Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 69
Filtrar
1.
J Travel Med ; 2024 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951998

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dengue is a leading cause of febrile illness among international travellers. We aimed to describe the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of imported dengue in returning travellers evaluated at GeoSentinel sites from 2007-2022. METHODS: We retrieved GeoSentinel records of dengue among travellers residing in non-endemic countries. We considered dengue confirmed when diagnosed by a positive DENV-specific RT-PCR, positive NS-1 antigen, and/or anti-DENV IgG seroconversion, and probable when diagnosed by single anti-DENV IgM or high titre anti-DENV IgG detection. Severe dengue was defined as evidence of clinically significant plasma leakage or bleeding, organ failure, or shock, according to the 2009 WHO guidance. Complicated dengue was defined as either severe dengue or dengue with presence of any warning sign. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: This analysis included 5958 travellers with confirmed (n = 4859; 81.6%) or probable (n = 1099; 18.4%) dengue. The median age was 33 years (range: < 1-91); 3007 (50.5%) travellers were female. The median travel duration was 21 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 15-32). The median time between illness onset and GeoSentinel site visit was 7 days (IQR: 4-15). The most frequent reasons for travel were tourism (67.3%), visiting friends or relatives (12.2%), and business (11.0%). The most frequent regions of acquisition were Southeast Asia (50.4%), South-Central Asia (14.9%), the Caribbean (10.9%), and South America (9.2%). Ninety-five (1.6%) travellers had complicated dengue, of whom 27 (0.5%) had severe dengue, and one died. Of 2710 travellers with data available, 724 (26.7%) were hospitalized. The largest number of cases (n = 835) was reported in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: A broad range of international travellers should be aware of the risk of acquiring dengue and receive appropriate pretravel counselling regarding preventive measures. Prospective cohort studies are needed to further elucidate dengue risk by destination and over time, as well as severe outcomes and prolonged morbidity (long-dengue) due to travel-related dengue.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965027

RESUMEN

The Spanish Society of Tropical Medicine and International Health (SEMTSI), the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN) and the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (SEMFYC) have prepared a consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with imported febrile illnesses. Twenty authors with different backgrounds and representing different healthcare perspectives (ambulatory primary care, travel and tropical medicine specialists, emergency medicine, hospital care, microbiology and parasitology and public health), identified 39 relevant questions, which were organised in 7 thematic blocks. After a systematic review of the literature and a thoughtful discussion, the authors prepared 125 recommendations, as well as several tables and figures to be used as a consulting tool. The present executive summary shows a selection of some of the most relevant questions and recommendations included in the guidelines.

4.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 60: 102726, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to describe post-chikungunya complications chronically developed cases in returning travelers from some epidemic/endemic regions, and the variables that are associated with the progression of acute or subacute cases to the chronic phase. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included chikungunya fever cases treated at La Paz-Carlos III University Hospital in Madrid, Spain, April 2014 to September 2016, when the chikungunya outbreak in Latin America started through the time of its greatest impact. RESULTS: The analysis included 119 cases. Of these, 67.2 % were male, with a median age of 41.0 years [IQR 16.0 to 76.0] years. Only 25.6 % of the patients attended a pre-travel advice consultation. Most patients reported arthralgias, which significantly impacted their daily quality of life (86 %). The mean duration of joint symptoms was 129.4 days, with a median of 90 days [IQR 0 to 715]. Factors found to be associated with chronic arthralgia include female sex, country of infection, age at diagnosis, previous diseases, symptoms during the acute phase, pain in previously injured tendons/joints, acute phase severity, and various laboratory markers such as hemoglobin, hematocrit, total serum bilirubin, and creatinine. Progression to chronic arthralgia significantly increased the need for changes in daily activity. Furthermore, 42.6 % of patients with chronic arthralgia reported recurrence of symptoms once they felt they had disappeared. Targeted treatment regimens led to significant improvements in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study underscore the need for: (1) comprehensive pre-travel advice; (2) effective management of patients in specialized units, alongside early diagnosis and treatment, to prevent trivialization of these viral infections; and (3) the development of interdisciplinary recommendations to assist physicians in treating patients and enhancing outcomes.

