Once-a-day administration of everolimus, cyclosporine, and steroid after renal transplantation: a review of the rationale.

The Evidence study (EVerolImus once-a-Day rEgimen with Neoral versus Corticosteroid Elimination) sought to compare once-a-day administration with steroid withdrawal versus twice-daily administration among de novo kidney transplant recipients treated with everolimus, cyclosporine, and steroids. This article describes the study design and rationale of once-daily administration and steroid withdrawal among recipients of de novo kidney transplants treated with everolimus and cyclosporine.

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil dose posttransplantation on 12-month renal function: analysis of the MOST database.

INTRODUCTION: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has greatly reduced the risk of acute rejection episodes (ARE) after renal transplantation, but dose reductions/withdrawals could jeopardize long-term results. METHODS: The MOST database of "de novo" patients treated with MMF at month 1 and functioning grafts at month 12 were divided into 2 groups: groups 1, 2 g MMF at month 1 and month 12; and group 2, 2 g MMF at month 1 but MMF <2 g at month 12 to evaluate renal function glonerular filtration rate (GFR). RESULTS: In this study, 1136 patients were receiving 2 g MMF at month 1. On month 12, 645 were on 2 g (56.8%, group 1) and 431 were on <2 g (43.2%, group 2). Group 1 included younger recipients of younger donors with fewer patients with delayed graft function (DGF). Group 1 showed more ARE during month 1 and more patients who received induction. Mean Neoral daily doses at month 1/month 12 were 5.3/3.0 and 5.3/3.1 mg/kg in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P = .05 at month 12). GFR in group 1 and group 2 were 59.06 (CI 57.10-60.60) and 53.81 (CI 52-55.7) at month 1 (P < .001); 63.7 (CI 62.1-65.30) and 55.9 (CI 54.1-57.7) mL/min*1.73 m(2) at month 12 (P < .001). The mean increases in GFR between month 1 and month 12 were 4.64 and 1.94 mL/min*1.73 m(2), respectively (P < .05). A multivariate analysis also included 795 patients from the "maintenance" patient database with retrospective detailed information. The following parameters were highly predictive for good renal function at month 12: donor age younger than 60 years, recipient age younger than 60 years, immediate graft function, 12-month MMF dose = 2 g, absence of CMV infection, and 12-month Neoral dose <3 mg/kg/d. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance of MMF dose at 2 g/d during the first year appears to facilitate the attainment of optimal renal function at 12-months after kidney transplantation.

Experience with cyclosporine.

Six hundred thirty-eight cadaveric kidney transplant patients between 1983 and 2001 were treated with cyclosporine (CsA) for 87 +/- 58 months. Among 571 patients with follow-up greater than 12 months, the 15-year renal function was investigated to assess the probability of a >30% increase in serum creatinine (sCr) above the month-6 value (baseline) and the impact on graft survival. At 15 years, patient and graft survival rates were 82.7% and 56.1%, respectively, with a 19.5-year half-life (censored for deaths). The main causes of graft loss were chronic rejection (33.0%) and patient death (24%). Cardiovascular disease and neoplasms were the main causes of death. Renal function remained stable in 266 patients (46.6%) with excellent sCr values observed even after a 15-year treatment period. An increased sCr was observed in 305 patients (53.4%) with a 15-year probability of 74%. In 178 patients (59.3%) it was self-limited; their grafts are still functioning well. One hundred three patients (32.8%) lost their graft which was more likely when the sCr had increased >45%. Twenty-four patients (7.9%) died with a functioning graft. Multivariate analysis showed the progression of graft deterioration to be related to proteinuria (P<.0001), a late acute rejection episode (P<.002), or the extent of sCr increase (P<.008). In conclusion, the long-term use of CsA has allowed us to achieve excellent long-term patient and transplant survival rates. Our data indicate a high 15-year probability of an increased sCr, but the rate of progression is slow.

