Mortality in a Nationwide Practice-Based Cohort Receiving Paclitaxel-Coated Devices for Lower Limb Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: According to a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, paclitaxel-coated devices (PCDs) for lower limb endovascular revascularization may be associated with increased risk of late mortality. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether PCDs are associated with all-cause mortality in a real-world setting. METHODS: DETECT is a nationwide, exhaustive retrospective cohort study using medico-administrative data from the French National Healthcare System representing >99% of the population. The main selection criterion was the first procedure of interest: endovascular revascularization for lower limb peripheral artery disease involving ≥1 balloon and/or stent performed between October 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Patients with or without PCDs were compared for all-cause mortality until December 31, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 259,137 patients were analyzed, with 20,083 (7.7%) treated with ≥1 PCD. After a median follow-up of 4.1 years (Q1-Q3: 2.3-6.4 years), a total of 5,385 deaths/73,923 person-years (PY) (7.3/100 PY) and 109,844 deaths/1,060,513 PY (10.4/100 PY) were observed in the PCD and control groups, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors, PCD treatment was associated with a lower risk of mortality in multivariable Cox analyses (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.84-0.89; P < 0.001). Similar results were observed using propensity score matching approaches based on either nearest-neighbor or exact matching. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide analysis based on large-scale real-world data, exposure to PCDs was not associated with a higher risk of mortality in patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for lower limb peripheral artery disease. (The DETECT Project; NCT05254106).

Pneumothorax Incidence with Normal Saline Instillation for Sealing the Needle Track After Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsy.

PURPOSE: To determine whether instillation of normal saline solution for sealing the needle track reduces incidence of pneumothorax and chest tube placement after computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 242 computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsies performed at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed, including 93 biopsies in which the needle track was sealed by instillation of 3-5 ml of normal saline solution during needle withdrawal (water seal group) and 149 biopsies without sealing (control group). Patient and lesion characteristics, procedure-specific variables, pneumothorax and chest tube placement rates were recorded. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. There was a statistically significant decrease in the pneumothorax rate (19.4% [18/93] vs. 40.9% [61/149]; p < 0.001) and a numerically lower chest tube placement rate without significant reduction (4.3% [4/93] vs. 10.7% [16/149]; p = 0.126) with using normal saline instillation for sealing the needle track versus not using sealant material. Using a multiple logistic regression analysis, using normal saline instillation to seal the needle track, having a senior radiologist as operator of the procedure and putting patients in prone position were significantly associated with a decreased risk of pneumothorax. The presence of emphysema along the needle track was significantly associated with an increased risk of pneumothorax. No complication was observed due to normal saline injection. CONCLUSION: Normal saline solution instillation for sealing the needle track after computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy is a simple, low-cost and safe technique resulted in significantly decreased pneumothorax occurrence and a numerically lower chest tube placement rate, and might help to reduce both hospitalization risks and costs for the healthcare system. Level of evidence 3 Non-controlled retrospective cohort study.

Semi-Quantitative [18F]FDG-PET/CT ROC-Analysis-Based Cut-Offs for Aortitis Definition in Giant Cell Arteritis.

[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) is used to diagnose large vessel vasculitis in giant cell arteritis (GCA). We aimed to define a semi-quantitative threshold for identifying GCA aortitis from aortic atheroma or the control. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) was used as the reference imaging for aortic evaluation and to define aortitis, aortic atheroma and control aortas. [18F]FDG-PET/CT was performed on 35 GCA patients and in two different control groups (aortic atheroma (n = 70) and normal control (n = 35)). Aortic semi-quantitative features were compared between the three groups. GCA patients without aortitis on CECT were excluded. Of the GCA patients, 19 (54.3%) were not on glucocorticoids (GC) prior to [18F]FDG-PET/CT. The SUVmax, TBRblood and TBRliver aortic values were significantly higher in the GCA aortitis group than in the aortic atheroma and control groups (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses brought to light quantitative cut-off values allowing GCA aortitis diagnosis with optimal sensitivity and specificity versus control or aortic atheroma patients for each PET-based feature analyzed. Considering the overall aorta, a SUVmax threshold of 3.25 and a TBRblood threshold of 1.75 had a specificity of 83% and 75%, respectively, a sensitivity of 81% and 81%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.86 and 0.83, respectively, for aortitis detection compared to control groups in GCA cases with GC. A SUVmax threshold of 3.45 and a TBRblood threshold of 1.97 had a specificity of 90% and 93%, respectively, a sensitivity of 89% and 89%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.89 and 0.96, respectively, for aortitis detection compared to the control in GC-free GCA cases. Discriminative thresholds of SUVmax and TBRblood for the diagnosis of GCA aortitis were established using CECT as the reference imaging.

