Disaggregation of Medical Research Data Reveals Outcome Differences in Demographic Groups and Presents Opportunity to Improve Patient Care.

Disaggregation, in the medical literature, means separation into demographic groups. This results in an opportunity to discover differences in outcomes by group, which could improve future treatments and provide outcome data, by group, that could be included in future systematic reviews. In research, the term disaggregation is most often used in reference to addressing inequities. We support the Sex and Gender Equity Research (SAGER) guidelines and encourage authors to examine how sex and gender are taken into account in their study and ensure adequate representation by sex and gender. (We respect that not all studies can or are designed to capture data by sex and gender, and that gender is "complex" and "fluid"). Disaggregation is encouraged, when possible, for other demographic variables allowing evaluation of all marginalized (as well as nonmarginalized) populations, so that we can better care for patients.

Association Between Severity of Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown and Functional Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Acetabular Labral Tears.

BACKGROUND: Despite focus on surgical preservation of the chondrolabral junction (CLJ), the transition zone between the acetabular cartilage and labrum, the association between severity of CLJ breakdown and functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy remains unexplored. PURPOSE: To assess the influence of CLJ breakdown on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a 24-month follow-up after hip arthroscopy for symptomatic labral tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted to identify patients ≥18 years of age with a minimum 24-month follow-up who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon for the treatment of symptomatic labral tears secondary to femoroacetabular impingement. The Beck classification of transition zone cartilage was used to grade CLJ damage; patients with grades 0 to 2 were stratified into the mild CLJ damage cohort, and those with grades 3 and 4 were stratified into the severe CLJ damage cohort. PROMs were collected at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 months, and annually thereafter postoperatively. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare PROMs. Rates of achieving clinically meaningful thresholds and subsequent surgery rates were also compared. RESULTS: In total, 198 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up of 3.54 ± 1.26 years. A total of 95 patients with severe CLJ damage (mean age, 34.9 ± 10.5 years) were compared with 103 patients with mild CLJ damage (mean age, 38.2 ± 11.9 years). Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and visual analog score for pain were inferior in the severe CLJ group at enrollment and all follow-up time points (P≤ .05). However, patients with severe CLJ breakdown exhibited greater improvements in HOS-ADL and NAHS at the 24-month follow-up and achieved clinically meaningful thresholds at equivalent rates to patients with mild CLJ breakdown. Subsequent surgery rates were 6.8% and 12.6% in patients with mild versus severe CLJ damage, respectively (P = .250). CONCLUSION: Severe CLJ breakdown is associated with increased pain and decreased functional level preoperatively and up to 24 months after hip arthroscopy. Despite this, patients with severe CLJ breakdown experienced greater improvements in functional outcomes at a 24-month follow-up and achieved clinical thresholds at similar rates to patients with mild CLJ damage. Thus, while worse baseline pain and functional levels may indicate severe CLJ breakdown, these patients still benefit substantially from hip arthroscopy.

Clinical and radiologic outcomes of posterior column extension, pedicle subtraction, and vertebral column resection osteotomies in adult chin on chest deformity: A systematic review.

Background: Chin-on-chest deformity is a rare and severely disabling condition characterized by kyphotic deformity in the cervicothoracic spine. To treat this deformity, various osteotomy techniques were described. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of biomedical databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus (via Elsevier), Embase (via Elsevier), and Cochrane Library in English from 1/1/1990 to 3/31/2022 was conducted using a combination of text and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Results: The final analysis included 16 studies. All the studies were assigned a level of evidence of four. Except for two articles, all of the articles were non-comparative studies. A total of 288 patients were included in this review. Of the 288 patients, 107 underwent posterior column extension osteotomy (PCEO), 108 underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and 33 underwent vertebral column resection osteotomy (VCRO). The most common osteotomy level in fifteen of the studies was C7/T1. The studies included in this review described several techniques for cervical sagittal balance correction. The range of preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores was 5.5-8.6 to 1.7-4.91, respectively. The range of preoperative and postoperative neck disability index (NDI) was 34.2-65.4 to 22.1-51.3, respectively. The most common complications were upper extremity paresthesia and hand numbness through the C8 dermatome distribution. Conclusions: Corrective osteotomies provide satisfactory results in patients with chin-on-chest deformity; however, the quality of the included studies limits the evidence.

