THE IMPACT OF ROUTINE CARDIAC TROPONIN I-BASED CARDIOTOXICITY SCREENING ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS ON CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) used as cancer therapy have been associated with a range of cardiac immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including fulminant myocarditis with a high case fatality rate. Early detection through cardiotoxicity screening by biomarker monitoring can lead to prompt intervention and improved patient outcomes. In this study, we investigate the association between cardiotoxicity screening with routine serial troponin I monitoring in asymptomatic patients receiving ICI, cardiovascular adverse event (CV AE) detection, and overall survival (OS). Methods: We instituted a standardized troponin I screening protocol at baseline and with each ICI dose (every 2-4 weeks) in all patients receiving ICI at our center starting Jan 2019. We subsequently collected data in 825 patients receiving ICI at our institution from January 2018 to October 2021. Of these patients, 428 underwent cardiotoxicity screening with serial troponin I monitoring during ICI administration (Jan 2019-Oct 2021) and 397 patients were unmonitored (Jan 2018-Dec 2018). We followed patients for nine months following their first dose of ICI and compared outcomes of CV AEs and OS between monitored and unmonitored patients. Additionally, we investigated rates of CV AEs, all-cause mortality, and oncologic time-to-treatment failure (TTF) between patients with an elevated troponin I value during the monitoring period versus patients without elevated troponin I. Results: We found a lower rate of severe (grades 4-5) CV AEs, resulting in critical illness or death, in patients who underwent troponin monitoring (0.5%) compared to patients who did not undergo monitoring (1.8%), (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.79, p = 0.04). There was no difference in overall CV AEs (grades 3-5) or OS between monitored and unmonitored patients. In the entire cohort, patients with at least one elevated troponin I during the follow up period, during routine monitoring or unmonitored, had a higher risk of overall CV AEs (HR 10.96, 95% CI 4.65-25.85, p<0.001) as well as overall mortality (HR 2.67, 95% CI 1.69 - 4.10, p<0.001) compared to those without elevated troponin. Oncologic time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was not significantly different in a sub-cohort of monitored vs. unmonitored patients. Conclusions: Patients undergoing cardiotoxicity screening with troponin I monitoring during ICI therapy had a lower rate of severe (grade 4-5) CV AEs compared patients who were not screened. Troponin I elevation in screened and unscreened patients was significantly associated with increased CV AEs as well as increased mortality. Troponin I monitoring did not impact oncologic time-to-treatment-failure in a sub-cohort analysis of patients treated with ICI. These results provide preliminary evidence for clinical utility of cardiotoxicity screening with troponin I monitoring in patients receiving ICI therapy.

Safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab in head and neck cancer: results from a phase I trial.

Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) has a poor prognosis at advanced stages. Given the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in HNC, inhibition of the programmed death-ligand 1/programmed death-1 (PD-L1/PD-1) signaling pathway represents a promising therapeutic approach. Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) is efficacious against many tumor types. Here we report the clinical safety and activity from the HNC cohort of the phase Ia PCD4989g clinical trial. Patients and methods: Patients with previously treated, advanced HNC received atezolizumab i.v. every 3 weeks for 16 cycles, up to 1 year or until loss of clinical benefit. Patients were monitored for safety and tolerability and evaluated for response at least every 6 weeks. Baseline PD-L1 expression level and human papillomavirus (HPV) status were evaluated. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled; 7 patients (22%) had a primary tumor in the oral cavity, 18 (56%) in the oropharynx, 1 (3%) in the hypopharynx, 2 (6%) in the larynx, and 4 (13%) in the nasopharynx. Seventeen patients (53%) had ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Twenty-one patients (66%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), with three experiencing grade 3 TRAEs and one experiencing a grade 4 TRAE (per CTCAE v4.0). No grade 5 TRAEs were reported. Objective responses by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) occurred in 22% of patients, with a median duration of response of 7.4 months (range 2.8-45.8 months). Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (range 0.5-48.4 months), and median overall survival was 6.0 months (range 0.5-51.6+ months). Responses showed no association with HPV status or PD-L1 expression level. Conclusions: In this heavily pre-treated advanced HNC cohort, atezolizumab had a tolerable safety profile and encouraging activity, with responses observed regardless of HPV status and PD-L1 expression level. These findings warrant further investigation of atezolizumab in HNC. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01375842.