Multi-expert annotation of Crohn's disease images of the small bowel for automatic detection using a convolutional recurrent attention neural network.

Background and study aims Computer-aided diagnostic tools using deep neural networks are efficient for detection of lesions in endoscopy but require a huge number of images. The impact of the quality of annotation has not been tested yet. Here we describe a multi-expert annotated dataset of images extracted from capsules from Crohn's disease patients and the impact of the quality of annotations on the accuracy of a recurrent attention neural network. Methods Images of capsule were annotated by a reader first and then reviewed by three experts in inflammatory bowel disease. Concordance analysis between experts was evaluated by Fleiss' kappa and all the discordant images were, again, read by all the endoscopists to obtain a consensus annotation. A recurrent attention neural network developed for the study was tested before and after the consensus annotation. Available neural networks (ResNet and VGGNet) were also tested under the same conditions. Results The final dataset included 3498 images with 2124 non-pathological (60.7 %), 1360 pathological (38.9 %), and 14 (0.4 %) inconclusive. Agreement of the experts was good for distinguishing pathological and non-pathological images with a kappa of 0.79 ( P  < 0.0001). The accuracy of our classifier and the available neural networks increased after the consensus annotation with a precision of 93.7 %, sensitivity of 93 %, and specificity of 95 %. Conclusions The accuracy of the neural network increased with improved annotations, suggesting that the number of images needed for the development of these systems could be diminished using a well-designed dataset.

Sex disparities in COVID-19 outcomes of inpatients with diabetes: insights from the CORONADO study.

OBJECTIVE: Male sex is one of the determinants of severe coronavirus diseas-e-2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to characterize sex differences in severe outcomes in adults with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a sex-stratified analysis of clinical and biological features and outcomes (i.e. invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and home discharge at day 7 (D7) or day 28 (D28)) in 2380 patients with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19 and included in the nationwide CORONADO observational study (NCT04324736). RESULTS: The study population was predominantly male (63.5%). After multiple adjustments, female sex was negatively associated with the primary outcome (IMV and/or death, OR: 0.66 (0.49-0.88)), death (OR: 0.49 (0.30-0.79)) and ICU admission (OR: 0.57 (0.43-0.77)) at D7 but only with ICU admission (OR: 0.58 (0.43-0.77)) at D28. Older age and a history of microvascular complications were predictors of death at D28 in both sexes, while chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was predictive of death in women only. At admission, C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate amino transferase (AST) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), according to the CKD-EPI formula predicted death in both sexes. Lymphocytopenia was an independent predictor of death in women only, while thrombocytopenia and elevated plasma glucose concentration were predictors of death in men only. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes admitted for COVID-19, female sex was associated with lower incidence of early severe outcomes, but did not influence the overall in-hospital mortality, suggesting that diabetes mitigates the female protection from COVID-19 severity. Sex-associated biological determinants may be useful to optimize COVID-19 prevention and management in women and men.