Novel 3D MRI-Based Volumetric Assessment of Rotator Cuff Musculature Demonstrates Stronger Correlation with Preoperative Functional Status When Compared to the Goutallier Grading Scheme.

BACKGROUND: The Goutallier classification (GC) is used to assess fatty atrophy in rotator cuff (RC) tears, yet limitations exist. A battery of 3D-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetric scores (VS) was developed to provide comprehensive characterization of RC pathology. The purposes of this study were to: (1) Describe the correlation between GC and VS for supraspinatus changes in RC tears, (2) Characterize the chronicity of RC tears using the battery of 12 VS measurements, and (3) Compare GC and VS to determine which method most closely corresponds with preoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Preoperative shoulder MRIs were reviewed after arthroscopic RC repair. Preoperative GC stage and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) scores were collected. The battery of VS included fat infiltration (FIS), muscle size (MSS) and relative volume contribution (RCS) for each RC muscle. Backwards linear regression was performed to compare GC stage with preoperative PROMIS PF/PI to determine which VS measurement most closely correlated with preoperative PROMs. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients underwent RC repair (mean age 55±8.2 years, 63% male, 68% GC stage ≤1). In evaluation of the supraspinatus, there was a moderate positive correlation between GC and FIS (r = 0.459, p < 0.001); strong negative correlations were observed between MSS (r = -0.800, p < 0.001) and RCS (r = -0.745, p < 0.001) when compared to GC. A negligible linear correlation was observed between GC and preoperative PROMIS PF (r = -0.106, p = 0.343) and PI (r = -0.071, p = 0.528). On multivariate analysis, subscapularis MSS (beta > 0, p = 0.064) was a positive predictor, and subscapularis FIS (beta < 0, p = 0.137), teres minor MSS (beta < 0, p = 0.141) and FIS (beta < 0, p = 0.070) were negative predictors of preoperative PF (r = 0.343, p = 0.044); while supraspinatus MSS (beta > 0, p = 0.009) and FIS (beta > 0, p = 0.073), teres minor FIS (beta > 0, p = 0.072) and subscapularis FIS (beta > 0, p = 0.065) were positive predictors of preoperative PI (r = 0.410, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Although gold standard in evaluation of RC pathology, GC demonstrated negligible correlation with preoperative functional disability. Alternatively, a battery of 3D VS showed strong correlation with GC through a quantitative, comprehensive evaluation of the RC unit including several moderate predictors of preoperative functional disability.

Recommended Requirements and Essential Elements for Proper Reporting of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Tools in Biomedical Research and Scientific Publications.

Essential elements required for proper use of artificial intelligence machine learning tools in biomedical research and scientific publications include (1) explanation justifying why a machine learning approach contributes to the purpose of the study; (2) description of the adequacy of the data (input) to produce the desired results (output); (3) details of the algorithmic (i.e., computational) approach including methods for organizing the data (preprocessing); the machine learning computational algorithm(s) assessed; on what data the models were trained; the presence of bias and efforts to mitigate these effects; and the methods for quantifying the variables (features) most influential in determining the results (e.g., Shapley values); (4) description of methods, and reporting of results, quantitating performance in terms of both model accuracy and model calibration (level of confidence in the model's predictions); (5) availability of the programming code (including a link to the code when available-ideally, the code should be available); (6) discussion of model internal validation (results applicable and sensitive to the population investigated and data on which the model was trained) and external validation (were the results investigated as to whether they are generalizable to different populations? If not, consideration of this limitation and discussion of plans for external validation, i.e., next steps). As biomedical research submissions using artificial intelligence technology increase, these requirements could facilitate purposeful use and comprehensive methodological reporting.

Editorial Commentary: Regression Modeling and Nomograms in Biomedical Research Are Valuable Decision-Making Tools When Externally Validated and Well Maintained.

