Diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy after the treatment of presumed benign fibroid disease with interventional radiology procedures: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the finding of future diagnosis of malignancy in women who undergo nonsurgical treatment for uterine fibroid disease with interventional radiology (IR) procedures. DESIGN: Mixed-methods retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary care academic hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. PATIENT(S): A total of 491 women who underwent radiologic intervention for fibroids between 2006 and 2016. INTERVENTION(S): Uterine artery embolization or high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Subsequent surgical interventions and diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy after the IR procedure. RESULT(S): During the study period, 491 women underwent treatment of fibroids with IR procedures; follow-up information was available for 346 cases. The mean age was 45.3 ± 4.8 years, and 69.7% were between the ages of 40 and 49 years. Regarding ethnicity, 58.9% of patients were white, and 26.1% were black. The most common symptoms were abnormal uterine bleeding (87%), pelvic pressure (62.3%), and pelvic pain (60.9%). A total of 106 patients underwent subsequent surgical treatment of fibroids. Of the 346 patients who had follow-up, 4 (1.2%) were diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma after their interventional treatment for fibroids. An additional 2 cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma and 1 case of a premalignant lesion of the endometrium were noted. CONCLUSION(S): The proportion of patients who went on to be diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma after conservative IR treatments appears to be higher than previously reported. A thorough preprocedural workup and patient counseling regarding the possibility of underlying uterine malignancy should be undertaken.

Minimally invasive management of retained products of conception and the adherent placenta.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Retained products of conception (POC) may occur independently or as a consequence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). Managing these conditions depends on the clinical scenario, and in some cases, can involve the use of minimally invasive techniques. This review presents the role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in the treatment of retained POC and the adherent placenta. RECENT FINDINGS: Hysteroscopic resection of retained POC is reported to have favorable outcomes compared to blind dilation and curettage, including higher success rates and a lower risk of intrauterine adhesion formation. Hysteroscopic and laparoscopic techniques for managing PAS are limited to select cases where uterine preservation is desired, or a laparoscopic gravid or postpartum delayed hysterectomy is feasible. Data on these methods are limited to case reports. SUMMARY: A hysteroscopic approach is preferred over dilation and curettage for retained POC. Minimally invasive surgery may have a role in unique cases of PAS.

Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block to Reduce Pain After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a superior hypogastric plexus block performed during laparoscopic hysterectomy reduces postoperative pain. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial of superior hypogastric plexus block at the start of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for any indication and with any other concomitant laparoscopic procedure were eligible. Standardized preoperative medications and incisional analgesia were provided to all patients. Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain score lower than 4 within 2 hours postoperatively. Patients but not surgeons were blinded to the treatment group. Twenty-nine patients per group was estimated to be sufficient to detect a 38% absolute difference in the proportion of patients with a VAS score lower than 4 at 2 hours postoperatively, with 80% power and an α of 0.05. To account for loss to follow-up and potential imbalances in patient characteristics, we planned to enroll 50 patients per group. All analyses were intention to treat. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and February 2019, 186 patients were eligible; 100 were randomized and analyzed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with a mean VAS score lower than 4 within 2 hours postoperatively between patients who received a superior hypogastric plexus block (57%) and patients who did not (43%) (odds ratio 1.63, 95% CI 0.74-3.59; adjusted odds ratio 1.84, 95% CI 0.75-4.51). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with standardized enhanced perioperative recovery pathways, superior hypogastric plexus block did not significantly reduce postoperative pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03283436.

Diagnosing endometriosis before laparoscopy: radiologic tools to evaluate the disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis is laparoscopy with tissue biopsy. This review presents new evidence regarding advanced imaging for more optimal clinical assessment and preoperative evaluation for endometriosis. RECENT FINDINGS: A systematic approach to the imaging evaluation of endometriosis using transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging has been proposed by expert groups and societies. Evidence suggests that new imaging techniques improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis and facilitate improved preoperative mapping of endometriotic lesions. SUMMARY: The clinical diagnosis of endometriosis, including new structured imaging protocols and techniques, is paramount in an initial evaluation. If surgery is indicated, clinical examination and imaging should provide sufficient information to anticipate the extent of surgery, properly counsel the patient, and when appropriate, refer to a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery specialist or assemble a multidisciplinary team.

