly controlled diabetes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] ≥8.5%) or coronary heart disease (blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >130 mg/dL) with coexisting depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥10). In the TEAMcare program, a nurse care manager collaborated closely with primary care physicians, patients, and consultants to deliver a treat-to-target approach across multiple conditions. Measures included medication initiation, adjustment, adherence, and disease self-monitoring. RESULTS: Pharmacotherapy initiation and adjustment rates were sixfold higher for antidepressants (relative rate [RR] = 6.20; P <.001), threefold higher for insulin (RR = 2.97; P <.001), and nearly twofold higher for antihypertensive medications (RR = 1.86, P <.001) among TEAMcare relative to usual care patients. Medication adherence did not differ between the 2 groups in any of the 5 therapeutic classes examined at 12 months. TEAMcare patients monitored blood pressure (RR = 3.20; P <.001) and glucose more frequently (RR = 1.28; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent and timely treatment adjustment by primary care physicians, along with increased patient self-monitoring, improved control of diabetes, depression, and heart disease, with no change in medication adherence rates. High baseline adherence rates may have exerted a ceiling effect on potential improvements in medication adherence.


Asunto(s)
Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Autocuidado/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Práctica Profesional , Análisis de Regresión , Autocuidado/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
Health Serv Res ; 47(2): 572-93, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22091785

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine ethnic differences in appointment-keeping in a managed care setting. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE), 2005-2007, n = 12,957. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. Poor appointment-keeping (PAK) was defined as missing >1/3 of planned, primary care appointments. Poisson regression models were used to estimate ethnic-specific relative risks of PAK (adjusting for demographic, socio-economic, health status, and facility effects). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Administrative/electronic health records and survey responses. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Poor appointment-keeping rates differed >2-fold across ethnicities: Latinos (12 percent), African Americans (10 percent), Filipinos (7 percent), Caucasians (6 percent), and Asians (5 percent), but also varied by medical center. Receiving >50 percent of outpatient care via same-day appointments was associated with a 4-fold greater PAK rate. PAK was associated with 20, 30, and 40 percent increased risk of elevated HbA1c (>7 percent), low-density lipoprotein (>100 mm/dl), and systolic blood pressure (>130 mmHg), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Latinos and African Americans were at highest risk of missing planned primary care appointments. PAK was associated with a greater reliance on same-day visits and substantively poorer clinical outcomes. These results have important implications for public health and health plan policy, as primary care rapidly expands toward open access to care supported by the patient-centered medical home model.


Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , California , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de Poisson , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 27(1): 22-30, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21308790

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether intensive care unit (ICU) admission is independently associated with increased risk of major depression in patients with diabetes. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 3596 patients with diabetes enrolled in the Pathways Epidemiologic Follow-Up Study, of whom 193 had at least one ICU admission over a 3-year period. We controlled for baseline depressive symptoms, demographics, and clinical characteristics. We examined associations between ICU admission and subsequent major depression using logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 2624 eligible patients who survived to complete follow-up; 98 had at least one ICU admission. Follow-up assessments occurred at a mean of 16.4 months post-ICU for those who had an ICU admission. At baseline, patients who had an ICU admission tended to be depressed, older, had greater medical comorbidity, and had more diabetic complications. At follow-up, the point prevalence of probable major depression among patients who had an ICU admission was 14% versus 6% among patients without an ICU admission. After multivariate adjustment, ICU admission was independently associated with subsequent probable major depression (Odds Ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval (1.06-4.06)). Additionally, baseline probable major depression was significantly associated with post-ICU probable major depression. CONCLUSIONS: ICU admission in patients with diabetes is independently associated with subsequent probable major depression. Additional research is needed to identify at-risk patients and potentially modifiable ICU exposures in order to inform future interventional studies with the goal of decreasing the burden of comorbid depression in older patients with diabetes who survive critical illnesses.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Anciano , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...