The mathematical formulas underpinning biostatistical modeling in medical research can be complicated. Nomograms are pictoral tools showing a graphical solution of a formula in which all variables in the formula can be read off the diagram. Nomograms can be used to simplify the calculation of risk of recurrence of injuries or disease. Although nomograms can be valuable, external validation is required (of all models) to ensure accuracy outside of the original population, because variation in patient populations, activities, and risk behaviors outside of the patient data used in the original analysis may deteriorate model performance (external validity). A model also needs to be maintained over time to ensure continued accuracy as populations and activities change. A model that fails to keep up will eventually have its accuracy and clinical utility fade. An externally validated, well-maintained model can be a valuable tool for patient counseling and decision-making.

Editorial Commentary: The Statistical Fragility Index of Medical Trials Is Low By Design: Critical Evaluation of Confidence Intervals Is Required.

The Fragility Index (FI) provides the number of patients whose outcome would need to have changed for the results of a clinical trial to no longer be statistically significant. Although it's a well-intended and easily interpreted metric, its calculation is based on reversing a significant finding and therefore its interpretation is only relevant in the domain of statistical significance. Its interpretation is only relevant in the domain of statistical significance. A well-designed clinical trial includes an a priori sample size calculation that aims to find the bare minimum of patients needed to obtain statistical significance. Such trials are fragile by design! Examining the robustness of clinical trials requires an estimation of uncertainty, rather than a misconstrued, dichotomous focus on statistical significance. Confidence intervals (CIs) provide a range of values that are compatible with a study's data and help determine the precision of results and the compatibility of the data with different hypotheses. The width of the CI speaks to the precision of the results, and the extent to which the values contained within have potential to be clinically important. Finally, one should not assume that a large FI indicates robust findings. Poorly executed trials are prone to bias, leading to large effects, and therefore, small P values, and a large FI. Let's move our future focus from the FI toward the CI.

Editorial Commentary: The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Is Less Important Than It Sounds: Patients Seek to Achieve Substantial Clinical Benefits and Not Minimally Perceptible Improvements When They Undergo Arthroscopic Surgery.

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is a frequently reported metric for describing within-patient improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). It was originally defined by Jaeschke et al. as "the smallest difference in score in the domain of interest which patients perceive as beneficial and which would mandate, in the absence of troublesome side effects and excessive cost, a change in the patient's management." The latter part of this statement is often omitted, and this results in a loss of the originally intended value through lack of sufficient clinical importance to change management. Other pitfalls in the use of the MCID include that they are population- and condition-specific. As such, MCIDs lack external validity and cannot easily be extrapolated from one study to another. Furthermore, broadly different values can be obtained depending on the calculation method used. This makes the MCID an unhelpful metric when seeking to understand the true efficacy of a given intervention. The Food and Drug Administration recommends anchor-based methodologies (which take into account patient perception), over distribution-based methods (which are purely statistical and do not account for clinical meaningfulness to patients). Regardless, it should be noted that even anchor-based methodologies are susceptible to statistical bias, and measures are apt to be influenced by the regression to mean phenomena, where the value of the preintervention scores and their relationship to postintervention scores can bias estimates of the MCID. Finally, when using MCIDs, one must consider that they are a low bar. This means that patients do not undergo treatment to achieve minimally perceptible clinical improvements; instead, they undergo treatment with the hope of achieving substantial clinical benefit or a patient acceptable symptom state, and so these are more appropriate individual-level metrics to consider when evaluating clinically meaningful outcomes of treatment.

Editorial Commentary: Ceiling Effects Are a Limitation of Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Used to Assess Shoulder Function: Appropriate Selection of Shoulder Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Is Required-Especially in Athletes.

Ceiling effects (CEs) are a major limitation of frequently used patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in the assessment of shoulder function. It is generally considered that a CE may be present when the best possible score for a given PROM is achieved by at least 15% of the study population. When a CE occurs, it typically indicates that the scoring criteria are relatively easy and therefore may not reliably capture greater levels of patient function. This is a particular problem with the use of activities of daily living-oriented PROMs in the evaluation of athletic patients because they can still score highly, despite limitations in athletic shoulder function. When a CE is present, it can result in failure to determine the true efficacy of a procedure, limited responsiveness to change, and furthermore if a subsequent comparison of 2 groups of patients is undertaken, it may produce similar results despite meaningful differences between them. It is important to recognize that CEs are common and have important consequences but that careful selection of PROMs adapted to the characteristics of the study population and the specific research question can help to mitigate these issues.