The risk of coronary artery disease after heart transplantation is increased in patients receiving low-dose cyclosporine, regardless of blood cyclosporine levels.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) of allografted hearts is the main cause of late mortality after cardiac transplant, but its etiology is still undetermined. HYPOTHESIS: This study was undertaken to evaluate the relevance of several risk factors, including cyclosporine (CsA) dose and blood CsA levels, to the incidence of CAD. METHODS: In 163 heart transplants performed between November 1985 and August 1994 at our Institution, CAD was diagnosed by coronary angiography or at postmortem examination. Patients in whom postmortem examination or coronary angiography was not performed, as well as those < 15 years of age and those who died within 1 month of surgery, were excluded from the study. The following risk factors were analyzed: recipient age, gender, pretransplant diagnosis, donor age, number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-AB mismatches, cytomegalovirus serology, mear serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels, the number of treated acute rejections, mean weighted CsA dose (CsA dosew and weighted blood CsA levels (blood CsA levelw). RESULTS: Coronary artery disease was diagnosed in 32 patients (19.6%). A low mean CsA dosew was the only significant predictor for CAD at multivariate analysis (p < 0.01): there was no correlation with blood CsA levelw. In the patients receiving a CsA dosew > 4 mg/kg/day, the 8.9 year probability of their remaining CAD free was 69% [confidence interval (CI) 50-87%] in comparison with 31% (CI 0-65%) in patients receiving a CsA dosew < 4 mg/kg/day. CONCLUSION: In our experience, a low CsA maintenance dose is the main risk factor for CAD, irrespective of blood CsA levels.

A randomized study comparing three cyclosporine-based regimens in cadaveric renal transplantation. Italian Multicentre Study Group for Renal Transplantation (SIMTRe).

Whether it is better to treat renal transplant patients with cyclosporine alone, combined with steroids, or combined with steroids and azathioprine is still unclear. After initial therapy with cyclosporine and steroids, 354 cadaver renal transplant recipients were randomly assigned at the post-transplant day 5 to cyclosporine alone (monotherapy), cyclosporine plus steroids (double therapy), or cyclosporine plus steroids plus azathioprine (triple therapy). Monotherapy patients, after a second acute rejection, were switched to either of the two alternative therapies. According to intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the 4-year patient survival was 97% in monotherapy, 91% in double therapy, and 96% in triple therapy; the graft survival including death was 84%, 77%, and 88%, respectively; and the pure graft survival was 87%, 85% and 91%, respectively (P = not significant). Acute rejections were diagnosed in 79 patients in monotherapy, 58 in double therapy, and 59 in triple therapy (P < 0.01). Of the patients on monotherapy, 52% were switched to double or triple therapy. In these patients, the 4-year graft survival including death was 68%, and the pure graft survival was 72%, in comparison with 93% and 94%, respectively, for patients who continued on cyclosporine alone. Patients with renal polycystic disease as a cause of renal failure and with low plasma creatinine at the time of randomization (5 days after transplant) had a higher probability of remaining on monotherapy, wherease those with glomerulonephritis or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and with high plasma creatinine levels at randomization had a higher probability of being switched to double or triple therapy. According to ITT analysis, there were fewer ocular (P < 0.0001), osteomuscular (P < 0.002) and cardiovascular complications (P = 0.05) and fewer patients with hypercholesterolemia (P < 0.0028) in the monotherapy group, with no difference between double and triple therapy. Creatinine clearance at 3 years was lower in monotherapy, but no attrition of renal function was seen over the years in any of the groups. Cyclosporine, however used, provided good results in cadaveric renal transplantation. Triple therapy and monotherapy offered a nonsignificantly better patient and graft survival than double therapy. Patients on monotherapy had a higher risk of acute rejection but had fewer adverse events than those on double or triple therapy. Patients maintained on cyclosporine alone had the best graft survival, whereas those who were assigned to monotherapy and had to add steroids because of multiple rejections had the worst outcome. Therefore, it seems reasonable to limit the choice of monotherapy to patients without immune-mediated renal diseases and with good graft function in the early post-transplant period.

Randomized study with cyclosporine in kidney transplantation: 10-year follow-up.

This study presents the 10-yr follow-up results of a multicenter controlled trial on 108 recipients of cadaveric renal transplantation, randomized to receive cyclosporine (N = 55) or azathioprine (N = 53), both in combination with steroids. The 10-yr patient survival rate was 89% in the cyclosporine group and 83% in the azathioprine group (P = not significant [NS]); the 10-yr graft survival was 56% and 35%, respectively (log-rank test, P = 0.009). The half-life of grafts functioning after 1 yr was 15.4 +/- 3.9 versus 10.6 +/- 3.6, P = NS). The rate of early rejection in the cyclosporine group was significantly lower than that in the azathioprine group (0.30 versus 1.4, P < 0.01). Although the mean creatinine clearance rate was always higher in the azathioprine group, the decline in graft function from the first to the tenth yr was not significantly different between the two groups (-13.0 +/- 16.4 versus -12.3 +/- 19 mL/min, P = NS). In cadaveric renal transplantation, cyclosporine allows better graft survival than azathioprine, not only in the short term but also in the long term, with similar attrition of graft function for up to 10 yr.

