EPidemiology Of Cardiogenic sHock in Scotland (EPOCHS): A multicentre, prospective observational study of the prevalence, management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in Scotland.

Background: Despite high rates of cardiovascular disease in Scotland, the prevalence and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock are unknown. Methods: We undertook a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or coronary care unit at 13 hospitals in Scotland for a 6-month period. Denominator data from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group were used to estimate ICU prevalence; data for coronary care units were unavailable. We undertook multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results: In total, 247 patients with cardiogenic shock were included. After exclusion of coronary care unit admissions, this comprised 3.0% of all ICU admissions during the study period (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6%-3.5%). Aetiology was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 48%. The commonest vasoactive treatment was noradrenaline (56%) followed by adrenaline (46%) and dobutamine (40%). Mechanical circulatory support was used in 30%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 55%. After multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06), admission lactate (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.19), Society for Cardiovascular Angiographic Intervention stage D or E at presentation (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10-4.29) and use of adrenaline (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.40-5.40) were associated with mortality. Conclusions: In Scotland the prevalence of cardiogenic shock was 3% of all ICU admissions; more than half died prior to discharge. There was significant variation in treatment approaches, particularly with respect to vasoactive support strategy.

British societies guideline on the management of emergencies in implantable left ventricular assist device recipients in transplant centres.

An implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is indicated as a bridge to transplantation or recovery in the United Kingdom (UK). The mechanism of action of the LVAD results in a unique state of haemodynamic stability with diminished arterial pulsatility. The clinical assessment of an LVAD recipient can be challenging because non-invasive blood pressure, pulse and oxygen saturation measurements may be hard to obtain. As a result of this unusual situation and complex interplay between the device and the native circulation, resuscitation of LVAD recipients requires bespoke guidelines. Through collaboration with key UK stakeholders, we assessed the current evidence base and developed guidelines for the recognition of clinical deterioration, inadequate circulation and time-critical interventions. Such guidelines, intended for use in transplant centres, are designed to be deployed by those providing immediate care of LVAD patients under conditions of precipitous clinical deterioration. In summary, the Joint British Societies and Transplant Centres LVAD Working Group present the UK guideline on management of emergencies in implantable LVAD recipients for use in advanced heart failure centres. These recommendations have been made with a UK resuscitation focus but are widely applicable to professionals regularly managing patients with implantable LVADs.

The Glasgow Experience of Extended Myocardial Protection: A Novel Method of Implantation to Reduce Primary Graft Dysfunction After Heart Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Around 2000 heart transplants are performed in Europe annually. The rates of primary graft dysfunction in Europe are among the highest in the world. With increasing demand for organs and the limited supply of donors, novel techniques such as ex vivo normothermic perfusion have garnered incre-asing interest. We present a series of patients who underwent heart transplant at our unit in which we used a novel implantation technique to reduce primary graft dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared our experience with the novel method detailed in our article (Glasgow experience group) with a contemporary UK cohort (2015-2016) of patients (control group). We performed multivariable logistic regression to compare the Glasgow experience with the control group with primary graft dysfunction as the outcome measure. We adjusted for donor age, recipient diabetes mellitus, urgent listing status, bypass time, and total ischemic time. RESULTS: Among 194 patients in both cohorts, 140 patients (72.1%) were men and 36 (18.6%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. The odds ratio of primary graft dysfunction in the control group was 2.99 (95% CI, 1.02- 8.75) compared with the Glasgow experience group. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel approach was associated with significant reductions in primary graft dysfunction, with a trend toward improved 1-year survival. Larger studies are needed to show differences after further adjustment for known confounders of primary graft dysfunction. We believe this novel technique is safe, cost-effective, and reproducible.

Primary Graft Dysfunction after Heart Transplantation - Unravelling the Enigma.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the main cause of early mortality following heart transplantation despite several advances in donor preservation techniques and therapeutic strategies for PGD. With that aim of establishing the aetiopathogenesis of PGD and the preferred management strategies, the new consensus definition has paved the way for multiple contemporaneous studies to be undertaken and accurately compared. This review aims to provide a broad-based understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management of PGD.

Mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock post-acute myocardial infarction-a decade of lessons.

