Single agent and combination studies of pralatrexate and molecular correlates of sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Pralatrexate is a dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitor with high affinity for reduced folate carrier 1 (RFC-1) and folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS), resulting in extensive internalization and accumulation in tumour cells. Pralatrexate is approved in the US for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma and is being investigated in various malignancies. Here, we evaluated molecular correlates of sensitivity to pralatrexate and explored combinations with a variety of anticancer agents. METHODS: Antiproliferative effects of pralatrexate were evaluated in 15 human-cancer cell lines using the MTT assay. Gene expression was evaluated using qRT-PCR. RESULTS: Pralatrexate and methotrexate had a similar pattern of cytotoxicity, pralatrexate being more potent. Pralatrexate potentiated the effects of platinum drugs, antimetabolites and EGFR inhibitors. Dose- and time-dependent cytotoxicity of pralatrexate correlated with high mRNA expression of FPGS. Acquired resistance to pralatrexate was associated with decreased RFC-1 expression, whereas methotrexate resistance correlated with increased DHFR expression, suggesting different mechanisms of acquired resistance. CONCLUSION: Pralatrexate was more potent than methotrexate in a panel of solid tumour lines. Our findings support the further clinical development of pralatrexate in combination with certain cytotoxics and targeted therapies, and suggest that RFC-1, FPGS and DHFR may be potential biomarkers of outcome.

Antiproliferative activity of PEP005, a novel ingenol angelate that modulates PKC functions, alone and in combination with cytotoxic agents in human colon cancer cells.

PEP005 is a novel ingenol angelate that modulates protein kinases C (PKC) functions by activating PKC delta and inhibiting PKC alpha. This study assessed the antiproliferative effects of PEP005 alone and in combination with several other anticancer agents in a panel of 10 human cancer cell lines characterised for expression of several PKC isoforms. PEP005 displayed antiproliferative effects at clinically relevant concentrations with a unique cytotoxicity profile that differs from that of most other investigated cytotoxic agents, including staurosporine. In a subset of colon cancer cells, the IC(50) of PEP005 ranged from 0.01-140 microM. The antiproliferative effects of PEP005 were shown to be concentration- and time-dependent. In Colo205 cells, apoptosis induction was observed at concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 3 microM. Exposure to PEP005 also induced accumulation of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. In addition, PEP005 increased the phosphorylation of PKC delta and p38. In Colo205 cells, combinations of PEP005 with several cytotoxic agents including oxaliplatin, SN38, 5FU, gemcitabine, doxorubicin, vinorelbine, and docetaxel yielded sequence-dependent antiproliferative effects. Cell cycle blockage induced by PEP005 in late G1 lasted for up to 24 h and therefore a 24 h lag-time between PEP005 and subsequent exposure to cytotoxics was required to optimise PEP005 combinations with several anticancer agents. These data support further evaluation of PEP005 as an anticancer agent and may help to optimise clinical trials with PEP005-based combinations in patients with solid tumours.

Antiproliferative effects of sapacitabine (CYC682), a novel 2'-deoxycytidine-derivative, in human cancer cells.

This study assessed the antiproliferative activity of sapacitabine (CYC682, CS-682) in a panel of 10 human cancer cell lines with varying degrees of resistance or sensitivity to the commonly used nucleoside analogues ara-C and gemcitabine. Growth inhibition studies using sapacitabine and CNDAC were performed in the panel of cell lines and compared with both nucleoside analogues and other anticancer compounds including oxaliplatin, doxorubicin, docetaxel and seliciclib. Sapacitabine displayed antiproliferative activity across a range of concentrations in a variety of cell lines, including those shown to be resistant to several anticancer drugs. Sapacitabine is biotransformed by plasma, gut and liver amidases into CNDAC and causes cell cycle arrest predominantly in the G(2)/M phase. No clear correlation was observed between sensitivity to sapacitabine and the expression of critical factors involved in resistance to nucleoside analogues such as deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1, cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase and DNA polymerase-alpha. However, sapacitabine showed cytotoxic activity against dCK-deficient L1210 cells indicating that in some cells, a dCK-independent mechanism of action may be involved. In addition, sapacitabine showed a synergistic effect when combined with gemcitabine and sequence-specific synergy with doxorubicin and oxaliplatin. Sapacitabine is therefore a good candidate for further evaluation in combination with currently used anticancer agents in tumour types with unmet needs.

