Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
1.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 19(9): 865-870, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34330193

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal stent delivery and deployment in calcified coronary lesions are associated with a poor clinical outcome. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Comparison between procedural and hospital outcomes between patients who underwent atherectomy and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 2,035,039 patients underwent PCI, of which 50,095 (2.4%) underwent lesion modification using atherectomy. After adjustment for baseline differences, patients who underwent atherectomy were found to have higher rates of in-hospital mortality (3.3% vs 2.2% adjusted Odds Ratio, aOR, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.46, P < 0.001), coronary artery dissection (1.7% vs 1.1%, aOR, 1.56; 95%, 1.45-1.67, P < 0.001) vascular complications (1.6% vs 1.0%, aOR, 1.52; 95%, 1.42-1.64, P < 0.001), major bleeding (6.3% vs 4.7%, aOR, 1.24; 95%, 1.18-1.28, P < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (10.9%vs 9.1%, aOR, 1.07; 95%, 1.04-1.11, P < 0.001) when compared with non-atherectomy patients. Concomitant intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging improved mortality, while other complication rates were not affected by imaging. CONCLUSION: Coronary atherectomy was performed in patients with multiple comorbidities and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and complications than the non-atherectomy group.


Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Calcificación Vascular , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Hospitales , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Am J Case Rep ; 22: e931103, 2021 Jun 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34157014

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Bilateral posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusions are exceedingly rare, and are considered a devastating phenomenon that presents as cortical blindness. Predominant causes of PCA infarcts include cardiac and arterial embolisms. Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) cardiomyopathy is also an extremely rare cardiopathology. Several reports describe stroke as a potential manifestation of LVNC, but bilateral PCA infarcts are likely also caused by underlying LVNC cardiomyopathy, although this has not yet been reported. CASE REPORT A 63-year-old man presented to the emergency department of an outside hospital with acute vision loss in both eyes and dysarthria. His neurological examination necessitated an emergent stroke evaluation. His electrocardiogram and telemetry at admission did not reveal arrhythmia. He underwent an emergency endovascular thrombectomy at our facility. During the post-intervention stroke workup, a transthoracic echocardiogram with contrast showed left ventricle dilation, with an ejection fraction (EF) of 29%. Subsequent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the presence of LVNC cardiomyopathy. He was started on therapeutic anticoagulation (apixaban) and remained stable neurologically during the 3-month followup, with some residual visual field deficits. His cardiac outcome also improved (stress test was unremarkable for any cardiac ischemia, and an echocardiogram showing improved EF of 40%). CONCLUSIONS Our report is distinct, as it presents 2 exceedingly rare events in a patient: the occurrence of simultaneous bilateral PCA infarcts and LVNC cardiomyopathy. Prompt and accurate diagnosis was pivotal to the successful management of both conditions. Prospective studies are warranted to further knowledge of LVNC pathophysiology and the occurrence of stroke in such patients so that comprehensive management plans can be devised.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Posterior , No Compactación Aislada del Miocardio Ventricular , Ecocardiografía , Humanos , No Compactación Aislada del Miocardio Ventricular/complicaciones , No Compactación Aislada del Miocardio Ventricular/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 22(7): 586-593, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34076606

RESUMEN

AIM: We sought to determine the racial and ethnical disparities in the delivery of TAVR and to evaluate the in-hospital outcomes and utilization of TAVR stratified by patient ethnicity. METHOD: Using a national inpatient sample database between 2011 and 2015, we identified all adult patients who had TAVR. Races were identified and white race was set as control. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed for the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Out of 58 174 patients who underwent TAVR, 50 809 (87.3%) were white, 2327 (4.0%) were black, 2311 (4.0%) were Hispanic, 640 (1.1%) Asian, 105 (0.2%) Native American and 1982 (3.4%) of other ethnicities. We found a statistically significant linear uptrend in the utilization of TAVR in patients of all races between the years 2011 and 2015. White, black, Hispanic and Native American patients had a downward linear trend for mortality during the studied years (P ≤ 0.005 for all). Black patients had lower in-hospital mortality [2.8 vs. 3.6%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44, 0.81 P < 0.001] compared with white patients, whereas Hispanic patients and Native Americans had higher in-hospital mortality compared with white patients (4.5% OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.01, 1.56 P = 0.041), (9.5% OR 4.44; 95% CI 2.25, 8.77 P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, TAVR utilization is associated with lower mortality. There is a rising trend in utilization of TAVR in the black population with a significantly favorable mortality trend compared with the white population.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/etnología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/etnología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/etnología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Factores Raciales , Factores de Riesgo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 98(3): 540-548, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33860990