Editorial Commentary: Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Threshold Scores to Estimate Patient Satisfaction: 'Let's Ask the Patient!'

The reporting and analysis of patient-reported outcome measures have come a long way. Since the concept of the minimally clinically important difference was first introduced in 1989, threshold scores have grown to include substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS). The initial motivation for developing these thresholds was rooted in separating clinical significance from statistical. These thresholds provide insight into the relationship between scores on patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported improvement and satisfaction. It follows that in order to evaluate PROM scores, the best method for deriving the threshold typically uses an anchor-based methodology, i.e., "ask the patient." Specifically, patients are asked how much change they've experienced and whether they consider their current state to be satisfactory. The responses to these questions are compared with the scores on PROMs to find outcome thresholds that best separate patients who reported no improvement from those who reported minimal improvement, substantial improvement, and satisfaction with their current state of health (PASS). The PASS is of particular importance as it speaks to what arguably matters most to patients-a satisfactory state of health. Finally, viewing the PASS from the perspective of variation from study to study rather than as a uniform classifier is needed to make use of the growing number of papers reporting these thresholds. Examining differences in PASS values across papers can provide insight into how well PROM scores reflect patient satisfaction in different settings.

Human Rotator Cuff Tears Reveal an Age-Dependent Increase in Markers of Cellular Senescence and Selective Removal of Senescent Cells With Dasatinib + Quercetin Increases Genetic Expression of COL1A1 In Vitro.

PURPOSE: To quantify cellular senescence in supraspinatus tendon and subacromial bursa of humans with rotator cuff tears and to investigate the in vitro efficacy of the senolytic dasatinib + quercetin (D+Q) to eliminate senescent cells and alter tenogenic differentiation. METHODS: Tissue was harvested from 41 patients (mean age, 62 years) undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. In part 1 (n = 35), senescence was quantified using immunohistochemistry and gene expression for senescent cell markers (p16 and p21) and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) (interleukin [IL] 6, IL-8, matrix metalloproteinase [MMP] 3, monocyte chemoattractant protein [MCP] 1). Senescence was compared between patients <60 and ≥60 years old. In part 2 (n = 6) , an in vitro model of rotator cuff tears was treated with D+Q or control. D+Q, a chemotherapeutic and plant flavanol, respectively, kill senescent cells. Gene expression analysis assessed the ability of D+Q to kill senescent cells and alter markers of tenogenic differentiation. RESULTS: Part 1 revealed an age-dependent significant increase in the relative expression of p21, IL-6, and IL-8 in tendon and p21, p16, IL-6, IL-8, and MMP-3 in bursa (P < .05). A significant increase was seen in immunohistochemical staining of bursa p21 (P = .028). In part 2, D+Q significantly decreased expression of p21, IL-6, and IL-8 in tendon and p21 and IL-8 in bursa (P < .05). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis showed decreased release of the SASP (IL-6, MMP-3, MCP-1; P = .002, P = .024, P < .001, respectively). Tendon (P = .022) and bursa (P = .027) treated with D+Q increased the expression of COL1A1. CONCLUSIONS: While there was an age-dependent increase in markers of cellular senescence, this relationship was not consistently seen across all markers and tissues. Dasatinib + quercetin had moderate efficacy in decreasing senescence in these tissues and increasing COL1A1 expression. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study reveals that cellular senescence may be a therapeutic target to alter the biological aging of rotator cuffs and identifies D+Q as a potential therapy.