Factors Associated with Negative Patient Experiences with Essure Sterilization.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify factors associated with negative patient experiences with Essure. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study and follow-up survey. SETTING: The study was conducted in an academic setting. PATIENTS: Patients included women who had an Essure placed between 2002 and 2017. METHODS: The hospitals' database was queried to identify subjects and charts were reviewed to confirm medical information. Subjects were invited by mail, e-mail, or phone call to participate a survey regarding symptoms and satisfaction with Essure. A comparison was made between women who reported a negative experience with Essure versus those who did not. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify subject or procedural characteristics associated with any negative experience with Essure sterilization. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-four women underwent Essure sterilization between 2002 and 2017, 42.3% of whom responded to the follow-up survey. Satisfaction with Essure was reported by 61.9% of respondents. Thirty-three percent of the respondents have undergone removal or desire removal of the device. The most frequent symptoms attributed to Essure were pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and vaginal bleeding. Forty-eight percent of the respondents were identified as having any negative experience with Essure. Factors associated with negative experiences with Essure included young age at placement (odds ratio [OR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.94; P < .001), high gravidity (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14-1.71; P = .002), and absent history of abdominal surgery (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.12-1.00; P = .049). CONCLUSION: Young age at placement, high gravidity, and absent history of abdominal surgery are factors associated with negative patient experiences following Essure sterilization. A negative experience with Essure is common, although dissatisfaction with the device is not always attributable to symptoms. This information could be considered when counseling women who plan removal of Essure. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Our study provides new follow-up data with respect to hysteroscopic sterilization. This research is the first to examine any cause for negative patient experiences with Essure. Understanding factors associated with negative patient experiences could improve patient counseling regarding the extent to which symptoms could be attributed to Essure as well as counseling women who want to undergo removal of the device. These factors could in turn prove to be predictors for successful resolution of symptoms after removal of Essure. Results of this study could also be used for developing future hysteroscopic sterilization techniques.

Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a highly effective option for refractory cervical insufficiency.

Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is emerging as the preferred treatment option for patients with refractory cervical insufficiency. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage reduces second-trimester loss and preterm birth with success rates similar to open abdominal cerclage. Increasing evidence also suggests improved neonatal survival rates with abdominal cerclage compared with repeat vaginal cerclage in patients who delivered prematurely despite a vaginal cerclage. The option to perform a highly effective treatment using minimally invasive techniques suggests laparoscopic abdominal cerclage will become the standard of care for refractory cervical insufficiency. This review examines the literature with regard to the indications and outcomes of abdominal cerclage, highlighting the laparoscopic technique.

Laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis and predictors of major complications: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced endometriosis may be at an increased risk of surgical complications following laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis; however, this relationship has not been examined. We sought to identify predictors of major complications following laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women who underwent laparoscopic treatment of suspected endometriosis between 2009 and 2016 within the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Predictors of major perioperative complications were assessed by comparing the characteristics of women who had any major intraoperative or postoperative complication with those of women who had no complication. RESULTS: A total of 397 women underwent laparoscopic treatment of suspected endometriosis including excision of superficial endometriosis (55.4%), excision of deep-infiltrating endometriosis (24.9%), fulguration of endometriosis (38.3%), hysterectomy (23.2%), ovarian cystectomy (35.5%), salpingectomy (18.6%), oophorectomy (15.1%), and bowel resection (1.0%). Women were followed for 60 days following surgery, over which time 18 women (4.5%) had a major perioperative complication. Patient characteristics and preoperative imaging were similar between women with and without complications. Women with advanced endometriosis, including stage III or IV endometriosis, deep-infiltrating endometriosis, or rectovaginal disease, were more likely to have a complication, though this did not reach statistical significance (77.8% of women with a complication versus 56.7% of women without a complication had advanced endometriosis, P = 0.077). Women who had a complication were more likely to have undergone adhesiolysis or ureterolysis (88.9% of women with a complication versus 52.5% without a complication underwent adhesiolysis, P = 0.002; and 61.1% of women with a complication versus 28.8% without a complication underwent ureterolysis, P = 0.003). The total number of procedures was greater for women who had a complication (4.3 ± 1.2 vs 3.2 ± 1.5, P = 0.003). All other procedure characteristics were similar between women with and without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Complications following laparoscopic treatment of suspected endometriosis could not be predicted by preoperative patient characteristics or surgical findings of advanced endometriosis. Adhesiolysis, ureterolysis, and an increased number of total procedures may be predictive of perioperative complications, suggesting that surgical complexity as measured by the procedures performed, rather than the disease severity, may increase the risk of a complication compared with women who do not undergo these procedures.

