Change in Physical Activity and Function in Patients with Baseline Advanced Nondialysis CKD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although progressive decline in physical activity and function are common in individuals with worsening CKD, little is known about the effect of dialysis initiation on physical activity. We assessed for any association of progression to dialysis in people with advanced CKD with temporal rates of change in physical activity and function. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Canadian Frailty Observation and Interventions Trial (CanFIT) participants with an eGFR of <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were included. Outcomes included change in physical activity level, measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, and physical function, measured using the chair stand, 4-m gait speed, and grip strength tests. Generalized linear regression models were conducted to determine whether dialysis initiation was associated with greater decline in physical activity or function. RESULTS: Of 386 individuals, 162 progressed to dialysis. Both assessments were completed by 98% of individuals for the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, 86% for the chair stand test, 84% for the gait speed test, and 91% for the grip strength test. Median (interquartile range) interassessment follow-up was 427 (357-578) days for the "stable advanced CKD" group and 606 (428-1000) days for the "progressed to dialysis" group. Self-reported physical activity and gait speed significantly declined in both groups. Mean (SD) chair stand time increased from 20.8 (17.1) to 24.0 (21.0) seconds among patients with stable advanced CKD, and from 18.5 (15.4) to 27.4 (22.2) seconds among those who progressed to dialysis (adjusted difference in change, 5.2 seconds; 95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 9.7 seconds; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced CKD experience progressive declines in physical activity and function. Transition to dialysis is associated with accelerated decline in physical function, as measured by the chair stand test.

Cost-Utility of Dialysis in Canada: Hemodialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis, and Nondialysis Treatment of Kidney Failure.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The kidney failure population is growing, necessitating the expansion of dialysis programs. These programs are costly and require a substantial amount of health care resources. Tools that accurately forecast resource use can aid efficient allocation. The objective of this study is to describe the development of an economic simulation model that incorporates treatment history and detailed modality transitions for patients with kidney disease using real-world data to estimate associated costs, utility, and survival by initiating modality. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-utility model with microsimulation. SETTING & POPULATION: Adult incident maintenance dialysis patients in Canada who initiated facility-based hemodialysis (HD) or home peritoneal dialysis (PD) between 2004 and 2013. INTERVENTION: HD and PD. OUTCOMES: Costs (related to dialysis, transplantation, infections, and hospitalizations), survival, utility, and dialysis modality mix over time. MODEL PERSPECTIVE & TIMEFRAME: The model took the perspective of the health care payer. Patients were followed up for 10 years from initiation of dialysis. Our cost-utility analysis compared the intervention with receiving no treatment. RESULTS: During a 10-year time horizon, the cost-utility ratio for all patients initiating dialysis was $103,779 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in comparison to no treatment. Patients who initiated with facility-based HD were treated at a cost-utility ratio of $104,880/QALY and patients who initiated with home PD were treated at a cost-utility ratio of $83,762/QALY. During this time horizon, the total mean cost and QALYs per patient were estimated at $350,774 ± $204,704 and 3.38 ± 2.05) QALYs respectively. LIMITATIONS: The results do not include costs from the societal perspective. Rare patient trajectories were unable to be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: This model demonstrates that patients who initiated dialysis with PD were treated more cost-effectively than those who initiated with HD during a 10-year time horizon.

Improving Blood Pressure Management in Primary Care Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: a Systematic Review of Interventions and Implementation Strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is widely prevalent, associated with morbidity and mortality, but may be lessened with timely implementation of evidence-based strategies including blood pressure (BP) control. Nonetheless, an evidence-practice gap persists. We synthesize the evidence for clinician-facing interventions to improve hypertension management in CKD patients in primary care. METHODS: Electronic databases and related publications were queried for relevant studies. We used a conceptual model to address heterogeneity of interventions. We conducted a quantitative synthesis of interventions on blood pressure (BP) outcomes and a narrative synthesis of other CKD relevant clinical outcomes. Planned subgroup analyses were performed by (1) study design (randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or nonrandomized studies (NRS)); (2) intervention type (guideline-concordant decision support, shared care, pharmacist-facing); and (3) use of behavioral/implementation theory. RESULTS: Of 2704 manuscripts screened, 73 underwent full-text review; 22 met inclusion criteria. BP target achievement was reported in 15 and systolic BP reduction in 6 studies. Among RCTs, all interventions had a significant effect on BP control, (pooled OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.38). Subgroup analysis by intervention type showed significant effects for guideline-concordant decision support (pooled OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.27) but not shared care (pooled OR 1.71; 95% CI 0.96 to 3.03) or pharmacist-facing interventions (pooled OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.34). Subgroup analysis finding was replicated with pooling of RCTs and NRS. The five contributing studies showed large and significant reduction in systolic BP (pooled WMD - 3.86; 95% CI - 7.2 to - 0.55). Use of a behavioral/implementation theory had no impact, while RCTs showed smaller effect sizes than NRS. DISCUSSION: Process-oriented implementation strategies used with guideline-concordant decision support was a promising implementation approach. Better reporting guidelines on implementation would enable more useful synthesis of the efficacy of CKD clinical interventions integrated into primary care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018102441.