Nonverbal Cognitive Skills in Children With Aicardi Goutières Syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Aicardi Goutières syndrome (AGS) is type I interferonopathy characterized by severe neurologic impairment. Although many children with AGS demonstrate motor and expressive language deficits, the magnitude of receptive language impairment is uncharacterized. We sought to characterize cognitive function in AGS-affected children using assessment tools with reduced dependence on motor abilities and compare cognitive testing outcomes with overall severity and parental assessment of adaptive behavior. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study. Children were recruited as part of the Myelin Disorders Biorepository Project at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. We included individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of AGS. We administered the Leiter International Performance Scale, third edition (Leiter-3), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, third edition (VABS-3), in the context of research encounters. Motor skills were categorized by AGS Severity Scale mobility levels. Descriptive statistics and Spearman's rank correlation were used to compare assessments. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests with correction with Dunn's multiple comparison test were used to compare test performance between mobility groups. RESULTS: Cognitive and adaptive behavior performance was captured in 57 children. The mean age at encounters was 8.51 (SD 5.15) years. The median (IQR) Leiter-3 score was 51 (interquartile range [IQR] 60), with administration failure in 20 of 57 (35%) individuals. On the VABS-3, the Motor Domain (median 29, IQR 36.25) was more impacted than the Communication (median 50, IQR 52), Daily Living Skills (median 52, IQR 31), and Socialization (median 54, IQR 40) Domains (p < 0.0001). The AGS Scale correlated with VABS-3 (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001) and Leiter-3 (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001). There was correlation between VABS-3 Domains and Leiter-3 (r-range 0.83-0.97). Gross motor and fine motor categories, respectively, correlated with VABS-3 (H = 39.37, p < 0.0001; U = 63, p < 0.0001) and Leiter-3 (H = 40.43, p < 0.0001; U = 66, p < 0.0001). Within each gross motor and fine motor category of the AGS Scale, a subset of children scored within normal IQ range. DISCUSSION: Parental assessment of function by the VABS-3 correlated with directly assessed performance measures. Our data underscore the potential value of VABS-3 and Leiter-3 as tools to assess psychometric function in AGS. With a deeper understanding of our patients' abilities, we can better guide clinicians and families to provide appropriate support and personalized interventions to empower children with leukodystrophies to maximize their communication and educational potential.

Characterization of Fine Motor and Visual Motor Skills in Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome.

Aicardi-Goutières syndrome is a genetic inflammatory disorder resulting in dispersed neurologic dysfunction. Despite a recognition of overall motor impairment, fine and visual motor skills are undercharacterized. We hypothesize that there is a spectrum of fine and visual motor skills in the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population as captured by a standard outcome measure, the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2), which will be proportional to overall disease severity.In a cohort of 74 subjects, the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 grasping and visual-motor integration subtests were administered concurrently with the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome Severity Scale (severe [range 0-3], moderate [range 4-8], and attenuated [range 9-11]). The cohort was also compared by genotype and performance as defined by raw scores. The distribution of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 scores within a genotype was assessed by interquartile ranges (IQRs).Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 grasping and visual-motor integration performance was the least variable in the TREX1-cohort (IQR: 10.00-12.00) versus the SAMHD1 and IFIH1 cohorts (IQR: 51.00-132.00 and 48.50-134.00, respectively). Neurologic severity highly correlated with both fine and visual motor skills (Spearman correlation: r = 0.87, 0.91, respectively). A floor effect (lowest 10% of possible scores) was observed within the severe cohort (n = 32/35), whereas a ceiling effect (top 10%) was observed in the attenuated cohort (n = 13/17).This study characterized the spectrum of fine and visual motor function in the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population, which correlated with overall neurologic dysfunction. The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 grasping and visual-motor integration showed promise as potential assessment tools in moderate and attenuated Aicardi-Goutières syndrome cohorts. A better understanding of fine and visual motor function in this population will benefit clinical care and clinical trial design.

Exploration of Gross Motor Function in Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome.

Background: Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by a spectrum of motor abilities. While the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome severity score favors severely impacted individuals, there is an unmet need to define tools measuring function across the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome spectrum as potential outcome assessments for future clinical trials. Methods: Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) and AGS Severity Scale were administered in individuals affected by Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (n = 71). We characterized the performance variability by genotype. Derived versions of the GMFM-88, including the GMFM-66, GMFM-66 item set (GMFM-66IS), and GMFM-66 Basal&Ceiling (GMFM-66BC) were calculated. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome cohort was divided into severe (AGS Severity Scale score <4) or attenuated (≥4). Performance on the AGS Severity Scale highly correlated with total GMFM-88 scores (Spearman Correlation: R = 0.91). To assess variability of the GMFM-88 within genotypic subcohorts, interquartile ranges (IQRs) were compared. Results: GMFM-88 performance in the TREX1 cohort had least variability while the SAMHD1 cohort had the largest IQR (4.23 vs 81.8). Floor effect was prominent, with most evaluations scoring below 20% (n = 46, 64.79%), particularly in TREX1- and RNASEH2-cohorts. Performance by the GMFM-66, GMFM-66IS, and GMFM-66BC highly correlated with the full GMFM-88. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population represents a broad range of gross motor skills. Conclusions: This work identified the GMFM-88 as a potential clinical outcome assessment in subsets of the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population but underscores the need for additional validation of outcome measures reflective of the diverse gross motor function observed in this population, including low motor function. When time is limited by resources or patient endurance, shorter versions of the GMFM-88 may be a reasonable alternative.

Development of a neurologic severity scale for Aicardi Goutières Syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aicardi Goutières Syndrome (AGS) is a severe, autoinflammatory leukodystrophy characterized by global neurologic dysfunction. Our goal was to create an easy-to-apply scale relevant to the unique developmental challenges associated with AGS. METHODS: All individuals were recruited through our natural history study. Individuals were classified by AGS severity as mild, moderate, or severe, and clinical encounters were assigned a composite score for neurologic function calculated from the sum of three functional classification scales. Through expert consensus, we identified 11 key items to reflect the severity of AGS across gross motor, fine motor, and cognitive skills to create the AGS Scale. There was strong interrater reliability. The AGS scale was applied across available medical records to evaluate neurologic function over time. The AGS scale was compared to performance on a standard measure of gross motor function (Gross Motor Function Measure-88, GMFM-88) and a putative diagnostic biomarker of disease, the interferon signaling gene expression score (ISG). RESULTS: The AGS scale score correlated with severity classifications and the composite neurologic function scores. When retrospectively applied across our natural history study, the majority of individuals demonstrated an initial decline in function followed by stable scores. Within the first 6 months of disease, the AGS score was the most dynamic. The AGS scale correlated with performance by the GMFM-88, but did not correlate with ISG levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of the AGS scale as a multimodal tool for the assessment of neurologic function in AGS. The AGS scale correlates with clinical severity and with a more labor-intensive tool, GMFM-88. This study underscores the limitations of the ISG score as a marker of disease severity. With the AGS scale, we found that AGS neurologic severity is the most dynamic early in disease. This novel AGS scale is a promising tool to longitudinally follow neurologic function in this unique population.