BACKGROUND: There are 0.9 catheterization labs per 100,000 inhabitants in Scotland for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which are much less accessible to patients in remote and rural areas. An uncommon but sinister sequalae following AMI is cardiogenic shock (CS) that could be refractory to inotropic support. CS complicates 5-15% of AMIs occurring in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs). Outcomes of CS are poor with mortalities of up to 90% reported in the literature in the absence of experienced care. We report our experience as the tertiary referral centre in Scotland for MCS and heart transplantation over 8 years. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was undertaken on all patients registered to the MCS service. The database was interrogated for patient demographics, type of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and duration of MCS support, PCI-outcomes and survival to 30 days. A time-to-event analysis was performed using patient survival as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (16 male, 7 females) were included. The median age of the patients as 50 years (range, 45-56 years). VA-ECMO was the initial MCS of choice in 17 (73.9%) patients with BIVAD for 4 (17.4%) patients and LVAD for 2 (8.7%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was 21.8% in this cohort, however survival to discharge was 52.2%. Eleven (47.8%) patients recovered without the need for any further support, however only 9 (81.8%) patients in this subgroup survived to discharge. Three (13.0%) patients received a durable LVAD. In this subgroup, one patient was transplanted whereas two patients died due to complications while on support. The median length of in-hospital MCS support was 4 days. Median in-hospital stay was 27 days. Long-term follow up of up to 8 years demonstrates a high mortality beyond 30-day up to the first 6-month post MCS support. CONCLUSIONS: MCS usage in these patients carries a high mortality in the early post-implantation period. However, there is a significant benefit to patients who survive the initial bridging period to recovery or destination therapy.

Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: a thorn amongst the roses.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the leading cause of early mortality post-heart transplantation. Despite improvements in mechanical circulatory support and critical care measures, the rate of PGD remains significant. A recent consensus statement by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) has formulated a definition for PGD. Five years on, we look at current concepts and future directions of PGD in the current era of transplantation.

Recurrent myocardial infarction in a 50-year-old woman.

CLINICAL INTRODUCTION: A 50-year-old woman presented with an inferoposterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Angiography revealed acute occlusion of the circumflex and right coronary (RCA) arteries. PCI was uncomplicated. Her medical history included asthma, hypertension and chronic sinusitis.Three months later, she presented with a non-STEMI (NSTEMI), and angiogram showed a new focal stenosis in the left anterior descending artery. Pressure wire assessment induced severe coronary spasm. After liberal intracoronary nitrate, fractional flow reserve measured 0.71, so a further stent was implanted. Six days later, she was readmitted with another NSTEMI. Repeat angiogram revealed patent stents, with severe spasm of the distal RCA which improved following nitrate (figure 1A,B). Four days later, she was readmitted with further NSTEMI. Coronary angiography was not felt to be appropriate, and she was discharged with vasodilator therapy.heartjnl;105/12/960/F1F1F1Figure 1(A) Angiogram of RCA pre nitrates; (B) Angiogram of RCA post nitrates; (C) CT brain post cardiac arrest; (D) CMR post cardiac arrest.The following day, she had an out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrest and was successfully resuscitated. CT brain showed no evidence of neurological injury (figure 1C). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed prior to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation (figure 1D). Eosinophils had been persistently elevated with a peak of 1.78×109 (normal: 0.02-0.5×109). Antinuclear antibodies and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) were negative. QUESTION?: What is the diagnosis for her recurrent acute coronary syndrome and VF arrest?Aggressive atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.Prinzmetal's variant angina.Loeffler endocarditis.Coronary vasculitis.

Patient survival and therapeutic outcome in the UK bridge to transplant left ventricular assist device population.

OBJECTIVE: To study the survival and patient outcome in a population of UK patients supported by an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation. METHODS: Data on all adult patients (n=342) who received a HeartMate II or HVAD as a first long-term LVAD between January 2007 and 31 December 2013 were extracted from the UK Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) Database in November 2015. Outcomes analysed include survival on a LVAD, time to urgent listing, heart transplantation and complications including those needing a pump exchange. RESULTS: 112 patients were supported with the Thoratec HeartMate II and 230 were supported with the HeartWare HVAD. Median duration of support was 534 days. During the study period, 81 patients required moving to the UK urgent waiting list for heart transplantation. Of the 342 patients, 85 (24.8%) received a heart transplant, this included 63 on the urgent list. Thirty-day survival was 88.9%, while overall patient survival at 3 years from LVAD implant was 49.6%. 156 patients (46%) died during LVAD support; the most common cause of death on a VAD was a cerebrovascular accident. There was no significant difference between the two devices used in any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of patients with advanced heart failure, who have a very poor prognosis, support with an implantable LVAD allowed a quarter to receive a heart transplant in a 3-year period. Overall survival of the cohort was about 50%. With improvement in technology and in post-LVAD management, it is likely that outcomes will improve further.

Algorithms to guide ambulance clinicians in the management of emergencies in patients with implanted rotary left ventricular assist devices.

Advances in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy have resulted in increasing numbers of adult LVAD recipients in the community. However, device failure, stroke, bleeding, LVAD thrombosis and systemic infection can be life-threatening emergencies. Currently, four LVAD systems are implanted in six UK transplant centres, each of which provides device-specific information to local emergency services. This has resulted in inconsistent availability and content of information with the risks of delayed or inappropriate decision-making. In order to improve patient safety, a consortium of UK healthcare professionals with expertise in LVADs developed universally applicable prehospital emergency algorithms. Guidance was framed as closely as possible on the standard ABCDE approach to the assessment of critically ill patients.