RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Few studies have analyzed epidemiologic factor associated with female patients presenting to the emergency department from facial fractures because of assault. Clearly understanding these factors may assist in developing effective strategies to decrease the incidence and sequelae of these injuries. OBJECTIVES: To determine the epidemiology of facial fractures because of assault in the female population. METHODS: All female facial fracture visits were queried in the 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department (ED) Sample database. The likelihood of a facial fracture encounter resulting from assault was modeled using logistic regression adjusting for demographics, insurance status, geographic region, location of patient residence, and income. Secondary outcomes analyzed hospitalization costs and adverse events. RESULTS: Of all facial fractures 12.4% of female encounters were due to assault were due to assault. Of assaulted females, 72.8% were between the ages of 20 and 40, and Black women experienced a disproportionate share of assault encounters (odds ratio [OR]=2.55; CI, 2.29-2.84). A large portion (46.4%) of encounters occurred in patients living in the lowest quartile of median household income, and 22.8% of patients were uninsured (OR=1.34; CI, 1.09-1.66). Assaulted patients were more likely to have fractures in nasal bone (58.1% vs. 42.5%), orbit (16.8% vs. 10.9%), zygoma (4.1% vs 3.6%), and mandible (8.7% vs. 4.8%) compared with their nonassaulted counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Facial fractures were especially common in lower income, uninsured, urban, and Black populations. Examining the patterns of injury and presentation are critical to improve prevention strategies and screening tools, identifying critical patients, and develop a more efficient and effective system to treat and support female patients suffering facial fractures secondary to assault.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , NiñoAsunto(s)
Estética , Mamoplastia , Pezones , Humanos , Femenino , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mamoplastia/psicología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prioridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming surgery is unequally distributed across the United States due to resource allocation, state-based regulations, and the availability of trained physicians. Many individuals seeking gender-affirming surgery travel vast distances to receive care. This study aims to quantify the distances that individuals travel to receive gender-affirming surgery based on procedure type and patient home-of-record location. METHODS: Patients in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart who underwent gender-affirming surgery were identified via Current Procedural Terminology codes. Data on patient demographics, procedural care, and location of patient and provider were collected. To be included, a patient had to meet diagnostic criteria to receive gender-affirming surgery and have a recorded surgical procedure reimbursed as part of gender-affirming surgery per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines. Patients residing or receiving care outside the continental United States were excluded. Distances between the ZIP Code of each patient's home of record and the location where the gender-affirming surgery was performed were calculated via the Google Maps Distance Matrix API. Distance traveled for gender-affirming surgery by patient state and gender-affirming surgery procedure were determined. Multivariate linear regression analysis determined predictors of distance traveled for gender-affirming surgery, whereas multivariate logistic regression identified variables associated with an increased likelihood of out-of-state travel to gender-affirming surgery. RESULTS: Across 86 million longitudinal patient records, the study population included 2,743 records corresponding to 1,735 patients who received gender-affirming surgery between January 2003 and June 2020. The median distance traveled for gender-affirming surgery was 191 miles (mean: 391.5), and 36.0% of patients traveled out of their state of residence. Every patient from West Virginia, Wyoming, South Dakota, Mississippi, and Delaware traveled out of state for gender-affirming surgery. Patients with homes of record in California (18.4%), Massachusetts (20.7%), and Oregon (19.0%) were the least likely to travel out-of-state for gender-affirming surgery out of states with more than 10 gender-affirming surgery encounters. The main predictors for out-of-state travel included both feminizing and masculinizing genital surgery, as well as an insurance coverage with increased provider options. Additionally, patients traveled shorter distances for gender-affirming surgery after the post-2014 Affordable Care Act expansion compared to pre-2014. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving gender-affirming surgery in the United States travel great distances for their care, often receiving their care from out-of-state providers. Restrictive guidelines imposed by state laws on both the access to and provision of gender-affirming surgery compound the myriad of common difficulties that patients face. It is imperative to discuss potential factors that may mitigate these barriers for those who require gender-affirming surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Anciano , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Medicare , Viaje , Massachusetts , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aesthetic and reconstructive implant-based breast operations are among the most common plastic surgery procedures. This study assessed the baseline knowledge of common breast implant-associated complications, and their influence on consideration of breast implants among adult laywomen within the United States. METHODS: Five hundred women were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Respondents self-reported demographics and experience with breast implants. Questions were asked addressing respondents' understanding of complications and concerns regarding breast implants. RESULTS: Of the authors' cohort (average age, 37.8 ± 11.7 years), 12.0% had received breast implants, 72.8% knew someone with implants, and nearly 50% would consider receiving implants in the future. As many as 82.2% reported at least one concern influencing their consideration of implants: safety (75.2%), cost (70.0%), unnatural shape (43.3%), and feel (45.2%). Respondents not considering implants were significantly concerned by foreign body implantation ( P < 0.001). Almost 75% believed that implants last longer than 10 years. Following education about risks of capsular contracture and implant rupture, one-third of respondents considering implants and half of those unsure were "less likely" to receive implants. The majority were unchanged in their likelihood after learning about infection (74.4%) and implant migration (69.2%). Respondents with a history of implants were significantly less likely to believe there is strong evidence supporting the aforementioned complications ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The rising awareness surrounding breast implant safety has the potential to significantly impact perceptions and receptivity. This study identifies public perceptions of common breast implant-associated complications and primary long-term concerns, highlighting the importance of education on postoperative complications in informed consent and surgical decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Opinión Pública , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Mama/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Compression of the peroneal nerve is recognized as a common cause of falls. The superficial course of the peroneal nerve exposes it to trauma and pressure from common activities such as crossing of legs. The nerve can be exposed also to distress due to metabolic problems such as diabetes. The purpose of our manuscript is to review common peroneal nerve dysfunction symptoms and treatment as well as provide a systematic assessment of its relation to falls. METHODS: We pooled the existing literature from PubMed and included studies (n = 342) assessing peroneal nerve damage that is related in any way to falls. We excluded any studies reporting non-original data, case reports and non-English studies. RESULTS: The final systematic assessment included 4 articles. Each population studied had a non-negligible incidence of peroneal neuropathy. Peroneal pathology was found to be consistently associated with falls. CONCLUSION: The peroneal nerve is an important nerve whose dysfunction can result in falls. This article reviews the anatomy and care of the peroneal nerve. The literature review highlights the strong association of this nerve's pathology with falls.
Asunto(s)
Nervio Peroneo , Neuropatías Peroneas , Humanos , Nervio Peroneo/anatomía & histología , Neuropatías Peroneas/epidemiología , Neuropatías Peroneas/etiología , Neuropatías Peroneas/diagnóstico , IncidenciaAsunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Acelerometría/instrumentación , Ergonomía , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Postura , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/educación , Cirujanos , Cirugía Plástica/educaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To perform the first systematic review of all available GAS publications across all procedures to assess outcomes reported in the literature and the methods used for outcome assessment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Assessment of GAS results is complex and multidimensional, involving not only complication rates but also anatomic (eg, vaginal depth), functional (eg, urinary), and psychosocial outcomes. A fully comprehensive aggregation of all prior research would offer an essential cornerstone for continued progress. METHODS: A systematic review was performed after PRISMA