A phase II study of a paclitaxel and oxaliplatin combination in platinum-sensitive recurrent advanced ovarian cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A multicentric, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination paclitaxel and oxaliplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel (over 3 h) followed by 130 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin (over 2 h) every 21 days for up to nine cycles without hydration or primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis. Patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and to have received no more than one prior cisplatin- and/or carboplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen with a platinum-progression-free interval > or =6 months. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients enrolled and treated, 98 were eligible. An overall response rate of 81% (79 of 98 patients) (95% confidence interval 71% to 88%) was observed according to RECIST criteria (third party reviewed), and 88% (86 of 98) when this was complemented with CA-125 response. With a median follow up of 43.6 months (range 30.2-64.2) the median progression-free survival was 10.2 months (range 0.3-21.4) and the overall survival 32.4 months. Seven hundred and eight cycles were administered (median seven per patient; range one to nine). A total of 67% of patients experienced National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3-4 neutropenia, including 8% with concomitant febrile episode, without treatment-related deaths. Ninety-three per cent of patients experienced neuropathy of grade 1 or more, including 25% with cumulative reversible peripheral neuropathy of grade 3-4. Oxaliplatin doses were reduced in 30 patients due to neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The oxaliplatin/paclitaxel combination can be administered in an outpatient setting every 3 weeks without specific measures. The high level of activity and its duration observed warrants further evaluation of this combination in pretreated platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Phase II study of ecteinascidin-743 in advanced pretreated soft tissue sarcoma patients.

PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II study evaluating efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743) in pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received ET-743 1,500 microg/m(2) (24-hour intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks (group 1, 26 patients with one to two prior single agents or one previous combination chemotherapy; group 2, 28 patients with three or more prior single agents or two or more previous combination chemotherapies). Results Patients (30 women, 24 men) had a median age of 48 years (range, 22 to 71 years); 41% had leiomyosarcoma (eight of 22 of uterine origin), a median of two involved organs (range, one to four), and 93% had documented progressive disease at study entry. Patients received a median of three cycles (range, one to 20); 28% received six or more cycles. Fifty-two patients were assessable for response (WHO criteria): two partial responses, four minor responses, and nine with stable disease (> or = 6 months). Three patients were rendered tumor free after surgery. Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (range, 0.69 to 17.90 months); 24% of patients were progression free at 6 months. Median survival was 12.8 months, with 30% of patients alive at 2 years. Four patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity. Two treatment-related deaths occurred (renal failure and febrile neutropenia, and rhabdomyolysis and decompensated cirrhosis, respectively) that were probably related to protocol eligibility violations. Reversible grade 3 to 4 AST or ALT occurred in 50% of patients and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred in 61% of patients, with six episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nausea, vomiting, and asthenia were prevalent but mild and manageable. CONCLUSION: With a 4% overall response rate (95% CI, 0.5 to 12.8) and an 11% rate of third-party-verified tumor regression (overall response rate + minor response), ET-743 has a 24% 6-month disease progression control rate, confirming evidence of antitumoral activity and a manageable safety profile in patients experiencing disease progression with pretreated soft tissue sarcoma.

Randomized phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone, oxaliplatin combined with infusional 5-FU, and infusional 5-FU alone in advanced pancreatic carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase II, open-label multicenter study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA), infusional 5-fluorouracil alone (5-FU) and an oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU combination (OXFU) in untreated, advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic, histologically/cytologically proven pancreatic carcinoma with measurable disease, received OXA [130 mg/m2, 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion] alone, OXA combined with 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v., days 1-4), or 5-FU alone, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (42 males/21 females) were treated: 17 patients/52 cycles OXA, 31 patients/ 175 cycles OXFU, 15 patients/41 cycles 5-FU, with a median of three, six and two cycles/patient, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar in all arms. Median age was 57 years (range 21-75), and 83% of patients had PS 0-1. Most patients (62%) had moderate to well-differentiated tumors, 90% had metastatic disease, 81% with liver metastases. All responses (three partial responses; WHO) occurred in the OXFU arm (10% response rate). Five of 32 patients evaluable for clinical benefit were responders (OXA, 14%; OXFU, 21%). Median time to progression and overall survival were higher in the combination arm (4.2 and 9.0 months, respectively) than either single-agent arm (OXA, 2.0 and 3.4 months; 5-FU, 1.5 and 2.4 months, respectively). Moderate hematotoxicity without morbidity was seen in all arms. Two OXFU patients had grade 3 oxaliplatin neurosensory toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: With a 10% response rate, median overall survival of 9 months and an encouraging safety profile, the OXFU combination is effective, appears superior to infusional 5-FU and warrants further studies in APC patients.