7.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 59: 102708, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467231

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Detecting imported diseases by migrants and individuals visiting friends and relatives (VFR) is key in the prevention and management of emergent infectious diseases acquired abroad. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study on migrants and VFR from Central and South America between 2017 and 2022 attended at a National Referral Centre for Tropical Diseases in Madrid, Spain. Demographic characteristics, syndromes and confirmed travel-related diagnoses were obtained from hospital patient medical records. RESULTS: 1654 cases were registered, median age of 42 years, 69.1% were female, and 55.2% were migrants. Most cases came from Bolivia (49.6%), followed by Ecuador (12.9%). Health screening while asymptomatic (31.6%) was the main reason for consultation, followed by Chagas disease follow-up (31%). Of those asymptomatic at screening, 47,2% were finally diagnosed of any disease, mainly Chagas disease (19,7%) and strongyloidiasis (10,2%) CONCLUSION: Our study emphasizes the importance of proactive health screening to detect asymptomatic conditions in migrants and VFR, enabling timely intervention and improved health outcomes. By understanding the unique health profiles of immigrant populations, targeted public health interventions can be devised to safeguard the well-being of these vulnerable groups.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas , Migrantes , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas/diagnóstico , España/epidemiología , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Viaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , América Latina/epidemiología , América Latina/etnología , Adulto Joven , Enfermedad de Chagas/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Chagas/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Chagas/prevención & control , Niño , Anciano , Medicina Tropical , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 162(11): 542-548, 2024 06 14.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220551

RESUMEN

Rabies is a deadly neurotropic viral infection but is preventable through vaccination. Its impact on human and animal health is often devastating. Despite advances in research and control of this disease, along with an effective vaccine, rabies continues to be a lingering threat in many parts of the world. Its high incidence reinforces the constant need to address it with scientific and public health measures. In this review article, we will explore the most important characteristics of the disease, its distribution, symptoms, prevention methods, and the global efforts that have been made to eradicate this deadly disease. The most recent research and advancements in the field of rabies will also be discussed in an effort to understand and combat this deadly disease more effectively.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Posexposición , Vacunas Antirrábicas , Rabia , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Rabia/terapia , Humanos , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Animales , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Salud Global , Incidencia
10.
Hum Immunol ; 84(11): 571-577, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37777360

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immigrants represented 21.8% of cases in a Spanish cohort of hospitalised patients with COVID-19, a proportion exceeding the percentage of immigrants in that area's total population. Among the ethnic-related genetic risk factors for COVID-19, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes in diverse populations might bias the response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or progression. Similarly, genetic differences in natural killer-activating and inhibitory receptors could play a role in the immune system's response to the viral infection. METHODS: We characterised HLA alleles and KIR genes in 52 Ecuadorian patients hospitalised for moderate and severe COVID-19 and 87 Ecuadorian controls from the general population living in the same area. RESULTS: There was a significantly increased frequency of the HLA-B*39 antigen and the activating KIR2DS4 receptor in the presence of its HLA-C*04 ligand in the COVID-19 group when compared with the control group. In contrast, there was a significant reduction in the frequency of carriers of KIR2DL1 and of the KIR3DL1/Bw4 receptor/ligand combination among COVID-19 group. On the other hand, HLA-A*24:02 and HLA-DRB1*09:01 alleles showed significantly lower frequencies specifically in the severe COVID-19 group. CONCLUSION: HLA-B*39 alleles might be genetic risk factors for developing COVID-19 in Ecuadorian individuals. In the presence of its ligand C*04, the natural killer-activating receptor KIR2DS4 might also increase the risk of developing COVID-19, while, in the presence of HLA-Bw4 alleles, the inhibitory receptor KIR3DL1 might play a protective role. Patients with COVID-19 who carry HLA-A*24:02 and HLA-DRB1*09:01 alleles might be protected against more severe forms of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Receptores KIR , Humanos , Cadenas HLA-DRB1/genética , Ligandos , Factores Protectores , Ecuador/epidemiología , Receptores KIR/genética , COVID-19/genética , SARS-CoV-2 , Antígenos HLA/genética , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/genética , Antígenos HLA-B/genética , Genotipo , Antígenos HLA-A/genética
11.
Ann Intern Med ; 176(7): 940-948, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37335991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dengue virus is a flavivirus transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes and is an important cause of illness worldwide. Data on the severity of travel-associated dengue illness are limited. OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes among international travelers with severe dengue or dengue with warning signs as defined by the 2009 World Health Organization classification (that is, complicated dengue). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review and analysis of travelers with complicated dengue reported to GeoSentinel from January 2007 through July 2022. SETTING: 20 of 71 international GeoSentinel sites. PATIENTS: Returning travelers with complicated dengue. MEASUREMENTS: Routinely collected surveillance data plus chart review with abstraction of clinical information using predefined grading criteria to characterize the manifestations of complicated dengue. RESULTS: Of 5958 patients with dengue, 95 (2%) had complicated dengue. Eighty-six (91%) patients had a supplemental questionnaire completed. Eighty-five of 86 (99%) patients had warning signs, and 27 (31%) were classified as severe. Median age was 34 years (range, 8 to 91 years); 48 (56%) were female. Patients acquired dengue most frequently in the Caribbean (n = 27 [31%]) and Southeast Asia (n = 21 [24%]). Frequent reasons for travel were tourism (46%) and visiting friends and relatives (32%). Twenty-one of 84 (25%) patients had comorbidities. Seventy-eight (91%) patients were hospitalized. One patient died of nondengue-related illnesses. Common laboratory findings and signs were thrombocytopenia (78%), elevated aminotransferase (62%), bleeding (52%), and plasma leakage (20%). Among severe cases, ophthalmologic pathology (n = 3), severe liver disease (n = 3), myocarditis (n = 2), and neurologic symptoms (n = 2) were reported. Of 44 patients with serologic data, 32 confirmed cases were classified as primary dengue (IgM+/IgG-) and 12 as secondary (IgM-/IgG+) dengue. LIMITATIONS: Data for some variables could not be retrieved by chart review for some patients. The generalizability of our observations may be limited. CONCLUSION: Complicated dengue is relatively rare in travelers. Clinicians should monitor patients with dengue closely for warning signs that may indicate progression to severe disease. Risk factors for developing complications of dengue in travelers need further prospective study. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, International Society of Travel Medicine, Public Health Agency of Canada, and GeoSentinel Foundation.