The effectiveness of the BuzzyⓇ device to reduce or prevent pain in children undergoing needle-related procedures: The results from a prospective, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Pain from needle-related procedures in children can alter pain perception, increase pain sensitivity, and generate inappropriate pain responses. Currently pain management includes the use of lidocaine-containing patches, which is complicated to manage in a busy medical setting such as a vaccination centre. We assessed the BuzzyⓇ device, which combines vibration and cold, to manage pain in children undergoing a needle-related procedure, compared to the standard lidocaine patch. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, non-inferiority trial. SETTING: The vaccination centres of three university hospitals in France. PARTICIPANTS: French speaking children aged 4-15 requiring a needle-related procedure (vaccination or venepuncture) were eligible. Principal exclusion criteria were allergy or sensitivity to the lidocaine patch. METHODS: Children were randomly allocated (1:1) to use either the BuzzyⓇ device or the lidocaine patch during the needle-related procedure. The lidocaine patch was applied to the puncture site for the hour prior to the intervention. The BuzzyⓇ device was applied to the puncture site for 30 s and then moved 5 cm along the limb during the procedure. The refrigerated wings were detached if they bothered the child. The child assessed their pain using the validated Revised Faces Pain Scale. The revised faces pain scale comprised six facial expressions from 0, normal "no pain" to 10, a screaming face "severe pain" (2 points/face). The primary endpoint was the average pain score recorded by the child. The study aimed to test the non-inferiority of BuzzyⓇ. RESULTS: Overall 219 participants were randomised. The primary outcome was assessed in 215 children: 108 in the BUZZY group (43% asked for the refrigerated wings were de to be detatched before the end of the procedure) and 107 in the PATCH group. The baseline characteristics were similar between the study groups with an average age of 9 (range: 4.08-15.81). The average needle-related pain was 2.04 in the BUZZY group and 1.42 in the PATCH group. The average difference between the children's assessments in the groups was 0.62, thus faling to demonstrate non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: Our study failed to show that the BuzzyⓇ device was not inferior to the lidocaine patch in managing pain in children undergoing needle-related procedures. Tweetable abstract: Pain management in children undergoing a needle-related procedure vaccination: which efficacy for BuzzyⓇ device as an alternative to lidocaine patch? A prospective, randomised study.

Correction to: Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of inpatients with COVID-19 and diabetes: the CORONADO study.

The authors regret a mistake in Table 1.

Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of inpatients with COVID-19 and diabetes: the CORONADO study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is a life-threatening infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Diabetes has rapidly emerged as a major comorbidity for COVID-19 severity. However, the phenotypic characteristics of diabetes in COVID-19 patients are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide multicentre observational study in people with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19 in 53 French centres in the period 10-31 March 2020. The primary outcome combined tracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation and/or death within 7 days of admission. Age- and sex-adjusted multivariable logistic regressions were performed to assess the prognostic value of clinical and biological features with the endpoint. ORs are reported for a 1 SD increase after standardisation. RESULTS: The current analysis focused on 1317 participants: 64.9% men, mean age 69.8 ± 13.0 years, median BMI 28.4 (25th-75th percentile: 25.0-32.7) kg/m2; with a predominance of type 2 diabetes (88.5%). Microvascular and macrovascular diabetic complications were found in 46.8% and 40.8% of cases, respectively. The primary outcome was encountered in 29.0% (95% CI 26.6, 31.5) of participants, while 10.6% (9.0, 12.4) died and 18.0% (16.0, 20.2) were discharged on day 7. In univariate analysis, characteristics prior to admission significantly associated with the primary outcome were sex, BMI and previous treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers, but not age, type of diabetes, HbA1c, diabetic complications or glucose-lowering therapies. In multivariable analyses with covariates prior to admission, only BMI remained positively associated with the primary outcome (OR 1.28 [1.10, 1.47]). On admission, dyspnoea (OR 2.10 [1.31, 3.35]), as well as lymphocyte count (OR 0.67 [0.50, 0.88]), C-reactive protein (OR 1.93 [1.43, 2.59]) and AST (OR 2.23 [1.70, 2.93]) levels were independent predictors of the primary outcome. Finally, age (OR 2.48 [1.74, 3.53]), treated obstructive sleep apnoea (OR 2.80 [1.46, 5.38]), and microvascular (OR 2.14 [1.16, 3.94]) and macrovascular complications (OR 2.54 [1.44, 4.50]) were independently associated with the risk of death on day 7. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: In people with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19, BMI, but not long-term glucose control, was positively and independently associated with tracheal intubation and/or death within 7 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04324736.