Demographics and Characteristics of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program Directors: A Cross-sectional Review.

To date, there has been a paucity of research evaluating the demographics, characteristics, and surgical training of orthopaedic residency program directors (PDs). Purpose: To determine the objective characteristics of orthopaedic residency PDs by analyzing their demographic characteristics, academic backgrounds, institutional histories, research productivity, and professional leadership affiliations. Methods: Data for each PD were collected by searching publicly available curriculum vitae, LinkedIn, Healthgrades, Doximity, and/or institutional biographies and consolidated into a database. Research productivities were collected by searching PubMed and Scopus. Results: Of the 210 PDs, 188 (89.5%) were male and 22 (10.5%) were female. One hundred seventy-four (82.9%) were non-Hispanic White, 14 (6.7%) Asian American and Pacific Islander, 12 (5.7%) Black or African American, 4 (1.9%) Hispanic or Latino, and 6 (2.9%) other/unknown. Twenty-four (11.4%) PDs had a military affiliation. Moreover, the most common subspecialties among orthopaedic PDs were orthopaedic traumatology (19.5%, n = 41), sports medicine (15.7%, n = 33), and hand surgery (11.9%, n = 25). The mean Scopus h-index, total number of publications at the time of data collection (June 2022), and total number of citations for all orthopaedic residency PDs were 10.5 ± 9.5, 33.9 ± 51.0, and 801.9 ± 1,536.4, respectively. Among all PDs, the mean tenure in the position was 8.9 ± 6.2 years to date, and the mean time from completion of residency to appointment as PD was 10.0 ± 6.2 years. Conclusions: Among orthopaedic surgery residency PDs, there is sparse female and minority representation. Overarchingly, orthopaedic PDs are White men in their early 50s. Moreover, 59.1% of PDs were appointed at an institution where they completed medical school, residency, or fellowship. orthopaedic traumatology (19.5%), sports medicine (15.7%), and hand surgery (11.9%) were the subspecialties most represented in current orthopaedic surgery PDs. Clinical Relevance: This study outlines important demographic characteristics among orthopaedic surgery residency PDs. Level of Evidence: III.

Outcomes of Pyrocarbon Arthroplasty in Metacarpophalangeal Joints Affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affecting the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint may warrant arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate implant survivorship, complications, radiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MCP arthroplasty with a pyrocarbon implant to treat RA. METHODS: In all, 124 MCP joint pyrocarbon arthroplasties in 40 patients performed to treat RA were reviewed. Operations were at the index (n = 43, 35%), middle (n = 33, 27%), ring (n = 27, 22%), and small (n = 21, 17%) fingers from 1998 to 2009 in 105 (85%) female and 19 (15%) male joints with a mean age of 54 ± 11 years. Mean postoperative follow-up was 6 ± 3 years. All patients achieved at least 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Rates of implant survivorship at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were 98%, 98%, 90%, and 81%, respectively. Fifteen percent (n = 18) of arthroplasties underwent revision at a mean 5 ± 3 years postoperatively. The overall reoperation rate was 29% (n = 36). Rates of survival from reoperation at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were 85%, 84%, 76%, and 68%, respectively. Complications occurred in 32% (n = 40). Pain ratings improved postoperatively (P < .01). Arc of motion improved from 37 ± 21 to 43 ± 19 (P = .03). Both appositional and oppositional strength improved after surgery; however, there was no improvement in grip strength (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty with a pyrocarbon implant demonstrated reliable improvement in pain and arc of motion in patients with RA. Complication and overall reoperation rates were high, while 1 in 10 undergo revision within 5 years postoperatively.

Hamstring Injuries: Critical Analysis Review of Current Nonoperative Treatments.

➢: Hamstring injuries are common among active and athletic individuals, especially those involved in high-speed running, distance running, or sports requiring sudden directional changes. Acute hamstring strains often occur as an eccentric strain during running or a stretch-type injury caused by simultaneous hip flexion and knee extension. Proximal hamstring tendinopathy is an overuse injury of the hamstring tendon as a result of chronic cicatrization of the musculotendinous unit. ➢: Repeated stress to the hamstring tendon leads to increased cellularity of tendon fibers, disruption of collagen, and subsequent microinjury of the tissue that attaches the tendon to bone. ➢: Management of hamstring injuries generally begins with nonoperative modalities consisting of eccentric rehabilitative exercise programs. Although various other treatment modalities are available, the comparative efficacy of these supportive measures is not well differentiated at this time. ➢: In this article, we review the current literature with regard to the nonoperative treatment of hamstring injuries, specifically focusing on acute hamstring muscle strains and proximal hamstring tendinopathy in order to provide supplementary insight on the effectiveness of current modalities.