Impact of social vulnerability index on patients with alcohol-related liver disease.

INTRODUCTION: Alcohol related liver disease (ALD) affects diverse communities with individual and social characteristics that can impact outcomes. The social vulnerability index (SVI) assigns a score between 0 and 1, where higher scores represent an increased risk of social vulnerability. We sought to assess the impact of SVI on outcomes of patients hospitalized with ALD with access to social support services. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Hospitalizations for ALD at our institution between March and August 2019 were reviewed. All patients were assigned an SVI score based on their residential census tract. Per our standard practice, patients were screened by care coordinators to identify needs for rehabilitation counseling, and care coordination after discharge. Demographics, hepatic decompensation, critical care needs, readmission, and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Among 73 patients admitted for alcoholic hepatitis, 32 had a low SVI and 42 had a high SVI. African American patients were more likely to have a higher SVI (35% vs 0%, p=<0.001). No significant difference in outcomes based on SVI was noted. There were 393 patients admitted for alcoholic cirrhosis including 166 with a low SVI and 227 with a high SVI. Patients that were African American (23.6% vs 5.5%, p=<0.001) or disabled (41.4% vs 29.5%, p = 0.008) had a higher SVI. No significant difference in outcomes based on SVI was noted. CONCLUSION: Most patients admitted for ALD had a high SVI; however, SVI did not impact hospitalization outcomes.

Disparities in outcomes and access to therapy options in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) disproportionately impacts racial and ethnic minorities and patients with lower socioeconomic status. These social determinants of health (SDH) lead to disparities in access to care and outcomes. We aim to understand the relationship between SDH and survival and locoregional treatment options in HCC. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we evaluated survival and access locoregional treatments including non-transplant surgery, liver transplant (LT), and liver-directed radiation therapy (LDRT) in patients with HCC diagnosed between 2004 and 2017. Variables including clinical stage, age, sex, race, income, rurality, year of diagnosis, facility type (FT), Charlson-Deyo score (CD), and insurance were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards multivariable regression and dominance analyses were used for analyses. RESULTS: In total, 140 340 patients were included. Worse survival was seen with advanced stage, older age, Black race, rurality, public insurance, treatment at a nonacademic center, and lower income. The top predictors for survival included stage, age, and income. Completion of non-transplant surgery was best predicted by stage, FT, and insurance type, whereas LT was predicted by age, year of diagnosis, and CD score. LDRT utilization was most associated with year of diagnosis, FT, and CD score. CONCLUSION: For patients with HCC, survival was predicted primarily by stage, age, and income. The primary sociodemographic factors associated with access to surgical treatments, in addition to FT, were insurance and income, highlighting the financial burdens of health care. Work is needed to address disparities in access to care, including improved insurance access, addressing financial inequities and financial toxicities of treatments, and equalizing care opportunities in community centers.

Randomized intervention and outpatient follow-up lowers 30-d readmissions for patients with hepatic encephalopathy, decompensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported national 30-d readmission rates of 27% in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC). AIM: To study prospective interventions to reduce early readmissions in DC at our tertiary center. METHODS: Adults with DC admitted July 2019 to December 2020 were enrolled and randomized into the intervention (INT) or standard of care (SOC) arms. Weekly phone calls for a month were completed. In the INT arm, case managers ensured outpatient follow-up, paracentesis, and medication compliance. Thirty-day readmission rates and reasons were compared. RESULTS: Calculated sample size was not achieved due to coronavirus disease 2019; 240 patients were randomized into INT and SOC arms. 30-d readmission rate was 33.75%, 35.83% in the INT vs 31.67% in the SOC arm (P = 0.59). The top reason for 30-d readmission was hepatic encephalopathy (HE, 32.10%). There was a lower rate of 30-d readmissions for HE in the INT (21%) vs SOC arm (45%, P = 0.03). There were fewer 30-d readmissions in patients who attended early outpatient follow-up (n = 17, 23.61% vs n = 55, 76.39%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our 30-d readmission rate was higher than the national rate but reduced by interventions in patients with DC with HE and early outpatient follow-up. Development of interventions to reduce early readmission in patients with DC is needed.

Outcomes of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Cirrhosis: A National Analysis.

GOALS: We sought to evaluate hospital outcomes of cirrhosis patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). BACKGROUND: NVUGIB is common in patients with cirrhosis. However, national outcome studies of these patients are lacking. STUDY: We utilized the 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database to evaluate NVUGIB in patients with cirrhosis, further stratified as no cirrhosis (NC), compensated cirrhosis (CC), or decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes captured diagnoses and interventions. Outcomes included 30-day readmission rates, index admission mortality rates, health care utilization, and predictors of readmission and mortality using multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 13,701 patients with cirrhosis were admitted with NVUGIB. The 30-day readmission rate was 20.8%. Patients with CC were more likely to undergo an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) within 1 calendar day of admission (74.1%) than patients with DC (67.9%) or NC (69.4%). Patients with DC had longer hospitalizations (4.1 d) and higher costs of care ($11,834). The index admission mortality rate was higher in patients with DC (6.2%) than in patients with CC (1.7%, P <0.001) or NC (1.4%, P <0.001). Predictors of 30-day readmission included performing an EGD >1 calendar day from admission (OR: 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.46) and DC (OR: 1.78; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.06). DC was a predictor of index admission mortality (OR: 3.68; 95% CI, 2.67 to 5.05). CONCLUSIONS: NVUGIB among patients with DC is associated with higher readmission rates, mortality rates, and health care utilization compared with patients with CC and NC. Early EGD is a modifiable variable associated with reduced readmission rates. Early identification of high-risk patients and adherence to guidelines may improve clinical outcomes.

The time to advocate for influenza vaccines in patients with cirrhosis is now.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The effect of an influenza infection on patients with cirrhosis remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the rate of influenza hospitalizations, influenza associated complications, and healthcare outcomes in patients with and without cirrhosis. METHODS: Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2005 and 2013, hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of influenza were identified. Patients with cirrhosis were classified as compensated or decompensated based on the Baveno criteria. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate complications of influenza, inpatient mortality and healthcare utilization including length of stay and cost of admission. RESULTS: In total, 236,513 patients with a diagnosis of influenza were admitted during the study period, including 1,553 (0.66%) with cirrhosis. Of those with cirrhosis, 1,176 (75.7%) were compensated and 377 (24.3%) were decompensated. On multivariable analysis, influenza patients with cirrhosis had a higher total cost of admission [$1,030; CI: $710-$1,351] compared to the general population. Influenza patients with decompensated cirrhosis had a longer length of stay [1.92 days; CI:1.63-2.21], higher total cost of admission [$5,005; CI: $4,459-$5,551] and increased rates of influenza complications [OR: 2.56; CI:1.32-4.93] compared to patients with compensated cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cirrhosis have increased healthcare utilization when admitted with influenza compared to the general population. Providers must advocate for patients with cirrhosis to obtain the influenza vaccine.

Call for action: Increased healthcare utilization with growing use of percutaneous cholecystectomy tube over initial cholecystectomy in cirrhotics.

BACKGROUND: Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is frequently seen in cirrhotics, with some being poor candidates for initial cholecystectomy. Instead, these patients may undergo percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) placement. We studied the healthcare utilization and predictors of cholecystectomy and PCT in patients with ACC. METHODS: The National Database was queried to study all cirrhotics and non-cirrhotics with ACC between 2010-2014 who underwent initial PCT (with or without follow-up cholecystectomy) or cholecystectomy. Cirrhotic patients were divided into compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Independent predictors and outcomes of initial PCT and failure to undergo subsequent cholecystectomy were studied. RESULTS: Out of 919 189 patients with ACC, 13 283 (1.4%) had cirrhosis. Among cirrhotics, cholecystectomy was performed in 12 790 (96.3%) and PCT in the remaining 493 (3.7%). PCT was more frequent in cirrhotics (3.7%) than in non-cirrhotics (1.4%). Multivariate analyses showed increased early readmissions [odds ratio (OR) = 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.43-3.13, P < 0.001], length of stay (effect ratio = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.20-1.61, P < 0.001), calendar-year hospital cost (effect ratio = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.28-1.39, P < 0.001) and calendar-year mortality (hazard ratio = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.07-3.29, P = 0.030) in cirrhotics undergoing initial PCT compared to cholecystectomy. Decompensated cirrhosis (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.67-3.03, P < 0.001) had the highest odds of getting initial PCT. Cirrhosis, regardless of compensated (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.90, P = 0.020) or decompensated (OR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14-0.59, P < 0.001), reduced the chances of getting a subsequent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhotic patients undergo fewer cholecystectomy incurring initial PCT instead. Moreover, the rates of follow-up cholecystectomy are lower in cirrhotics. Increased healthcare utilization is seen with initial PCT amongst cirrhotic patients. This situation reflects suboptimal management of ACC in cirrhotics and a call for action.

Apprising the choice of bariatric surgery in patients with compensated cirrhosis with morbid obesity: results of a national analysis.

Bariatric surgery (BS) was proved safe in carefully selected patients with compensated cirrhosis (CC). However, limited data exist on differential impact of bariatric surgery type on clinical outcomes and health care utilization. This retrospective study utilizes the 2010-2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database. We included obese adults with CC who underwent the two most commonly used BS, Roux-en-Y (RYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Those with decompensation within 6 months of BS were excluded. Rates of hepatic decompensation (new-onset ascites, variceal bleed, encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and/or hepatorenal syndrome), surgical complications, health care utilization, and mortality were compared between RYGB and LSG. Multivariable analysis was performed to fit various models. A total of 3032 patients with CC underwent BS, including 1864 (61.5%) RYGB and 1168 (38.5%) LSG. The majority (56%) of BS were performed at large, metropolitan teaching hospitals. There were no significant differences in various decompensations and surgical complications comparing RYGB to LSG. Healthcare utilization including index length of stay (RYGB: 3.4 days vs LSG: 3.0 days), 30-day readmission rate (RYGB: 9.5% vs LSG: 3.7%), and cost of admission (RYGB: $14,006 vs LSG: $12,523) were higher in RYGB (p values < 0.001). Index admission and calendar year mortality could not be analyzed due to the few number of events. Two types of bariatric surgeries in obese patients with compensated cirrhosis have similar rates of decompensated cirrhosis events and surgical complications. However, RYGB procedure incurred increased healthcare utilization. Therefore, LSG may be the preferred BS for patients with CC. Prospective, randomized studies comparing the types of BS are needed to confirm our observations.

Trends and Health Care Outcomes Among Living Liver Donors: Are We Ready to Expand the Donor Pool With Living Liver Donations?

We studied the trends and various outcomes, including the readmission rates, health care utilization, and complications among living liver donors (LLDs) in the United States. We queried the National Database for data from 2010 to 2017 for all LLDs. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmission rates. The secondary outcomes included health care use (length of stay [LOS], cost of care), index admission, and calendar-year mortality. Logistic regression models were fit for various outcomes. A total of 1316 LLDs underwent hepatectomy during the study period. The median donor age was 35.0 years (interquartile range, 27.4-43.6), and donors were predominantly women (54.2%). The trend of LLD surgeries remained stable at large medical centers (85.3%). The 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were low at 5% and 5.9%, respectively. Older age (50 years and older; 8%; confidence interval [CI], 0.6%-15.9%; P = 0.03) and hepatectomy at small to medium-sized hospitals were associated with increased index LOS (13.4%; 95% CI, 3.1%-24.7%; P = 0.01). Moreover, older age of donor (-11.3%; 95% CI, -20.3% to -1.4%; P = 0.03), Elixhauser score ≥3 (17%; 95% CI, 1.2%-35.3%; P = 0.03), and Medicaid insurance (24.5%; 95% CI, 1.2%-53.1%; P = 0.04) were also associated with increased cost. The overall rate of any complications during index admission was 42.8%. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% CI, 1.19-2.23) was an independent predictor of post-LLD complications. There was no index admission or calendar-year mortality reported during the study period. This is the largest national report of LLDs to date, showing that the trend of LLD surgeries is stable in the United States. With established safety, fewer complications, and less health care utilization, LLDs can be a potential source of continuation of liver transplantation in the context of changing liver allocation policies in the United States.

Pregnancy in Liver Transplantation Recipients Is Associated With Increased Complications and Healthcare Utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Given the increased rates of pregnancy in liver transplant recipients, evaluating the safety of pregnancy is crucial. We aim to evaluate pregnancy-related complications and outcomes in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: A retrospective nationwide review comparing pregnancy outcomes in liver transplant recipients vs the general population was performed between 2005 and 2013. Propensity-matched and multivariable regression analyses were performed to study pregnancy- and delivery-related complications in addition to patient and hospital outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 38,449,030 pregnancy-related admissions were evaluated in this study including 1,469 (0.004%) admissions in liver transplant recipients. Liver transplant recipients were more likely to undergo a caesarean delivery (60% vs 36%) and have a pregnancy-related complication (56% vs 27%) including miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, portpartum hemorrhage, hypertension, preeclampsia, and thromboembolism (P < 0.001) compared with the general population. Propensity-weighted analysis revealed higher rates of pregnancy complications (odds ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-2.73), cost ($3,023, 95% CI $850-$5,197), and longer length of stay (1.52 days, 95% CI 0.62-2.41) in transplant recipients. Liver transplant recipients experienced zero inpatient mortalities compared with 0.01% of the general population. Transplant recipients with at least 1 complication had a longer length of stay (2.45 days, 95% CI 1.44-3.45) and higher cost of admission ($5,205, 95% CI $2,848-$7,561) compared with transplant recipients without a complication. DISCUSSION: Pregnancy after liver transplant is associated with higher rates of complications and worse outcomes without an increased risk of mortality.

Outcomes of hepatitis C virus seropositive donors to hepatitis C virus seronegative liver recipients: A large single center analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The success of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has transformed the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and has led to the expansion of the deceased donor organ pool for liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a single center retrospective review of liver transplantations performed on HCV-seronegative recipients from HCV-seropositive organs from 11/2017 to 05/2020. HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) was performed on HCV-seropositive donors to assess active HCV infection. RESULTS: 42 HCV-seronegative recipients underwent a liver transplant from a HCV-seropositive donor, including 21 NAT negative (20 liver, 1 simultaneous liver kidney transplant) and 21 NAT positive liver transplants. Two (9.5%) HCV antibody positive/NAT negative recipients developed HCV viremia and achieved sustained virologic response with DAA therapy. The remaining patients with available data (19 patients) remained polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative at 6 months. 20 (95%) of HCV antibody positive/NAT positive recipients had a confirmed HCV viremia. 100% of patients with available data (15 patients) achieved SVR. Observed events include 1 mortality and graft loss and equivalent rates of post-transplant complications between NAT positive and NAT negative recipients. CONCLUSIONS: HCV-seropositive organs can be safely transplanted into HCV-seronegative patients with minimal complications post-transplant.

Cannabis use may reduce healthcare utilization and improve hospital outcomes in patients with cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies reveal conflicting data on the effect of cannabis use in patients with cirrhosis. This research evaluates the impact of cannabis on hepatic decompensation, health care utilization, and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the State Inpatient Database (SID) was performed evaluating patients from Colorado and Washington in 2011 to represent pre-cannabis legalization and 2015 to represent post-cannabis legalization. Multivariable analysis was performed to study the impact of cannabis on the rate of admissions with hepatic decompensations, healthcare utilization, and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. RESULTS: Cannabis use was detected in 370 (2.1%) of 17,520 cirrhotics admitted in 2011 and in 1162 (5.3%) of 21,917 cirrhotics in 2015 (p-value <0.001). On multivariable analysis, cirrhotics utilizing cannabis after its legalization experienced a decreased rate of admissions related to hepatorenal syndrome (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.51; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.34-0.78) and ascites (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.63-0.84). Cirrhotics with an etiology of disease other than alcohol and hepatitis C had a higher risk of admission for hepatic encephalopathy if they utilized cannabis [OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.16-2.13]. Decreased length of stay (-1.15 days; 95% CI: -1.62, -0.68), total charges (-$15,852; 95% CI: -$21,009, -$10,694), and inpatient mortality (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51-0.91) were also observed in cirrhotics utilizing cannabis after legalization compared to cirrhotics not utilizing cannabis or utilizing cannabis prior to legalization. CONCLUSION: Cannabis use in patients with cirrhosis resulted in mixed outcomes regarding hospital admissions with hepatic decompensation. A trend towards decreased hospital utilization and mortality was noted in cannabis users after legalization. These observations need to be confirmed with a longitudinal randomized study.

Thirty-day readmission rates, trends and its impact on liver transplantation recipients: a national analysis.

