Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Med ; 11(19)2022 Sep 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36233505

RESUMEN

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Radiotherapy remains one of the first-line treatments in localised disease and may be used as monotherapy or in combination with other treatments such as androgen deprivation therapy or radical prostatectomy. Despite advancements in delivery methods and techniques, radiotherapy has been unable to totally overcome radioresistance resulting in treatment failure or recurrence of previously treated PCa. Various factors have been linked to the development of tumour radioresistance including abnormal tumour vasculature, oxygen depletion, glucose and energy deprivation, changes in gene expression and proteome alterations. Understanding the biological mechanisms behind radioresistance is essential in the development of therapies that are able to produce both initial and sustained response to radiotherapy. This review will investigate the different biological mechanisms utilised by PCa tumours to drive radioresistance.

2.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 893: 173831, 2021 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359146

RESUMEN

Drug repurposing has been increasingly used by both researchers and clinicians to identify new cancer treatments. The alpha-1 adrenoreceptor blockers are a class of drugs that have been used for many years in the treatment of hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Some of the drugs in this class, notably the quinazoline derivatives, have been found to display cytotoxic properties, identifying them as potential options in the treatment of cancer. This review will examine the currently available evidence that investigates the cytotoxic and anti-cancer properties of these agents, the mechanisms behind these properties and how the alpha-1 blockers fit within current cancer therapies. It aims to answer the question of whether these agents can go from the laboratory bench top into cancer clinics.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/metabolismo , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/efectos adversos , Animales , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/patología , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Transducción de Señal
3.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 105(6): 1073-1077, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31473130

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has long been used to reduce blood loss associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Debate remains over the best administration route with limited data comparing regimes including, to date, no studies investigating the equivalence of oral TXA and a combined topical/intravenous (IV) regime. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral TXA to combined topical/IV/oral TXA. WORKING HYPOTHESIS: We postulated that oral TXA would offer the same efficacy and safety as combined topical/IV/oral regime. We asked: (1) Would blood loss and haemoglobin change be affected? (2) Would complication rates increase? PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomised into either the study group (oral TXA regimen) or the control group (combined topical/IV/oral TXA). Both groups were administered three doses of TXA and received the same post-operative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Efficacy outcomes including blood loss and haemoglobin (Hb) change were investigated, together with safety outcomes of incidence of deep vein thrombosis and adverse events. RESULTS: The study (n=25) and control (n=28) group were comparable at baseline (eg pre-op haemoglobin). No significant difference was found between the study and control group in terms of Hb change (32.9±8.9 vs. 31.8±10.4, p=0.687) or blood loss (measured 640.0±291.1 vs. 538.3±270.2, p=0.173 and total 1211.5±336.0 vs. 1092.9±341.4, p=0.214). No cases of DVT were reported for either group and no statistical differences were found in the incidence of adverse events (nausea, hypotension, constipation) between groups. DISCUSSION: This study has shown for the first time that an oral TXA regimen is non-inferior to a topical/IV/oral regimen in TKA in efficacy and safety. Utilising oral TXA in place of a combined topical/IV/oral regime can significantly reduce costs without compromising patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, Randomised controlled trial.


Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Administración Tópica , Anciano , Transfusión Sanguínea , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...