RESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: What outcomes are important for women to decide on the day of embryo transfer (ET) in IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: The highest cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) per treatment was the most important treatment outcome for women undergoing an IVF treatment, regardless of the number of transfers needed until pregnancy and impact on quality of life. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Cleavage stage (Day 3) and blastocyst stage (Day 5) ETs are common transfer policies in IVF. The choice for one or the other day of ET differs between clinics. From the literature, it remains unclear whether the day of transfer impacts the cLBR. Patient preferences for the day of ET have not been examined yet. STUDY DESIGN SIZE AND DURATION: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was performed to investigate female patients' preferences and their values concerning various aspects of an IVF treatment, with a particular focus on ET policy. A multicenter DCE was conducted between May 2020 and June 2020 in which participants were asked to choose between different treatments. Each treatment was presented using hypothetical scenarios containing the following attributes: the probability of a healthy live birth per IVF treatment cycle, the number of embryos available for transfer (for fresh and frozen-thawed ET), the number of ETs until pregnancy and the impact of the treatment on the quality of life. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Women (n = 445) were asked to participate in the DCE at the start of an IVF treatment cycle in 10 Dutch fertility clinics. Participating women received an online questionnaire. The attributes' relative importance was analyzed using logistic regression analyses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 164 women participated. The most important attribute chosen was the cLBR. The total number of embryos suitable for transfer also influenced women's treatment preferences. Neither the number of transfers needed until pregnancy, nor the impact on quality of life influenced the treatment preferences in the aggregated data. For women in the older age group (age ≥36 years) and the multipara subgroup, the impact on quality of life was more relevant. Naive patients (patients with no prior experience with IVF treatment) assigned less value to the number of ETs needed until pregnancy and assigned more value to the cLBR than the patients who had experienced IVF. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: An important limitation of a DCE study is that not all attributes can be included, which might be relevant for making choices. Patients might make other choices in real life as the DCE scenarios presented here are hypothetical and might not exactly represent their personal situation. We tried to avoid potential bias by selecting the attributes that mattered most to the patients obtained through patient focus groups. The final selection of attributes and the assigned levels were established using the input of an expert panel of professionals and by performing a pilot study to test the validity of our questionnaire. Furthermore, because we only included women in our study, we cannot draw any conclusions on preferences for partners. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results of this study may help fertility patients, clinicians, researchers and policymakers to prioritize the most important attributes in the choice for the day of ET. The present study shows that cLBR per IVF treatment is the most important outcome for women. However, currently, there is insufficient information in the literature to conclude which day of transfer is more effective regarding the cLBR. Randomized controlled trials on the subject of Day 3 versus Day 5 ETs and cLBR are needed to allow evidence-based counseling. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work received no specific funding and there are no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this article was to review the incidence, presentation, treatment and complications of paediatric pelvic fractures of children who were admitted to our level 1 trauma centre and to compare them with our data from adult pelvic fracture patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all children with pelvic fractures who were managed at our institution between January 1993 and December 2013 and compared the data with our database on pelvic fractures in adults during the period 2007 to 2012. RESULTS: We identified 51 children and 268 adults with pelvic fractures. The median age of the paediatric patients was 11 years. Children were significantly more involved in traffic accidents than adults (p < 0.001). Adults had a significantly higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (31 vs 24.5; p < 0.03) and were significantly more often haemodynamically unstable (p < 0.01). Adults had a type C fracture more often, while children had a type B fracture (p < 0.001). Associated injuries were seen in both groups; however, thoracic injuries were significantly higher in adults (p < 0.01) and injuries to the extremities were higher in children (p < 0.01). Adults were significantly more often treated with open reduction and internal fixation (p < 0.001). Mortality in both groups, however, did not differ (6% vs 8%). CONCLUSION: Paediatric pelvic fractures are rare. They differ from adult pelvic fractures in presentation, associated injuries and management. Mortality, however, is substantial and does not differ from the adult population. Mortality is often due to concomitant injuries and not to exsanguination from the pelvic fracture.
RESUMEN
During November and December 2011, data were collected from 44 dairy operations in 13 Pennsylvania counties. Researchers visited each farm to collect information regarding management practices and feeding, and costs for labor, health, bedding, and reproduction for replacement heifers from birth until first calving. Costs per heifer were broken up into 4 time periods: birth until weaning, weaning until 6 mo of age, 6 mo of age until breeding age, and heifers from breeding to calving. Milk production records for each herd were obtained from Dairy Herd Improvement. The average number of milking cows on farms in this study was 197.8 ± 280.1, with a range from 38 to 1,708. Total cost averaged $1,808.23 ± $338.62 from birth until freshening. Raising calves from birth to weaning cost $217.49 ± 86.21; raising heifers from weaning age through 6 mo of age cost $247.38 ± 78.89; raising heifers from 6 mo of age until breeding cost $607.02 ± 192.28; and total cost for bred heifers was $736.33 ± 162.86. Feed costs were the largest component of the cost to raise heifers from birth to calving, accounting for nearly 73% of the total. Data envelopment analysis determined that 9 of the 44 farms had no inefficiencies in inputs or outputs. These farms best combined feed and labor investments, spending, on average, $1,137.40 and $140.62/heifer for feed and labor. These heifers calved at 23.7 mo of age and produced 88.42% of the milk produced by older cows. In contrast, the 35 inefficient farms spent $227 more on feed and $78 more on labor per heifer for animals that calved 1.6 mo later and produced only 82% of the milk made by their mature herdmates. Efficiency was attained by herds with the lowest input costs, but herds with higher input costs were also able to be efficient if age at calving was low and milk production was high for heifers compared with the rest of the herd.