Phase I and pharmacological study of an oxaliplatin and carboplatin combination in advanced malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Phase I and pharmacokinetic study to determine the maximal tolerated dose and the recommended dose, as well as the optimal sequence of a carboplatin/oxaliplatin combination delivered every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received either carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC)-based individually calculated dose (starting dose AUC 4 mg.min/ml), 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion] followed by oxaliplatin (110 mg/m(2), 2 h i.v. infusion), every 3 weeks, or the reverse sequence. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included and only one dose level was assessed. In group A, 10 patients received 23 cycles of carboplatin followed by oxaliplatin. In group B, 6 patients received 20 cycles with the reverse sequence. Delayed recovery from hematological toxicities was treatment-limiting, with mainly moderate thrombocytopenia and neutropenia as dose-limiting toxicities for group A (5 of 10 patients for each) and thrombocytopenia for group B (3 of 6 patients). No febrile neutropenia or grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity occurred. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed similar mean total platinum AUCs for the two groups: 37.2 +/- 13.7 and 33.6 +/- 9.9 mg.h/l, respectively. One complete response and two partial responses (World Health Organization-International Union Against Cancer criteria, response rate 18.8%) were seen in ovarian, Fallopian and neuroendocrine carcinomas, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This platinum combination appears feasible and active at the dose of AUC 4 mg.min/ml for carboplatin (Chatelut formula) and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2); however, it does not allow a significant increase in platinum dose-intensity delivery.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin versus oxaliplatin combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil in hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, multicenter phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA) and oxaliplatin-5-fluorouracil combination (OXFU) in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Metastatic, pathologically proven prostate carcinoma patients, progressing despite anti-androgen therapy, received intravenous OXA (130 mg/m(2 )over 2 h), alone or with 5-FU (1000 mg/m(2)/day, continuous intravenous infusion, days 1-4), every 3 weeks. OXA patients could receive OXFU after treatment failure. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (26 OXA, 28 OXFU) from nine centers received 269 treatment cycles (106 OXA, 163 OXFU; median 3.5 OXA or 5 OXFU cycles per patient; range 1-10 or 1-14, respectively). Patient characteristics were similar in both arms. Three partial responses (PR) occurred in 21 evaluable OXA patients [14%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1% to 30%], and in five of 26 evaluable OXFU patients (19%; 95% CI 7% to 39%). Clinical benefit response (pain, performance status and weight changes) was assessed in 20 OXA and 22 OXFU symptomatic patients, with more responders in the OXFU arm (39% compared with 12%). Median time to progression in the OXA and OXFU arms was 2.6 and 3.4 months, and median overall survival was 9.4 and 11.4 months, respectively. Hematotoxicity was common, but mostly mild to moderate. Neutropenia was more common in OXFU than OXA patients. After oxaliplatin failure, 12 patients received 46 cycles of OXFU and one of 11 evaluable patients had a PR. CONCLUSION: The objective response rate, palliation benefit, survival and manageable toxicity obtained in this heavily pretreated HRPC population with OXFU merit further study.

Phase I population pharmacokinetics of irofulven.

Our aim was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for irofulven and to assess covariates that might affect irofulven pharmacokinetics. Irofulven was administered by 5- or 30-min i.v. infusion to cancer patients during a phase I study. Blood samples were collected over 4 h. Plasma samples were analyzed to quantitate irofulven by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a non-linear mixed effects modeling program, MP2. Fifty-nine patients were available for pharmacokinetic analysis. Irofulven plasma concentration-time profiles were best described by a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Clearance and central volume of distribution were not significantly influenced by individual characteristics, i.e. body weight (BW), body surface area (BSA), age and gender. Final parameter estimates of clearance and central volume of distribution were 616 l/h and 37 l, respectively, resulting in a very short terminal half-life of less than 10 min. A relatively high level of variability was observed in irofulven pharmacokinetics, which was mainly due to a significant residual variability, 39%. For a 30-min irofulven infusion, the optimal sampling schedule for clearance estimation using the Bayesian method was the three time points 0.35-0.45, 0.80 and 1-1.2 h from the beginning of a 30-min infusion. We conclude that after i.v. infusion of irofulven, plasma clearance was high and not dependent upon patient age, gender, BSA or BW.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) combination in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer (M/AGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 54 eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC, 53 received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 400 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) (10-minute infusion) and then 5-FU 3,000 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days. RESULTS: Patients (69% male, 31% female) had a median age of 61 years (range, 31 to 75 years), 89% had a performance status of 0 or 1, 70% had newly diagnosed disease, and 87% had metastatic disease. All had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. With a median of three involved organs, disease sites included the lymph nodes (67%), stomach (65%), and liver (61%). A median of 10 cycles per patient and 468 complete cycles were administered. Best responses in the 49 assessable patients were two complete responses and 20 partial responses, giving an overall best response rate of 44.9%. Eight patients underwent complementary treatment with curative intent (six with surgery and two with chemoradiotherapy). Median follow-up, time to progression, and overall survival were 18.6 months, 6.2 months, and 8.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 38%, 19%, 4%, and 11% of patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients (one episode each). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21% of patients (oxaliplatin-specific scale). Seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSION: This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in M/AGC patients, and may prove to be a suitable alternative regimen in this indication.