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study the risk factors associated with 30-readmission postperipheral vascular intervention (PVI) in peripheral artery disease (PAD). BACKGROUND: There has been a paucity of data regarding the trend and predictors of PVI readmission. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study of patients admitted with peripheral vascular disease for PVI using the NRD for the years 2010-2014. PVI was defined as angioplasty, atherectomy, and/or stenting of lower limb vessels. RESULTS: A total of 453,278 patients (30-day readmission n = 97,235). The mean age of study population was 68.6 ± 12.2 years and included 43.8% women. The 30-day readmission post-PVI was 21.5% (p = .034). Cardiovascular causes constitute 44% of readmission. Chronic limb ischemia and intermittent claudication were two most common cardiovascular causes constituting 11.7 and 4.9% cases of readmissions. Other cardiac causes of readmissions included heart failure (4.64%), dysrhythmias (1.4%), and acute myocardial infarction (1.7%). The high-risk factors for of all-cause 30-day readmission were hypertension, CLI, diabetes, renal failure, dyslipidemia, smoking, chronic pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation (p < .005). Length-of-stay was greater than 5 days for 56.2 and 75.4% paid by Medicare. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows an average yearly readmission rate of 21.5% post-PVI. Chronic comorbidities and prolonged hospitalization were associated with higher risk of readmission.


Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicación Intermitente/epidemiología , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
5.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 19(5): 433-444, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33896335

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transradial (TR) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a preferable PCI route. The complication difference between TR and TF approaches is controversial. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases were queried for PCI outcomes of TR TF in STEMI for major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), major bleeding, and mortality. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the random-effect model. RESULTS: We included 56 studies comprising of 68,733 patients (TR, n = 26,179; TF, n = 42,537). TR-PCI was associated with statistically significant lower odds of MACCE (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.88, p-value = 0.005), major bleeding (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.68, p-value<0.001), mortality (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80, p-value<0.001) at in hospital follow-up. TR-PCI was associated with statistically significant lower MACCE (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80, p-value<0.001), major bleeding (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.68, p-value<0.001), and mortality (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.86, p-value = 0.005) at 30-day follow-up. The same difference was seen at 1-year. CONCLUSION: TR-PCI was associated with lower odds of MACCE, major bleeding, and mortality during short- and long-term follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Arteria Femoral , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Arteria Radial , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 19(4): 363-368, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33615950

RESUMEN

Background: The transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has recently gained traction as a viable alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), but data on its safety and clinical outcomes in transplant patients are limited.Methods: We retrieved relevant demographic and clinical outcome data from the U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the year 2012-2015. The clinical outcomes of TAVR in renal transplant (RT) and liver transplant (LT) were ascertained using an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) on Mantzel-Hensel test.Results: A total of 62,399 TAVR patients were identified; 62,180 (99.6%) with no history of transplant, 219 (0.4%) with RT and 85 (0.1%) with LT. There was no significant difference in odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.25-1.5, p = 0.37), major cardiovascular, respiratory or neurological complications in patients with and without RT. Similarly, the odds of cardiac complications, renal and neurological complications between patients with and without LT were identical.Conclusion: Compared to non-transplant patients, TAVR appears to be associated with similar odds of major systemic complications or mortality in patients with a history of kidney or liver transplant.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Hígado , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos
7.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 19(3): 261-268, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33499696

