Anti-Neuronal Autoantibodies (Cell Surface and Onconeural) and Their Association With Natural Autoantibodies in Synthetic Cannabinoid-Induced Psychosis.

Patients suffering from encephalitis may present psychiatric symptoms; however, the clinical relevance of anti-neuronal antibodies in patients experiencing a psychotic episode without encephalitis is still unclear. In this study, we examined the presence of anti-neuronal cell surface autoantibodies and onconeural autoantibodies in serum samples of 22 synthetic cannabinoid users presenting with psychosis. We found only two positive cases; however, seven patients had borderline results. Nonetheless, we found no significant correlation between anti-neuronal autoantibodies and the intensity of psychosis indicated by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores. The length of drug use and the combination of other drugs with synthetic cannabinoids have no significant effect on anti-neuronal autoantibody positivity. Nonetheless, the ratio of anti-citrate synthase (anti-CS) IgM and IgG natural autoantibodies was significantly lower (p = 0.036) in the anti-neuronal autoantibody-positive/borderline samples, than in the negative group. Interestingly, anti-CS IgM/IgG showed a significant negative correlation with PANSS-positive score (p = 0.04, r = -0.464). Our results demonstrated that anti-neuronal autoantibody positivity occurs in synthetic cannabinoid users, and the alteration of anti-CS IgM/IgG natural autoantibody levels points to immunological dysfunctions in these cases.

Single-center study of autoimmune encephalitis-related autoantibody testing in Hungary.

OBJECTIVE: Autoantibody detection is crucial for the early diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) since prompt therapy can determine the disease outcome. Here, we report a single-center 6-year retrospective study of autoantibody testing in AIE in the Hungarian population. METHODS: Serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) autoantibody tests were performed using cell-based indirect immunofluorescence assay for AIE diagnosis. Samples were provided by neurology clinics as part of a nationwide program. Test results were analyzed for samples received during the period from 2012 to 2018. RESULTS: We tested 1,247 samples from 1,034 patients with suspected AIE. Autoantibodies were present in 60 patients (5.8% of total). The distribution of patients with different autoantibodies by age and sex was as follows: NMDAR (70%), mostly in young females, LGI1 (15%) in middle-aged males, GABAB R (12%) in elderly males, and Caspr2 (7%) in males. Long-term follow-up was conducted in 30 patients with repeated test requests, of which 17 remained positive, and 13 switched to negative. CONCLUSION: We report the most comprehensive clinical laboratory study of autoantibody testing in AIE in the Hungarian population. Our results show that the frequency of different autoantibody types in AIE corresponds to the data described in the literature.

[Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes: laboratory diagnostics and immunological aspects]. / A paraneopláziás neurológiai szindrómák laboratóriumi diagnosztikája és immunológiai vonatkozásai.

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) and autoimmune encephalitis (AE) are rare neurological disorders, which have similar symptoms, but vary in outcome and treatment strategy. In our retrospective statistical study we evaluated the autoantibody test results of serum and CSF from 2362 patients with suspected PNS and 1034 patients with suspected AE. For autoantibody testing, immunoblot assay (PNS) and cell-based indirect immunofluorescence assay (AE) were used. Autoantibodies were present in 8% of patients with suspected PNS: anti-Yo > anti-Hu > anti-Ma2 > anti-CV2 > anti-titin > anti-Zic4 > anti-amphiphysin > anti-Ri > anti-GAD65 > anti-Sox1 > anti-recoverin. Mostly elderly women were affected. Autoantibodies were present in 5.8% of patients with suspected AE: anti-NMDAR (young women) > anti-LGI1 (middle-aged men) > anti-GABABR (elderly men) > anti-Caspr2 (adult men). Our results correspond to the data described in the literature. The number of patients with suspected PNS and AE shows an increasing tendency, where the autoantibody testing with modern laboratory diagnostic methods helps in the early introduction of the appropriate therapy.

Development of a robust and standardized immunoserological assay for detection of anti-measles IgG antibodies in human sera.