Effects of granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on expression of adhesion molecules and production of cytokines in blood monocytes and ovarian cancer-associated macrophages.

The present study was aimed at characterizing the effects of in vitro exposure to GM-CSF on blood monocytes and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) in human ovarian cancer. Purified populations of TAM from ovarian cancer patients were studied in terms of expression of surface molecules, cytokine production and tumor cytotoxicity after overnight incubation with GM-CSF or IFN gamma and LPS, used as reference activators. GM-CSF augmented the surface expression of ICAM-I and CD18 in TAM and in blood monocytes. Stimulation was more prominent in monocytes than in TAM, which showed higher baseline expression of this adhesion molecule. ICAM-3 was not influenced by GM-CSF or by IFN gamma/LPS. GM-CSF-augmented ICAM-I expression was associated with higher levels of mRNA transcripts. The protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide super-induced basal and GM-CSF-induced ICAM-I transcripts, thus excluding a role for secondary polypeptide mediators. In the absence of stimuli, TAM produced higher levels, compared to monocytes, of IL-6 and IL-8 but not of IL-1 and TNF. GM-CSF augmented the production of IL-6 and IL-8 (but not that of IL-1 and TNF) in TAM, whereas it had little effect on blood monocyte. Tumoricidal activity was tested against two ovarian tumor cell lines (OVCAR3 and SW626). GM-CSF more prominently augmented monocyte cytotoxicity, while only 2 of 6 TAM preparations were stimulated by GM-CSF. These results suggest that GM-CSF selectively regulates the function of blood monocytes and TAM, the effect of this cytokine varying with the parameter and cell population examined. These data provide a rational and biological endpoint for further studies with GM-CSF as an activator of mononuclear phagocyte function in ovarian cancer.

Immunoprophylaxis in "septic risk" patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Results of a randomized, multicenter clinical trial.

The results of a randomized, multicenter clinical trial of immunoprophylaxis of post-operative infections with intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIG) (Sandoglobulin) in "septic-risk" patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer are presented. "Septic-risk" patients were selected by an original multiparametric test based on delayed hypersensitivity skin testing and serum protein electrophoretic sub-fractions. This screening test had shown 76% positive predictivity in a previous validation assessment. In the present study, 159 "septic-risk" patients were selected prospectively from 369 patients undergoing colo-rectal (colon) and other kinds of gastrointestinal (non-colon) oncologic surgery: 80 "septic-risk" patients were included in the colon and 79 in the non-colon group. Immunoprophylaxis with IVIG (15 g on the day prior to operation, on the 1st and 5th postoperative days) was randomly associated with antibiotic prophylaxis (cefoxitin: 2 g one hour prior to, followed by 2 g at the end of operation plus 2 g every six hours for 24 hours) in colon surgery while the prophylactic schedule in non-colon surgery was only based on random administration of IVIG, at the same dosage as in the colon group. There was a clear-cut reduction of post-operative infections both in colon and non-colon "septic-risk" patients who had IVIG prophylaxis; in the colon group, 37 and 21 infections (P < 0.004) in antibiotic (A) versus IVIG plus antibiotic (IVIG + A) subset, respectively; in the non-colon group, 33 and 19 infections (P < 0.01) in control (C) versus (IVIG) subset, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prophylaxis of infection with intravenous immunoglobulins plus antibiotic for patients at risk for sepsis undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The results of a randomized, multicenter clinical trial with perioperative short-term antibiotic plus intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG + A) versus antibiotic alone (A) for prevention of postoperative infections in patients at risk for sepsis undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer are presented. METHODS: The patients at risk for sepsis were selected by an original multiparametric test based on delayed-hypersensitivity skin testing and serum protein electrophoretic subfractions. This screening had shown 76% positive predictability in a previous validation assessment. Eighty patients at risk for sepsis were selected prospectively from 210 patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer; 43 patients were randomly assigned to the IVIG + A group and 37 to the A group. IVIG was administered on the day before operation, on the first and fifth postoperative days. RESULTS: There was a clear-cut reduction of postoperative infections in the IVIG + A group: 21 infections in 20 patients versus 37 infections in 29 patients in the A group (p less than 0.004). With regard to serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G monitoring, basal IgG levels were significantly lower in patients given IVIG + A who had postsurgical infections (p less than 0.005) compared with patients with a regular outcome, whereas the same was not true in the A group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: A significant decrease (p less than 0.001) of postoperative IgG was evidenced in the A group of patients who had infections as opposed to a significant increase (p less than 0.001) of postoperative IgG in IVIG + A patients with a normal outcome.