Characterizing CD137 upregulation on NK cells in patients receiving monoclonal antibody therapy.

Background: In the era of personalized cancer medicine, identifying techniques for effectively matching patients to efficacious treatments is a critical step in the treatment process. The advent of anti-cancer immunotherapies necessitates novel approaches to biomarker identification beyond traditional genomic profiling. One promising approach is incorporation of nomograms into treatment decisions. Nomograms are prediction tools, based on statistical modeling, designed to predict treatment outcomes. As a first step toward developing a nomogram, we conducted analyses to predict CD137 expression of natural killer cells after monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment. Patients and methods: Patient, tumor and immune characteristics were collected from 199 patients with breast cancer (N = 62), head/neck cancers (N = 46) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (N = 91), who were receiving mAb therapy as part of clinical trials. The difference in CD137 expression before and after mAb therapy was assessed by flow cytometry. To evaluate those who respond to mAb therapy via increased CD137 expression, we applied classification and regression trees (CART), multivariable lasso regression tools and Random Forest. Results: The CD137 expression was significantly different for each cancer type [mean (SD): Breast: 6.6 (6.5); Head/Neck: 11.0 (7.0); NHL: 7.5 (7.1), P < 0.0001]. For breast cancer and NHL, FcR polymorphism and baseline CD137 expression were significant predictors of increased CD137 expression; for head/neck cancer, FcR polymorphism and age were significant predictors of increased expression. Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that FcR polymorphism, pre-treatment CD137 expression and age are significant predictors of CD137 upregulation in patients. This study demonstrates that the development of a nomogram for therapy response is feasible. Further work validating our models in an independent cohort will provide the next steps in developing a nomogram that may be used to individualize this therapeutic approach for patients (NCT01114256).

A phase I dose-escalation study of aflibercept administered in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics of aflibercept, and to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of aflibercept in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin. METHODS: Aflibercept was administered at escalating doses of 2, 4, or 6 mg kg(-1) in combination with fixed doses of pemetrexed (500 mg m(-2)) plus cisplatin (75 mg m(-2)) every 3 weeks. Blood samples were collected for PK analyses. Serum antiaflibercept antibodies were quantified to assess their impact on systemic aflibercept concentrations. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. One patient dosed at 4 mg kg(-1) experienced grade 3 hypophosphatemia (dose-limiting toxicity; DLT), which prompted a cohort expansion. No further DLTs were observed in the 4 mg kg(-1) cohort or the 6 mg kg(-1) dose cohort. Most common adverse events (AEs) of all grades included (%): fatigue (89), anaemia (89), nausea (83), hyponatremia (78), and neutropenia (72). Grade ≥ 3 AEs consistent with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy included (%): hypertension (22), pulmonary embolism (11), and deep vein thrombosis (6). Five patients (28%) experienced mild neurocognitive disturbance. No episodes of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) were noted. CONCLUSION: The results of this phase I study allowed further evaluation of the combination of aflibercept with pemetrexed and cisplatin in a phase II study. The RP2D of aflibercept was 6 mg kg(-1), to be administered intravenously every 3 weeks in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin.

Phase I/II trial of outpatient docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (opTPFL) as induction for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

The purpose of this study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel in an outpatient docetaxel (T), cisplatin (P), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (F), and leucovorin (L) (opTPFL) regimen and to obtain preliminary assessment of opTPFL efficacy. Thirty-four patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with opTPFL. Docetaxel was escalated from 60 to 95 mg/m(2) in combination with 100 mg/m(2) cisplatin intravenous bolus, and 2,800 mg/m(2) 5-FU continuous infusion and 2,000 mg/m(2) leucovorin continuous infusion with prophylactic growth factors and antibiotics. Patients who achieved a complete (CR) or partial (PR) response to three cycles received definitive twice-daily radiation therapy. A total of 97 cycles were administered to 34 patients. The major acute toxicities were neutropenia and mucositis. The MTD of docetaxel was 90 mg/m(2) . Seventy-seven of 97 cycles of were administered on an outpatient basis. The overall clinical response rate to opTPFL was 94%, with 44% CRs and 50% PRs. The MTD of opTPFL is 90 mg/m(2) docetaxel. Outpatient administration of opTPFL is tolerable, feasible, and does not alter the ability to administer definitive radiation therapy on schedule.