guidelines to identify all outcomes measures in GAS cohorts, including patient-centered outcomes, complications, and functional outcomes. Data were aggregated to assess pooled rates of complications, satisfaction, and other outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 15,186 references were identified, 4162 papers advanced to abstract review, and 1826 underwent full-text review. After review, there were 406 GAS cohort publications, including 171 vaginoplasty, 82 phalloplasty, 16 metoidioplasty, 23âoophorectomy/vaginectomy, and 21 with multiple procedures.Although 68.7% of genitoplasty papers addressed patient-centered outcomes, only 1.0% used metrics validated in the transgender population. Forty-three different outcome instruments were used. No instrument was used in more than 15% of published series and 38 were used in only 1 or 2 publications. CONCLUSIONS: Our review found high patient satisfaction for genital procedures but little concordance between study methods, with almost 90% of patient-focused outcome metrics appearing only once or twice. Standardization of outcome instruments and measurement methods through patient-inclusive, multidisciplinary consensus efforts is the essential next step for quality improvement. As GAS continues to mature, building on current foundations with the goal of improving both surgical and patient-reported outcomes is essential.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Revisión por Pares , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/métodos , Personas Transgénero , Transexualidad/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To perform the first systematic review of all available gender-affirming surgery (GAS) publications across all procedures to assess both outcomes reported in the literature and the methods used for outcome assessment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rapidly increasing clinical volumes of gender-affirming surgeries have stimulated a growing need for high-quality clinical research. Although some procedures have been performed for decades, each individual procedure has limited data, necessitating synthesis of the entire literature to understand current knowledge and guide future research. METHODS: A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify all outcomes measures in GAS cohorts, including PCOs, complications, and functional outcomes. Outcome data were pooled to assess currently reported complication, satisfaction, and other outcome rates. RESULTS: Overall, 15,186 references were identified, 4162 papers advanced to abstract review, and 1826 underwent full-text review. After review, there were 406 GAS cohort publications. Of non-genitoplasty titles, 35 were mastectomy, 6 mammoplasty, 21 facial feminization, and 31âvoice/cartilage. Although 59.1% of non-genitoplasty papers addressed PCOs in some form, only 4.3% used instruments partially-validated in transgender patients. Overall, data were reported heterogeneously and were biased towards high-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the most comprehensive review of GAS literature. By aggregating all previously utilized measurement instruments, this study offers a foundation for discussions about current methodologic limitations and what dimensions must be included in assessing surgical success. We have assembled a comprehensive list of outcome instruments; this offers an ideal starting basis for emerging discussions between patients and providers about deficiencies which new, better instruments and metrics must address. The lack of consistent use of the same outcome measures and validated GAS-specific instruments represent the 2 primary barriers to high-quality research where improvement efforts should be focused.
Asunto(s)
Cara/cirugía , Disforia de Género/cirugía , Mastectomía/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Revisión por Pares/métodos , Voz/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Personas TransgéneroRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Uterine allotransplantation (UTx) is a novel therapy to allow women with uterine factor infertility (UFI) to bear their own children. To date, over 60 UTx have been performed, resulting in 15 live births. Our study investigates the attitudes, perspectives, and interests of women with UFI towards UTx. METHODS: Anonymous questionnaires were distributed electronically to women diagnosed with UFI at Johns Hopkins Hospital between the years 2003 and 2018. RESULTS: Thirty-one women with UFI were identified, resulting in 10 completed surveys. The average age was 31.7 ± 6.31 years, and the average age of diagnosis was 20 years (range 14-31); all 10 surveyed women had congenital UFI. Of note, 80% of women agreed that UTx should be an option for women with UFI, and 90% would consider receiving a UTx. The majority of the nine (90%) women who had previously heard of UTx learned about it from the news (5, 50%). When asked to rank the risks related to UTx in order of personal importance, only two women ranked themselves most important; the other woman ranked fetus and donor as more important. All women had health insurance (70% had private insurance), and 90% believed that UTx should be covered by health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: We surveyed women with UFI and found that the majority are willing to have UTx, despite the associated risks of the procedure. Taking into consideration the responses for ranking the importance of risks of the procedure, women with UFI should be considered a vulnerable population, requiring special considerations for UTx informed consents.