RESUMEN
We demonstrated that dose-densified and dose-intensified ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine; ABVDDD-DI) was safe and effective. Here, we present a post hoc long-term analysis of the 82 patients enrolled in the original study. The median observation time was 175 months (IQR 159-197). At 15 years, progression-free and overall survival rates were 81.2% (95% CI, 69.9%-88.7%) and 92.7% (95% CI, 82.6%-97.0%), respectively. Four patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors experienced delayed G3 cardiac events. The cumulative incidence of second malignancies at 20 years was 6.1%. Fertility and childbearing potential were unaffected. Data support an ongoing benefit for ABVDDD-DI without uneven late toxicities.
RESUMEN
Patients affected by multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and subsequent coronavirus (20)19 disease (COVID-19)-related death. The changing epidemiological and therapeutic scenarios suggest that there has been an improvement in severity and survival of COVID-19 during the different waves of the pandemic in the general population, but this has not been investigated yet in MM patients. Here we analyzed a large cohort of 1221 patients with MM and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection observed between February 2020, and August 2022, in the EPICOVIDEHA registry from 132 centers around the world. Median follow-up was 52 days for the entire cohort and 83 days for survivors. Three-hundred and three patients died (24%) and COVID-19 was the primary reason for death of around 89% of them. Overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in vaccinated patients with both stable and active MM versus unvaccinated, while only a trend favoring vaccinated patients was observed in subjects with responsive MM. Vaccinated patients with at least 2 doses showed a better OS than those with one or no vaccine dose. Overall, according to pandemic waves, mortality rate decreased over time from 34% to 10%. In multivariable analysis, age, renal failure, active disease, hospital, and intensive care unit admission, were independently associated with a higher number of deaths, while a neutrophil count above 0.5 × 109 /L was found to be protective. This data suggests that MM patients remain at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection even in the vaccination era, but their clinical outcome, in terms of OS, has progressively improved throughout the different viral phases of the pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with refractory or multiply relapsed (R/R) disease is disappointing. Pixantrone is currently approved as third or fourth line regimen, with encouraging results, even if long-term follow-up data are limited. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of our observational study, we retrospectively investigated disease outcome and clinical characteristics of 16 R/R DLBCL patients who achieved a complete response with pixantrone. RESULTS: Pixantrone was administered as third or fourth line in 12/16 (75%) and 4/16 (25%) cases. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 14/16 patients (87.5%) were alive (causes of death were progressive disease and secondary acute myeloid leukemia, one case each). Median progression-free survival was 23.8 months, median duration of response was 17.8 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached (2-years OS was 84%). A significant proportion of patients achieved a long-lasting response >12 months (7/16 cases). Response to prior therapy did not influence long-term remission after pixantrone. CONCLUSION: In this real-life experience, pixantrone demonstrated long-term efficacy in a cohort of R/R DLBCL cases who had previously received at least two prior regimens; many of whom had characteristics associated with poor prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/etiología , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Background: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment decreases the hospitalisation rate in immunocompetent patients with COVID-19, but data on efficacy in patients with haematological malignancy are scarce. Here, we describe the outcome of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment in a large cohort of the latter patients. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from the multicentre EPICOVIDEHA registry (NCT04733729) on patients with haematological malignancy, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between January and September 2022. Patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were compared to those who did not. A logistic regression was run to determine factors associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration in our sample. Mortality between treatment groups was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival plots after matching all the patients with a propensity score. Additionally, a Cox regression was modelled to detect factors associated with mortality in patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Findings: A total of 1859 patients were analysed, 117 (6%) were treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 1742 (94%) were treated otherwise. Of 117 patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 80% had received ≥1 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose before COVID-19 onset, 13% of which received a 2nd vaccine booster. 5% were admitted to ICU. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment was associated with the presence of extrapulmonary symptoms at COVID-19 onset, for example anosmia, fever, rhinitis, or sinusitis (aOR 2.509, 95%CI 1.448-4.347) and 2nd vaccine booster (aOR 3.624, 95%CI 1.619-8.109). Chronic pulmonary disease (aOR 0.261, 95%CI 0.093-0.732) and obesity (aOR 0.105, 95%CI 0.014-0.776) were not associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use. After propensity score matching, day-30 mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was 2%, significantly lower than in patients with SARS-CoV-2 directed treatment other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (11%, p = 0.036). No factor was observed explaining the mortality difference in patients after nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration. Interpretation: Haematological malignancy patients were more likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir when reporting extrapulmonary symptoms or 2nd vaccine booster at COVID-19 onset, as opposed to chronic pulmonary disease and obesity. The mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was lower than in patients with targeted drugs other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Funding: EPICOVIDEHA has received funds from Optics COMMIT (COVID-19 Unmet Medical Needs and Associated Research Extension) COVID-19 RFP program by GILEAD Science, United States (Project 2020-8223).