Hypothyroidism incidence after multimodality treatment for stage III and IV squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: Treatment of head-and-neck cancer patients with surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy has been associated with posttherapy hypothyroidism (HT). We evaluated the rate of posttherapy HT in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, treated with multimodality therapy to determine which factors might predict this condition and at what interval the condition developed. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected thyroid function data of patients treated with sequential chemotherapy, RT, and neck dissection. The incidence of posttherapy HT was estimated. The patient, tumor, and treatment factors possibly associated with HT were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 203 patients, 118 had data adequate for evaluation. HT developed in 45% at a median of 24.4 months after therapy. HT occurred in 14% and 27% of patients at 6 months and 1 year after treatment, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses of sex, age, RT dose, RT fractionation, T and N stage, tumor site, and neck dissection failed to identify a clinically relevant risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: A high number of patients undergoing aggressive organ-sparing multimodality therapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are at risk for subsequent HT. We recommend that all patients definitively irradiated to the head and neck region undergo frequent serum thyroid-stimulating hormone screening for HT, beginning 6 months after RT.

A phase II study of combined oral uracil and ftorafur with leucovorin for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this Phase II study was to define the response rate, safety profile, and toxicity of oral uracil and ftorafur (UFT) with leucovorin (UFT/LV) as a palliative treatment for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: Patients with metastatic or recurrent SCCHN with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < 2 and adequate organ function were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved trial. Prior induction or adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted provided 6 months had elapsed since the last chemotherapy. Patients were treated with UFT 300 mg/m(2) per day and leucovorin 90 mg per day administered in three doses daily for 28 days followed by a 7-day break for a 35-day cycle. Planned intrapatient dose modifications were based on individual toxicity. Patients were removed from the study for progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: One hundred six cycles of UFT/LV had been administered to 42 patients as of January 1, 2000. The most common toxicities, in descending order of incidence, were anemia, pain, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, mucositis, and anorexia. Clinically significant toxicities attributable to UFT/ LV were primarily gastrointestinal. On an intent-to-treat basis, three patients (7%) achieved a complete response, and six patients (14%) achieved a partial response. The overall response rate was 21% (95% confidence interval, 10--37%). CONCLUSIONS: UFT/LV therapy is feasible in this patient population and is generally well tolerated. Response rates are similar to the rates expected with continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil. UFT/LV should be studied further both alone and in combination therapy for patients with SCCHN.

Multicenter phase I-II trial of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil induction chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I-II, multi-institutional trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin in an induction chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) and to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the regimen at MTD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients with previously untreated, locally advanced, curable SCCHN were entered. Overall, 29 patients (67%) had N2 or N3 nodal disease and nine (21%) had T4 primary tumors. All patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1; cisplatin at 75 (level I) or 100 (level II) mg/m(2) on day 1; and a continuous fluorouracil infusion at 1,000 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 through 4. Patients were treated with prophylactic antibiotics on days 5 through 15. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a total of three cycles. Patients then received definitive therapy based on institutional preferences. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were treated at level I, and 30 patients were treated at level II. All 43 patients were assessable for toxicity. There were no major differences in toxicity between level I and level II. Cisplatin-associated grade 3 or 4 hypomagnesemia or hypocalcemia occurred in 13 (30%) and hearing loss in two patients (5%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 41 patients (95%) and febrile neutropenia occurred in eight (19%). There was one serious infection (2%). There were 17 (40% [95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 56%]) clinical complete responders (CR), 23 (54% [95% CI, 39% to 69%]) partial responders (PR), one (2%) with no change, and two (5%) unassessable patients. Major responses (CR, PR) were observed in 40 (93% [95% CI, 81% to 99%]) patients. Primary site CR was documented in 24 (54%) of patients. Postchemotherapy primary site biopsies were performed in 25 patients (58%) and pathologically negative biopsy was obtained in 11 (92%) of 12 primary site clinical CRs and seven (54%) of 13 with PR or no change. Overall, negative biopsies were obtained in 18 patients (72%). CONCLUSION: TPF induction chemotherapy can be delivered safely with a cisplatin dose of 100 mg/m(2) in previously untreated patients with SCCHN. The regimen is associated with a high rate of primary site clinical and pathologic CRs. Phase III comparison with cisplatinum and fluorouracil chemotherapy is warranted.