Important considerations for women in the late reproductive and perimenopausal years desiring myomectomy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review important considerations in the counseling and management of women over the age of 40 desiring a myomectomy for symptomatic fibroids. RECENT FINDINGS: Women in the late reproductive and perimenopausal years may choose a myomectomy over a hysterectomy for reasons of fertility preservation or a personal desire to retain their uterus. Data suggest that laparoscopic myomectomy is a low-risk procedure that can be offered to older women, though the age-related risk of uterine malignancy must be evaluated. SUMMARY: When assessing the surgical candidacy of older women desiring myomectomy, it is important to weigh a woman's fertility potential, surgical risk, and concerns about malignancy with her desire to preserve the uterus and autonomy to choose a procedure type.

Perioperative Antibiotic Use and Associated Infectious Outcomes at the Time of Myomectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To report the frequency of perioperative antibiotic use at time of myomectomy and associated risk of infectious outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all women who underwent any route of myomectomy from 2009 to 2016 at two academic hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. Cases involving chromopertubation or conversion to hysterectomy were excluded from further analysis. Medical records were queried for the use or nonuse of perioperative antibiotics, as well as baseline patient factors and perioperative outcomes. Statistical analyses included univariate comparisons between treatment groups, as well as multivariable logistic regression analyses of infectious morbidity controlling for patient age, route of surgery, presence of high-risk factors, any intraoperative complication, myoma weight, and entrance into the endometrial cavity. Matched cohort analysis also was performed to confirm findings in the setting of underlying differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 1,211 patients were included in the myomectomy cohort, 92.7% of whom received perioperative antibiotics at the time of surgery. Demographic characteristics were similar between the group that received and the group that did not receive antibiotics. The cases with antibiotic use were associated with longer operative times, higher estimated blood loss, and greater myoma burden. No difference was noted with regard to intraoperative or postoperative complications. Surgical site infection occurred more commonly in the group that did not receive antibiotics (2.9% vs 6.8% in the antibiotic and no-antibiotic groups, respectively; effect size 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-0.97 P=.04), representing a nearly fourfold increase in odds of any surgical site infection in the absence of perioperative antibiotic use (adjusted odds ratio 3.77, 95% CI 1.30-10.97, P=.015). CONCLUSION: A high frequency of antibiotic use was noted at time of myomectomy, despite lack of clear evidence supporting the practice. Patients who received perioperative antibiotics had fewer postoperative infectious outcomes and, in particular, experienced a lower incidence of surgical site infection.

A Novel Technique for Essure Reversal.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An increasing number of women are seeking removal of the Essure sterilization device due to symptoms including pelvic pain, abnormal bleeding, and allergic reaction. A fraction of these women also desire a future pregnancy and request sterilization reversal at the time of device removal. We present a novel technique for Essure reversal in addition to our experience with three cases. METHODS: Simultaneous laparoscopy and hysteroscopy is used to remove the device followed by laparoscopic reimplantation of the distal fallopian tube to the uterine fundus. A video of our method is included and the outcomes of three patients reported. RESULTS: Three women underwent laparoscopic Essure reversal for device-attributed symptoms and desire to restore fertility between 2017 and 2018. All procedures were uncomplicated with restoration of tubal patency in one or both fallopian tubes on follow-up hysterosalpingogram. Over a period of 4 to 10 months of followup, no pregnancies have been reported. CONCLUSION: Essure reversal is a feasible technique for removing the device and restoring tubal patency; however, more data are needed on pregnancy outcomes following this novel procedure.

Perioperative Outcomes of Myomectomy for Extreme Myoma Burden: Comparison of Surgical Approaches.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the perioperative outcomes of various modes of myomectomy (abdominal [AM], laparoscopic [LM], or robotic [RM]) in cases of extreme myoma burden. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: A tertiary academic center in Boston, Massachusetts. PATIENTS: All women who underwent an AM, LM, or RM for extreme myoma burden, defined as representing the upper quartile for specimen weight (≥434.6 g) or myoma count (≥7 myomas), between 2009 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected from review of medical records, including estimated blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and complications. Univariate linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period 659 women underwent myomectomy for extreme myoma burden; 47.2% of cases were AM, 28.1% LM, and 24.7% RM. Overall myoma burden differed across the 3 routes and was greatest in the AM group (mean weight: 696.2 ± 784.5 g for AM vs 586.6 ± 426.1 g for LM and 586.6 ± 426.1 g for RM; mean number: 16.8 ± 15.0 for AM vs 7.2 ± 7.0 for LM and 6.7 ± 4.7 for RM; p <.001 for both). The 3 routes differed in operative time and length of stay, with RM having the longest operative time (mean, 239.7 minutes; p <.001) and AM the longest length of stay (mean, 2.2 ± .9 days; p <.001). Other perioperative outcomes were similar across the surgical approaches. Increasing myoma burden was associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications for all surgical approaches, with a threshold of 13 myomas associated with an almost 2-fold higher risk of perioperative complications (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.70; p = .009). Cumulative incidence of perioperative complications with increasing specimen weight was greater in the RM cases as compared with AM (p = .002) or LM (p = .020), whereas the cumulative incidence of perioperative complications with increasing myoma count was lowest with AM compared with LM (p <.001) or RM (p <.001). CONCLUSION: Myomectomy for extreme myomas is feasible using an abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic approach. Increased myoma burden is associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications. A threshold of 13 myomas was associated with an almost 2-fold higher risk of perioperative complications for all modes. Perioperative complication outcomes were more favorable in AM or LM over RM with increased myoma weight and AM over LM or RM with increased myoma number.

Prospective Evaluation of Manual Morcellation Techniques: Minilaparotomy versus Vaginal Approach.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the number of days required to return to daily activities after laparoscopic hysterectomy with 2 tissue extraction methods: manual morcellation via colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Secondary outcomes were additional measures of patient recovery, perioperative outcomes, containment bag integrity, and tissue spillage. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective cohort study and follow-up survey (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Two tertiary care academic centers in northeastern United States. PATIENTS: Seventy women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with anticipated need for manual morcellation. INTERVENTIONS: Tissue extraction by either contained minilaparotomy or contained vaginal extraction method, along with patient-completed recovery diary. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Recovery diaries were returned by 85.3% of participants. There were no significant differences found in terms of average pain at 1, 2, or 3 weeks after surgery or in time to return to normal activities. Patients in both groups used narcotic pain medication for an average of 3 days. After adjusting for patient body mass index, history of prior surgery, uterine weight, and surgeon, there were no differences found for blood loss, operative time, length of stay, or incidence of any intra- or postoperative complication between groups. All patients had benign findings on final pathology. More cases in the vaginal contained extraction group were noted to have bag leakage on postprocedure testing (13 [40.6%] vs 3 [8.3%] tears in vaginal and minilaparotomy groups, respectively; p = .003). CONCLUSION: Regarding route of tissue extraction, contained minilaparotomy and contained vaginal extraction methods are associated with similar patient outcomes and recovery characteristics.

Surgical skills assessment tools in gynecology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to outline surgical skills assessment tools for the purpose of training and competency evaluation, with a focus on recent literature in gynecology. RECENT FINDINGS: Objective standardized surgical skills assessment tools are increasingly being explored in multiple surgical disciplines including gynecology. Several small studies in gynecology have validated procedure-specific checklists, global rating scales, and other surgical proficiency examinations in their ability to differentiate trainee skill level or correlate with other standardized tests. Few studies have included gynecologic surgeons in practice, and no studies have investigated their use in credentialing and maintenance of certification. SUMMARY: Surgical skills assessment tools may be a useful adjunct to gynecology training programs, with promising applications for practicing gynecologists.

