Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 109(5): 460-466, 2024 Aug 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272658

RESUMEN

There are no internationally agreed descriptors for categories of neonatal transports which facilitate comparisons between settings. To continually review and enhance neonatal transport care we need robust categories to develop benchmarks. This review aimed to report on the development and application of key measures across a national neonatal transport service. The UK Neonatal Transport Group (UK-NTG) developed a core dataset and benchmarks for transported infants and collected annual national data. Data were reported back to teams to allow benchmarking and improvements. From 2012 to 2021, the rate of UK neonatal transfers increased from 18 to 22/1000 live births despite a falling birth rate. Neonatal transfers on nitric oxide increased until 2016 before plateauing. The proportion of transport services able to provide high frequency oscillation and servo-controlled therapeutic hypothermia increased over the study period. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen use increased, becoming the most frequently used non-invasive respiratory support mode. For infants <27 weeks of gestational age, transfers for uplift of care in the first 3 days of life have fallen from 420 (2016) to 288 (2020/2021) and for lack of neonatal capacity from 24 (2016) to 2 (2020/2021). The rate of ventilated infants completing transfer with CO2 out of the benchmark range varied from 9% to 13% with marked variation between transport services' rates of hypocapnia (0-10%) and hypercapnia with acidosis (0-9%). The development of the UK-NTG dataset supports national tracking of activity and clinical trends allowing comparison of patient-focused benchmarks across teams.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Transporte de Pacientes , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Reino Unido , Transporte de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 25(7): 850-7, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23411866

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Performing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been described to be useful in cases of suspected biliary obstruction where EUS can triage patients for ERCP. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS and its impact on ERCP burden in real clinical practice. We also evaluated the safety and efficacy of EUS+ERCP in a single endoscopic session. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and eighteen consecutive patients with suspected but unexplained biliary obstruction referred for EUS before possible ERCP were evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS and its value in predicting the need for ERCP were determined. EUS established whether pancreaticobiliary disorder (PBD) was present and whether therapeutic ERCP was required. These decisions were matched with ERCP findings, histology, clinical course, and follow-up. Where ERCP was indicated, it was performed in the same endoscopic session. RESULTS: EUS was performed in 412/418 patients (feasibility 98.5%), and ERCP was considered necessary in 64% (ERCP avoided in 36%). The single-session EUS and ERCP was safe and effective (264 patients). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS was as follows: choledocholithiasis 99%, malignant strictures 90%, and benign strictures 92%. EUS showed pathology in 42% of patients who had a nondilated biliary system at initial investigations. When EUS indicated a normal common bile duct (n=119), this had a 100% positive predictive value for non-necessity for ERCP. The median overall follow-up period was 12 months (range 6-34 months). CONCLUSION: EUS demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in this mixed group of PBD. This accurately guided ERCP need and avoided unnecessary ERCP in 36%. EUS and ERCP in the same endoscopic session for the evaluation and management of PBD is technically feasible, with safety and efficacy profiles equivalent to that of each procedure performed independently in different sessions.


Asunto(s)
Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colestasis/diagnóstico , Colestasis/cirugía , Endosonografía , Selección de Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Colestasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Colestasis/etiología , Constricción Patológica , Endosonografía/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Procedimientos Innecesarios , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...