Postoperative Radiographic Outcomes Following Primary Open Coracoid Transfer (Bristow-Latarjet) Vary in Definition, Classification, and Imaging Modality: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To analyze radiographic outcomes by conventional radiography, computed tomography (CT), or both and complication rates of open coracoid transfer at a minimum of 12-months follow-up. METHODS: A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using PubMed, Medline (Ovid), and EMBASE library databases. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies reporting on open Latarjet as the primary surgical procedure(revision coracoid transfer after failed prior stabilization excluded) with postoperative radiographic outcomes at a minimum mean 1-year follow-up. Patient demographics, type of postoperative imaging modality, and radiographic outcomes and complications including graft union, osteoarthritis, and osteolysis were systematically reviewed. Data were summarized as ranges of reported values for each outcome metric. Each radiographic outcome was graphically represented in a Forest plot with point estimates of the incidence of radiographic outcomes with corresponding 95% confidence intervals and I2. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 1,456 shoulders. The most common postoperative imaging modality was plain radiography only (n = 848 [58.2%]), both CT and radiography (n = 287 [19.7%]), and CT only (n = 321 [22.1%]). Overall, the reported graft union rate ranged from 75% to 100%, of which 79.8% (n = 395) were detected on plain radiography. The most common reported postoperative radiographic complications after the open coracoid transfer were osteoarthritis (range, 0%-100%, pooled mean 28%), graft osteolysis (range, 0%-100%, pooled mean 30%), nonunion (range, 0%-32%, pooled mean 5.1%), malpositioned graft (range, 0%-75%, pooled mean 14.75%), hardware issues (range, 0%-9.1%, pooled mean 5%), and bone block fracture (range, 0%-8%, pooled mean 2.1%). Graft healing was achieved in a majority of cases (range, 75%-100%). CONCLUSION: Postoperative radiographic outcomes after open coracoid transfer vary greatly in definition, classification, and imaging modality of choice. Greater consistency in postoperative radiographic outcomes is essential to evaluate graft healing, osteolysis, and nonunion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.

Location and Progression of Chondral Injuries at the Time of Revision ACL Surgery Varies by Sex.

PURPOSE: To quantify progression of chondral and meniscal injuries between primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent both index and revision ACL reconstruction between 2000 and 2020 at our institution were identified, and dates of injury and surgery, demographics, and clinical data were obtained from operative reports. Outerbridge grade was recorded in each compartment, along with presence and location of meniscal injury. The frequency of each injury between first and second cases was calculated. Differences in injury and progression were compared over time as well as between patient sex and age. RESULTS: The study included 189 patients (96 female, 93 male). Age at first surgery was 31.7 ± 13.2 years. Mean time to second injury was 3.3 ± 3.0 years. In total, 116 patients had a new or previous chondral injury (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.1). The medial femoral condyle (31%) and the patella (21%) accounted for the highest proportion of new injury to articular surfaces, whereas new injury to menisci was comparable between the medial (25%) and lateral (23%) meniscus. At the time of revision ACL reconstruction, females had a high prevalence of chondral injuries to the lateral compartment, whereas males had a high prevalence of chondral injury to the medial femoral condyle. The prevalence of new chondral injuries was comparable between sexes, with males having a slightly higher proportion. While time between surgeries, sex, and age had graphical evidence of moderating risk, the effects were small and imprecise. CONCLUSIONS: Revision ACL reconstruction carried a 1.6 increase in the odds for new or progressive chondral lesions in our cohort. At the time of revision, females had a relatively higher proportion of lateral-sided chondral injuries, whereas males had a relatively higher proportion of medial femoral condyle injuries. The greatest increase in the prevalence of new and progressive lesions was observed in the medial femoral condyle and trochlea. This progression appeared to be moderated by time between surgeries, patient sex, and age; however, the differences were small and imprecise. STUDY DESIGN: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The effect of augmenting suture material with magnesium and platelet-rich plasma on the in vitro adhesion and proliferation potential of subacromial bursa-derived progenitor cells.

