Inflammation-induced increases in plasma endocan levels are associated with endothelial dysfunction in humans in vivo.

Although endothelial dysfunction is central to the pathogenesis of sepsis, no specific and clinically applicable marker for endothelial dysfunction is currently available. Endocan, a proteoglycan excreted by endothelial cells in response to inflammatory cytokines, may serve as such a marker. Our objective was to investigate the kinetics of endocan and its relationship with inflammation-induced endothelial dysfunction during experimental human endotoxemia. Endothelial function was assessed in 17 healthy male volunteers before and 4 h after the administration of 2 ng/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by determination of the vasodilatory response of forearm blood vessels to intra-arterial infusion of endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine) or endothelium-independent (nitroglycerin/sodium nitroprusside) vasodilators using venous occlusion plethysmography. Plasma levels of endocan, inflammatory cytokines, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM), and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) were measured, and correlations with endothelial dysfunction were explored. Plasma levels of all measured cytokines, endocan, ICAM, and VCAM concentrations significantly increased after LPS administration. Furthermore, LPS administration resulted in a significantly blunted response to acetylcholine (mean ± SD increase in forearm blood flow [FBF] of 383% ± 320% before LPS vs. 173% ± 134% after LPS, P = 0.03), whereas the response to nitroglycerin/sodium nitroprusside was not affected (mean ± SD increase in FBF of 174% ± 120% before LPS vs. 110% ± 82% after LPS, P = 0.11). Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between the increase in plasma endocan levels and the attenuation of vasodilatory responses to acetylcholine (r = -0.48, P < 0.05). No correlation existed between plasma levels of ICAM or VCAM and the attenuation of the acetylcholine-induced vasodilatory response. Endocan levels are related to endothelial dysfunction in humans in vivo during systemic inflammation evoked by experimental endotoxemia. Therefore, this study suggests that endocan could be a novel marker of endothelial dysfunction in inflammatory conditions.

C1-esterase inhibitor attenuates the inflammatory response during human endotoxemia.

OBJECTIVE: Besides its role in regulation of the complement and contact system, C1-esterase inhibitor has other immunomodulating effects that could prove beneficial in patients with acute inflammation such as during sepsis or after trauma. We examined the immunomodulating properties of C1-esterase inhibitor during human experimental endotoxemia, in which the innate immune system is activated in the absence of activation of the classic complement pathway. DESIGN: Double-blind placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Research intensive care unit of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre. SUBJECTS: Twenty healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous injection of 2 ng/kg Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Thirty minutes thereafter (to prevent binding of lipopolysaccharide), C1-esterase inhibitor concentrate (100 U/kg, n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) was infused. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators, markers of endothelial and complement activation, hemodynamics, body temperature, and symptoms were measured. C1-esterase inhibitor reduced the release of proinflammatory cytokines as well as C-reactive protein (peak levels of: interleukin-6 1521 ± 209 vs. 932 ± 174 pg/mL [p = .04], tumor necrosis factor-α 1213 ± 187 vs. 827 ± 167 pg/mL [p = .10], monocyte chemotactic protein-1 6161 ± 1302 vs. 3373 ± 228 pg/mL [p = .03], interleukin-1ß 34 ± 5 vs. 23 ± 2 pg/mL [p < .01], C-reactive protein 39 ± 4 vs. 29 ± 2 mg/L [p = .02]). In contrast, release of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 was increased by C1-esterase inhibitor (peak level 73 ± 11 vs. 121 ± 18 pg/mL, p = .02). The increase in interleukin-1 receptor antagonist tended to be smaller in the C1-esterase inhibitor group, but this effect did not reach statistical significance (p = .07). Markers for endothelial activation were increased after lipopolysaccharide infusion, but no significant differences between groups were observed. The lipopolysaccharide-induced changes in heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, and symptoms (all p < .001 over time) were not influenced by C1-esterase inhibitor. Complement fragment C4 was not increased after lipopolysaccharide challenge. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to demonstrate that C1-esterase inhibitor exerts anti-inflammatory effects in the absence of classic complement activation in humans.