Exacerbation of oxaliplatin neurosensory toxicity following surgery.

Combination of chemotherapy and surgical resection of metastases is the most promising strategy to improve the fraction of long-term survivors and cured patients in metastatic colorectal cancer. We reproducibly observed evidence of exacerbation of the oxaliplatin-induced neurosensory toxicity following surgery. Total, protein-bound and intra-erythrocytic concentrations of oxaliplatin were measured, whenever possible, immediately prior to surgery and 4, 24 and 48 h following surgical resection. Among 12 patients, seven (58%) patients reported immediate post-operative aggravation of the pre-existing neurotoxicity. At the time of surgery, we detected high intra-erythrocytic platinum concentrations in all patients (median: 1365 micro g/l, range: 820-2968 micro g/l). While ultrafilterable oxaliplatin was not detectable prior to surgery, it could be detected immediately after surgery and during 48 h. These results suggest that patients heavily pretreated with oxaliplatin may experience aggravation of neurotoxicity after surgery, probably through a redistribution of the pool of intra-erythrocytic oxaliplatin biotransformation products into the plasma. This clinical observation might be the consequence of peroperative hemolysis.

Influence of oxaliplatin on 5-fluorouracil plasma clearance and clinical consequences.

UNLABELLED: The influence of oxaliplatin (OXA) on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plasma clearance was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 29 patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to prior weekly 8-h 5-FU infusion plus bolus folinic acid (FA), received the same combination plus OXA at 130 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, OXA plus 5-FU plus FA on day 1, and 5-FU plus FA on days 8 and 15. Steady-state 5-FU concentrations in plasma were measured weekly and 5-FU clearance was calculated. Both before and after the addition of OXA, the 5-FU dose was individually adjusted according to the pharmacokinetic follow-up (target steady-state plasma concentrations 2.5-3 mg/l). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 122 OXA-containing infusions and 338 5-FU plus FA infusions were given and the median number of infusions per patient was 4 (2-9) and 10 (5-28), respectively. 5-FU plasma clearance was significantly decreased on days 8 and 15 when compared with the value on day 1 and with the values before OXA introduction using a direct paired comparison (2.36 and 2.31 l/min, respectively, vs 3.12 and 3.05 l/min; P<10(-5)). Of 25 evaluable patients, 6 had an objective response after the introduction of OXA (24% objective response rate, 95% confidence interval 9.4-45%). CONCLUSION: OXA reduces 5-FU plasma clearance for 15 days. This may be a factor in the synergy between the two drugs. It is not linked to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition. Implications for drug schedules in clinical practice are discussed.

Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of a GERCOR multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: Based on preclinical in vitro synergy data, this study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination in patients with metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled onto this multicenter phase II study. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 10-mg/m(2)/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks. Patients with metastatic disease were treated until evidence of progressive disease, whereas patients with locally advanced disease received six cycles in the absence of progression, followed when appropriate by concomitant radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 64 eligible patients included in eight centers, 30 had locally advanced and 34 had metastatic disease. Response rate for the 62 patients with measurable disease was 30.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.7% to 42.3%), 31.0% for locally advanced and 30.3% for metastatic patients. Among 58 assessable patients, 40% had clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 5.3 and 9.2 months, respectively, with 36% of patients alive at 1 year. Median OS for patients with metastatic disease and locally advanced disease were 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. With 574 treatment cycles (median per patient, nine; range, zero to 27), grade 3/4 toxicity per patient was 11% for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 14% for nausea or vomiting, 6.2% for diarrhea, and 11% for peripheral neuropathy, with no toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: Palliative effects, response rate, and survival observed with this well-tolerated gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination deserve additional evaluation. A comparative study of combination therapy versus gemcitabine alone is ongoing.