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Near-infrared spectroscopy can detect changes in tissue oxygenation postoperatively that predict flap necrosis. The authors hypothesized that this technology can be applied along with topical nitroglycerin to measure an improvement in tissue oxygenation that correlates with tissue salvage. METHODS: Dorsal, random pattern flaps measuring 10 × 3 cm were raised using Sprague-Dawley rats. Tissue oxygenation was measured after flap elevation in 10 locations using the ViOptix Intra.Ox. Animals were divided into three groups that received 30 mg of topical nitroglycerin daily, twice-daily, or not at all. Oxygenation measurements were repeated on postoperative day 1 and animals were euthanized on day 7 and evaluated for tissue necrosis. RESULTS: Tissue necrosis was greatest in controls (51.3 mm) compared to daily (28.8 mm) and twice-daily nitroglycerin (18.8 mm; p = 0.035). Three flap perfusion zones were identified: healthy (proximal, 50 mm), necrotic (distal, 20 mm), and watershed. Immediate postoperative tissue oxygenation was highest in healthy tissue (57.2 percent) and decreased to 33.0 and 19.3 percent in the watershed and necrotic zones, respectively (p < 0.001). One day after treatment with nitroglycerin, oxygenation in the healthy zone did not increase significantly (mean difference, -1.5 percent). The watershed (17.8 percent; p < 0.001) and necrotic zones (16.3 percent; p <0.001) did exhibit significant improvements that were greater than those measured in control tissues (7.9 percent; both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serial perfusion assessment using the ViOptix Intra.Ox measured a significant improvement in flap oxygenation after treatment with topical nitroglycerin. Within the watershed area of the flap, this increase in tissue oxygenation was associated with the salvage of ischemic tissue.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Nitroglicerina/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/irrigación sanguínea , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Necrosis/diagnóstico , Necrosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Necrosis/etiología , Oxígeno/análisis , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ratas , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional/efectos de los fármacos , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/patología , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/trasplanteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mastectomy flap necrosis affects 7 to 40 percent of patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction, with many cases resulting in infection and/or explantation. The Intra.Ox near-infrared spectrometer is a novel device that assesses tissue perfusion by measuring the interactions of light with oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. This handheld device facilitates serial flap perfusion assessment and may objectively identify at-risk tissues and guide evidence-based treatment algorithms. In this preliminary study, we hypothesized that the Intra.Ox spectrometer detects differences in tissue oxygenation that correlate to tissue necrosis. METHODS: Dorsal, random-pattern flaps measuring 10 × 3 cm were raised in eight male Sprague-Dawley rats. Intraoperative tissue oxygen saturation was measured using Intra.Ox in 10 standardized locations. On postoperative day 7, the skin flaps were evaluated for full-thickness necrosis. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance. A receiver operating characteristic curve assessed the accuracy of intraoperative tissue oxygenation in predicting the risk of flap necrosis. RESULTS: Tissue oxygen saturation exhibited a strong negative correlation to distance from the flap pedicle (r = -0.798). Oxygen saturation in tissue that developed necrosis averaged 32 percent, compared to 59 percent in tissues that did not (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.969. Post hoc oxygen saturation cutoffs with 100 percent specificity and sensitivity in predicting necrosis were identified at 46 percent and 54 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intra.Ox detects significant differences in tissue oxygenation saturation that are associated with the risk for flap necrosis. This technology can be used to identify at-risk tissues and represents an avenue for research aimed at preventing flap necrosis.