Background: Connective tissue subacromial bursa-derived progenitor cells (SBDCs) have been suggested as a potent biologic augment to promote healing of the repaired rotator cuff tendon. Maximizing the amount of retained progenitor cells at the tendon repair site is essential for ensuring an optimal healing environment, warranting a search for proadhesive and proliferative adjuvants. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of magnesium (Mg), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and a combination of both adjuvants on the in vitro cellular adhesion and proliferation potential of SBDCs on suture material commonly used in rotator cuff surgery. Methods: SBDCs were isolated from subacromial bursa samples harvested during rotator cuff repair and cultured in growth media. Commercially available collagen-coated nonabsorbable flat-braided suture was cut into 1-inch pieces, placed into 48-well culture dishes, and sterilized under ultraviolet light. Either a one-time dose of 5 mM sterile Mg, 0.2 mL of PRP, or a combination of both adjuvants was added, while a group without treatment served as a negative control. Cellular proliferation and adhesion assays on suture material were performed for each treatment condition. Results: Augmenting the suture with Mg resulted in a significantly increased cellular adhesion (total number of attached cells) of SBDCs compared to PRP alone (31,527 ± 19,884 vs. 13,619 ± 8808; P < .001), no treatment (31,527 ± 19,884 vs. 21,643 ± 8194; P = .016), and combination of both adjuvants (31,527 ± 19,884 vs. 17,121 ± 11,935; P < .001). Further, augmentation with Mg achieved a significant increase in cellular proliferation (absorbance) of SBDCs on suture material when compared to the PRP (0.516 ± 0.207 vs. 0.424 ± 0.131; P = .001) and no treatment (0.516 ± 0.207 vs. 0.383 ± 0.094; P < .001) group. The combination of Mg and PRP showed a significantly higher proliferation potential compared to PRP alone (0.512 ± 0.194 vs. 0.424 ± 0.131; P = .001) and no treatment (0.512 ± 0.194 vs. 0.383 ± 0.094; P < .001). There were no significant differences in the remaining intergroup comparisons (P > .05, respectively). Conclusion: Augmenting suture material with Mg resulted in a significantly increased cellular adhesion of SBDCs compared to untreated suture material, as well as augmentation with PRP alone or a combination of both adjuvants. Further, Mg with or without PRP augmentation achieved a significant increase in the cellular proliferation of SBDCs on suture material compared to untreated sutures and augmentation with PRP alone. Application of Mg may be a clinically feasible approach to optimizing the use of SBDCs as a biological augment in rotator cuff repair, while combined augmentation with PRP may harness the full potential for optimized tissue recovery due to the high concentration of PRP-derived growth factors.

Contact Mechanics of Elliptical and Spherical Head Implants during Axial Rotation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Comparison.

BACKGROUND: Elliptical humeral head implants have been proposed to result in more anatomic kinematics following total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). The purpose of this study was to compare glenohumeral contact mechanics during axial rotation using spherical and elliptical humeral head implants in the setting of aTSA. METHODS: Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were utilized for biomechanical testing in neutral (NR), internal (IR), and external (ER) rotation at various levels of abduction (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°) with lines of pull along each of the rotator cuff muscles. Each specimen underwent the following three conditions: (1) native, and TSA using (2) an elliptical and (3) spherical humeral head implant. Glenohumeral contact mechanics, including contact pressure (CP; kPa), peak contact pressure (PCP; kPa), and contact area (CA; mm2), were measured in neutral rotation as well as external and internal rotation using a pressure mapping sensor. RESULTS: Elliptical head implants showed a significantly lower PCP in ER compared to spherical implants at 0° (Δ-712.0 kPa; p = 0.034), 15° (Δ-894.9 kPa; p = 0.004), 30° (Δ-897.7 kPa; p = 0.004), and 45° (Δ-796.9 kPa; p = 0.010) of abduction, while no significant difference was observed in ER at 60° of abduction or at all angles in NR and IR. Both implant designs had similar CA in NR, ER, and IR at all tested angles of abduction (p > 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of aTSA, elliptical heads showed significantly lower PCP during ER at 0° to 45° of abduction, when compared to spherical head implants. However, in NR and IR, PCP was similar between implant designs. Both designs showed similar CA during NR, ER, and IR at all abduction angles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: basic science; controlled laboratory study.

Dual Bracing for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Restores Native Valgus Laxity and Native Medial Joint Gapping of the Elbow.