Asunto(s)
Dengue Grave , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Viaje , Estudios Prospectivos , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M
13.
J Travel Med ; 30(3)2023 05 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: International travellers may seek care abroad to address health problems that arise during their trip or plan healthcare outside their country of residence as medical tourists. METHODS: Data were collected on travellers evaluated at GeoSentinel Network sites who reported healthcare during travel. Both unplanned and planned healthcare were analysed, including the reason and nature of healthcare sought, characteristics of the treatment provided and outcomes. Travellers that presented for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis were described elsewhere and were excluded from detailed analysis. RESULTS: From May 2017 through June 2020, after excluding travellers obtaining rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (n= 415), 1093 travellers reported care for a medical or dental issue that was an unanticipated part of the travellers' planned itinerary (unplanned healthcare). Travellers who sought unplanned healthcare abroad had frequent diagnoses of acute diarrhoea, dengue, falciparum malaria and unspecified viral syndrome, and obtained care in 131 countries. Thirty-four (3%) reported subsequent deterioration and 230 (21%) reported no change in condition; a third (n = 405; 37%) had a pre-travel health encounter. Forty-one travellers had sufficient data on planned healthcare abroad for analysis. The most common destinations were the US, France, Dominican Republic, Belgium and Mexico. The top reasons for their planned healthcare abroad were unavailability of procedure at home (n = 9; 19%), expertise abroad (n = 9; 19%), lower cost (n = 8; 17%) and convenience (n = 7; 15%); a third (n = 13; 32%) reported cosmetic or surgical procedures. Early and late complications occurred in 14 (33%) and 4 (10%) travellers, respectively. Four travellers (10%) had a pre-travel health encounter. CONCLUSIONS: International travellers encounter health problems during travel that often could be prevented by pre-travel consultation. Travellers obtaining planned healthcare abroad can experience negative health consequences associated with treatments abroad, for which pre-travel consultations could provide advice and potentially help to prevent complications.


Asunto(s)
Rabia , Humanos , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Medicina del Viajero , Viaje , Diarrea , Atención a la Salud
14.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 41(10): 629-634, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36624034

RESUMEN

Monkeypox is a zoonosis that is spread mainly through direct contact with fluids and skin lesions of infected people with vesicles still active. Although the virus was isolated for the first time in 1958 and the first human case was identified in a child in 1970, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the disease has progressively increased its incidence in Africa reaching in May 2022 sustained transmission outside this continent. As it is a newly introduced virus in our health system, it is necessary to learn the epidemiological pattern in a different environment from that of traditionally endemic areas and to know the available antiviral treatments, as well as the prophylactic measures that could be considered, knowing that as a virus emerging in our regions, scientific evidence is still limited. There are antivirals that have been shown, in animal models, to effectively combat the disease with very good clinical tolerance. This disease has also forced us to review the characteristics of smallpox vaccines, because they have shown a protective effect against monkeypox. For this reason, it is important to have a document that compiles all the scientific information published in this regard.