The Milan clinical trial with cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. A three-year follow-up.

Between February and November 1983, 108 recipients of cadaveric renal transplants entered a randomized multicenter trial and were treated either with cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone (n = 55) or with conventional treatment based on azathioprine (Aza) and glucocorticoids (n = 53). The graft survival probability at 3 years was 76% for CsA patients and 48% for Aza patients (P less than 0.001). The cumulative number of acute rejections was significantly lower in the CsA group (32 vs. 104, P less than 0.001). Incidence of early posttransplant anuria was similar in both groups and did not affect renal function after three years. Nephrotoxicity in CsA patients, when present, was handled by reducing the dose of CsA, but in 12/55 patients a change to conventional therapy was thought to be necessary. However, in this group of 12, one patient lost the allograft because of irreversible rejection and one patient died 14 months later because of an infection. Mean creatinine clearance after three years was significantly lower in the CsA patients (54.7 +/- 2.6 ml/min) than in Aza patients, (67.2 +/- 4.9 ml/min, P less than 0.05). Considering only patients with grafts functioning after three years and still on the original randomized therapy, the mean creatinine clearance was similarly and significantly decreased from 1 to 3 years in both groups. There were no significant differences in occurrence of severe infections. Side effects such as hypertension, hypertrichosis, tremor and gum hyperplasia were more frequent in CsA patients.

Intravenous immunoglobulins in association with antibiotics: a therapeutic trial in septic intensive care unit patients.

The therapeutic use of iv immunoglobulins of the G class in association with antibiotics in patients with severe sepsis is reported. As compared to the randomized control group of patients treated with antibiotics alone, patient survival was only slightly improved (from 25% to 42%; NS); however, the defervescence time was significantly shorter (10 vs. 16 days), and a greater percentage of microbiologically positive cultures became negative (40% vs. 8%; p less than .01). The percentage of days on antibiotic treatment during ICU hospitalization was consequently reduced (38% vs. 95%; p less than .01). The therapeutic use of iv immunoglobulin G is discussed in terms of antibody substitution and modulation of the immune system.

Cyclosporin A in marrow transplantation for leukemia and aplastic anemia.

A total of 29 consecutive patients with leukemia or aplastic anemia who received an HLA-identical marrow graft were given cyclosporin A (CyA) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). These patients were compared with an historic group of 25 similar patients with leukemia or AA given methotrexate (MTX) for GvHD prophylaxis at this institution. Engraftment was faster in patients given CyA when compared with MTX patients, with less days of granulocytopenia (P = 0.04), a shorter interval before reaching a platelet count of 70 X 10(9)/l (P = 0.04), fewer major infections (P = 0.01), and fewer days on intravenous antibiotics (P = 0.02). There were no graft failures in CyA patients compared with four of 25 in MTX patients (P = 0.01). Early mortality was lower in CyA patients but not significantly (P = 0.06). The incidence of pulmonary complications was comparable, five of 29 and seven of 25 in CyA and MTX patients, respectively, but the clinical features of such complications differed. Interstitial pneumonia developing after day 30 was seen in MTX patients, whereas an acute respiratory distress syndrome developing between day +8 and day +18 was seen in CyA patients. Acute GvHD was less severe in CyA patients (P = 0.04), but chronic GvHD was comparable (P = 0.3). The actual one-year survival is currently 72% and 52% in CyA and MTX patients, respectively (P = 0.1). Although our initial experience with CyA is encouraging with regard to engraftment and acute GvHD, optimization of CyA protocols will probably be needed for it to be proven as having a definite advantage over MTX.