RESUMEN

Background: The 30-day readmission risk factors for acute pericarditis are not well known. We investigated the risk factors and predictors of pericarditis from a national cohort.Methods: Readmission data from the National Readmission Database (NRD) from the year 2016 were used to analyze the prevalence of risk factors and predictors of pericarditis 30-day readmission.Results: From the year 2016, 16,475 acute pericarditis hospitalizations were recorded. The rate of readmission from the year 2016 is similar to 2012 reported data (18%). A total of 13,844 patients (mean age 55.2 years, 40% of women) were found for acute pericarditis readmissions. The incidence rate of 30-day readmission of acute pericarditis patients in our study was 17.8% with the major cause of readmission was related to cardiovascular (pericarditis, endocarditis, and myocarditis) during 30-day follow-up. The median cost of the index and 30 days pericarditis admission $10,048 and $9,932, respectively.Conclusion: Chronic comorbidities, prolonged hospitalization, and admission to a short-term hospital/left against medical advice admission to metropolitan teaching hospital were associated with a higher risk of 30-day readmission.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pericarditis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
8.
Am J Cardiol ; 145: 143-150, 2021 04 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33460607

RESUMEN

It is unknown whether endovascular intervention (EVI) is associated with superior outcomes when compared with surgical revascularization in octogenarian. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to compare the outcomes of limb revascularization in octogenarians who had surgical revascularization versus EVI. The NIS database's information on PAD patients ≥80-year-old who underwent limb revascularization between 2002 and 2014 included 394,504 octogenarian patients, of which 184,926 underwent surgical revascularization (46.9%) and 209,578 underwent EVI (53.1%). Multivariate analysis was performed to examine in-hospital outcomes. Trend over time in limb revascularization utilization was examined using Cochrane-Armitage test. EVI group had lower odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.58 to 0.63], myocardial infarction (aOR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.81 to 0.87]), stroke (aOR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.89 to 0.96]), acute kidney injury (aOR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.77 to 0.81]), and limb amputation (aOR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.74 to 0.79]) compared with surgical group (p < 0.001 for all). EVI group had higher risk of bleeding (aOR: 1.20 [95% CI: 1.18 to 1.23]) and vascular complications (3.2% vs 2.7%, aOR: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.19 to 1.30]) compared with surgical group (p < 0.001 for all). Within study period, EVI utilization increased in octogenarian patients from 2.6% to 8.9% (ptrend < 0.001); whereas use of surgical revascularization decreased from 11.6% to 5.2% (ptrend < 0.001). In conclusion, the utilization of EVI in octogenarians is increasing, and associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular and limb outcomes as compared with surgical revascularization.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Angioplastia/tendencias , Aterectomía/tendencias , Endarterectomía/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Riesgo , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Injerto Vascular/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias
9.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 19(1): 89-98, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33135511

RESUMEN

Objectives: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of calcified coronary artery disease (CAC) is not well known. We sought to assess IVL safety and efficacy in CAC. Methods: A comprehensive online databases search were performed to identify intravascular lithotripsy studies in patients with coronary artery disease. The primary outcome was IVL related change in the mean pre and post-procedural diameter of the coronary artery. Results: A total of 4 studies with 282 patients were included. The mean pre-IVL coronary diameter for all patients was 1.01 mm, while the mean post-IVL coronary diameter was 2.70 mm. The mean pre-post IVL diameter difference of coronary arteries on the pooled analysis was significantly lower by 4.08 mm (95% CI -4.94 to -3.30, p ≤ 0.00001). The Overall increase in the post-IVL lumen diameter was significantly higher than the pre-IVL diameter with a mean difference of -4.16 (95% CI -5.08 to -3.24, p = 0.000001). However, compared to pre-IVL, there was a significant reduction in the overall mean difference of luminal calcium angle after IVL of the stented coronary arteries (0.09, 95% CI 0.002-0.16, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Intravascular lithotripsy can offer a significant improvement in the vessel lumen to facilitate coronary stent delivery and deployments in severely calcified coronary arteries.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Litotricia/métodos , Calcificación Vascular/terapia , Humanos , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(3): e13711, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32955776

