Outcomes of the salivary-oral health impact profile (S-OHIP) for chronic salivary disorders.

PURPOSE: The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) is a previously validated, concise, patient-friendly questionnaire used to determine the impact of oral diseases on patient quality of life. The present study seeks to examine the outcomes of a modified Salivary-OHIP (S-OHIP) survey in patients with chronic salivary disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort of 67 patients with chronic salivary disorders and a control group of 16 patients undergoing septoplasty were surveyed using the modified Salivary-OHIP (S-OHIP) before surgery and six weeks following operative intervention. Additional factors analyzed included age, gender, etiology of salivary disease, general quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L, and general salivary symptoms. RESULTS: There was no difference between treatment and control groups with respect to age or gender. There was a significant difference between the groups regarding change in S-OHIP scores before and after surgery (p < 0.01). Salivary patients had a significant decrease in S-OHIP scores indicating improved salivary quality of life (p < 0.01), with a mean decrease in score of 9.5. The control group showed no change in S-OHIP score (p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: The S-OHIP allows for a specific, targeted survey of salivary symptoms and is a useful, patient-friendly tool to quantify symptomatic changes in patients with chronic salivary disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Botox for the prevention of radiation-induced Sialadenitis and xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the safety of Botox and its potential effect on alleviating radiation therapy (RT)-induced sialadenitis in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: Twenty patients with stage III/IV head and neck cancer were randomized to receive Botox or saline injections into both submandibular glands (SMG). There were three visits: one before RT (V1); 1 week after RT (V2); and 6 weeks after RT (V3), each of which included saliva collection, a 24-h dietary recall, and a quality-of-life survey. RESULTS: No adverse events were observed. While the control group was much older, the Botox group more commonly underwent induction chemotherapy compared with controls. From V1 to V2, salivary flow decreased in both groups, but only in the control group from V1 to V3. CXCL-1 (GRO), a neutrophil chemoattractant, was lower in the Botox group compared with the control group at V3. CONCLUSION: Botox can be safely administered to the salivary glands prior to external beam radiation without observed complications or side-effects. After an initial reduction in salivary flow following RT, the Botox group showed lack of further flow reduction compared with controls. The inflammatory marker CXCL 1, which was reduced in the in Botox group at V3, may be a candidate for further studies of radiation-induced sialadenitis.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Usage by Therapy Nonresponders.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine differences in therapy usage and outcomes of therapy between responder (R) and nonresponder (NR) groups in an international, multicenter prospective registry of patients undergoing hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). STUDY DESIGN: Database analysis (level III). SETTING: International, multicenter registry. METHODS: The studied registry prospectively collects data pre- and postimplantation, including sleep parameters, Epworth score, patient experience, and safety questions, over the course of 12 months. Patients are defined as a "responder" based on Sher criteria, which require a final apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of ≤20 and a final AHI reduction of >50% at their 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, there were 497 (69%) R and 220 (31%) NR. Most patients in both groups experienced improvement in quality of life following implantation (96% of R; 77% of NR) with reductions in oxygen desaturation index and Epworth score. At final follow-up, the R group demonstrated significantly better adherence to recommended therapy (>4 hours/night) (P = .001), average hours of nightly use (P = .001), final Epworth scores (P = .001), and degree of subjective improvement (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients classified as NR to upper airway stimulation continue to use therapy with improvement in percent time of sleep with O2 <90%, reduction in daytime sleepiness, and improvement in quality of life. Therefore, ongoing usage of the device should be encouraged in NR patients who note improvement while integrating additional strategies to lower the long-term effects of OSA.

Outcomes of Submandibular Stone Removal With and Without Salivary Endoscopes.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: For patients with submandibular sialolithiasis, there are many gland-preserving treatment options including sialendoscopy. Sialendoscopy, however, requires expensive instrumentation with limited availability, which may not be required for routine cases. The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients with submandibular sialolithiasis undergoing sialendoscopy versus those undergoing transoral incisional sialithotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective study of patient undergoing gland-preserving therapy for submandibular sialolithiasis. METHODS: The study was a prospective, nonrandomized trial of 30 patients with submandibular sialolithiasis who received gland-preserving treatment by either sialendoscopy-assisted techniques (Scope group; 14 patients) or transoral sialithotomy with or without dochoplasty (No Scope group; 16 patients). Factors analyzed between the two groups included age, race, gender, size of stone, location of stone, gland(s) involved, surgical method, and modified salivary Oral Health Impact Profile (sOHIP) scores before and after therapy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the Scope and No Scope groups regarding age, race, or gender. There was a significant difference in stone size between the groups, with the No Scope group having larger stones on average. Both treatments led to statistically significant symptomatic improvement in sOHIP scores. There was no statistically significant difference in salivary quality of life improvement between the Scope and No Scope groups (P = .33). CONCLUSIONS: Sialendoscopy is an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the management of salivary disorders, but is not associated with improved outcomes in gland-preserving treatments for routine submandibular sialolithiasis. Transoral stone removal alone may have equivalent symptomatic outcomes in the management of select sialoliths. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:754-760, 2022.

Sialendoscopy and Sjogren's Disease: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study is a systematic review of the literature which seeks to estimate the expected treatment outcomes of a patient with Sjogren's syndrome (SS) undergoing therapeutic sialendoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases were used to search for studies published as of August 2020 regarding the treatment outcomes of SS with sialendoscopy. The key search terms included "Sjogren's syndrome" and "sialendoscopy." Only studies in the English language involving more than one human patient were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed in study inclusion and data extraction. The primary outcome assessed was improvement in patient symptoms. RESULTS: Six studies met criteria and were analyzed in this review, including 125 patients undergoing sialendoscopy of parotid and/or submandibular glands as well as 25 controls. Of these patients, 90% were female with an age range of 18 to 79 years. There was significant diversity in outcome reporting tools. The outcomes of symptom improvement were pooled qualitatively based on improvement noted in each study. Outcomes were defined as partial improvement if the measured outcomes improved and complete improvement if measured outcomes resolved entirely. Despite the limited number of studies on this topic, this meta-analysis suggests that a similar study of therapeutic sialendoscopy could expect to provide at least temporary improvement of symptoms 90% to 99% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides support for the application of sialendoscopy in the treatment of SS salivary disease. Larger studies with consistent outcome reporting tools and control groups are needed to validate these results and provide a consistent therapy protocol. Laryngoscope, 131:1474-1481, 2021.

Perioperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Otolaryngologic Surgery.

This article reviews the evidence regarding current perioperative pain management strategies in pediatric patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgery. Pediatric otolaryngology is a broad field with a wide variety of surgical procedures that each requires careful consideration for optimal perioperative pain management. Adequate pain control is vital to ensuring patient safety and achieving successful postoperative care, but many young children are limited in their capacity to communicate their pain experience. Current literature holds a disproportionate amount of focus on pain management for certain procedures, whereas there is a paucity of evidence-based literature informing most other procedures within the field.