Reinforcement enhancement by nicotine in adult rats: behavioral selectivity and relation to mode of delivery and blood nicotine levels.

RATIONALE: Reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine occur in human subjects and laboratory rats. However, the doses used in animal studies typically exceed smoking-associated levels of exposure, and generalized behavioral activation by nicotine can potentially confound data interpretation. METHODS: During daily 60-min sessions, male adult rats pressed an "active" lever to illuminate a brief cue light. Pressing on either the active or inactive lever retracted both levers for 60 s. Nicotine (0.025-0.2 mg/kg) was given either by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion, or spaced IV pulses (3-s or 30-s/pulse), or pre-session subcutaneous (SC) injection. RESULTS: Almost all rats responded preferentially for the cue light for several weeks. After several home-cage nicotine injections, reinforcement enhancement occurred even within the first nicotine test session. Nicotine increased active lever responding without altering inactive lever responding, with effects reliably observed at doses as low as 0.1 mg/kg SC or 0.1 mg/kg/session IV. Within the session, the 0.1 mg/kg dose maximally increased active lever responding by 2-3-fold, coinciding with serum levels of 25 ng/ml. Intravenous nicotine (tested at 0.1 mg/kg/60-min session) was equally effective whether delivered by continuous infusion or in a series of equally spaced 0.003 mg/kg pulses each of 3-s or 30-s duration. CONCLUSIONS: Low doses of nicotine can potentiate responding for a primary sensory reinforcer without producing a generalized increase in lever pressing. Reinforcer enhancement by nicotine generalized to several modes of drug delivery, appeared to track circulating levels of drug, and occurred even at serum levels within the daytime range of moderate cigarette smokers.

Enhancement of a visual reinforcer by D-amphetamine and nicotine in adult rats: relation to habituation and food restriction.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Nicotine and D-amphetamine can strengthen reinforcing effects of unconditioned visual stimuli. We investigated whether these reinforcement-enhancing effects reflect a slowing of stimulus habituation and depend on food restriction. METHODS: Adult male rats pressed an active lever to illuminate a cue light during daily 60-min sessions. Depending on the experiment, rats were challenged with fixed or varying doses of D-amphetamine (0.25-2 mg/kg IP) and nicotine (0.025-0.2 mg/kg SC) or with the tobacco constituent norharman (0.03-10 µg/kg IV). Experiment 1 tested for possible reinforcement-enhancing effects of D-amphetamine and norharman. Experiment 2 investigated whether nicotine and amphetamine inhibited the spontaneous within-session decline in lever pressing. Experiment 3 assessed the effects of food restriction. RESULTS: Amphetamine (0.25-1 mg/kg) and nicotine (0.1 mg/kg) increased active lever pressing specifically (two- to threefold increase). The highest doses of nicotine and amphetamine also affected inactive lever responding (increase and decrease, respectively). With the visual reinforcer omitted, responding was largely extinguished. Neither drug appeared to slow habituation, as assessed by the within-session decline in lever pressing, and reinforcement-enhancing effects still occurred if the drugs were given after this decline had occurred. Food restriction enhanced the reinforcement-enhancing effect of amphetamine but not that of nicotine. CONCLUSIONS: Responding remained goal-directed after several weeks of testing. Low doses of D-amphetamine and nicotine produced reinforcement enhancement even in free-feeding subjects, independent of the spontaneous within-session decline in responding. Reinforcement enhancement by amphetamine, but not nicotine, was enhanced by concurrent subchronic food restriction.

Lack of effect of dopaminergic denervation on caudate-putamen hyperthermia or hypothermia induced by drugs and mild stressors.

A number of drugs and psychological stressors induce brain hyperthermia and increase extracellular dopamine in the caudate-putamen. The present study tested whether caudate-putamen hyperthermia produced by such stimuli is dependent on dopaminergic transmission. Rats were infused with 6-hydroxydopamine unilaterally into the medial forebrain bundle, and after a two-week recovery period, removable thermocouples were used to monitor temperature in the depleted and intact caudate-putamen in freely-moving animals. The indirect dopamine agonist d-amphetamine (1 and 2mg/kg s.c.) increased caudate-putamen temperature, whereas a low dose of the direct agonist apomorphine (0.1mg/kg s.c.) reduced it. Gamma-butyrolactone, which strongly inhibits dopamine release at the dose administered (700mg/kg i.p.), initially reduced and then increased caudate-putamen temperature. Brief (5-10min) presentation of mild stressors, including tail pinch, produced a rapid and transient caudate-putamen hyperthermia. Quantitative (125)I-RTI-55 autoradiography in post-mortem tissue revealed a 97-100% loss of binding to dopamine transporters in the lesioned caudate-putamen. Despite this near-total dopamine denervation, neither basal caudate-putamen temperature, nor any of the observed temperature responses to drugs or mild stressors, was altered. We conclude that in the caudate-putamen, endogenous dopamine is unlikely to modulate temperature significantly at a local level.