Asunto(s)
Oxígeno/metabolismo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/patología , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/fisiología , Animales , Correlación de Datos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Masculino , Necrosis , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Espectroscopía Infrarroja CortaRESUMEN
Prepectoral breast reconstruction promises to minimize breast animation deformity and decrease pain associated with subpectoral dissection and tissue expansion. This latter benefit is particularly timely given the ongoing opioid epidemic; however, this theoretical benefit remains to be demonstrated clinically. As such, this study aimed to compare inpatient opioid use and prescription practices following prepectoral and subpectoral expander-based breast reconstruction. A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing immediate tissue expander placement between January 2017 and April 2018. Medical records were reviewed for surgical details, 24-hour inpatient PRN opioid usage (oral morphine equivalents [OME]), and discharge prescriptions. Comparisons were made using chi-squared and student's t tests where appropriate. Two hundred and thirty-one patients were identified, (mean age 48.8 years), 222 of which met inclusion criteria. 89 underwent subpectoral and 133 prepectoral tissue expander placements. All but two subpectoral patients and two prepectoral patients were opioid-naïve. The rate of bilateral procedures did not differ between cohorts (P = .194). Overall, 94% of patients were discharged within 24 hours, and length of stay did not differ between cohorts (P = .0753). Two subpectoral and two prepectoral patients required prolonged admission due to postoperative pain. All patients were ordered standing acetaminophen, celecoxib, and gabapentin, and subpectoral patients cyclobenzaprine. Narcotic pain medication was offered on an "as needed" (PRN) basis. Opioid usage within the first 24-hours was halved in the prepectoral cohort (22.2 vs 44.5 OME, P = .0003), which was not associated with bi/unilaterality of procedure or the presence of any psychiatric conditions. The amount of opioids prescribed on discharge was not significantly different between cohorts (308.42 OME prepectoral vs 336.99 subpectoral, P = .3197). Prepectoral expander placement appears to be associated with decreased inpatient opioid use postoperatively. This may represent an opportunity to improve patient satisfaction and safety by decreasing outpatient opioid prescriptions.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dispositivos de Expansión Tisular/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the personal, ethical, and financial perspectives of individuals with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH), a congenital uterine factor infertility condition, regarding uterine transplantation (UTx). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, quantitative survey. SETTING: A 60-item anonymous electronic questionnaire was disseminated via social media sites. PATIENTS: International members of the Beautiful You MRKH Foundation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The survey contained UTx educational materials followed by questions assessing participants' baseline knowledge, global perceptions, financial concerns, and ethical considerations regarding UTx. RESULTS: We received 281 responses, with a mean participant age of 28.2 ± 9.8 years. After reviewing the education material, most participants considered receiving a UTx (73%), believed that it should be an option for all women with uterine factor infertility (86%), and believed that it should be covered by health insurance (78%). Respondents perceived the benefits of the procedure to outweigh the risks (67%) and considered it to be an ethical procedure (82%). Almost one-half (49%) were willing to spend more than $10,000 out of pocket to receive the procedure. When asked to rank the risk of UTx to self, donor, and fetus in order of personal importance, 21% ranked their own safety last. CONCLUSION: There is a profound desire in the MRKH community for UTx to become more widely available and affordable. MRKH patients may represent a vulnerable population requiring special considerations for informed consent and rigorous evaluation for UTx. Providers caring for MRKH patients should be prepared to provide education about UTx and to thoughtfully engage with news and media outlets to communicate evidence-supported information.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Desarrollo Sexual 46, XX/psicología , Trastornos del Desarrollo Sexual 46, XX/cirugía , Anomalías Congénitas/psicología , Anomalías Congénitas/cirugía , Infertilidad Femenina/psicología , Infertilidad Femenina/cirugía , Conductos Paramesonéfricos/anomalías , Trasplante de Órganos/psicología , Útero/trasplante , Trastornos del Desarrollo Sexual 46, XX/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Conductos Paramesonéfricos/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is becoming an increasingly important and accessible component of breast cancer care. We hypothesize that prepectoral patients benefit from lower short-term complications and shorter periods to second-stage reconstruction compared with individuals receiving reconstruction in the subpectoral plane. