FDrisk: development of a validated risk assessment tool for Fabry disease utilizing electronic health record data.

Purpose: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare, X-linked, lysosomal storage disease characterized by great variability in clinical presentation and progressive multisystemic organ damage. Lack of awareness of FD and frequent misdiagnoses cause long diagnostic delays. To address the urgent need for earlier diagnosis, we created an online, risk-assessment scoring tool, the FDrisk, for predicting an individual's risk for FD and prompting diagnostic testing and clinical evaluation. Methods: Utilizing electronic health records, data were collected retrospectively from randomly selected, deidentified patients with FD treated at the Emory Lysosomal Storage Disease Center. Deidentified, negative controls were randomly selected from the Fabry Disease Diagnostic Testing and Education project database, a program within the American Association of Kidney Patients Center for Patient Education and Research. Diagnosis of FD was documented by evidence of a pathogenic variant in GLA and/or an abnormal level of leukocyte α-Gal A. Thirty characteristic clinical features of FD were initially identified and subsequently curated into 16 clinical covariates used as predictors for the risk of FD. An overall prediction model and two sex-specific prediction models were built. Two-hundred and sixty samples (130 cases, 130 controls) were used to train the risk prediction models. One-hundred and ninety-seven independent samples (30 cases, 167 controls) were used for testing model performance. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using a threshold of 0.5 to determine a predicted case vs. control. Results: The overall risk prediction model demonstrated 80% sensitivity, 83.8% specificity, and positive predictive value of 47.1%. The male model demonstrated 75% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity, and positive predictive value of 75%. The female model demonstrated 83.3% sensitivity, 81.3% specificity, and positive predictive value of 45.5%. Patients with risk scores at or above 50% are categorized as "at risk" for FD and should be sent for diagnostic testing. Conclusion: We have developed a statistical risk prediction model, the FDrisk, a validated, clinician-friendly, online, risk-assessment scoring tool for predicting an individual's risk for FD and prompting diagnostic testing and clinical evaluation. As an easily accessible, user-friendly scoring tool, we believe implementing the FDrisk will significantly decrease the time to diagnosis and allow earlier initiation of FD-specific therapy.

Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Access Cosmesis Scale (AVACS): A new measure for vascular access.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a cosmesis scale to evaluate the cosmetic appearance of hemodialysis (HD) arteriovenous (AV) accesses from the perspective of the patient and clinician, which could be incorporated into clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN: Using a modified Delphi process, two AV access cosmesis scale (AVACS) components were developed in a four-round Delphi panel consisting of two surveys and two consensus meetings with two rounds of patient consultation. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Delphi panel consisted of 15 voting members including five interventional or general nephrologists, five vascular surgeons, three interventional radiologists, and two vascular access nurse coordinators. Four patients experienced with vascular access were involved in patient question development. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: For a component to be included in the AVACS, it had to meet the prespecified panel consensus agreement of ⩾70%. RESULTS: The clinician component of the AVACS includes nine questions on the following AV access features: scarring, skin discoloration, aneurysm/pseudoaneurysms and megafistula appearance. The patient component includes six questions about future vascular access decisions, interference with work or leisure activities, clothing choices, self-consciousness or attractiveness, emotional impact, and overall appearance. LIMITATIONS: Delphi panel methods are subjective by design, but with expert clinical opinion are used to develop classification systems and outcome measures. The developed scale requires further validation testing but is available for clinical trial use. CONCLUSIONS: While safety and efficacy are the primary concerns when evaluating AV access for HD, cosmesis is an important component of the ESKD patient experience. The AVACS has been designed to assess this important domain; it can be used to facilitate patient care and education about vascular access choice and maintenance. AVACS can also be used to inform future research on developing new techniques for AV access creation and maintenance, particularly as relates to AV access cosmesis.

Patient and Care Partner Burden in CKD Patients With and Without Anemia: A US-Based Survey.