Incisional Outcomes of Umbilical vs Suprapubic Mini-laparotomy for Tissue Extraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes following umbilical minilaparotomy and suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction. DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Two large academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Women who underwent a minilaparotomy for tissue extraction following a laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy between 2014 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Umbilical or suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 374 women underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy with minilaparotomy, including 289 (77.3%) with an umbilical minilaparotomy and 85 (22.7%) with a suprapubic minilaparotomy. The 2 groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, parity, surgical history, procedure type, surgical approach, and surgical indication. The size of the minilaparotomy incision and the specimen weight were significantly smaller in the umbilical minilaparotomy group (mean, 3.3 ± 0.8 cm vs 4.2 ± 0.6 cm [p < .001] and 472.6 ± 357.1 g vs 683.0 ± 475.7 g [p < .001], respectively). Two women in the suprapubic minilaparotomy group sustained a bladder injury during creation of the incision. There were no other complications related to the minilaparotomy in either group. Postoperative outcomes related to the minilaparotomy incision were compiled using the medical record and a follow-up survey. Of the 374 women in this cohort, 163 responded to a detailed survey about their minilaparotomy incision (response rate, 43.5%). With regard to the minilaparotomy, 52.7% of women reported incisional symptoms; 25.9% had increased pain at the incision, 8.3% had an incisional infection, and 2.7% reported an incisional hernia. There was no significant between-group difference in incisional outcomes; however nearly 3 times as many women in the umbilical minilaparotomy group reported concerns about incisional hernia (3.1% vs 1.2%; p = .833). These findings were maintained in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. No patient or procedure characteristics were significantly associated with the development of hernia. CONCLUSION: There were no significant difference in incisional symptoms, pain, or infection following umbilical minilaparotomy vs a suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction. Although not statistically significant, the rate of incisional hernia was higher at the umbilical site compared with the suprapubic site.

Review of Sterilization Techniques and Clinical Updates.

Sterilization is the most common form of contraception used worldwide and is highly effective in preventing unintended pregnancy. Each of the available sterilization methods has unique advantages and disadvantages that influence the choice of approach for each individual patient. Salpingectomy for sterilization has become more popular in recent years, with mounting evidence suggesting a protective effect against ovarian cancers originating in the fallopian tube. At the same time, Essure hysteroscopic sterilization has come under scrutiny because of increasing reports of possible adverse effects associated with its use. Here we review clinical updates in sterilization techniques, with a focus on salpingectomy and Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.

Tissue Extraction Techniques During Laparoscopic Uterine Surgery.

Morcellation allows minimally invasive approaches to surgery even in the presence of large uteri or myomas. Recent restrictions in the use of power morcellation, as well as concerns regarding the potential for morcellation to disseminate malignant tissue, have initiated investigation and innovation to find safer methods. This review examines current techniques for tissue extraction during uterine surgery, with a focus on contained power morcellation and contained manual morcellation via mini-laparotomy or colpotomy. Videos are included to demonstrate these methods.

