Visual Field Progression After Glaucoma Surgery in Pseudoexfoliation versus Primary Glaucoma.

Purpose: To compare visual field progression in severity-matched pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (XFG) and primary glaucoma after intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction by filtering surgery. Methods: Patients with XFG (n=32), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG, n=33) or primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG, n=28) that underwent routine cataract and glaucoma filtering surgery by the same surgeon (APR) between May 2017 and September 2021, were included for this prospective study. Rate of progression (ROP) was determined using guided progression analysis and compared between XFG and primary glaucoma. Multivariate regression was done to analyse the factors responsible for progression in each group. Results: Visual field progression after surgery was noted in 48 eyes (n=11 XFG, 18 POAG and 19 PACG eyes) at a mean follow-up of 10±5.6 months after surgery with RVI seen in 18 of 48 eyes. The final IOP (p=0.8) and mean ROP (p=0.09) were not significantly different between XFG and primary glaucoma. The XFG eyes had a greater number of eyes (36%) showing an ROP worse than -5dB/yr, with 45% of eyes showing an IOP spike >5mm Hg, and a higher mean IOP spike between visits. The ROP in eyes with RVO and >5mm Hg IOP spikes was greater in XFG than in POAG or PACG. In the multivariate analysis, higher IOP fluctuations >5mm Hg, and associated retinal vein occlusions (RVO) were significant factors for visual progression greater than -5dB/year (R2=53.5%) in POAG and XFG eyes. Age, gender, baseline MD, and number of medications before surgery or at final follow-up did not influence visual progression rates in either group. Conclusion: A higher IOP fluctuation >5mm Hg and associated RVO were the significant factors predicting visual field progression after filtering surgery in XFG and POAG eyes. Control of both IOP-dependent and -independent mechanisms of VF progression is therefore essential in these eyes.

Clinical differentiation of keratitis due to fungus and Pythium: A photographic survey.

Purpose: To evaluate the knowledge and skills of clinicians in differentiating cases of Pythium from fungal keratitis based on their clinical appearance. Methods: Thirty slit-lamp photographs from culture-proven cases of Pythium and fungal keratitis were selected for conducting a prospective online-based photographic survey. The participants were asked to identify the causative organism and enlist the specific clinical features which helped in reaching the diagnosis. Both cornea specialists and clinical fellows/trainees participated in the survey. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were estimated, and the factors associated with these, including the identification rates of clinical signs, were evaluated using bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. The identification rates between the consultants and fellows were compared. Results: A total of 42 cornea specialists (28 consultants and 14 clinical fellows) participated in the survey. Clinicians were able to differentiate Pythium from fungal etiology in only 56% of cases. The differentiating ability between the consultants and fellows was statistically insignificant. Average sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for differentiating Pythium from fungus were 56%, 65%, 56%, and 66%, respectively. The specific clinical features enlisted by the participants to differentiate Pythium from fungus were the presence of tentacles, peripheral guttering, dot-like infiltrates, and elevated plaques. Conclusion: Clinical knowledge regarding the signs and symptoms and the microbiological identification of features for Pythium are still lacking among clinicians. As the treatment protocols are distinctly different for both, it is imperative to enhance the knowledge and diagnosing ability to tackle this emerging microorganism which causes high morbidity.

'Progressive peripheral anterior synechiae in iridocorneoendothelial syndrome- a crawling disaster'.

Purpose: Iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome is well known to cause refractory glaucoma in young adults. Commonly acclaimed mechanism for trabeculectomy failure in these cases include accelerated subconjunctival fibrosis, abnormal endothelial proliferation, and closure of ostium. In the following article, we present a case of Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome that presented with refractory glaucoma after trabeculectomy due to rapidly progressive peripheral anterior synechiae causing angle closure and corneal decompensation that mandated a tailored surgical approach of management. Methods: This is a descriptive case report based on electronic medical records, patient observation, surgical intervention, and follow-ups. Case description: A thirty-eight-year-old-male presented to us with signs suggestive of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome with gonioscopy revealing peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) over four clock-hours temporally. Uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximal medical therapy mandated augmented trabeculectomy with anti-fibrotics. The bleb failed within 3 weeks of trabeculectomy, with evidence of progressive crawling PAS causing endothelial decompensation and raised IOP. He underwent Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implant surgery with viscosynechiolysis and sectoral iridectomy under antiviral cover. This helped control IOP and retain corneal clarity, with no recurrence of PAS in the affected area. Conclusion: Progressive peripheral synechiae in ICE syndrome can cause early bleb failure and refractory glaucoma. Careful viscosynechiolysis and sectoral iridectomy alongside a second implant surgery can help salvage visual functions and preserve corneal clarity while preventing further progression of PAS in these eyes.