Reduction of early hospital readmissions is a declared goal in the United States economic and quality improvement agenda. A retrospective study was performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014. Our primary aim was to study the rate of early readmissions and its predictors in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). Our secondary aims were to determine the trends of LT, reasons for readmission, costs and predictors of calendar year mortality. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized. The 30-day readmission rate was 30.6% among a total of 25,054 LTRs. Trends of LT were observed to be increased in patients > 65 years (11.7-17.8%, p < 0.001) and decreased in 40-64 years (78.0-73.5%, p = 0.001) during study period. The majority of 30-day readmissions were due to post transplant complications, with packed red blood cell transfusions being the most common intervention during readmission. Medicaid or Medicare insurance, surgery at low and medium volume centers, infections, hemodialysis, liver biopsy, and length of stay > 10 days were the predictors of 30-day readmission. Moreover, number of early readmission, age > 64 years, non-alcoholic cirrhosis, and length of stay > 10 days were significant predictor of calendar year mortality in LTRs. Approximately one third of patients require early admission after LT. Early readmission not only increases burden on healthcare, but is also associated with calendar year mortality. Strategies should be implemented to reduce readmission in patients with high risk of readmission identified in our study.

Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Cirrhosis: Careful Patient and Surgery-Type Selection Is Key to Improving Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Previous reports suggest an increased mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing bariatric surgery (BS). With advancements in management of BS, we aim to study the trends, outcomes, and their predictors in patients with cirrhosis undergoing BS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the National Database from 2008 to 2013. Outcomes of BS in patients with cirrhosis were studied. In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost of care were compared between patients with no cirrhosis (NC), compensated cirrhosis (CC), and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to study the predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Of the 558,017 admissions of patients who underwent BS during the study period, 3086 (0.55%) had CC and 103 (0.02%) had DC. An upward trend of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) utilization was seen during the study period. On multivariate analysis, mortality in CC was comparable with those in NC (aOR 1.88; CI 0.65-5.46); however, it was higher in DC (aOR 83.8; CI 19.3-363.8). Other predictors of mortality were older age (aOR 1.06; CI 1.04-1.08), male (aOR 2.59; CI 1.76-3.81), Medicare insurance (aOR 1.93; CI 1.24-3.01), lower income (aORs 0.44 to 0.55 for 2nd to 4th income quartile vs. 1st quartile), > 3 Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (aOR 5.30; CI 3.45-8.15), undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as opposed to VSG (aOR 3.90; CI 1.79-8.48), and centers performing < 50 BS per year (aOR 5.25; CI 3.38-8.15). Length of stay and hospital cost were also significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis as compared with those with NC. CONCLUSION: Patients with compensated cirrhosis can be considered for bariatric surgery. However, careful selection of patients, procedure type, and volume of surgical center is integral in improving outcomes and healthcare utilization in patients with cirrhosis undergoing BS.

Management of hepatic hydrothorax and effect on length of stay, mortality, cost, and 30-day hospital readmission.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cirrhosis-related complications are associated with high inpatient mortality, cost, and length of stay. There is a lack of multi-centered studies on interventions for hepatic hydrothorax and its impact on patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of performing thoracentesis for hepatic hydrothorax on hospital length of stay, mortality, cost, and 30-day readmission. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2002 and 2013 and Nationwide Readmission Database during 2013 was performed including patients with a primary diagnosis of hydrothorax or pleural effusion and a secondary diagnosis of cirrhosis based on International Classification of Disease 9 codes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effect of thoracentesis on patient outcomes during their hospital stay. RESULTS: Of the 37 443 patients included from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 26 889 (72%) patients underwent thoracentesis. Thoracentesis was associated with a longer length of stay (4.56 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.40-6.72) and higher total cost ($9449, 95% CI: 3706-15 191). There was no significant difference in inpatient mortality between patients who underwent thoracentesis compared with those who did not. Of the 2371 patients included from the Nationwide Readmission Database, 870 (33%) were readmitted within 30 days. Thoracentesis was not a predictor of readmission; however, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (odds ratio: 4.89, 95% CI: 1.17-20.39) and length of stay (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.001-1.05) on index admission were predictors of readmission. CONCLUSION: When considering treatment for hepatic hydrothorax, many factors should contribute to determining the best intervention. While performing thoracentesis may provide immediate relief to symptomatic patients, it should not be considered a long-term intervention given that it increases hospital cost, was associated with longer length of stays, and did not improve mortality.