Asunto(s)
Mpox , Vacuna contra Viruela , Niño , Animales , Humanos , Mpox/tratamiento farmacológico , Mpox/epidemiología , Mpox/prevención & control , Monkeypox virus , Vacuna contra Viruela/uso terapéutico , África , Incidencia
15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36621246

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Frontline health care workers (HCW) have higher risk than the general population to become infected by SARS.CoV.2, so they were a priority group for Covid-19 vaccine administration. We compared the incidence and prevalence of HCW infected pre-and post-vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study carried out between 01/12/20 and 07/03/21 in La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). SARS.CoV.2 positive cases in HCW after vaccination were collected and compared to those hospitalized COVID-19 patients at the same hospital. RESULTS: Two weeks after finishing the first round of vaccinations daily new cases of HCW infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic) decreased substantially and cumulative cases of infected HCW and hospitalized COVID-19 patients started to diverge. No new positive cases of HCW infection were registered seven days after the second dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is highly effective in Spanish HCW.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Personal de Salud , Hospitales Universitarios , ARN Mensajero
16.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 41(1): 33-35, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34334860

RESUMEN

Introduction: Frontline health care workers (HCW) have higher risk than the general population to become infected by SARS.CoV.2, so they were a priority group for Covid-19 vaccine administration. We compared the incidence and prevalence of HCW infected pre-and post-vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Material and methods: Prospective observational study carried out between 01/12/20 and 07/03/21 in La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). SARS.CoV.2 positive cases in HCW after vaccination were collected and compared to those hospitalized COVID-19 patients at the same hospital. Results: Two weeks after finishing the first round of vaccinations daily new cases of HCW infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic) decreased substantially and cumulative cases of infected HCW and hospitalized COVID-19 patients started to diverge. No new positive cases of HCW infection were registered seven days after the second dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusions: BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is highly effective in Spanish HCW.


Introducción: Los trabajadores sanitarios (TS) de primera línea tienen mayor riesgo de infectarse de SARS-CoV-2 que la población general, por lo que han sido un grupo prioritario para la vacunación frente a COVID-19. Comparamos la incidencia y prevalencia de TS infectados antes y después de la vacunación con BNT162b2 mRNA frente a COVID-19. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo observacional realizado entre 01 de diciembre de 2021 en el Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España. Se registraron los casos positivos para SARS-CoV-2 en TS y se compararon con los hospitalizados por COVID-19. Resultados: Dos semanas tras la primera ronda de vacunación las nuevas infecciones en TS (sintomáticas y asintomáticos) disminuyeron sustancialmente y los casos acumulados de TS infectados y pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 empezaron a divergir. No hubo nuevas infecciones en TS vacunados a los siete días de la segunda dosis de la vacuna. Conclusión: La vacuna BNT162b2 mRNA frente a SARS-CoV-2 es altamente eficaz en TS españoles.

17.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 88(5): 1074-1082, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36455826

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human monkeypox has become increasingly frequent worldwide since the outbreak was first reported in May 2022. OBJECTIVES: As cidofovir is effective against vaccinia and other Orthopoxvirus diseases, we hypothesize that its topical use could be an effective treatment for monkeypox skin lesions, avoiding the adverse effects of systemic administration. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study to collect data on the clinical and virologic course of patients with monkeypox. All patients were offered symptomatic treatment. They were also offered treatment with topical cidofovir on a compassionate use basis. Twelve patients received treatment with topical cidofovir 1%, while the others received only symptomatic treatment. Prospective visits were scheduled for the collection of clinical and virological data. RESULTS: Lesions cleared quicker in the cidofovir-treated group (hazard ratio, 4.572; P = .0039). The median time to resolution was 12 (11.5-15) and 18 (16-21) days, respectively. On day 14, polymerase chain reaction-positive skin lesions were detected in 10% of the cidofovir sample, compared with 62.5% of the non-treated group (P = .019). Local adverse effects were frequent (50%), especially in the anogenital region. No systemic adverse effects were reported. LIMITATIONS: The study is not a clinical trial and lacks a placebo-controlled arm. DISCUSSION: Topical cidofovir is a potentially relevant therapy in patients with skin lesions but mild systemic involvement. Reducing time to resolution could shorten isolation time and improve the cosmetic impact in areas such as the face.


