Use of 3D-Printed Implants in Complex Foot and Ankle Reconstruction.

SUMMARY: Treatment of traumatic critical-sized bone defects remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Autograft remains the gold standard to address bone loss, but for larger defects, different strategies must be used. The use of 3D-printed implants to address lower extremity trauma and bone loss is discussed with current techniques including bone transport, Masquelet, osteomyocutaneous flaps, and massive allografts. Considerations and future directions of implant design, augmentation, and optimization of the peri-implant environment to maximize patient outcome are reviewed.

Geographic Distribution of Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Surgeons Throughout the United States.

BACKGROUND: At present, the geographic distribution of orthopedic foot and ankle (OFA) surgeons in the United States is poorly defined. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the geographic distribution of OFA surgeons in the United States. We hypothesize that there will be differences in OFA surgeon density throughout the United States and that economic factors may play a role in access to subspecialty OFA care. METHODS: A current membership list was obtained from the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS). Active members were categorized relative to states and US congressional districts, using publicly available census data. The relationship between income and surgeon density was determined using a Pearson correlation. RESULTS: We identified a list of 1103 active AOFAS members. There was an average of 0.38 and 0.40 OFA surgeons per 100 000 people in each state and congressional district, respectively. We found a weak negative relationship demonstrating that regions with higher levels of poverty had fewer OFA surgeons, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.14 (95% CI: -0.24, -0.04), P = .008. CONCLUSION: There is wide geographic variation of OFA surgeon density throughout the United States. Regions with higher levels of poverty were weakly associated with decreased population density of OFA surgeons compared to regions with lower poverty levels. Understanding these trends may aid in developing both recruitment and referral strategies for complex foot and ankle care in underserved regions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Medial Malleoli Fractures: Clinical Comparison Between Newly Designed Sled Device and Conventional Screws.

BACKGROUND: The Trimed Medial Malleolar Sled is a newer device designed to treat medial malleolus fracture. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of medial malleolar fractures treated with the sled and conventional malleolar screws. METHODS: After obtaining an institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective study to identify all skeletally mature patients who sustained an ankle fracture with medial malleolar involvement treated with the sled and we identified a matched cohort treated with conventional malleolar screws. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A included patients treated with malleolar screws and group B included patients treated with the sled device. The outcomes measured included rate of union, implant removal, and pain over the implant site. RESULTS: Eighty-five medial malleolar ankle fractures were divided into 2 groups: group A included patients (n = 64) treated with malleolar screws and group B included patients (n = 21) treated with the sled device. In group A (n = 64), 62 patients (96.8%) achieved radiological union with a mean union rate of 11 weeks and 10 (15%) patients underwent repeat surgery for implant removal of which 3 patients (4.6%) had pain specifically over the medial implant. In group B (n = 21), all of the patients (100%) achieved radiological union with a mean union rate of 10.8 weeks and 3 patients (14.2%) underwent repeat surgery of which 1 (4.7%) was related to the medial pain. There is no significant difference between the groups for the outcomes measured, including rate of union ( P = .93), visual analog scale score for pain ( P = .07), implant removal ( P = .41), and pain over the implant site ( P = .88). CONCLUSION: Based on the data from our study, we conclude that there are no major differences between the sled devices and conventional screws relating to union rate and complications. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Observational study.

Levels of Evidence for Foot and Ankle Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: 15-Year Trends.

BACKGROUND: The foot and ankle (FA) content domain is a component of the orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE). Levels of evidence (LoE) have been infrequently studied on the OITE. The purpose of this study is to determine if LoE for primary journal articles referenced for FA questions increased over a 15-year period. We also aim to determine if reference characteristics and question taxonomy have changed during this period. METHODS: All 132 questions and 261 references in the FA content domain from 1995 to 1997 and from 2010 to 2012 were included. We defined the characteristics of each reference and taxonomy of each question. Every primary journal article was assigned a LoE based on American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines. RESULTS: Foot & Ankle International (FAI) was the most frequently cited journal. The change in the distribution of the Buckwalter classifications was statistically significant (p = 0.0286) with an increase in the number of clinical management questions. There were more level I studies on the 2010 to 2012 OITE (p = 0.0478) 6/54 (11%) of questions on the 2010 to 2012 OITE cited level I or II evidence compared with 3/78 (4%) on the 1995 to 1997 examinations (p = 0.1035). CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend toward improved LoE for journal articles within the FA content domain on the OITE over a 15-year period, particularly when analyzing the increase in level I studies. FAI is the most frequently cited journal and questions increasingly test clinical management concepts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results can be used to help improve resident self-study and suggest that reviewing recent FAI articles may aid OITE preparation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science.

Analysis of Orthopedic Resident Ability to Apply Levels of Evidence Criteria to Scientific Articles.