Background: Despite growing evidence on the role of the posterior ulnar collateral ligament (pUCL) in elbow stability, current ligament bracing techniques are mainly focused on the anterior ulnar collateral ligament (aUCL). A dual-bracing technique combines the repair of the pUCL and aUCL with a suture augmentation of both bundles. Purpose: To biomechanically assess a dual-bracing approach addressing aUCL and pUCL for humeral-sided complete UCL lesions to restore medial elbow laxity without overconstraining. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 21 unpaired human elbows (11 right, 10 left; 57.19 ± 11.7 years) were randomized into 3 groups to compare dual bracing with aUCL suture augmentation and aUCL graft reconstruction. Laxity testing was performed with 25 N applied 12 cm distal to the elbow joint for 30 seconds at randomized flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°) for the native condition and then for each surgical technique. A calibrated motion capture system was used for assessment, allowing the 3-dimensional displacement during the complete valgus stress cycle between the optical trackers to be quantified as joint gap and laxity. The repaired constructs were then cyclically tested through a materials testing machine starting with 20 N for 200 cycles at a rate of 0.5 Hz. The load was increased stepwise by 10 N for 200 cycles until displacement reached 5.0 mm or complete failure occurred. Results: Dual bracing and aUCL bracing resulted in significantly (P = .045) less joint gapping at 120° of flexion compared with aUCL reconstruction. No significant differences in valgus laxity were found among the surgical techniques. Within each technique, there were no significant differences between the native and the postoperative state in valgus laxity and joint gapping. No significant differences between the techniques were observed in cycles to failure and failure load. Conclusion: Dual bracing restored native valgus joint laxity and medial joint gapping without overconstraining and provided similar primary stability regarding failure outcomes as established techniques. Furthermore, it was able to restore joint gapping in 120° of flexion significantly better than aUCL reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: This study provides biomechanical data on the dual-bracing approach that may help surgeons to consider this new method of addressing acute humeral UCL lesions.

Current Trends in Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP2) Usage for Spinal Fusion Surgery.

(1) Background: Since first approved by the FDA, on-label and off-label usage of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP2) for spinal fusion surgeries has become widespread. While many studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of its use, as well as its economic impact, few have looked at the current trends in its on- and off-label use. The goal of this study is to evaluate the current trends of on- and off-label rhBMP2 use for spinal fusion surgery. (2) Methods: A deidentified survey was created and electronically distributed to members of two international spine societies. Surgeons were asked to report their demographic information, surgical experience, and current usage of rhBMP2. They were then presented with five spinal fusion procedures and asked to report if they use rhBMP2 for these indications in their current practice. Responses were stratified between rhBMP2 users vs. non-users and on-label vs. off-label use. Data were analyzed using chi-square with Fisher's exact test for categorical data. (3) Results: A total of 146 respondents completed the survey with a response rate of 20.5%. There was no difference in overall rhBMP2 usage based on specialty, experience, or number of cases per year. Fellowship-trained surgeons and those who practice in the United States were more likely to use rhBMP2. Surgeons who were trained in the Southeast and Midwest regions reported the highest usage rates. rhBMP2 use was more common among fellowship-trained and US surgeons for ALIFs; non-US surgeons for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusions; and fellowship-trained and orthopedic spine surgeons for lateral lumbar interbody fusions. Non-US surgeons were more likely to use rhBMP2 for off-label indications compared to surgeons from the US. (4) Conclusions: While various demographics of surgeons report different rates of rhBMP2 use, off-label use remains relatively commonplace amongst practicing spine surgeons.

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suture Tape Augmentation for Subscapularis Peel Repair.

Background: Failure of a subscapularis repair construct after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can result in difficulty with internal rotation and an increased likelihood of dislocation. Although suture tape has been demonstrated to be an efficacious augment for tendonous repairs elsewhere in the body, it has not been investigated as a method for augmenting subscapularis peel repairs. Purpose: To determine the biomechanical efficacy of suture tape augmentation for the repair of a subscapularis peel. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twelve human cadaveric shoulders underwent a subscapularis peel. Specimens were randomly split into 2 groups: 6 specimens underwent repair using a transosseous bone tunnel technique with 3 high-strength sutures placed with a Mason-Allen configuration (control group), and 6 specimens underwent the control repair using augmentation with 2 suture tapes placed in an inverted mattress fashion and secured to the proximal humerus using a suture anchor (augmentation group). Shoulders underwent biomechanical testing to compare repair displacement with cyclic loading, load at ultimate failure, and construct stiffness. Results: There were no significant between-group differences in displacement after cyclic loading at the superior (P = .87), middle (P = .47), or inferior (P = .77) portions of the subscapularis tendon. Load to failure was significantly greater in the augmentation group (585.1 ± 97.4 N) than in the control group (358.5 ± 81.8 N) (P = .001). Stiffness was also greater in the augmentation group (71.8 ± 13.7 N/mm) when compared with the control group (48.7 ± 5.7 N/mm) (P = .003). Conclusion: Subscapularis peel repair with augmentation via 2 inverted mattress suture tapes secured with an anchor in the proximal humerus conferred significantly greater load at ultimate failure and construct stiffness when compared with a traditional repair using 3 Mason-Allen sutures. There was no difference in repair displacement with cyclic loading between the repair groups. Clinical Relevance: Suture tape augmentation of subscapularis peel repairs after shoulder arthroplasty provides an effective segment to the strength of the repair.