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTIONS & AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a common comorbidity in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to access the temporal trends and outcomes of TAVR or SAVR in HF patients. METHOD: The NIS database from 2011-2014 was queried for patients that underwent TAVR or SAVR and were subsequently diagnosed with HF. Temporal trends in the utilisation of TAVR or SAVR in HF patients were analysed. RESULTS: Among 27 982 patients who were diagnosed with HF of whom 17 681 (63.2%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) while 10 301 (36.8%) had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 9049 (32.3%) underwent TAVR and 16 933 (76.7%) underwent SAVR. Patients with HFrEF and HFpEF had higher utilisation of TAVR compared with SAVR over the course of the study period (P trend < .001). TAVR was associated with lower mortality [2.8% in 2012 and 1.8% in 2014 (P .013)] compared with SAVR. Similarly, multiple logistic regression showed a statistically significant lower in-hospital mortality in the TAVR group compared with SAVR (aOR 0.634; CI 0.504, 0.798, P < .001). CONCLUSION: For patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and heart failure who undergo aortic valve intervention, TAVR is associated with less odds of in-hospital mortality compared with SAVR.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 18(11): 809-817, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32825807

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy and safety of transradial (TR) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison to transfemoral (TF) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) is not well studied in literature. Objectives: We sought to study the outcome and complications associated with TR compared with TF for CTO interventions. METHODS: After a systematic literature search was done in PubMed and EMBASE, we performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing TF and TR for CTO PCI. Results: Twelve studies with 19,309 patients were included. Compared to those who has TF access, individuals who were treated via TR approach had statistically significant lower access complication rates [odds ratio (OR): 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22 to 0.49; p < 0.0001]. The procedural success was in the favor of TR method (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.31-1. 51; p < 0.0001). The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and contrast-induced nephropathy were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: When compared with TF access interventions in CTO PCI; the TR approach appears to be associated with far less access-site complications, higher procedural success, and comparable MACCE.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Arteria Femoral , Humanos , Incidencia , Arteria Radial , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 18(11): 827-833, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32842807

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is defined as coronary artery obstruction with no luminal continuity. Comparative outcomes of PCI in patients with in-stent CTO (IS-CTO) versus de-novo CTO are unclear. METHODS: An extensive literature search was done for outcomes of PCI in patients undergoing IS-CTO and de-novo CTO. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, MI, and procedural success. Odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Five studies consisting of 3,681 patients (IS-CTO = 464, de-novo CTO = 3,217) were included. PCI in IS-CTO was associated with a significantly higher odds of MACE (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.32-3.68, p = 0.002) and MI (OR 4.31, 95% CI 1.94-9.58, p = 0.0003) compared to patients with de-novo CTO. Mortality outcome (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.93-2.39, p = 0.10) between the two groups was similar. Overall odds of procedural-success were similar among the groups (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.84-1.46, p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: PCI for in-stent CTO might be associated with higher odds of MACE and MI compared to PCI for de-novo CTO. However, cardiovascular mortality or failure of procedure are similar.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Stents , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Cardiol Res ; 11(5): 280-285, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32849962

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The outcome of transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with kidney transplant is unknown, as majority of these patients were excluded from the major TAVR clinical trials. We sought to compare patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a history of kidney transplant. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant articles. The incidence of all-cause mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI) was calculated using relative risk on a random effect model. RESULTS: A total of 1,538 patients (TAVR 328, SAVR 1,210) were included in the study. TAVR was associated with lower mortality as compared with SAVR at 30 days from the index procedure (odds ratio (OR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25 - 0.93; P = 0.03). One-year mortality was studied in three studies and showed comparable mortality in patients undergoing TAVR and SAVR (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.10 - 5.51; P = 0.78). Compared to SAVR, TAVR carries an identical risk of AKI (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.10 - 1.90; P = 0.27). A sensitivity analysis performed by exclusion of Voudris et al study showed a non-significant difference in the mortality incidence of two groups at 30 days (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.27 - 1.91; P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a history of kidney transplant, TAVR was associated with a comparable risk of mortality and AKI compared to SAVR.

