Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 161(9): 659-67, 2014 Nov 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25364887

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on the comparative effectiveness and safety of preventive dietary and pharmacologic management of recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults. METHODS: This guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through March 2014), Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. Searches were limited to English-language publications. The clinical outcomes evaluated for this guideline include symptomatic stone recurrence, pain, urinary tract obstruction with acute renal impairment, infection, procedure-related illness, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, quality of life, and end-stage renal disease. This guideline grades the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. The target audience for this guideline is all clinicians, and the target patient population is all adults with recurrent nephrolithiasis (≥1 prior kidney stone episode). RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP recommends management with increased fluid intake spread throughout the day to achieve at least 2 L of urine per day to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis. (Grade: weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP recommends pharmacologic monotherapy with a thiazide diuretic, citrate, or allopurinol to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in patients with active disease in which increased fluid intake fails to reduce the formation of stones. (Grade: weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).


Asunto(s)
Nefrolitiasis/dietoterapia , Nefrolitiasis/prevención & control , Adulto , Alopurinol/uso terapéutico , Quelantes del Calcio/uso terapéutico , Ácido Cítrico/uso terapéutico , Fluidoterapia , Supresores de la Gota/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Nefrolitiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Inhibidores de los Simportadores del Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéutico
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 161(6): 429-40, 2014 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25222388

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on the nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence (UI) in women. METHODS: This guideline is based on published English-language literature on nonsurgical management of UI in women from 1990 through December 2013 that was identified using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Scirus, and Google Scholar. The outcomes evaluated for this guideline include continence, improvement in UI, quality of life, adverse effects, and discontinuation due to adverse effects. It grades the evidence and recommendations by using ACP's guideline grading system. The target audience is all clinicians, and the target patient population is all women with UI. RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP recommends first-line treatment with pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, high-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP recommends bladder training in women with urgency UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 3: ACP recommends pelvic floor muscle training with bladder training in women with mixed UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 4: ACP recommends against treatment with systemic pharmacologic therapy for stress UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 5: ACP recommends pharmacologic treatment in women with urgency UI if bladder training was unsuccessful. Clinicians should base the choice of pharmacologic agents on tolerability, adverse effect profile, ease of use, and cost of medication. (Grade: strong recommendation, high-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 6: ACP recommends weight loss and exercise for obese women with UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Urinaria/terapia , Terapia Conductista , Biorretroalimentación Psicológica/métodos , Electromiografía , Terapia por Ejercicio , Femenino , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/terapia , Diafragma Pélvico , Calidad de Vida , Vejiga Urinaria , Incontinencia Urinaria/complicaciones , Incontinencia Urinaria/diagnóstico , Incontinencia Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Pérdida de Peso
3.
Ann Intern Med ; 161(3): 210-20, 2014 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25089864

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. METHODS: This guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using MEDLINE (1966 through May 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Searches were limited to English-language publications. The clinical outcomes evaluated for this guideline included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal cardiovascular disease, stroke, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, postsurgical outcomes, and quality of life. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios were also assessed as outcomes of diagnostic tests. This guideline grades the evidence and recommendations by using ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP recommends a sleep study for patients with unexplained daytime sleepiness. (Grade: weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP recommends polysomnography for diagnostic testing in patients suspected of obstructive sleep apnea. ACP recommends portable sleep monitors in patients without serious comorbidities as an alternative to polysomnography when polysomnography is not available for diagnostic testing. (Grade: weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).


Asunto(s)
Polisomnografía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Adulto , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 159(7): 471-83, 2013 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24061345

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults. METHODS: This guideline is based on published literature from 1966 to September 2010 that was identified by using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. A supplemental MEDLINE search identified additional articles through October 2012. Searches were limited to English-language publications. The clinical outcomes evaluated for this guideline included cardiovascular disease (such as heart failure, hypertension, stroke, and myocardial infarction), type 2 diabetes, death, sleep study measures (such as the Apnea-Hypopnea Index), measures of cardiovascular status (such as blood pressure), measures of diabetes status (such as hemoglobin A1c levels), and quality of life. This guideline grades the evidence and recommendations using ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP recommends that all overweight and obese patients diagnosed with OSA should be encouraged to lose weight. (Grade: strong recommendation; low-quality evidence) RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP recommends continuous positive airway pressure treatment as initial therapy for patients diagnosed with OSA. (Grade: strong recommendation; moderate-quality evidence) RECOMMENDATION 3: ACP recommends mandibular advancement devices as an alternative therapy to continuous positive airway pressure treatment for patients diagnosed with OSA who prefer mandibular advancement devices or for those with adverse effects associated with continuous positive airway pressure treatment. (Grade: weak recommendation; low-quality evidence).


