Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 98(33): 2675-2677, 2018 Sep 04.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30220158

RESUMEN

Objective: To explore the application of transperineal pelvic floor ultrasonography in the diagnosis of female stress urinary incontinence(SUI). Methods: From March 2017 to December 2017, 60 patients diagnosed with SUI by department of gynecology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University were selected as the case group, and 30 cases of normal women in the same period were selected as the control group. All subjects in both groups were examined by transperineal pelvic floor ultrasonography, that is, to be measured the bladder neck descent(BND), the urethral inclination angle(UIA), the posterior urethrovesical angle(PUVA) and the levator hiatus area(LHA) in resting state and during Valsalva maneuver. Results: (1)The differences in the measured values of the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05). (2)The receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC) was used to find the cut-off values of SUI: when BND>31.5 mm; in Valsalva state, UIA>33.5°, PUVA>150.5° and LHA>20.6 cm2, with their sensitivity of 77.6%, 71.4%, 68.3% and 61.4%, respectively; the specificity of 68.9%, 74.6%, 73.9% and 78.0%, respectively. The area under the curve(AUC) were 0.753, 0.812, 0.721 and 0.712, respectively, when combined analysis of these indexes, reaching to 0.912. Conclusions: (1) Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasonography has a certain diagnostic value for SUI. (2)Combined analysis of various ultrasonic parameters can significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency of SUI.


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Diafragma Pélvico , Ultrasonografía , Uretra
2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 22(11): 3378-3385, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29917189

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expressions of HIF-1α, surviving, and VEGF in patients with hepatocarcinoma as well as the correlation analysis among them. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 65 patients, who were admitted to our hospital and diagnosed as hepatocarcinoma from January 2014 to October 2015, were selected as hepatocarcinoma group, while 50 healthy cases that do not have hepatocarcinoma were selected as normal control group. The expression levels of HIF-1α, surviving, and VEGF in hepatocarcinoma tissues of hepatocarcinoma group and normal liver tissues of control group were detected by immunohistochemical (SP) staining method; then, the correlation among them was explored. The expression levels of HIF-1α, surviving, and VEGF protein in hepatocarcinoma tissues and corresponding normal tissues were detected by Western blot. RESULTS: The positive expression rate of HIF-1α, surviving, and VEGF in hepatocarcinoma tissues of hepatocarcinoma group was respectively 46.2%, 55.4%, and 61.5%, significantly higher than that in cancer adjacent normal liver tissues of control group which was 2%, 2%, and 2%, and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The expressions of HIF-1α, surviving, and VEGF in hepatocarcinoma tissues of patients with hepatocarcinoma were correlated with clinical stage, tumor differentiation degree and extrahepatic metastasis (p<0.05), but were not related to gender and tumor size (p>0.05). By Spearman rank correlation analysis, it could be seen that HIF-1α expression was positively correlated with VEGF protein expression in hepatocarcinoma tissues (r=0.683, p<0.05). Survivin expression was positively correlated with VEGF protein expression (r=0.717, p<0.05). There was no significant correlation between HIF-1α expression and survivin expression (p>0.05). The relative quantitative value of HIF-1α, surviving, and VEGF in hepatocarcinoma tissues of hepatocarcinoma group was respectively 3.04±0.23, 2.26±0.31, and 2.57±0.36, significantly higher than that in cancer adjacent liver tissues of control group which was 1.07±0.17, 1.31±0.27, and 1.42±0.43, and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). From Western blot electrophoresis scanning, it could be seen that the expressions of HIF-1α, surviving, and VEGF in hepatocarcinoma tissues were higher than those in cancer adjacent normal liver tissues. CONCLUSIONS: The expressions of HIF-1α, surviving, and VEGF played important roles in the occurrence, invasion, and metastasis of hepatocarcinoma. In hepatocarcinoma tissues, HIF-1α, and survivin protein expression was positively correlated with VEGF expression, but survivin protein was not related to HIF-1α expression, which indicated that HIF-1α and survivin may inhibit the apoptosis of hepatocarcinoma cells and promote tumor angiogenesis by up-regulating the expression of VEGF protein, thus accelerating the occurrence and development of hepatocarcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/metabolismo , Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/biosíntesis , Neoplasias Hepáticas/metabolismo , Survivin/biosíntesis , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/biosíntesis , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neovascularización Patológica/metabolismo , Regulación hacia Arriba , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...