14.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 28: 100509, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32300637

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are indicated as bridging or destination therapy for patients with advanced (Stage D) heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Due to the clustering of the mutual risk factors, HFrEF patients have a high prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). This, along with the fact that continuous flow LVAD influence shear stress on the vasculature, can further deteriorate the PAD. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2002-2014) to identify the burden of pre-existing PAD cases, its association with LVAD, in-hospital mortality, and other complications of LVAD. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: A total of 20,817 LVAD patients, comprising of 1,625 (7.8%) PAD and 19,192 (91.2%) non-PAD patients were included in the study. The odds of in-hospital mortality in PAD patients were significantly higher compared to non-PAD group (OR 1.29, CI, 1.07-1.55, P = 0.007). The PAD group had significantly higher adjusted odds as compared to non-PAD group for acute myocardial infarction (aOR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.55, P = 0.007), major bleeding requiring transfusion (aOR, 1.286; 95% CI, 1.136-1.456, P < 0.001), vascular complications (aOR, 2.360; 95% CI, 1.781-3.126, P < 0.001), surgical wound infections (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.17-1.94, P = 0.002), thromboembolic complications (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.36-2.10, P < 0.001), implant-related complications (aOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.19-1.80, P < 0.001), and acute renal failure (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12-1.43, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PAD patients can have high LVAD associated mortality as compared to non-PAD.

15.
Avicenna J Med ; 10(1): 22-28, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32110546

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is considered the most common congenital heart disease and the main etiology of aortic valve stenosis (AS) in young adults. Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is routinely used in high- and intermediate-risk patients with AS, BAV patients with AS were excluded from all pivotal trials that led to TAVR approval. We sought, therefore, to examine in-hospital outcomes of patients with BAV who underwent TAVR in comparison with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2011 to 2014, we identified patients with BAV with International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-CM code 746.4. Patients who underwent TAVR were identified using ICD-9 codes 35.05 and 35.06 and those who underwent SAVR were identified using codes 35.21 and 35.22 during the same period. RESULTS: A total of 37,052 patients were found to have BAV stenosis. Among them, 36,629 patients (98.8%) underwent SAVR, whereas 423 patients (1.14%) underwent TAVR. One-third of enrolled patients were female, and the majority of the patients were White with a mean age of 65.9 ± 15.1 years. TAVR use for BAV stenosis significantly increased from 0.39% in 2011 to 4.16% in 2014 (P < 0.001), which represents a 3.77% overall growth in procedure rate. The median length of stay decreased significantly throughout the study period (mean 12.2 ± 8.2 days to 7.1 ± 5.9 days, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between SAVR and TAVR groups in the in-hospital mortality (0% vs. 5.9%; adjusted P = 0.119). CONCLUSION: There is a steady increase in TAVR use for BAV stenosis patients along with a significant decrease in length of stay.

16.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(5): e013678, 2020 03 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32075491

RESUMEN

Background Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers tomographic images of the coronary vessels, allowing optimization of stent implantation at the time of PCI. However, the long-term beneficial effect of IVUS over PCI guided by coronary angiography (CA) alone remains under question. We sought to investigate the outcomes of IVUS-guided compared with CA-guided PCI. Methods and Results We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register, looking for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared PCI outcomes of IVUS with CA. Data were aggregated for the primary outcome measure using the random-effects model as pooled risk ratio (RR). The primary outcomes were the rate of cardiovascular death, need for target lesion revascularization, occurrence of myocardial infarction, and rate of stent thrombosis. A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 27 610 patients divided into IVUS (n=11 513) and CA (n=16 097). Compared with standard CA-guided PCI, we found that the risks of cardiovascular death (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.73), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86), target lesion revascularization (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94), and stent thrombosis (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41-0.79) were all significantly lower using IVUS guidance. Conclusions Compared with standard CA-guided PCI, the use of IVUS imaging guidance to optimize stent implantation is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death and major adverse events, such as myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos
18.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 95(3): 503-512, 2020 02 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31254325