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of all adult postmastectomy patients receiving tissue expanders (TEs) was completed for a 21-month period (n = 286). RESULTS: A total of 286 patients underwent mastectomy followed by TE placement, with 59.1% receiving prepectoral TEs and 40.9% receiving subpectoral TEs. Participants receiving prepectoral TEs required fewer clinic visits before definitive reconstruction (6.4 vs 8.8, P <0.01) and underwent definitive reconstruction 71.6 days earlier than individuals with subpectoral TE placement (170.8 vs 242.4 days, P < 0.01). Anesthesia time was significantly less for prepectoral TE placement, whether bilateral (68.0 less minutes, P < 0.01) or unilateral (20.7 minutes less, P < 0.01). Operating room charges were higher in the prepectoral subgroup ($31,276.8 vs $22,231.8, P < 0.01). Partial necrosis rates were higher in the prepectoral group (21.7% vs 10.9%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing breast reconstruction using prepectoral TE-based reconstruction benefit from less anesthesia time, fewer postoprative clinic visits, and shorter time to definitive reconstruction, at the compromise of higher operating room charges.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Humanos , Mastectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dispositivos de Expansión TisularRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Breast reconstruction is most commonly performed using implant-based reconstruction. Patients with subpectoral implant placement with or without latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle coverage can experience muscle pain and animation deformity. Due to minimal literature describing the use of botulinum toxin (BTX-A) treatment for these side effects from implant-based reconstruction, we report our outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of breast reconstructive patients for a single surgeon was performed. Patients who underwent BTX-A injection for muscular pain, spasm, or animation deformity were identified and outcomes reviewed. They were also stratified based on radiation treatment and type of muscle flap used. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified who had a submuscular pectoralis pocket and/or a pedicled latissimus dorsi flap. Nineteen breasts were treated. The average amount of time from the patient's last surgery to BTX-A injection was 11.2 months. 25-100 units were used per injection with an average of 60 units. Non-irradiated patients had signifycantly lower post-injection capsular contracture Baker grades and significantly lower amounts of BTX-A were injected. Patients who had both pectoralis major muscle and LD implant-reconstruction were significantly less likely to have improvement in pain/tightness. Most patients reported improvement or resolution of their pain and/or animation deformities. CONCLUSION: Implant-based reconstruction using the pectoralis major and/or LD muscles can be plagued with muscular pain, spasm, and animation deformities. The use of BTX-A is a diagnostic and therapeutic modality for these post-breast reconstruction patients with most patients having resolution of symptoms without the need for additional surgery.
RESUMEN
Roughly 80% of patients undergoing mastectomy in the United States opt for reconstruction with implants. The introduction of acellular dermal matrices has allowed for placement of breast prostheses in the prepectoral plane, while a new carbon dioxide tissue expander (TE) (AeroForm) allows for needle-free, patient-controlled expansion. These 2 novel technologies have ushered in a new patient-centered era of breast reconstruction, with the possibility of reducing patient morbidity for the first time in decades. We hypothesize that AeroForm expanders placed in the prepectoral plane reduce time to second-stage reconstruction, reduce the number of clinic visits, and have lower complications than traditional saline TEs. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing breast mastectomy and TE placement in the prepectoral plane over a 21-month period (169 patients, 267 breasts), comparing AeroForm expanders to TEs. RESULTS: The AeroForm group (n = 57) had a shorter period to second-stage reconstruction than the TE group (n = 210) (135.4 versus 181.7 days; P = 0.01) and required fewer clinic visits (5.1 versus 6.9; P < 0.01). Partial thickness (25.6% versus 12.3%, P = 0.03) and full thickness (8.7% versus 0.0%, P = 0.02) necrosis were more common in the saline cohort. The rates of infection, hematoma, and seroma requiring drainage were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Two-staged breast reconstruction with the use of AeroForm expanders in the prepectoral space marks progress in improving care for breast cancer patients by demonstrating a reduction in some adverse events, the number of clinic visits, and the time to second-stage reconstruction.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy secondary lymphedema can cause substantial morbidity. However, few studies have investigated longitudinal quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients with postmastectomy lymphedema, especially with regard to surgical versus nonoperative management. This study prospectively investigated QoL in surgically versus nonsurgically managed patients with postmastectomy upper extremity lymphedema. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study of breast cancer-related lymphedema patients at a single institution, between February 2017 and January 2020. Lymphedema Quality of Life Instrument (LyQLI) and RAND-36 QoL instrument were used. Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests were used for descriptive statistics. Wilcoxon's signed-rank testing and linear modeling were used to analyze longitudinal changes in QoL. RESULTS: Thirty-two lymphedema patients were recruited to the study (20 surgical and 12 nonsurgical). Surgical and nonsurgical cohorts did not significantly differ in clinical/demographic characteristics or baseline QoL scores, but at the 12-month time point surgical patients had significantly greater LyQLI overall health scores than nonsurgical patients (79.3 vs. 58.3, p = 0.02), as well as higher composite RAND-36 physical (68.5 vs. 38.3, p = 0.04), and mental (77.0 vs. 52.7, p = 0.02) scores. Furthermore, LyQLI overall health scores significantly improved over time in surgical patients (60.0 at baseline vs. 79.3 at 12 months, p = 0.04). Besides surgical treatment, race, and age were also found to significantly impact QoL on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that when compared with nonoperative management, surgery improved QoL for chronic, secondary upper extremity lymphedema patients within 12-month postoperatively. Our results also suggested that insurance status may have influenced decisions to undergo lymphedema surgery. Further study is needed to investigate the various sociodemographic factors that were also found to impact QoL outcomes in these lymphedema patients.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfedema , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Linfedema/cirugía , Linfedema/terapia , Mastectomía , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has entered the spotlight, as several high-profile media outlets have begun to relay the evolving science to the public. This study aimed to gauge the baseline knowledge and concern regarding BIA-ALCL among adult laywomen within the United States. METHODS: Mechanical Turk was used to survey 500 American women on self-reported demographics, prior experience with breast implants, and 11 questions regarding their knowledge and concern regarding BIA-ALCL. Responses were reviewed for quality control before study inclusion. RESULTS: Overall, 12 percent of respondents had received breast implants and 73 percent knew someone with implants; 13.6 percent of respondents (including 51.7 percent of respondents with implants) had previously heard of BIA-ALCL. After providing information about its risk, 58.4 percent of respondents were still willing to receive a reconstructive implant and 45.8 percent a cosmetic implant; 35.8 percent reported they would be less likely to receive an implant. Of the respondents with breast implants, 66.7 percent reported some degree of concern regarding BIA-ALCL and 35.0 percent are strongly considering removing their implants. Those who had heard of BIA-ALCL consumed information from several sources, predominantly health professionals or media/health care blogs. Different sources of information were not associated with a respondent's degree of concern. CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of American women have heard of BIA-ALCL and understand its association with breast implants. As plastic surgeons who perform breast reconstruction, we can promote the spread of information through the popular media and health care blogs to address this growing concern, particularly among women with existing breast implants.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Falla de Prótesis/etiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A growing number of transgender women present to plastic surgeons seeking breast augmentation. Despite some advocating their technical similarity, the authors have found substantially different planning and techniques are needed to obtain aesthetic results in transgender patients versus cosmetic breast augmentation. The authors sought to develop an approach for operative planning and technique to elucidate these differences and obtain consistent results. METHODS: All patients who underwent breast augmentation at the Johns Hopkins Center for Transgender Health were included in this study. Anthropometric assessments were obtained and comparative statistics between operative and nonoperative cohorts were calculated. Outcomes were analyzed and a patient-reported survey was performed to evaluate patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Fifty-nine consecutive transfemale patients presented for evaluation. Anthropometric measurements included base width (median, 15.0 ± 2.1 cm), notch-to-nipple distance (median, 22.0 cm), nipple-to-midline distance (median, 12.0 cm), areolar diameter (median, 3.5 ± 1.5 cm), and upper pole pinch (mean, 1.8 ± 1.1 cm). Thirty-six patients underwent augmentation mammaplasty. Postoperative complications (8.3 percent) included a minor hematoma and grade III capsular contracture in two patients. Patients were asked to complete a brief outcomes survey and reported an improvement in psychosocial well-being and high satisfaction rate (100 percent) with the overall cosmetic result. CONCLUSIONS: Transgender female patients represent a unique patient population requiring special consideration of anatomical differences in key planning decisions. The authors delineate the first systematic algorithm that addresses these differences, emphasizing maneuvers such as routine inframammary fold lowering. This can allow experienced augmentation surgeons to obtain excellent aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes in this population. As with cosmetic breast augmentation, patient satisfaction rates are high. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.