Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Ment Health Syst ; 13: 31, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31080500

RESUMEN

Worldwide, people with mental disorders are detained within the justice system at higher rates than the general population and often suffer human rights abuses. This review sought to understand the state of knowledge on the mental health of people detained in the justice system in Africa, including epidemiology, conditions of detention, and interventions. We included all primary research studies examining mental disorders or mental health policy related to detention within the justice system in Africa. 80 met inclusion criteria. 67% were prevalence studies and meta-analysis of these studies revealed pooled prevalence as follows: substance use 38% (95% CI 26-50%), mood disorders 22% (95% CI 16-28%), and psychotic disorders 33% (95% CI 28-37%). There were only three studies of interventions. Studies examined prisons (46%), forensic hospital settings (37%), youth institutions (13%), or the health system (4%). In 36% of studies, the majority of participants had not been convicted of a crime. Given the high heterogeneity in subpopulations identified in this review, future research should examine context and population-specific interventions for people with mental disorders.

2.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 4(11): 876-886, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28625876

RESUMEN

There has been little external analysis of Zimbabwe's mental health system. We did a systems analysis to identify bottlenecks and opportunities for mental health service improvement in Zimbabwe and to generate cost-effective, policy-relevant solutions. We combined in-depth interviews with a range of key stakeholders in health and mental health, analysis of mental health laws and policies, and publicly available data about mental health. Five themes are key to mental health service delivery in Zimbabwe: policy and law; financing and resources; criminal justice; workforce, training, and research; and beliefs about mental illness. We identified human resources, rehabilitation facilities, psychotropic medication, and community mental health as funding priorities. Moreover, we found that researchers should prioritise measuring the economic impact of mental health and exploring substance use, forensic care, and mental health integration. Our study highlights forensic services as a central component of the mental health system, which has been a neglected concept. We also describe a tailored process for mental health systems that is transferable to other low-income settings and that garners political will, builds capacity, and raises the profile of mental health.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Legislación Médica , Servicios de Salud Mental , Salud Mental , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/economía , Psiquiatría Forense/economía , Psiquiatría Forense/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Política de Salud/economía , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/economía , Derechos Humanos , Humanos , Salud Mental/economía , Salud Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica/economía , Participación de los Interesados , Análisis de Sistemas , Zimbabwe
3.
PLoS One ; 11(9): e0161860, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27607240

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Few people with mental disorders in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) receive treatment, in part because mental disorders are highly stigmatized and do not enjoy priority and resources commensurate with their burden on society. Advocacy has been proposed as a means of building political will and community support for mental health and reducing stigma, but few studies have explored the practice and promise of advocacy in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with leaders in health and mental health in Zimbabwe to explore key stakeholder perceptions on the challenges and opportunities of the country's mental health system. We coded the transcripts using the constant comparative method, informed by principles of grounded theory. Few interview questions directly concerned advocacy, yet in our analysis, advocacy emerged as a prominent, cross-cutting theme across participants and interview questions. RESULTS: Two thirds of the respondents discussed advocacy, often in depth, returning to the concept throughout the interview and emphasizing their belief in advocacy's importance. Participants described six distinct components of advocacy: the advocates, to whom they advocate ("targets"), what they advocate for ("asks"), how advocates reach their targets ("access"), how they make their asks ("arguments"), and the results of their advocacy ("outcomes"). DISCUSSION: Despite their perception that mental health is widely misunderstood and under-appreciated in Zimbabwe, respondents expressed optimism that strategically speaking out can reduce stigma and increase access to care. Key issues included navigating hierarchies, empowering service users to advocate, and integrating mental health with other health initiatives. Understanding stakeholder perceptions sets the stage for targeted development of mental health advocacy in Zimbabwe and other LMICs.


Asunto(s)
Defensa del Consumidor , Mercadotecnía , Salud Mental , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental , Zimbabwe
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...