Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus exploits the DNA damage response to circularize its genome.

To establish lifelong, latent infection, herpesviruses circularize their linear, double-stranded, DNA genomes through an unknown mechanism. Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) herpesvirus (KSHV), a gamma herpesvirus, is tightly linked with KS, primary effusion lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman's disease. KSHV persists in latently infected cells as a multi-copy, extrachromosomal episome. Here, we show the KSHV genome rapidly circularizes following infection, and viral protein expression is unnecessary for this process. The DNA damage response (DDR) kinases, ATM and DNA-PKcs, each exert roles, and absence of both severely compromises circularization and latency. These deficiencies were rescued by expression of ATM and DNA-PKcs, but not catalytically inactive mutants. In contrast, γH2AX did not function in KSHV circularization. The linear viral genomic ends resemble a DNA double strand break, and non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) reporters indicate both NHEJ and HR contribute to KSHV circularization. Last, we show, similar to KSHV, ATM and DNA-PKcs have roles in circularization of the alpha herpesvirus, herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1), while γH2AX does not. Therefore, the DDR mediates KSHV and HSV-1 circularization. This strategy may serve as a general herpesvirus mechanism to initiate latency, and its disruption may provide new opportunities for prevention of herpesvirus disease.

Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus latency-associated nuclear antigen broadly regulates viral gene expression and is essential for lytic infection.

Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV) is a leading cause of malignancy in AIDS and current therapies are limited. Like all herpesviruses, KSHV infection can be latent or lytic. KSHV latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA) is essential for viral genome persistence during latent infection. LANA also maintains latency by antagonizing expression and function of the KSHV lytic switch protein, RTA. Here, we find LANA null KSHV is not capable of lytic replication, indicating a requirement for LANA. While LANA promoted both lytic and latent gene expression in cells partially permissive for lytic infection, it repressed expression in non-permissive cells. Importantly, forced RTA expression in non-permissive cells led to induction of lytic infection and LANA switched to promote, rather than repress, most lytic viral gene expression. When basal viral gene expression levels were high, LANA promoted expression, but repressed expression at low basal levels unless RTA expression was forcibly induced. LANA's effects were broad, but virus gene specific, extending to an engineered, recombinant viral GFP under control of host EF1α promoter, but not to host EF1α. Together, these results demonstrate that, in addition to its essential role in genome maintenance, LANA broadly regulates viral gene expression, and is required for high levels of lytic gene expression during lytic infection. Strategies that target LANA are expected to abolish KSHV infection.