Functional drivers of resistance to anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy targeting CD19 (CAR-19) promotes impressive durable remissions for relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients with historically poor prognoses. Despite this, over half of patients still fail to respond or eventually progress. Studies to reveal mechanisms of resistance have examined host clinical parameters, CAR-19 product composition, and tumor microenvironment (TME) alterations, while a relative paucity of studies has analyzed contributions by genomic alterations in tumor cells. Factors associated with outcome include increased tumor volume, specific characteristics of infused CAR-T products, infiltration by myeloid cells in tumor microenvironments, and markers of complexity in LBCL genomes. Functional laboratory studies of resistance are largely absent in the current literature, illustrating a need for experiments in genetically accurate immunocompetent systems to confirm candidate alterations' roles in resistance and inform future improvements. In this review, we highlight key studies that have elucidated biomarkers of resistance in hosts, CAR products, TMEs, and comparatively understudied tumor-intrinsic mediators encoded by tumor genomes. We conclude with an experimental framework suitable for CAR-19 resistance biomarker identification and laboratory functional validation.

Whole-genome sequencing reveals complex genomic features underlying anti-CD19 CAR T-cell treatment failures in lymphoma.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-19) T cells are groundbreaking immunotherapies approved for use against large B-cell lymphomas. Although host inflammatory and tumor microenvironmental markers associate with efficacy and resistance, the tumor-intrinsic alterations underlying these phenomena remain undefined. CD19 mutations associate with resistance but are uncommon, and most patients with relapsed disease retain expression of the wild-type receptor, implicating other genomic mechanisms. We therefore leveraged the comprehensive resolution of whole-genome sequencing to assess 51 tumor samples from 49 patients with CAR-19-treated large B-cell lymphoma. We found that the pretreatment presence of complex structural variants, APOBEC mutational signatures, and genomic damage from reactive oxygen species predict CAR-19 resistance. In addition, the recurrent 3p21.31 chromosomal deletion containing the RHOA tumor suppressor was strongly enriched in patients for whom CAR T-cell therapy failed. Pretreatment reduced expression or monoallelic loss of CD19 did not affect responses, suggesting CAR-19 therapy success and resistance are related to multiple mechanisms. Our study showed that tumor-intrinsic genomic alterations are key among the complex interplay of factors that underlie CAR-19 efficacy and resistance for large B-cell lymphomas.

Proteomics reveal cap-dependent translation inhibitors remodel the translation machinery and translatome.

Tactical disruption of protein synthesis is an attractive therapeutic strategy, with the first-in-class eIF4A-targeting compound zotatifin in clinical evaluation for cancer and COVID-19. The full cellular impact and mechanisms of these potent molecules are undefined at a proteomic level. Here, we report mass spectrometry analysis of translational reprogramming by rocaglates, cap-dependent initiation disruptors that include zotatifin. We find effects to be far more complex than simple "translational inhibition" as currently defined. Translatome analysis by TMT-pSILAC (tandem mass tag-pulse stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture mass spectrometry) reveals myriad upregulated proteins that drive hitherto unrecognized cytotoxic mechanisms, including GEF-H1-mediated anti-survival RHOA/JNK activation. Surprisingly, these responses are not replicated by eIF4A silencing, indicating a broader translational adaptation than currently understood. Translation machinery analysis by MATRIX (mass spectrometry analysis of active translation factors using ribosome density fractionation and isotopic labeling experiments) identifies rocaglate-specific dependence on specific translation factors including eEF1ε1 that drive translatome remodeling. Our proteome-level interrogation reveals that the complete cellular response to these historical "translation inhibitors" is mediated by comprehensive translational landscape remodeling.

Author Correction: Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes.

In the version of this article originally published, an asterisk was omitted from Fig. 1a. The asterisk has been added to the figure. Additionally, a "NOTCH2" label was erroneously included in Fig. 4a. The label has been removed. The errors have been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of this article.

Publisher Correction: Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes.

In the version of this article originally published, some text above the "Tri-nucleotide sequence motifs" label in Fig. 2a appeared incorrectly. The text was garbled and should have appeared as nucleotide codes.Additionally, the labels on the bars in Fig. 2c were not italicized in the original publication. These are gene symbols, and they should have been italicized.The colored labels above the graphs in Fig. 4b were also erroneously not italicized. These labels represent gene names and loci, and they should have been italicized.

Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common lymphoid malignancy in adults, is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disease that is further classified into transcriptionally defined activated B cell (ABC) and germinal center B cell (GCB) subtypes. We carried out a comprehensive genetic analysis of 304 primary DLBCLs and identified low-frequency alterations, captured recurrent mutations, somatic copy number alterations, and structural variants, and defined coordinate signatures in patients with available outcome data. We integrated these genetic drivers using consensus clustering and identified five robust DLBCL subsets, including a previously unrecognized group of low-risk ABC-DLBCLs of extrafollicular/marginal zone origin; two distinct subsets of GCB-DLBCLs with different outcomes and targetable alterations; and an ABC/GCB-independent group with biallelic inactivation of TP53, CDKN2A loss, and associated genomic instability. The genetic features of the newly characterized subsets, their mutational signatures, and the temporal ordering of identified alterations provide new insights into DLBCL pathogenesis. The coordinate genetic signatures also predict outcome independent of the clinical International Prognostic Index and suggest new combination treatment strategies. More broadly, our results provide a roadmap for an actionable DLBCL classification.