RESUMEN
(1) This study aimed to investigate whether baseline clinical and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (bPET)-derived parameters could help predicting early response to the first two cycles of chemotherapy (Deauville Score at interim PET, DS at iPET) in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) to identify poor responders (DS ≥ 4) who could benefit from first-line treatment intensification at an earlier time point. (2) cHL patients with a bPET and an iPET imaging study in our Centre's records (2013−2019), no synchronous/metachronous tumors, no major surgical resection of disease prior to bPET, and treated with two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy before iPET were retrospectively included. Baseline International Prognostic Score for HL (IPS) parameters were collected. Each patient's bPET total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and highest tumoral SUVmax were collected. ROC curves and Youden's index were used to derive the optimal thresholds of TMTV and SUVmax with regard to the DS (≥4). Chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used for the univariate analysis. A multivariate analysis was then performed using logistic regression. The type I error rate in the hypothesis testing was set to 5%. (3) A total of 146 patients were included. The optimal threshold to predict a DS ≥ 4 was >177 mL for TMTV and >14.7 for SUVmax (AUC of 0.65 and 0.58, respectively). The univariate analysis showed that only TMTV, SUVmax, advanced disease stage, and age were significantly associated with a DS ≥ 4. A multivariate model was finally derived from TMTV, SUVmax, and age, with an AUC of 0.77. (4) A multivariate model with bPET parameters and age at diagnosis was satisfactorily predictive of poor response at iPET after ABVD induction chemotherapy in cHL patients. More studies are needed to validate these results and further implement DS-predictive factors at baseline in order to prevent poor response and intensify therapeutic strategies a-priori when needed.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Healthy organs uptake, including cerebellar and liver SUVs have been reported to be inversely correlated to total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), a controversial predictor of event-free survival (EFS) in classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL). The objective of this study was to estimate TMTV by using healthy organs SUV measurements and assess the performance of this new index (UF, Uptake Formula) to predict EFS in cHL. Methods: Patients with cHL were retrospectively included. SUV values and TMTV derived from baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT were harmonized using ComBat algorithm across PET/CT systems. UF was estimated using ANOVA analysis. Optimal thresholds of TMTV and UF were calculated and tested using Cox models. Results: 163 patients were included. Optimal UF model of TMTV included age, lymphoma maximum SUVmax, hepatic SUVmean and cerebellar SUVmax (R2 14.0% - p < 0.001). UF > 236.8 was a significant predictor of EFS (HR: 2.458 [1.201-5.030], p = 0.01) and was not significantly different from TMTV > 271.0 (HR: 2.761 [1.183-5.140], p = 0.001). UF > 236.8 remained significant in a bivariate model including IPS score (p = 0.02) and determined two populations with different EFS (63.7 vs. 84.9%, p = 0.01). Conclusion: The Uptake Formula, a new index including healthy organ SUV values, shows similar performance to TMTV in predicting EFS in Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Validation cohorts will be needed to confirm this new prognostic parameter.
RESUMEN
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a neoplastic disease in which the inflammatory microenvironment plays a pivotal role in the tumorigenesis. Neutrophilia is a typical finding in HL at diagnosis and, in particular, in association with lymphocytopenia, is a negative prognostic factor. As the immune checkpoint Programmed Death (PD)-L1/PD-1 has become an important therapeutic target, we were interested in the expression of PD-L1 in peripheral blood (PB) leukocytes using flow cytometry and RT-PCR in patients with HL and healthy controls. Granulocytes were the major PB cell fraction expressing PD-L1. PD-L1 expression on granulocytes was higher in patients with HL than in controls and correlated with lower T-cell numbers in PB. We analyzed for associations between PD-L1 expression in PB granulocytes at the time of diagnosis with patient characteristics and outcome in 126 patients with HL treated with standard chemotherapy adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine. Increased PD-L1 expression in PB associated with advanced disease, systemic symptoms, positive interim positron emission tomography, and inferior progression-free survival (PFS). PFS at 4 years was 81% (95% C.I., 71-87%) in patients with normal PD-L1 expression and 56% (95% C.I., 35-72%) in patients with higher-than-normal PD-L1 expression (p = 0.002). In conclusion, PD-L1 expression in PB could become a potentially actionable prognostic factor in HL.