Opioid Prescription and Patient Use After Gynecologic Procedures: A Survey of Patients and Providers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe opioid distribution and patient use after gynecologic procedures. DESIGN: Survey study (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: An urban academic tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS: Ninety-six gynecologists in the Boston area, and 147 patients who underwent a benign hysterectomy between January 2015 and April 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Survey study of physicians and patients composed of 2 parts: (1) a physician survey on opioid prescribing practices after gynecologic procedures and (2) a patient survey on opioid consumption after hysterectomy. Physicians were contacted via e-mail to participate in an online survey. Eligible patients were contacted via telephone and asked to participate in a telephone survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-one physicians responded to an online survey and prescribed a mean of 27.1 tablets (range, 5-30) of oxycodone (5 mg) or hydromorphone (2 mg) after abdominal hysterectomy (AH), a mean of 22.6 tablets (range, 5-30) after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), and a mean of 16.8 tablets (range 5-30) after vaginal hysterectomy (VH). Physicians prescribed more opioids for AH compared with LH, with a mean difference of 4.5 tablets (standard deviation, 4.7; p < .01), and AH compared with VH, with a mean difference of 6.8 tablets (standard deviation, 5.8; p < .01), which were both statistically significant. In addition, 40.0% of physicians prescribe opioids after a hysteroscopy and 19.2% after a dilation and curettage. Fifty-six patients participated in the telephone survey: 64.6% of patients used less than half of the opioids prescribed and 16.1% used none. For AH, patients reported being prescribed a mean of 25.7 tablets and using a mean of 8.7 tablets (range, 0-60; 33.9% used). For LH or VH, patients reported being prescribed a mean of 24.2 tablets and using a mean of 10.0 tablets (range, 0-30; 41.4% used). Opioid consumption was not significantly different for AH compared with LH or VH (p = .613 for AH to LH, p = .279 for AH to VH). CONCLUSIONS: With respect to the physician survey, we conclude there is a wide range of opioid prescription practices and patient opioid consumption after gynecologic surgery. The patient survey revealed that physicians prescribe fewer opioid tablets after a minimally invasive approach to hysterectomy versus open hysterectomy. However, most patients use less than half of prescribed opioids, and a fraction did not use any opioids at all.

The menstrual cycle and blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Operative morbidity of laparoscopic myomectomy largely relates to the potential for intraoperative blood loss. We sought to determine whether blood loss varies according to the menstrual cycle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 268 women who underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy from 2007 to 2012. Patients were categorized into five menstrual groups: follicular phase, luteal phase, oligomenorrheic or amenorrheic on hormonal therapy, postmenopausal or other. Patient and procedure characteristics were compared for the follicular phase group, luteal phase group, and hormonal therapy group. The estimated blood loss was compared across the five groups using a regression model. RESULTS: A total of 268 women underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy: 108 (40.3%) were in the follicular phase, 92 (34.3%) were in the luteal phase, 44 (16.4%) were on hormonal therapy, nine (3.4%) were postmenopausal, and 15 (5.6%) could not be classified. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the groups with the exception of endometriosis. Geometric mean estimated blood loss was 91.9 mL in the follicular phase group, 108.7 mL in the luteal phase group, 114.1 mL in the hormonal therapy group, and 39.8 mL in the postmenopausal group. There was no significant difference in the geometric mean estimated blood loss when comparing the follilcuar phase, luteal phase, and hormonal phase groups (p = 0.41). Upon adjusted multivariable analysis of all five menstrual groups, there was also no difference in estimated blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy does not vary significantly with the phase of the menstrual cycle.

Impact of a Fellowship-Trained Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeon on Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As the performance of minimally invasive hysterectomy has increased in the United States, the need to apply outcomes measures has also increased. This study was conducted to determine the impact of a fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) specialist on patient outcomes after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) in a gynecology department. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 218 patients who underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications at a suburban academic-affiliated tertiary care hospital with a broad patient base from 2010 to 2014. RESULTS: A total of 218 women underwent conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy by 10 members of a gynecology department: 96 women (44%) by a MIGS specialist and 122 women (56%) by a group of general gynecologists. Operative time was less (119 vs 148 min; P < .001), and patients were more likely to be discharged on the same day (90.6% vs 66.4%; P < .001) for the MIGS specialist compared to other surgeons. More patients of the MIGS specialist had undergone prior laparotomies (42.7% vs 17.2%; P = < .001) and had a greater uterine weight (392 vs 224 g; P < .001). Although the difference was not statistically significant, conversion to laparotomy (0 vs 2 cases; P = .505) and postoperative infection (6 vs 16 cases; P = .095) were lower for the MIGS specialist. Total billing charges were also lower for the MIGS specialist ($9,920 vs $11,406; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A fellowship-trained MIGS specialist performed laparoscopic hysterectomy in less time on more difficult surgical patients, with a shorter length of stay and lower costs, and no difference in complications compared to other providers in a gynecology department.