RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential benefit of instrumental swallowing assessments for patients with prolonged disordered consciousness participating in rehabilitation. DESIGN: Case-control, retrospective. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five participants divided into 2 cohorts according to cognitive level at the time of baseline instrumental swallowing assessment. Group 1 (n = 17) participants were at Rancho Los Amigo (RLA) level II/III or RLA level III, while Group 2 (n = 18) participants were rated better than RLA level III. RESULTS: Aspiration and laryngeal penetration rates for both groups were similar (aspiration rate Group 1 = 41%, Group 2 = 39%; laryngeal penetration rate Group 1 = 59%, Group 2 = 61%). Overall, 76% (13/17) of Group 1 and 72% (13/18) of Group 2 were able to receive some type of oral feedings following baseline video fluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) or endoscopic exam of the swallow (FEES). CONCLUSION: The majority of participants who underwent an instrumental swallowing examination while still functioning at RLA level II/III or RLA level III were able to return to some form of oral feedings immediately following their baseline examination. Swallowing as a treatment modality can be considered a part of the overall plan to facilitate neurobehavioral recovery for patients with prolonged disordered consciousness participating in rehabilitation.
Asunto(s)
Coma Postraumatismo Craneoencefálico/diagnóstico , Coma Postraumatismo Craneoencefálico/rehabilitación , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/rehabilitación , Examen Neurológico , Aspiración Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Aspiración Respiratoria/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Coma Postraumatismo Craneoencefálico/fisiopatología , Trastornos de Deglución/fisiopatología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Nutrición Enteral , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Laringoscopía , Laringe/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Neumonía por Aspiración/diagnóstico , Neumonía por Aspiración/etiología , Centros de Rehabilitación , Aspiración Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Grabación en Video , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of providing oral feedings to persons early in coma recovery following a severe brain injury. RESEARCH DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective study. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Medical chart reviews of all patients admitted to a rehabilitation hospital following severe brain injury. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria, 22 had a tracheostomy, and all were NPO. Subjects were divided into two cohorts. Group 1, n=10, mean age 43.5 years, received oral feedings early in coma recovery. Group 2, n=15, mean age 45.2 years, did not. Group 1, 30% returned to an oral diet of three meals daily at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation as compared to 40% in group 2 (chi2 = 0.260, p = 0.610). Average cost of care for group 1 = US$45 759 and group 2 = US$41 056 (p = 0.634). CONCLUSION: Safe therapeutic oral feedings, in accordance with findings from instrumental swallowing examinations, are possible for patients with disordered consciousness. The therapeutic oral feedings do not significantly increase the cost of care, but the effectiveness of oral feedings early in coma recovery requires further investigation.
