RESUMEN
Data regarding open-label treatment with fluoxetine following failure to respond to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or intolerance of TCA side effects, suggest a response rate between 51.4% and 62.1%, depending on the definition of TCA refractoriness employed. Double-blind study of this issue would extend these findings. Fluoxetine is well tolerated in patients unable to tolerate TCAs. Within this population, more than 80% of patients unable to tolerate TCAs found fluoxetine acceptable. Fluoxetine, as an alternative to polypharmaceutical augmentation, may represent a logical choice as the next step in therapy for a patient who has initially been treated with a TCA and has proven refractory or intolerant.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/efectos adversos , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Due to the interstitial pulmonary edema present in neonates with idiopatic respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS), it was believed furosemide would be useful in its treatment. In newborns with this syndrome, the effect of said diuretic was studied in blood gases, oxygen alveoloarterial difference and right to left short circuit. Twenty-two infants with similar clinical and laboratory characteristics were included in the study. Out of them, 11 were given furosemide (1 mg/kg/single dosis) and the remaining cases were controls. No difference was shown between both groups in PaO2 and PaCO2 and therefore, the alveoloarterial difference of oxygen nor the right to left short circuit during 60 minutes that the study lasted were either affected even if the infants who were given furosemide showed a significantly greater urinary flow. Due to the above results, the use of furosemide is not recommended for children with IRDS to eliminate an interstitial edema.