Because of measles outbreaks there is a need for continuous monitoring of immunological protection against infection at population level. For such monitoring to be feasible, a cost-effective, reliable and high-throughput assay is necessary. Herein we describe an ELISA protocol for assessment of anti-measles antibody levels in human serum samples that fulfills the above criteria and is easily adaptable by various laboratories. A serum bank of anonymous patient sera was established (N > 3000 samples). Sera were grouped based on measles immunization schedules and/or changes in vaccine components since the introduction of the first measles vaccine in Hungary in 1969. Newly designed ELISA was performed by using Siemens BEP 2000 Advance System and data were confirmed using commercially available kits. Our indirect ELISA was compared to indirect immunfluoresence and to anti-measles nucleocapsid (N) monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA. The results obtained are in high agreement with the confirmatory methods, and reflect measles vaccination history in Hungary ranging from pre-vaccination era, through the initial period of measles vaccination, to present. Based on measurement of 1985 sera, the highest ratio of low/questionable antibody level samples was detected in cluster '1978-1987' (~25.4%), followed by cluster '1969-1977' (~15.4%).Our assay is suitable for assessment of anti-measles immunity in a large cohort of subjects. The assay is cost-effective, allows high-throughput screening and has superior signal-to-noise ratio. This assay can serve as a first step in assessment of the effectiveness of all three components of the MMR vaccine.

[Autoimmune encephalitis: possibilities in the laboratory investigation]. / Az autoimmun encephalitisek laboratóriumi vizsgálati lehetoségei.

INTRODUCTION: The role of autoimmune responses against central nervous system (CNS) antigens in encephalitis presenting with non-classified neurologic or psychiatric symptoms has been appreciated in the past decade. Paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis has a poor prognosis and is most commonly associated with lung, ovarium, and testicular neoplasms, leading to immune reactions against intracellular antigens (anti-Hu/ANNA1, anti-Ri/ANNA2, anti-CV2/CRMP5 and anti-Ma2/Ta). In contrast, the recently described autoimmune encephalitis subtypes present with a broad spectrum of symptoms, respond to autoimmune therapies well and usually associate with autoantibodies against neuronal cell surface receptors (NMDAR, GABABR, AMPAR) or synaptic proteins (LGI1, CASPR2). AIM: Our aim is to bring to awareness the increasing number of autoimmune encephalitis patients requiring neurologic, psychiatric and intensive care and to emphasize the significance of detecting various autoantibodies in diagnosing patients. METHOD: In the past 6 years, our laboratory received 836 autoimmune encephalitis diagnostic test requests from a total of 717 patients. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were analysed with indirect immunofluorescence using a BIOCHIP consisting of cell lines transfected with 6 different receptor proteins. RESULTS: IgG autoantibodies against receptor proteins were present in 7.5% of patients. The frequency of positive samples was the following: NMDAR > LGI1 > GABABR > CASPR2. CONCLUSION: Detecting autoantibodies facilitates the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis in an early stage. Patients diagnosed early can be effectively treated with plasmapheresis and immunosuppressive drugs. The efficiency of therapies can be monitored by autoantibody detection. Therefore, the diagnostic immune laboratory plays an important role in proper diagnosis and in the prevention of rapidly progressing symptoms. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(3): 107-112.

[Clinical evaluation of the renin-aldosterone system: comparison of two methods in different clinical conditions]. / A renin-aldoszteron rendszer vizsgálata két módszerrel különbözo klinikai állapotokban.

INTRODUCTION: Measurement of plasma aldosterone/renin ratio is the key step in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism. AIM: The aim of the authors was to analyze and compare the diagnostic utility of plasma aldosterone/renin activity and plasma aldosterone/renin concentration ratios. METHODS: Plasma aldosterone and plasma renin activity were determined by radioimmunoassays and plasma renin concentration was measured by immunoradiometric assay in 134 subjects (80 women and 54 men, aged 46±15.5 years) including 49 healthy blood donors (control group), 59 patients with hypertension (25 treated and 34 untreated) and 26 patients with incidentally discovered adrenal adenomas. RESULTS: There was a weak correlation (r = 0.59) between plasma renin activity and plasma renin concentration in the lower range (plasma renin activity, 0.63±0.41 ng/ml/h; plasma renin concentration, 8.1±4.9 ng/l). Considering the cut-off value of plasma aldosterone/renin ratios determined in controls (plasma aldosterone/renin activity ratio, 30 ng/dl/ng/ml/h; plasma aldosterone/renin concentration ratio, 3.0 ng/dl/ng/l), high proportion of falsely positive results were found among patients on beta-receptor blocker therapy (plasma aldosterone/renin activity ratio, 22.2%; plasma aldosterone/renin concentration ratio, 44.4%) CONCLUSION: The widely used plasma aldosterone/renin activity ratio can only be replaced with plasma aldosterone/renin concentration ratio with precaution on different clinical conditions.