Oxaliplatin plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin and vinorelbine are both active agents against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a previous phase I trial, we showed that oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, day 1) and vinorelbine (26 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 8) can be safely combined when given every 21 days. We completed the evaluation of this new platinum-based doublet in advanced NSCLC patients in a multicenter phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight chemotherapy-naïve patients (22 men and six women: median age 58 years, range 33-70), including 20 with stage IV disease, received this out-patient combination, with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3-receptor agonists as the only prophylactic measure. RESULTS: A total of 117 cycles were given, for a median of three per patient (range 1-8). Of 26 eligible patients, nine achieved a partial response (WHO criteria), giving an objective response rate of 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17% to 56%]. The median progression free survival was 5.0 months (95% CI 3.1 to 6.9), median overall survival was 9.8 months (95% CI 2.2 to 17.5) and the 1-year survival rate was 37%. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity, grade 4 occurring in 11 patients (39%) and 25 cycles (22%). Four patients (14%) experienced one episode of febrile neutropenia each. Acute oxaliplatin-related neurosensory toxicity was prevalent, but was mild to moderate in the majority of patients (82%) and reversible. Grade 1/2 vomiting (65% of patients) and diarrhea (32% of patients) were easily managed. CONCLUSIONS: The oxaliplatin-vinorelbine doublet is a safe and active out-patient combination. It may represent an interesting alternative in the management of patients with NSCLC, and serve as a new doublet to which other active agents could be added.

Search for metabolites of ecteinascidin 743, a novel, marine-derived, anti-cancer agent, in man.

Ecteinascidin 743 (ET-743) is a potent anti-tumoral agent of a marine origin. It is currently being tested in phase II clinical trials using a 3-weekly 24-h i.v. infusion of 1500 microg/m(2) and 3-h infusions of 1650 microg/m(2). Knowledge of the metabolism of ET-743 is, however, still scarce. In the present study, a qualitative chromatographic discovery of metabolites of ET-743 in man is reported. ET-743 and its demethylated analog ET-729 were incubated at 37 degrees C in the presence of enzyme systems, pooled human microsomes, pooled human plasma and uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronyltransferase, respectively, in appropriate media. Reaction products were investigated chromatographically using photodiode array and ion spray-mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS). The main reaction products in microsomal incubations of ET-743 resulted from a remarkable breakdown of the molecule. In plasma the drugs were deacetylated, and the transferase did actually yield a glucuronide of both ET-743 and ET-729. In contrast, screening of urine, plasma and bile, collected from patients treated with ET-743 at the highest dose levels, using a sensitive LC-MS assay, did not result in detection of ET-729 and metabolites which were generated in vitro. The urinary excretion of ET-743 in man was lower than 0.7% of the administered dose for a 24-h infusion.

[Oxaliplatin: a first DACH-platinum in oncology]. / In process citation.

Around 3,000 cisplatin analogues have been synthetised over the past 30 years but only half a dozen are presently in clinical development, while only two (cisplatin and carboplatin) have been available prior to the recent European registration of oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin is a new platinum salt belonging to the DACH (diaminocyclohexane) platinum family, and is the only such cisplatin analogue that has entered clinical development and achieved approval for marketing. During its development, oxaliplatin has aroused lively interest due, firstly, to its in vitro and in vivo antitumoral activity, especially in cisplatin-resistant models and cell lines expressing resistance genes, and, secondly, to its good clinical tolerance, the absence of renal or auditory toxicity being combined with a low hematotoxicity. Combined with other antitumoral agent cytotoxic agents (5FU, raltitrexed, irinotecan or cisplatin), oxaliplatin produces an additive and often synergistic cytotoxic effect. The oxaliplatin-5FU +/- FA combination is now well established in metastatic colorectal cancer. Regarding its particular cytotoxic characteristics and its activity in mismatch repair deficient cells (which are resistant to cisplatin and carboplatin), oxaliplatin is shows potential in a large variety of solid tumor types, notably in association with other cytotoxic agents, thus opening the path to a wider range of indications.

Factors predicting efficacy of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) +/- folinic acid in a compassionate-use cohort of 481 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer patients.