The Glenoid Track Paradigm Does Not Reliably Affect Military Surgeons' Approach to Managing Shoulder Instability.

Purpose: To report the frequencies of surgical stabilization procedures performed by military shoulder surgeons and to use decision tree analysis to describe how bipolar bone loss affects surgeons' decision to perform arthroscopic versus open stabilization procedures. Methods: The Military Orthopaedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network (MOTION) database was queried for anterior shoulder stabilization procedures from 2016 to 2021. A nonparametric decision tree analysis was used to generate a framework for classifying surgeon decision making based on specified injury characteristics (labral tear location, glenoid bone loss [GBL], Hill-Sachs lesion [HSL] size, and on-track vs off-track HSL). Results: A total of 525 procedures were included in the final analysis, with a mean patient age of 25.9 ± 7.2 years and a mean GBL percentage of 3.6% ± 6.8%. HSLs were described based on size as absent (n = 354), mild (n = 129), moderate (n = 40), and severe (n = 2) and as on-track versus off-track in 223 cases, with 17% (n = 38) characterized as off-track. Arthroscopic labral repair (n = 428, 82%) was the most common procedure, whereas open repair (n = 10, 1.9%) and glenoid augmentation (n = 44, 8.4%) were performed infrequently. Decision tree analysis identified a GBL threshold of 17% or greater that resulted in an 89% probability of glenoid augmentation. Shoulders with GBL less than 17% combined with a mild or absent HSL had a 95% probability of an isolated arthroscopic labral repair, whereas a moderate or severe HSL resulted in a 79% probability of arthroscopic repair with remplissage. The presence of an off-track HSL did not contribute to the decision-making process as defined by the algorithm and data available. Conclusions: Among military shoulder surgeons, GBL of 17% or greater is predictive of a glenoid augmentation procedure whereas HSL size is predictive of remplissage for GBL less than 17%. However, the on-track/off-track paradigm does not appear to affect military surgeons' decision making. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Elliptical and spherical heads show similar obligate glenohumeral translation during axial rotation in total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Elliptical shape humeral head prostheses have been recently proposed to reflect a more anatomic shoulder replacement. However, its effect on obligate glenohumeral translation during axial rotation compared to a standard spherical head is still not well understood. The purpose of the study was to compare obligate humeral translation during axial rotation using spherical and elliptical shaped humeral head prostheses. It was hypothesized that the spherical head design would show significantly more obligate translation when compared to the elliptical design. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were utilized for biomechanical testing of internal (IR) and external (ER) rotation at various levels of abduction (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°) with lines of pull along each of the rotator cuff muscles. Each specimen underwent the following three conditions: (1) native; total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using (2) an elliptical and (3) spherical humeral head implant. Obligate translation during IR and ER was quantified using a 3-dimensional digitizer. The radius of curvature of the superoinferior and anteroposterior dimensions of the implants was calculated across each condition. RESULTS: Posterior and inferior translation as well as compound motion of spherical and elliptical heads during ER was similar at all abduction angles (P > 0.05, respectively). Compared to the native humeral head, both implants demonstrated significantly decreased posterior translation at 45° (elliptical: P = 0.003; spherical: P = 0.004) and 60° of abduction (elliptical: P < 0.001; spherical: P < 0.001). During internal rotation at 0° abduction, the spherical head showed significantly more compound motion (P = 0.042) compared to the elliptical head. The spherical implant also demonstrated increased anterior translation and compound motion during internal rotation at 60° abduction (P < 0.001) compared to the resting state. This difference was not significant for the native or elliptical head design at this angle (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the setting of TSA, elliptical and spherical head implants showed similar obligate translation and overall compound motion during axial rotation. A gained understanding of the consequences of implant head shape in TSA may guide future surgical implant choice for better recreation of native shoulder kinematics and potentially improved patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Controlled Laboratory Study.