Expression of PD-L1 in peripheral blood reflects disease burden and predicts interim PET result and prognosis in classical HL.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Granulocitos/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Pronóstico , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pixantrone is a novel aza-anthracenedione with antineoplastic activity, currently approved for multiply relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), even if real-life data are limited. METHODS: We investigated pixantrone efficacy and safety in clinical practice, as 3rd or 4th line therapy. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 37 R/R DLBCL patients managed in 8 Tuscan onco-hematological centers. Pixantrone, 50 mg/m2 , was administered on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28 days cycle for up to 6 cycles. Response to therapy was evaluated according to the Lugano 2014 classification. RESULTS: Pixantrone was administered as 3rd or 4th line in 24/37 (64.9%) and 13/37 (35.1%) cases. Overall response rate and CR rate were 43.2% and 32.4%. After a median follow-up of 6 months, 17/37 patients (46%) were alive, the main cause of death was progressive disease (14/37 cases, 37.9%). Median PFS was 3 months, median DOR was 17.9 months, and median OS was 9.7 months. A significant proportion of patients achieved a long-lasting response >12 months (8/37 cases). IPI>2 showed a trend toward inferior PFS. CONCLUSION: In this real-life setting, pixantrone demonstrated appreciable efficacy in a population with poor prognosis; in a small proportion of cases, it can be associated with long-term remission.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Isoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) patients have a poor prognosis and their management is challenging, in absence of a golden standard as salvage treatment. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib represents an effective treatment for R/R MCL patients. We investigated ibrutinib efficacy and safety in daily clinical practice, together with factors that could predict disease outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 69 consecutive R/R MCL patients managed in 10 Tuscan onco-hematological centers. The treatment regimen consisted of oral, continuous, single-agent ibrutinib, maximum dosage of 560 mg once per day, until disease progression. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 62.3%, with a CR rate of 39.1%. After a median follow-up of 15.6 months, 40/69 patients (58%) were alive, the main cause of death was progressive disease (PD, 22/69 cases, 31.9%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 17 and 34.8 months. Inferior PFS was associated with >1 prior line of therapy and B symptoms. Ibrutinib refractoriness was associated with inferior OS, median OS after ibrutinib failure was only 5 months. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In this real-life setting ibrutinib treatment prolonged survival in R/R MCL patients, without unexpected adverse events. Patients receiving ibrutinib as 2nd line regimen had the most favorable outcome.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic role of end-of-treatment (EoT) FDG-PET/CT parameters in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and then to explore a pilot application of Neural Networks (NN) in predicting time-to-relapse. METHODS: For conventional survival analysis, parameters as Deauville score (DS) and quantitative extension of DS (qPET) were correlated to adverse events as relapse or progression in the follow-up. To build NN and conventional multi-regression models (MM) for time-to-event prediction, patients with residual FDG uptake (DS ≥ 2) and an adverse event were divided into a training and a test group. Models developed on the training group were evaluated in the test group. Pearson correlation coefficient (R) and mean relative error between observed and forecasted time-to-event were calculated. RESULTS: FDG-PET/CT data of 308 patients with DLBCL were analyzed. DS and qPET were prognostic factors in conventional univariate analysis. Positive and negative predictive values, respectively, were 55% and 83% for DS 4-5, 89% and 82% for positive qPET. Focusing on 37 relapsed patients with a residual FDG uptake, R between observed and forecasted time-to-event was of 0.63 in the NN model and 0.49 in the MM. Mean relative error in predicting time-to-event was of 58% for NN and 67% for MM. CONCLUSIONS: EoT FDG-PET/CT visual score (DS) is a strong outcome predictor in DLBCL in a large monocentric cohort. The semi-quantitative parameter qPET may increase this prognostic performance. A pilot NN model applied on residual FDG uptake parameters seems to predict time-to-event in the follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/terapia , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is causing millions of infections and hundreds of thousands of deaths worldwide. Cumulative clinical and laboratory evidence suggest that a subset of patients with severe COVID-19 may develop a cytokine storm syndrome during the course of the disease, with severe respiratory impairment requiring