Complementary and alternative medicine in HIV care: frequency of consumption, risks and interactions with antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: People living with HIV (PLWH) are common users of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). The main objective of this study was to study the frequency and patterns of CAM natural products use in a large cohort of PLWH and to identify potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and the impact on their antiretroviral treatment (ART) adherence and efficacy. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional multicenter survey including 420 PLWH from different Spanish hospitals. Participants completed a face-to-face questionnaire on CAM consumption and different sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. DDIs between CAM and ART were identified and classified according to the Liverpool University Database and patient factors related to CAM consumption were assessed. RESULTS: 420 participants were included (82.6% male, mean age 47 years); 209 patients (49.8%) were taking at least one CAM. The most consumed CAM were green, black and red tea (n=146, 25.4%), ginger (n=26, 4.5%), fish oil (n=25, 4.4%) and cannabis (n=24, 4.2%). An ART based on integrase inhibitors was the only factor independently associated with CAM consumption (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.26). 50 potential CAM-ART interactions in 43 (20.6%) patients taking CAM were identified, being clinically significant in 80% of the cases. CAM products most frequently involved with a potential significant DDI were supplements containing divalent cations (n=11) and garlic (n=7). No differences in ART efficacy and adherence were observed between patients with and without CAM consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 50% of patients were taking at least one CAM product and its use was associated with an integrase inhibitor based ART. One out of every six patients was at risk of presenting with an interaction between a CAM and their ART, confirming the need to review continuously the use of CAM as part of the medication review process.

Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Refractory Crohn's Disease: Efficacy in a Single-Centre Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HSCT] is considered a therapeutic option for patients with severe Crohn's disease [CD] unresponsive to currently available therapies. METHODS: Autologous HSCT was considered for CD patients with active disease, unresponsive or intolerant to approved medications and unsuitable for surgery. After HSCT, patients were closely followed up every 6 weeks during the first 2 years and every 6 months thereafter up to 5 years. Colonoscopy and/or magnetic resonance imaging were performed at Months 6, 12, 24, and 48 after HSCT. RESULTS: From December 1, 2007 to December 31, 2015, 37 CD patients were assessed for HSCT. Of these, 35 patients [13 within the ASTIC trial] underwent mobilisation. Six patients did not complete the transplant for various reasons and 29 patients were finally transplanted. Patients were followed up during a median of 12 months [6-60]. At 6 months, 70% of patients achieved drug-free clinical remission (Crohn's Disease Index of Severity [CDAI] < 150). The proportion of patients in drug-free remission (CDAI < 150, Simple Endoscopic activity Score [SES]-CD < 7] was 61% at 1 year, 52% at 2 years, 47% at 3 years, 39% at 4 years, and 15% at 5 years. Patients who relapsed were re-treated and 80% regained clinical remission. Six out of the 29 [21%] required surgery. One patient died due to systemic cytomegalovirus infection 2 months after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: HSCT is a salvage therapy for patients with extensive and refractory CD. Although relapse occurs in a majority of patients within 5 years after transplant, drug responsiveness is regained and clinical remission achieved in 80% of cases.

Improving safety of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment of refractory Crohn's disease (CD). DESIGN: In this prospective study, patients with refractory CD suffering an aggressive disease course despite medical treatment, impaired quality of life and in whom surgery was not an acceptable option underwent HSCT. Toxicity and complications during the procedure and within the first year following transplantation were evaluated, along with the impact of the introduction of supportive measures on safety outcomes. RESULTS: 26 patients were enrolled. During mobilisation, 16 patients (62%) presented febrile neutropaenia, including one bacteraemia and two septic shocks. Neutropaenia median time after mobilisation was 5 days. 5 patients withdrew from the study after mobilisation and 21 patients entered the conditioning phase. Haematopoietic recovery median time for neutrophils (>0.5×10(9)/L) was 11 days and for platelets (>20×10(9)/L) 4 days. Twenty patients (95%) suffered febrile neutropaenia and three patients (27%) presented worsening of the perianal CD activity during conditioning. Among non-infectious complications, 6 patients (28.5%) presented antithymocyte globulin reaction, 12 patients (57%) developed mucositis and 2 patients (9.5%) had haemorrhagic complications. Changes in supportive measures over the study, particularly antibiotic prophylaxis regimes during mobilisation and conditioning, markedly diminished the incidence of severe complications. During the first 12-month follow-up, viral infections were the most commonly observed complications, and one patient died due to systemic cytomegalovirus infection. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous HSCT for patients with refractory CD is feasible, but extraordinary supportive measures need to be implemented. We suggest that this procedure should only be performed in highly experienced centres.