Asunto(s)
Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Obesidad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/prevención & control , Humanos , Avance Mandibular , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Aparatos Ortodóncicos , Calidad de Vida , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
5.
Ann Intern Med ; 157(10): 729-34, 2012 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23165664

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), American Heart Association (AHA), American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons to help clinicians diagnose known or suspected stable ischemic heart disease. METHODS: Literature on this topic published before November 2011 was identified by using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsychINFO, AMED, and SCOPUS. Searches were limited to human studies published in English. This guideline grades the evidence and recommendations according to a translation of the ACCF/AHA grading system into ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. RECOMMENDATIONS: This guideline includes 28 recommendations that address the following issues: the initial diagnosis of the patient who might have stable ischemic heart disease, cardiac stress testing to assess the risk for death or myocardial infarction in patients diagnosed with stable ischemic heart disease, and coronary angiography for risk assessment.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Angina de Pecho/etiología , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca , Electrocardiografía , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo
6.
Ann Intern Med ; 157(10): 735-43, 2012 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23165665

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline with the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), American Heart Association (AHA), American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons to present the available evidence on the management of stable known or suspected ischemic heart disease. METHODS: Literature on this topic published before November 2011 was identified by using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsychINFO, AMED, and SCOPUS. Searches were limited to human studies published in English. This guideline grades the evidence and recommendations according to a translation of the ACCF/AHA grading system into ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. RECOMMENDATIONS: The guideline includes 48 specific recommendations that address the following issues: patient education, management of proven risk factors (dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, physical activity body weight, and smoking), risk factor reduction strategies of unproven benefit, medical therapy to prevent myocardial infarction and death and to relieve symptoms, alternative therapy, revascularization to improve survival and symptoms, and patient follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Angina de Pecho/terapia , Terapia por Ejercicio , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidad , Revascularización Miocárdica , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo
7.
Ann Intern Med ; 156(2): 147-9, 2012 Jan 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22250146

RESUMEN

Unsustainable rising health care costs in the United States have made reducing costs while maintaining high-quality health care a national priority. The overuse of some screening and diagnostic tests is an important component of unnecessary health care costs. More judicious use of such tests will improve quality and reflect responsible awareness of costs. Efforts to control expenditures should focus not only on benefits, harms, and costs but on the value of diagnostic tests-meaning an assessment of whether a test provides health benefits that are worth its costs or harms. To begin to identify ways that practicing clinicians can contribute to the delivery of high-value, cost-conscious health care, the American College of Physicians convened a workgroup of physicians to identify, using a consensus-based process, common clinical situations in which screening and diagnostic tests are used in ways that do not reflect high-value care. The intent of this exercise is to promote thoughtful discussions about these tests and other health care interventions to promote high-value, cost-conscious care.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Control de Costos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Medicina Interna/economía , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/economía
8.
Ann Intern Med ; 148(2): 141-6, 2008 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18195338

RESUMEN

RECOMMENDATION 1: In patients with serious illness at the end of life, clinicians should regularly assess patients for pain, dyspnea, and depression. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.) RECOMMENDATION 2: In patients with serious illness at the end of life, clinicians should use therapies of proven effectiveness to manage pain. For patients with cancer, this includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and bisphosphonates. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.) RECOMMENDATION 3: In patients with serious illness at the end of life, clinicians should use therapies of proven effectiveness to manage dyspnea, which include opioids in patients with unrelieved dyspnea and oxygen for short-term relief of hypoxemia. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.) RECOMMENDATION 4: In patients with serious illness at the end of life, clinicians should use therapies of proven effectiveness to manage depression. For patients with cancer, this includes tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or psychosocial intervention. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.) RECOMMENDATION 5: Clinicians should ensure that advance care planning, including completion of advance directives, occurs for all patients with serious illness. (Grade: strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.).


Asunto(s)
Depresión/terapia , Disnea/terapia , Manejo del Dolor , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Planificación Anticipada de Atención/normas , Cuidadores/psicología , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Derivación y Consulta , Apoyo Social
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA