Dimethyl fumarate modulates the Treg-Th17 cell axis in patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is the active ingredient of Skilarence™ and Tecfidera™, which are used for the treatment of psoriasis and multiple sclerosis, respectively. Various immunomodulatory mechanisms of action have been identified for DMF; however, it is still unclear what effects DMF exerts in vivo in patients with psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: In this study we examined the effects of DMF, both in vivo and in vitro, on T cells, which play a key role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. METHODS: The frequency of T-cell subsets was examined by flow cytometry in untreated patients with psoriasis or those treated with DMF. The effects of DMF in vitro on T-cell survival, activation and proliferation, and cell-surface thiols were assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: In patients with psoriasis treated with DMF we observed an increase in the frequency of T regulatory (Treg) cells and a decrease in T helper (Th)17 lineage cells and the associated cytokines interleukin-17, interleukin-22 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. T cells cultured in vitro with DMF exhibited reduced viability, and inhibition of activation and proliferation in response to stimulation due to the oxidative effects of DMF. However, the frequency of Treg cells increased in the presence of DMF due to their heightened ability to resist DMF-induced oxidative stress. CONCLUSIONS: DMF enhanced the ratio of Treg cells to Th17 cells in patients with psoriasis, in patients with multiple sclerosis and in vitro. Furthermore, our data suggest that this is at least in part as a result of the differential effects of DMF on Treg cells compared with conventional T cells.

Increased non-melanoma skin cancer risk in young patients with inflammatory bowel disease on immunomodulatory therapy: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies report an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Concurrently, paediatric IBD incidence is rising, with more patients now exposed to immunomodulators from a younger age. OBJECTIVES: To investigate NMSC incidence and to examine the risk associated with immunomodulators in the development of NMSC in patients with IBD. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre cohort study. Patients with IBD attending a tertiary adult hospital from 1994 to 2013 were included. Skin cancer incidence was compared with population data from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (NCRI) to calculate standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Logistic regression was utilized for risk factor analysis. RESULTS: Two thousand and fifty-three patients with IBD were studied. The SIR for NMSC in patients with IBD taking immunomodulators overall was 1.8 (95% CI: 1.0-2.7) with age-specific rates significantly elevated across certain age categories. Exposure to thiopurines (OR: 5.26, 95% CI: 2.15-12.93, P < 0.001) and in particular thiopurines and/or tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (OR: 6.45, 95% CI: 2.69-15.95, P < 0.001) was significantly associated with NMSC. The majority (82%) of those exposed to a TNF-α inhibitor also had thiopurine exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with skin cancer preventative measures should be highlighted to all patients with IBD. There should be a low threshold for dermatology referral for immunosuppressed patients, particularly those with a history of exposure to dual immunomodulators from a young age.

The challenges of managing refractory oesphageal lichen planus.

INTRODUCTION: Lichen planus is an inflammatory mucocutaneous disorder, often idiopathic. It is postulated that the characteristic skin lesions arise from a T cell mediated autoimmune response against basal keratinocytes. Oral mucosal involvement can occur in up to 70 % of cases of cutaneous disease however, oesphageal involvement is rare. RESULT: We report the case of a 60 year old female with ulcerative oesphagitis and concomitant cutaneous lesions suggestive of lichen planus. Multiple immunosuppressant therapies were administered but with little success, except for pulses of oral steroids. CONCLUSION: Oesphageal lichen planus is rare, often unrecognised and can be resistant to treatment. However, diagnosis is crucial as malignant transformation of longstanding ulcerative lichen planus may occur.