Rationale & Objective: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a far-reaching impact on both patients and care partners, which can be further compounded by frequent complications such as anemia. This study assessed the burden experienced by patients with CKD and the care partners of patients with CKD, with and without anemia. Study Design: Online survey. Setting & Participants: Adult patients with CKD and the care partners of adult patients with CKD living in the United States were recruited through the American Association of Kidney Patients and a third-party online panel (January 9, 2020-March 12, 2020). Outcomes: Patient and care partner characteristics, care received or provided; health-related quality of life, and work productivity. Analytical Approach: Descriptive statistics were reported separately based on the presence or absence of anemia. Results: In total, 410 patients (anemia: n=190, no anemia: n=220) and 258 care partners (anemia: n=110, no anemia: n=148) completed the survey. Most patients reported receiving paid or unpaid care because of their health condition (anemia: 58.9%, no anemia: 50.9%), with an overall average of 14.2 and 11.3 h/wk among the anemia and no anemia patients, respectively. The care partners also reported providing numerous hours of care (anemia: 33.6 h/wk, no anemia: 38.0 h/wk), especially care partners living with their care recipient (anemia: 52.6 h/wk, no anemia: 42.8 h/wk). Among the patients, those with anemia reported a numerically lower average health-related quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia score, anemia: 110.1; no anemia: 121.6). Most care partners reported a severe or very severe burden (Burden Scale for Family Caregivers-Short Version score≥15, anemia: 69.1%; no anemia: 58.8%). The work productivity impairment was substantial among employed patients (anemia: 44.9%, no anemia: 35.4%) and employed care partners (anemia: 47.9%, no anemia: 40.7%). Limitations: The survey results may have been subject to selection and recall biases; moreover, the observational nature of the study does not allow for causal inferences. Conclusions: Patients with CKD and the care partners of patients with CKD experience a considerable burden, especially when anemia is present.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Patient, Family Member, and Stakeholder Research Engagement: Insights from the PREPARE NOW Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of COVID-19 on patient, family member, and stakeholder patient-centered outcomes research engagement. OBJECTIVE: To answer the research questions: (1) What is the impact of COVID-19 on the lives of patients with kidney disease and their families? (2) What is the impact of COVID-19 on research engagement for patient and family member research team members who are themselves at very high risk for poor COVID-19 outcomes? and (3) How can we help patients, family members, and stakeholder team members engage in research during COVID-19? DESIGN: We conducted virtual semi-structured interviews with patient and family member co-investigators and kidney disease stakeholders from the PREPARE NOW study during November 2020. The interview guide included questions about participants' experiences with the impact of COVID-19 on research engagement. PARTICIPANTS: Seven patient and family member co-investigators and eight kidney disease stakeholders involved in a kidney disease patient-centered outcomes research project participated in the interviews, data analysis, and writing this manuscript. APPROACH: We used a content analysis approach and identified the main themes using an inductive process. KEY RESULTS: Respondents reported three main ways that COVID-19 has impacted their lives: emotional impact, changing behaviors, and changes in health care delivery. The majority of respondents reported no negative impact of COVID-19 on their ability to engage in this research project. Suggestions for patient-centered outcomes research during COVID-19 and other emergencies include virtual research activities; active engagement; and promoting trust, honesty, transparency, and authenticity. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has had a significant negative impact on patient, family member, and stakeholder research team members; however, this has not resulted in less research engagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02722382.

American Association of Kidney Patients survey of patient preferences for hemodialysis vascular access.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the vascular access modalities used for hemodialysis, the reasons for choosing them, and determinants of satisfaction with vascular access among patients with end-stage renal disease. METHODS: The American Association of Kidney Patients Center for Patient Research and Education used the American Association of Kidney Patients patient engagement database to identify eligible adult hemodialysis patients. Participants completed an online survey consisting of 34 demographic, medical history, and hemodialysis history questions to determine which vascular access modalities were preferred and the reasons for these preferences. RESULTS: Among 150 respondents (mean age 54 years, 53% females), hemodialysis was most frequently initiated with central venous catheter (64%) while the most common currently used vascular access was arteriovenous fistula (66%). Most (86%) patients previously received an arteriovenous fistula, among whom 77% currently used the arteriovenous fistula for vascular access. Older patients and males were more likely to initiate hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula. The factors most frequently reported as important in influencing the selection of vascular access modality included infection risk (87%), physician recommendation (84%), vascular access durability (78%), risk of complications involving surgery (76%), and impact on daily activities (73%); these factors were influenced by patient age, sex, and race. Satisfaction with current vascular access was 90% with arteriovenous fistula, 79% with arteriovenous graft, and 67% with central venous catheter. CONCLUSION: Most end-stage renal disease patients continue to initiate hemodialysis with central venous catheter despite being associated with the lowest satisfaction rates. While arteriovenous fistula was associated with the highest satisfaction rate, there are significant barriers to adoption that vary based on patient demographics and perception of procedure invasiveness.