A statistical analysis was performed on the patient data collected from two compassionate-use programmes using oxaliplatin (Eloxatin(R)) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) +/- folinic acid (FA), to identify predictive factors for oxaliplatin-based salvage treatment in patients with 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). 481 5-FU-resistant ACRC patients, most with performance status < or = 2, > or = 3 involved sites, and > or = 2 prior lines of chemotherapy, received oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA. Prognostic factors associated with overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. The ORR was 16% (95% CI: 13-20), the median TTP was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.4-4.6), and the median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.6-10.6). The multivariate analysis indicated poor (> or = 2 WHO) performance status (PS), a large number of prior chemotherapy regimens (> or = 3), a low baseline haemoglobin level (< 10 g/dl), and a triweekly (vs biweekly) treatment administration schedule as significantly associated (P< 0.05) with a lower ORR. Sex (male), number of organs involved (> or =3) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) level (> or = 2 x the upper limit of normal) were associated (P< 0.05) with shorter TTP. Poor PS, a large number of organs involved, and elevated AP were independently and significantly correlated with shorter OS. Our analysis identified a relationship between efficacy results of oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA treatment in 5-FU-resistant ACRC patients and baseline prognostic factors related to PS, extent of disease and number of prior regimens.

Ecteinascidin-743: a marine-derived compound in advanced, pretreated sarcoma patients--preliminary evidence of activity.

PURPOSE: To report the activity of the chemotherapeutic agent ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743) in advanced pretreated sarcoma patients observed during a phase I study and a named-patient basis, compassionate use program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine pretreated, advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma patients consecutively seen in our centers were included, 12 from a phase I trial and 17 from a compassionate use program cohort. Patients were treated every 3 weeks at either 1,200 microg/m(2) (six patients), 1,500 microg/m(2) (the recommended dose, 22 patients), or 1,800 microg/m(2) (the maximum-tolerated dose, one patient), given as a 24-hour infusion every 3 to 4 weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen men and 14 women were treated. The median patient age was 46 years (range, 16 to 71 years), with a median World Health Organization performance status of 1 (range, 0 to 2). Twenty-five patients had STS, three had osteosarcoma, and one had Ewing's sarcoma, and all had progressive disease at accrual. Fifteen patients had bulky disease, and 14 had clinical resistance to anthracyclines. A total of 136 treatment cycles were administered (median per patient, five cycles; range, one to 12 cycles). Transient grade 3 and 4 transaminitis was reported in 24% and 5% of cycles, respectively, grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred in 32% of cycles, with concomitant sporadic grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia in 5.1% of cycles. Grade 2 to 3 asthenia occurred in 21% of cycles. There were two partial responses (PRs) in STS patients and two PRs in osteosarcoma patients. Two minor responses and 10 disease stabilizations were seen. Median duration of response was 10.5 months (range, 2.8 to 15 months), and mean duration of stabilization was 5.2 months. CONCLUSION: ET-743 has activity in advanced, highly pretreated STS and osteosarcoma patients and warrants further trials to establish the extent of its activity in this setting.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ecteinascidin-743, a new marine compound, administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the phase II recommended dose (RD) of ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743) given as a 24-hour continuous infusion every 3 weeks to patients with treatment-refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients received a total of 158 cycles of ET-743 at one of nine dose levels (DLs) ranging from 50 to 1,800 microg/m(2). RESULTS: The MTD was defined as 1,800 microg/m(2) (DL 9), and the phase II RD was 1,500 microg/m(2) (DL 8) for moderately pretreated patients with performance status (PS) 0 to 1 and good hepatobiliary function. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and were severe at the MTD (1,800 microg/m(2)) in 94% and 25% of cycles, respectively. At the RD (1,500 microg/m(2)), neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were present in 33% and 10% of cycles, respectively. Transient acute elevated transaminase levels occurred in almost all cycles and was severe in 38% of cycles. Severe toxicities and DLTs were observed in patients with poor PS or abnormal liver function or who had received a large number of previous chemotherapy regimens. Antitumor activity was observed at the three highest DLs, including three partial responses (breast cancer, osteosarcoma, and liposarcoma), and four patients (all with progressing soft tissue sarcomas) had stable disease lasting > or = 3 months. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on all patients for at least the first cycle, giving a linear pharmacokinetic profile; this showed a relationship between area under the curve (AUC) and transaminitis grade and a clear correlation between AUC and severe hematologic toxicity likelihood. CONCLUSION: The RD for a 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion of ET-743 is 1,500 microg/m(2), with the most prevalent DLTs being hematologic. Patients with minor baseline hepatobiliary function abnormalities have a higher likelihood of severe hematologic toxicities and AUC-related DLTs, requiring dose adjustments or delays.