The role of induction chemotherapy in the curative treatment of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

Induction chemotherapy is appropriate for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck because it allows organ preservation without compromising survival and improves survival in unresectable disease. Radiation therapy, not surgery, should immediately follow induction chemotherapy in potentially resectable patients to prevent tumor repopulation. The results of three phase II studies of docetaxel-based regimens as induction therapy of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are reviewed and reported. Overall response rates ranged from 93% to 100%, with complete response rates of 40% to 63%. The primary toxicities were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. A North American phase III trial, randomizing patients to docetaxel/cisplatin/fluorouracil or cisplatin/fluorouracil sequentially followed by chemoradiotherapy is being performed to determine whether docetaxel improves the complete response rate, organ preservation rate, and survival of patients treated with induction chemotherapy.

A phase II trial of palliative docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil for squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: A phase II study to determine the response rate and toxicity of docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) every four weeks ('TF'), in patients with incurable SCCHN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or recurrent SCCHN with an ECOG PS < 3 were enrolled in an institutional review board approved trial. Prior induction or adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted provided six months had elapsed. The regimen was docetaxel 70 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2/d x 5 days, days 1-5, as a continuous intravenous infusion, repeated every 28 days. Planned intra-patient dose modifications were based on hematological, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal toxicities. Patients were removed from the study for progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled. Fourty-six cycles of TF were administered. Reasons for discontinuance of TF included: progressive disease, 12 patients; toxicity, 3 patients; concomitant illness, 1 patient; death, 1 patient. The most common toxicities were neutropenia, mucositis, anemia, fatigue, alopecia, pain, diarrhea and nausea. Evaluation of responses to TF showed that there were four patients of seventeen (24%, 95% exact CI: 6.8-49.9) who achieved a PR or CR. Accrual was terminated after interim analysis of the response rate of the first 17 patients failed to exceed 4 of 17. CONCLUSIONS: The response rate to TF in patients with SCCHN was lower than expected. Trials of other regimens should take precedence over further exploration of the TF regimen.

Phase II trial of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as induction for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of a 4-day regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (TPFL4) in patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty previously untreated patients with stage III or IV SCCHN and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group functional status of 2 or less were treated with TPFL4. Postchemotherapy support included prophylactic growth factors and antibiotics. Patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to three cycles of TPFL4 received definitive twice-daily radiation therapy. The primary end points were toxicity and response to TPFL4. RESULTS: Eighty-five cycles were administered to 30 patients. The major acute toxicities to TPFL4 were mucositis and nausea. One patient died of neutropenic sepsis during therapy. Additional major toxicities were neutropenia, anorexia, nephropathy, neuropathy, and diarrhea. Fourteen percent of all cycles were associated with hospitalization for toxicity. The overall clinical response rate to TPFL4 was 93%, with 63% CRs and 30% PRs. Primary tumor site clinical and pathologic response rates were 93% and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSION: TPFL4 has an acceptable toxicity profile in good-performance-status patients. Modification of the 5-day TPFL regimen (TPFL5: shorter chemotherapy infusion time, earlier intervention with growth factors and antibiotics) led to fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalization. Response rates to TPFL justify further evaluation of combinations of these agents in the context of formal clinical trials.

An initial experience using concurrent paclitaxel and radiation in the treatment of head and neck malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Combined modality therapy plays a central role in the management of head and neck malignancies. This study examined the feasibility and preliminary results of treating a group of patients using concurrent bolus paclitaxel (Taxol) and radiation therapy. METHODS: Fourteen patients with a median age of 56 years (range 42-81) were treated. Paclitaxel was given every 3 weeks at a dose of 100 mg/m2 concurrently with external beam radiation. The patients treated included those who had failed to achieve a complete response (CR) to induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (PFL), or who had locally advanced disease not previously treated. RESULTS: Median follow-up from the initiation of treatment is 40 months (range 23-48). The majority of patients (13/14) achieved clinical CRs at the primary site. The development of responses was characterized by a long time course. Three patients who were nonresponders (NRs) to induction PFL chemotherapy were treated. One was a clinical CR at the primary site, one did not achieve a CR, and the other had residual disease in the neck. Four patients have failed, one with local-regional disease, one with a marginal failure, one with distant metastases, and one was not rendered disease-free by the treatment. As expected, significant local toxicity was observed. Most patients were managed with the aid of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Two patients experienced significant moist desquamation and required treatment breaks of greater than 1 week. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel can be given on a 3-week schedule at 100 mg/m2 concurrently with radiation. The preliminary results indicate good local responses and acceptable toxicity. This treatment approach merits further study in the treatment of head and neck malignancies, and should be considered as an option in other sites.