Asunto(s)
Mpox , Organofosfonatos , Humanos , Cidofovir , Estudios Prospectivos , Organofosfonatos/efectos adversos , Mpox/tratamiento farmacológico , Citosina/efectos adversos , Administración Tópica , Brotes de Enfermedades , Antivirales/efectos adversos
18.
J Travel Med ; 30(2)2023 04 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36573483

RESUMEN

Increasing numbers of travellers returning from Cuba with dengue virus infection were reported to the GeoSentinel Network from June to September 2022, reflecting an ongoing local outbreak. This report demonstrates the importance of travellers as sentinels of arboviral outbreaks and highlights the need for early identification of travel-related dengue.


Asunto(s)
Dengue , Viaje , Humanos , Dengue/epidemiología , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Cuba , Brotes de Enfermedades
19.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 23(2): 196-206, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36216018

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The early epidemiology of the 2022 monkeypox epidemic in non-endemic countries differs substantially from the epidemiology previously reported from endemic countries. We aimed to describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics among individuals with confirmed cases of monkeypox infection. METHODS: We descriptively analysed data for patients with confirmed monkeypox who were included in the GeoSentinel global clinical-care-based surveillance system between May 1 and July 1 2022, across 71 clinical sites in 29 countries. Data collected included demographics, travel history including mass gathering attendance, smallpox vaccination history, social history, sexual history, monkeypox exposure history, medical history, clinical presentation, physical examination, testing results, treatment, and outcomes. We did descriptive analyses of epidemiology and subanalyses of patients with and without HIV, patients with CD4 counts of less than 500 cells per mm3 or 500 cells per mm3 and higher, patients with one sexual partner or ten or more sexual partners, and patients with or without a previous smallpox vaccination. FINDINGS: 226 cases were reported at 18 sites in 15 countries. Of 211 men for whom data were available, 208 (99%) were gay, bisexual, or men who have sex with men (MSM) with a median age of 37 years (range 18-68; IQR 32-43). Of 209 patients for whom HIV status was known, 92 (44%) men had HIV infection with a median CD4 count of 713 cells per mm3 (range 36-1659; IQR 500-885). Of 219 patients for whom data were available, 216 (99%) reported sexual or close intimate contact in the 21 days before symptom onset; MSM reported a median of three partners (IQR 1-8). Of 195 patients for whom data were available, 78 (40%) reported close contact with someone who had confirmed monkeypox. Overall, 30 (13%) of 226 patients were admitted to hospital; 16 (53%) of whom had severe illness, defined as hospital admission for clinical care rather than infection control. No deaths were reported. Compared with patients without HIV, patients with HIV were more likely to have diarrhoea (p=0·002), perianal rash or lesions (p=0·03), and a higher rash burden (median rash burden score 9 [IQR 6-21] for patients with HIV vs median rash burden score 6 [IQR 3-14] for patients without HIV; p<0·0001), but no differences were identified in the proportion of men who had severe illness by HIV status. INTERPRETATION: Clinical manifestations of monkeypox infection differed by HIV status. Recommendations should be expanded to include pre-exposure monkeypox vaccination of groups at high risk of infection who plan to engage in sexual or close intimate contact. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, International Society of Travel Medicine.


Asunto(s)
Exantema , Infecciones por VIH , Mpox , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Viruela , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Homosexualidad Masculina , Estudios Transversales , Mpox/epidemiología
20.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36249471

RESUMEN

Monkeypox is a zoonosis that is spread mainly through direct contact with fluids and skin lesions of infected people with vesicles still active. Although the virus was isolated for the first time in 1958 and the first human case was identified in a child in 1970, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the disease has progressively increased its incidence in Africa reaching in May 2022 sustained transmission outside this continent. As it is a newly introduced virus in our health system, it is necessary to learn the epidemiological pattern in a different environment from that of traditionally endemic areas and to know the available antiviral treatments, as well as the prophylactic measures that could be considered, knowing that as a virus emerging in our regions, scientific evidence is still limited. There are antivirals that have been shown, in animal models, to effectively combat the disease with very good clinical tolerance. This disease has also forced us to review the characteristics of smallpox vaccines, because they have shown a protective effect against monkeypox. For this reason, it is important to have a document that compiles all the scientific information published in this regard.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...