Liver Cancer-Specific Serine Protease Inhibitor Kazal Is a Potentially Novel Biomarker for the Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Liver cancer-secreted serine protease inhibitor Kazal (LC-SPIK) is a protein that is specifically elevated in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We assessed the performance of LC-SPIK in detecting HCC, including its early stages, in patients with cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: We enrolled 488 patients, including 164 HCC patients (81 early HCC) and 324 controls in a blinded, prospective, case-control study. Serum LC-SPIK levels were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based assay. The performance of serum LC-SPIK and α-fetoprotein (AFP), including area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity, are compared. The performance of LC-SPIK was evaluated in an independent validation cohort with 102 patients. RESULTS: In distinguishing all HCC patients from those with cirrhosis and chronic HBV/HCV, LC-SPIK had an AUC of 0.87, with 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity using a cutoff of 21.5 ng/mL. This is significantly higher than AFP, which had an AUC of 0.70 and 52% sensitivity and 86% specificity using a standard cutoff value of 20.0 ng/mL. For early-stage HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0 and A), LC-SPIK had an AUC of 0.85, with 72% sensitivity and 90% specificity, compared with AFP, which had an AUC of 0.61, with 42% sensitivity and 86% specificity. In addition, LC-SPIK accurately detected the presence of HCC in more than 70% of HCC patients with false-negative AFP results. DISCUSSION: The study provided strong evidence that LC-SPIK detects HCC, including early-stage HCC, with high sensitivity and specificity, and might be useful for surveillance in cirrhotic and chronic HBV/HCV patients, who are at an elevated risk of developing HCC.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy worldwide and a major cause of cancer-related mortality for which liver resection is an important curative-intent treatment option. However, many patients present with advanced disease and with underlying chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis, limiting the proportion of patients who are surgical candidates. In addition, the development of recurrent or de novo cancers following surgical resection is common. These issues have led investigators to evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies aimed at improving resectability rates and decreasing recurrence rates. While high-level evidence to guide treatment decision making is lacking, recent advances in locoregional and systemic therapies, including antiviral treatment and immunotherapy, raise the prospect of novel approaches that may improve the outcomes of patients with HCC. In this review, we evaluate the evidence for various neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and discuss opportunities for future clinical and translational research.

Insurance status impacts treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Previous studies have identified treatment disparities in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on insurance status and provider. Recent studies have shown more Americans have healthcare insurance; therefore we aim to determine if treatment disparities based on insurance providers continue to exist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective database analysis using the NIS was performed between 2010 and 2013 including adult patients with a primary diagnosis of HCC determined by ICD-9 codes. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to analyze differences in treatment, mortality, features of decompensation, and metastatic disease based on the patient's primary payer. RESULTS: This study included 62,368 patients. Medicare represented 44% of the total patients followed by private insurance (27%), Medicaid (19%), and other payers (10%). Patients with Medicare, Medicaid, and other payer were less likely to undergo liver transplantation [(OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.84), (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15-0.33), (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.45)] and surgical resection [(OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87), (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32-0.51), (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.32-0.54)] than patients with private insurance. Medicaid patients were less likely to undergo ablation then patients with private insurance (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.68). Patients with other forms of insurance were less likely to undergo transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) compared to private insurance (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.96). CONCLUSION: Insurance status impacts treatment for HCC. Patients with private insurance are more likely to undergo curative therapies of liver transplantation and surgical resection compared to patients with government funded insurance.

A validated risk model for prediction of early readmission in patients with hepatic encephalopathy.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication in cirrhotics and is associated with an increased healthcare burden. Our aim was to study independent predictors of 30-day readmission and develop a readmission risk model in patients with HE. Secondary aims included studying readmission rates, cost, and the impact of readmission on mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized the 2013 Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) for hospitalized patients with HE. A risk assessment model based on index hospitalization variables for predicting 30-day readmission was developed using multivariate logistic regression and validated with the 2014 NRD. Patients were stratified into Low Risk and High Risk groups. Cox regression models were fit to identify predictors of calendar-year mortality. RESULTS: Of 24,473 cirrhosis patients hospitalized with HE, 32.4% were readmitted within 30 days. Predictors of readmission included presence of ascites (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06-1.33), receiving paracentesis (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.26-1.62) and acute kidney injury (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.00-1.22). Our validated model stratified patients into Low Risk and High Risk of 30-day readmissions (29% and 40%, respectively). The cost of the first readmission was higher than index admission in the 30-day readmission cohort ($14,198 vs. $10,386; p-value <0.001). Thirty-day readmission was the strongest predictor of calendar-year mortality (HR: 4.03; 95% CI: 3.49-4.65). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of patients with HE were readmitted within 30 days, and early readmission adversely impacted healthcare utilization and calendar-year mortality. With our proposed simple risk assessment model, patients at high risk for early readmissions can be identified to potentially avert poor outcomes.