Interprofessional provider attitudes toward the initiation of epidural analgesia in the laboring patient: are we all on the same page?

BACKGROUND: The timing of initiation of neuraxial labor analgesia should ultimately depend on patient preference although obstetricians, anesthesiologists and nurses may influence decision-making. We hypothesized that provider groups would have similar attitudes toward the timing of epidural placement, but some identifiable differences could be used to improve understanding and communication among providers. METHODS: Anesthesiologists, nurses and obstetricians completed a survey assessing their knowledge and attitudes on the timing of epidural placement in specified clinical circumstances. RESULTS: Anesthesiologists (100%) and nurses (86.2%) reported being more familiar with epidural management than obstetricians (43.3%, P <0.01). The willingness of providers to advocate epidural placement based on the magnitude of cervical dilation was similar, although at 10 cm dilatation obstetricians (73.3%) were significantly more likely to advocate neuraxial block compared to both nurses (27.6%, P <0.01) and anesthesiologists (36.7%, P <0.01). The impact of patient factors and clinical circumstances on the timing of neuraxial block placement showed significant differences among provider groups in five of 24 areas assessed, including patient desire for an epidural, primigravid patients without membrane rupture, oxytocin infusion initiated, labor epidural in a previous pregnancy, and a difficult airway. CONCLUSIONS: There were differences between providers in factors that may impact the timing of epidural placement and in their self-perceived familiarity with epidural management. These present an opportunity for furthering interprofessional education and collaboration.

Anesthetic management of parturients with Arnold Chiari malformation-I: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Consensus regarding the safest mode of delivery and anesthetic management for parturients with Arnold Chiari malformation-I (ACM-I) remains controversial. This study assessed their anesthetic management and reported anesthetic complications during hospitalization for delivery. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of patients with ACM-I undergoing vaginal or cesarean delivery. Data were obtained from the electronic databases of four United States academic institutions using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes from 2007-2017 at three sites and 2004-2017 at one site. The primary outcome was anesthetic complications. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 185 deliveries in 148 patients. Diagnosis of ACM-I was made prior to delivery in 147 (80%) cases. Pre-delivery neurosurgical consultation for management of ACM-I was performed in 53 (36%) patients. Pre-existing symptoms were recorded for 89 (48%) of the deliveries. Vaginal deliveries occurred in 80 (43%) cases, and 62 women (78%) received neuraxial labor analgesia. Cesarean delivery was performed in 105 (57%) cases, of which 70 women (67%) had neuraxial anesthesia and 34 (32%) received general anesthesia. Post-dural puncture headache was reported in three (2%) patients who had neuraxial anesthesia, and in two (12%) patients with syringomyelia. There was one (3%) reported case of aspiration pneumonia with general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that anesthetic complications occur infrequently in patients with ACM-I regardless of the anesthetic management. Although institutional preference in anesthetic and obstetric care appears to drive patient management, the findings suggest that an individualized approach has favorable outcomes in this population.

Transversus abdominis plane and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks for cesarean delivery in a patient with type II spinal muscular atrophy.

While neuraxial and general anesthetic techniques are most commonly utilized for cesarean delivery, there are rare instances in which alternative techniques may be considered. We report a patient with type II spinal muscular atrophy who had relative contraindications to both neuraxial and general anesthesia, and had experienced significant discomfort during two previous cesarean deliveries performed with local anesthetic infiltration. We describe the successful use of bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks, in addition to intravenous sedation, for cesarean delivery anesthesia.