ventilatory support. One field of research nowadays is to identify and treat viral-induced hyperinflammation with drugs used in other clinical conditions characterized by an hyperinflammation status. These drugs might help to reduce COVID19 mortality. Methods: Ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, has been successfully used to treat severe immune-mediated diseases, such as graft vs. host disease and Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. We used ruxolitinib in 18 patients with clinically progressive COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome, with a primary endpoint to rapidly reduce the degree of respiratory impairment and as a secondary endpoint to rapidly restore the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, as an evaluation of clinical status, and monitoring of drug related Adverse Events. Parameters of inflammation responses and organ functions were assessed and monitored. The treatment plan was ruxolitinib 20 mg bid for the first 48 h and subsequent two-step de-escalation at 10 mg bid and 5 mg bid for a maximum of 14 days of treatment. Results: Our data collection shows a rapid clinical response with no evolution from non-invasive ventilation to mechanical ventilation in 16/18 patients and no response in two patients (overall response rate-ORR 89%). Already after 48 h of ruxolitinib treatment 16/18 patients showed evident clinical improvement, and after 7 days of treatment 11/18 patients showed fully recovered respiratory function (pO2 > 98% in spontaneous breathing), 4/18 patients had minimal oxygen requirement (2-4 L/m), 1/18 patient showed stable disease, and 2/18 patient showed progressive disease. After 14 days, 16/18 patients showed complete recovery of respiratory function (ORR 89%). Compliance to ruxolitinib planned treatment was 100% and no serious adverse event was recorded. In our case series of 18 critically ill patients with COVID-19 and ARDS, administration of ruxolitinib resulted in a clinical improvement that concurred to modify the standard course of disease. Ruxolitinib can be a therapeutic option for patients with respiratory insufficiency in COVID-19 related ARDS. RESPIRE Study (Ruxolitinib for the treatment of acute rESPIratory distREss syndrome, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04361903).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several small studies on patients with COVID-19 and haematological malignancies are available showing a high mortality in this population. The Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 aimed to collect data from adult patients with haematological malignancies who required hospitalisation for COVID-19. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective, cohort study included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with diagnosis of a WHO-defined haematological malignancy admitted to 66 Italian hospitals between Feb 25 and May 18, 2020, with laboratory-confirmed and symptomatic COVID-19. Data cutoff for this analysis was June 22, 2020. The primary outcome was mortality and evaluation of potential predictive parameters of mortality. We calculated standardised mortality ratios between observed death in the study cohort and expected death by applying stratum-specific mortality rates of the Italian population with COVID-19 and an Italian cohort of 31â993 patients with haematological malignancies without COVID-19 (data up to March 1, 2019). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352556, and the prospective part of the study is ongoing. FINDINGS: We enrolled 536 patients with a median follow-up of 20 days (IQR 10-34) at data cutoff, 85 (16%) of whom were managed as outpatients. 440 (98%) of 451 hospitalised patients completed their hospital course (were either discharged alive or died). 198 (37%) of 536 patients died. When compared with the general Italian population with COVID-19, the standardised mortality ratio was 2·04 (95% CI 1·77-2·34) in our whole study cohort and 3·72 (2·86-4·64) in individuals younger than 70 years. When compared with the non-COVID-19 cohort with haematological malignancies, the standardised mortality ratio was 41·3 (38·1-44·9). Older age (hazard ratio 1·03, 95% CI 1·01-1·05); progressive disease status (2·10, 1·41-3·12); diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia (3·49, 1·56-7·81), indolent non-Hodgin lymphoma (2·19, 1·07-4·48), aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (2·56, 1·34-4·89), or plasma cell neoplasms (2·48, 1·31-4·69), and severe or critical COVID-19 (4·08, 2·73-6·09) were associated with worse overall survival. INTERPRETATION: This study adds to the evidence that patients with haematological malignancies have worse outcomes than both the general population with COVID-19 and patients with haematological malignancies without COVID-19. The high mortality among patients with haematological malignancies hospitalised with COVID-19 highlights the need for aggressive infection prevention strategies, at least until effective vaccination or treatment strategies are available. FUNDING: Associazione italiana contro le leucemie, linfomi e mieloma-Varese Onlus.