Docetaxel in head and neck cancer: a review.

Docetaxel has been shown to have significant antitumor activity. The mechanism of action is through stabilization of tubulin, arresting cells in the G2M phase of the cell cycle. The maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel is 100 mg/m2 every 21 days. Short-lasting neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity. Other significant toxicities include alopecia, mucositis, fatigue, sensory neuropathy, fluid retention, rash, and hypersensitivity reactions. Phase II studies of docetaxel as a single agent in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have documented response rates of 27% to 43%. Studies of docetaxel combined with cisplatin, and docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) as induction therapy for patients with SCCHN demonstrate that these regimens are highly active. An early trial of induction TPF with leucovorin (TPFL) has yielded an overall response rate of 100% and complete response rate of 61%. In vitro studies have shown docetaxel to be a potent radiation sensitizer for squamous cell carcinoma cell lines, and phase I trials using concurrent docetaxel and radiotherapy are ongoing.

Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I/II trial.

PURPOSE: A phase I/II trial of docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (TPFL5) induction chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three previously untreated patients with stage III or IV SCCHN and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group functional status less than or equal to 2 were treated with TPFL5. Postchemotherapy home support included intravenous fluids, prophylactic antibiotics, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Docetaxel dose was escalated to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Fifteen patients were treated with three cycles of TPFL5 at MTD. Patients who achieved either a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) to three cycles of TPFL5 then received definitive twice-daily radiation therapy. Toxicity and clinical and pathologic response to TPFL5 were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received a total of 69 cycles of TPFL5. The MTD was determined to be docetaxel 60 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia. Additional significant toxicities at MTD were nausea, mucositis, diarrhea, peripheral neuropathy, and sodium-wasting nephropathy. The overall response rate to TPFL5 was 100%, which included 14 of 23 (61%) clinical CRs and nine of 23 (39%) clinical PRs. Primary-site clinical and pathologic CR rates were 19 of 22 (86%) CRs and 20 of 22 (91%) CRs, respectively. Eight patients had less than a CR in the neck to chemotherapy and, therefore, had postradiation neck dissections, four of which were positive for residual tumor. CONCLUSION: TPFL5 is a tolerable induction regimen in patients with good performance status. The DLT is neutropenia with significant mucositis, diarrhea, peripheral neuropathy, and sodium-wasting nephropathy. The high response rates to TPFL5 justify further evaluation of this combination of agents in the context of formal clinical trials.

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: long-term results.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (PFL) induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region (HNCA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred two patients (stage III/IV, previously untreated) were treated with induction PFL. Patients with resectable primary tumor site lesions and clinical complete response (CR) were offered radiotherapy (RT) without surgery to the primary tumor site. Response, toxicity, local-regional therapy, survival, and preservation of the primary tumor site were assessed. RESULTS: Among 279 courses, the overall response rate was 81%. Nineteen (19%) failed to respond, including three who died during therapy. Sixty-seven (69%) of 97 with assessable primary lesions had a clinical CR at the primary tumor site. Pathologic CR was recorded in 46 of 55 (84%) clinical CR patients who had biopsies performed on the primary tumor site. Toxicities resulted in unexpected hospitalizations in 19% of cases. After definitive local-regional therapy, 84 (82%) were disease-free including 71 (69%) with preserved primary tumor site anatomy. With a median follow-up time of 63 months, the cause-specific, overall (OS), and failure-free survival (FFS) rates at 5 years are 58%, 52%, and 51%. Local failure occurred in 29 of 102 (29%) and the local control rate at 5 years was 68%. CONCLUSION: PFL has significant activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced disease who have a good performance status. Preservation of the primary tumor site could be achieved without apparent loss of local control or survival. Management of neck disease by surgery or RT must be individualized and separate from management of primary tumor. Survival compares favorably with similar trials of induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.