OBJECTIVE: In the era of evidence-based medicine, understanding study design and levels of evidence (LoE) criteria is an important component of resident education and aids practicing surgeons in making informed clinical decisions. The purpose of this study is to analyze the ability of orthopedic residents to accurately determine LoE criteria for published articles compared with medical students. DESIGN: Basic science article. SETTING: Geisinger Medical Center (Danville, PA), tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 25 U.S. orthopedic residents and 15 4th year medical students interviewing for a residency position in orthopedic surgery voluntarily participated and provided baseline demographic information. A total of 15 articles from the American Volume of Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery were identified. Study participants were provided with the article title, the abstract, and the complete methods section. The assigned LoE designation was withheld and access to the LoE criteria used by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery was provided. Each participant was assigned a study type and LoE designation for each article. RESULTS: There were more correct responses regarding the article type (67%) than for LoE designation (39%). For LoE, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.30. The percentage of correct responses for article type and LoE increased with more years of training (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002). Although residents had a higher proportion of correct LoE responses overall than medical students, this difference did not reach statistical significance (42% vs. 35%, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Although improvements in accurately determining both article type and LoE were seen among residents with increasing years of training, residents were unable to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement for determining LoE or article type when compared with medical students. Strategies to improve resident understanding of LoE guidelines need to be incorporated into orthopedic residencies, especially when considering the increased emphasis on evidence-based medicine.

Single-incision lateral approach for triple arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Triple arthrodesis is a powerful hindfoot corrective procedure involving fusion of the talonavicular (TN), calcaneocuboid (CC), and subtalar (ST) joints. A 2-incision approach, a single-incision medial triple arthrodesis, and a single-incision medial double arthrodesis are well described. We present a single-incision lateral approach to triple arthrodesis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 70 patients who underwent triple arthrodesis at our institution from 2007 to 2011. Patients had either double-incision (n = 33) or single-incision lateral (n = 37) triple arthrodesis. A single surgeon performed all procedures. The most common diagnosis was stage III planovalgus deformity. Deformity correction, union rate, time of surgery, complications, wound healing, reoperations, and pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were analyzed for both groups. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in deformity correction, wound healing, complications, reoperations, or improvement in VAS pain scores. Operation time was significantly shorter in the single-incision lateral group (86 minutes vs 95 minutes, P = .0395). There was no difference in union rates with regard to the TN, ST, or CC joints. Five patients had radiographic nonunions of the CC joint between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that presents outcomes of a single lateral approach for triple arthrodesis. The single-incision approach was faster. The low rate of symptomatic nonunions suggests that fusion of the CC joint may not be important in symptomatic relief or deformity correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Tendon transfers for peroneal nerve injuries in the multiple ligament injured knee.

Although knee dislocations are relatively rare injuries; associated drop foot complication as a consequence of common peroneal nerve palsy (CPN) is substantially high. Even after successful ligament constructions; unresolved CPN palsy is a factor contributing to bad outcome after knee dislocations. CPN palsy is seen more after open dislocations, rotatory dislocations, and especially in patients with posterolateral corner injuries. CPN palsy can readily be diagnosed clinically, although high index of suspicion is needed. Surgical exploration in the acute setting is still debatable. Conservative management can be appropriate in early phase of treatment, however surgery is the choice of treatment for persistent nerve damage. Neurolysis, primary nerve repair, nerve grafting, and posterior tibialis tendon transfer are all reasonable choices for surgical treatment. Late surgery results have an exceedingly low success. Tibialis posterior tendon transfer is indicated primarily in the setting of a drop foot and a steppage gait. Tibialis posterior tendon transfer procedures have had acceptable success in allowing patients to return to ambulation without assistive device.

Drop foot after knee dislocation: evaluation and treatment.

Although knee dislocations are relatively rare, serious complications make treatment difficult. Common peroneal nerve (CPN) palsy is a debilitating complication and its incidence has been reported as high as 50%. Even after successful ligament construction, unresolved CPN palsy is a major factor contributing to poor outcomes after knee dislocations. CPN palsy is more common with open dislocations, rotatory dislocations, and especially occurs in patients with posterolateral corner injuries. CPN palsy can be readily diagnosed clinically, although a high index of suspicion is needed. The risk versus benefits of surgical exploration in the acute setting is still under debate. Conservative management can be appropriate in the early phase of treatment, however, for persistent nerve damage, surgery is the treatment of choice because it results in better functional outcomes. Neurolysis, primary nerve repair, nerve grafting, and posterior tibialis tendon transfer have all been used by surgeons as viable surgical treatment options. As late surgical treatment of CPN typically results in poor prognosis, awareness of this injury, thorough physical examination and documentation of the nerve injury, and close follow-up are of paramount importance.

The flexible flatfoot in the adult.

The adult acquired flatfoot deformity is characterized by flattening of the medial longitudinal arch with insufficiency of the supporting posteromedial soft tissue structures of the ankle and hindfoot. While the etiology of this deformity can be arthritic or traumatic in nature, it is most commonly associated with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD). By one estimate, PTTD affects approximately five million people in the United States. The clinical presentation of adult flatfoot can range from a flexible deformity with normal joint integrity to a rigid, arthritic foot.