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Italia/epidemiología , Leucemia/epidemiología , Leucemia/terapia , Linfoma no Hodgkin/epidemiología , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos/epidemiología , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos/terapia , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Células Plasmáticas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Inmunoconjugados , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos , Brentuximab Vedotina , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Lymphoma is listed among the neoplasias with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Risk factors for VTE appear to differ from risk factors in solid tumors. We review the literature of the last 20 years for reports identifying these risk factors in cohorts consisting exclusively of lymphoma patients. We selected 25 publications. The most frequent studies were analyses of retrospective single-center cohorts. We also included two reports of pooled analyses of clinical trials, two meta-analyses, two analyses of patient registries, and three analyses of population-based databases. The VTE risk is the highest upfront during the first two months after lymphoma diagnosis and decreases over time. This upfront risk may be related to tumor burden and the start of chemotherapy as contributing factors. Factors consistently reported as VTE risk factors are aggressive histology, a performance status ECOG ≥ 2 leading to increased immobility, more extensive disease, and localization to particular sites, such as central nervous system (CNS) and mediastinal mass. Association between laboratory values that are part of risk assessment models in solid tumors and VTE risk in lymphomas are very inconsistent. Recently, VTE risk scores for lymphoma were developed that need further validation, before they can be used for risk stratification and primary prophylaxis. Knowledge of VTE risk factors in lymphomas may help in the evaluation of the individual risk-benefit ratio of prophylaxis and help to design prospective studies on primary prophylaxis in lymphoma.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/etiología , Linfoma Folicular/complicaciones , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/farmacologíaRESUMEN
We analyzed the prognostic impact of levels of free light chains (FLC) in 106 patients with DLBCL, selecting 61 patients with a monoclonal (M) protein in serum, and 45 patients without a M protein as an IPI-matched control group. Patients with a M protein had higher levels of FLC, but these were not of prognostic significance in this group. The presence of a M protein nullified associations of κ-FLC with several laboratory parameters indicating immune system activation observed in patients without a M protein. Patients without M protein and κ-FLC >50 mg/L had a significant inferior event-free survival (p = .004). The presence of M protein of an IgM type at diagnosis was a negative outcome predictor (p = .008), while a non-IgM M protein did not significantly impact on prognosis. In conclusion, the prognostic performance of the FLC assay is altered by the presence of a M protein.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Cadenas Ligeras de Inmunoglobulina , Cadenas kappa de Inmunoglobulina , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , PronósticoRESUMEN
The clinical management of older adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) remains a major challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of comorbidity assessment according to a standardized approach, the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), on prognosis in patients with classical HL aged 60 years and older. We studied 76 consecutive older adult patients with HL (median age 69 y, range 60-84) who had been treated in our institution between 1999 and 2018. Comorbidity was assessed at diagnosis according to CIRS. Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy with curative intent was administered in 59 (78%) patients. We identified 41 (54%) patients with at least one severe comorbidity rated on CIRS grade ≥ 3. Patients with severe comorbidity were more likely to have advanced-stage disease (P = .003), to have an International Prognostic Score (IPS) > 3 (P = .03), and to not receive anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (P = .008). The probability of overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 88% (95% CI, 71%-95%) in patients without severe comorbidities, while it was only 46% (95% CI, 29%-62%) in patients with a comorbidity CIRS grade ≥ 3 (P = .0001). The impact of comorbidity on prognosis was also evident when restricting the analysis to patients treated with anthracycline-containing therapy. The 3-year OS was 93% (95% CI, 76%-98%) (P = .004) in patients without severe comorbidity and 72% (95% CI, 47%-87%) in patients with severe comorbidity (P = .004). In a multivariate analysis, presence of comorbidity, but not age, was a significant factor for OS. Therefore, we conclude that a significant proportion of older adult patients with HL has severe comorbidity on the CIRS scale, which impacts more importantly than age on prognosis.