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The utilization of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has been increasing. We sought to evaluate the outcome of coronary intervention using PVAD compared with IABP in noncardiogenic shock and nonacute myocardial infarction patients. METHOD: Using the National Inpatient Sampling (NIS) database from 2005 to 2014, we identified patients who underwent PCI using ICD 9 codes. Patients with cardiogenic shock, acute coronary syndrome, or acute myocardial infarction were excluded. Patient was stratified based on the MCS used, either to PVAD or IABP. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to study PCI outcome using PVAD compared with IABP. RESULTS: Out of 21,848 patients who underwent PCI requiring MCS, 17,270 (79.0%) patients received IABP and 4,578 (21%) patients received PVAD. PVAD patients were older (69 vs. 67, p < .001), were less likely to be women (23.3% vs. 33.3%, p < .001), and had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia prior PCI, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, anemia, chronic lung disease, liver disease, renal failure, and peripheral vascular disease compared with IABP group (p ≤ .007). Using Multivariate logistic regression, PVAD patients had lower in-hospital mortality (6.1% vs. 8.8%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.62; 95% CI 0.51, 0.77, p < .001), vascular complications (4.3% vs. 7.5%, aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62, 0.99, p = .046), cardiac complications (5.6% vs. 14.5%, aOR 0.29; 95% CI 0.24, 0.36, p < .001), and respiratory complications (3.8% vs. 9.8%, aOR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28, 0.48, p < .001) compared with patients who received IABP. CONCLUSION: Despite higher comorbidities, nonemergent PCI procedures using PVAD were associated with lower mortality compared with IABP.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Función Ventricular , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/efectos adversos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
19.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 95(3): E84-E95, 2020 02 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31631511

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) outcome remains incompletely elucidated. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the outcome of PVI in dialysis patients with those with normal kidney function. METHODS: Using weighted data from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2002 and 2014, we identified all peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients aged ≥18 years that underwent PVI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1,186,192 patients who underwent PVI, 1,066,830 had normal kidney function (89.9%) and 119,362 had ESRD requiring dialysis (10.1%). Critical limb ischemia was more prevalent in dialysis patients (63.2 vs. 34.0%, p < .001). Compared with normal kidney function group, ESRD requiring dialysis was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (1.5 vs. 4.2%, adjusted OR: 2.13 [95% CI: 2.04-2.23]) and longer length of hospital stay (median 3 days, Interquartile range [IQR] (0-6) vs. 7 days, IQR (4-18); p < .001). Dialysis patients had higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; 14.3 vs. 9.8%, p < .001) and net adverse cardiovascular events (composite of MACE, major bleeding, or vascular complications; 40.8 vs. 29.1%, p < .001). ESRD patients less frequently underwent open bypass (5.6 vs. 8.5%, p < .001) and more frequently had major amputation (10.3 vs. 3.0%, p < .001) compared with normal kidney function group. CONCLUSION: PAD patients on dialysis who underwent PVI have higher rates of mortality and adverse outcomes as compared to those with normal kidney function.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Isquemia/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Riñón/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crítica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Int J Clin Pract ; 74(1): e13434, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31602732

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation ablation increased over the last two decades by its high success rate. However, the trend of inpatient adverse outcomes is limited. The aim of this study to examine the frequency and predictors of acute pericarditis resulting from catheter ablation. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we identified all patients who underwent AF ablation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed for the primary outcome of in-hospital acute pericarditis post-AF ablation. Variance-weighted regression has been used to test for linear and curvilinear trends in disease characteristics and outcomes over time. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2014, our study included 122,993 patients, acute pericarditis was found in 984 (0.8%) patients who underwent AF ablation. The trend of acute pericarditis showed inconsistent fluctuation leaning towards reduction over the years. Multivariate analysis showed that patients of female gender are at a 40% higher risk of acute pericarditis post-ablation compared with males. Additionally, obese patients have a 40% higher risk of developing acute pericarditis compared with patients who have BMI < 30. Furthermore, anaemia and rheumatoid arthritis have the odds ratio (OR: 2.63; 95% [CI] 2.04-3.39) and (OR: 1.64; 95% [CI] 1.08-2.48). CONCLUSION: Post-AF ablation, in-hospital acute pericarditis showed inconsistent fluctuation leaning towards reduction. Female gender and obesity are at higher risk for developing acute pericarditis post-AF ablations. Proper evaluation might alter those complications.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Pericarditis/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/epidemiología , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Pericarditis/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...