Infective endocarditis risk in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis in bicuspid aortic valve patients is currently a matter of debate. Although it is no longer recommended by international guidelines, some studies indicate a high risk of infective endocarditis. We aim to evaluate the risk of native valve infective endocarditis in bicuspid aortic valve patients and compare to individuals with tricuspid aortic valve. Methods: Study search of longitudinal studies regarding infective endocarditis incidence in bicuspid aortic valve patients (compared with tricuspid aortic valve/overall population) was conducted through OVID in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE; from inception until October 2020. The outcomes of interest were the incidence rate and relative risk of infective endocarditis. The relative risk and incidence rate (number of cases for each 10 000 persons-year) with their 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) were estimated using a random effects model meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO CRD42020218639. Results: Eight cohort studies were selected, with a total of 5351 bicuspid aortic valve patients. During follow up, 184 bicuspid aortic valve patients presented infective endocarditis, with an incidence rate of 48.13 per 10,000 patients-year (95 %CI 22.24-74.02), and a 12-fold (RR: 12.03, 95 %CI 5.45-26.54) increased risk compared with general population, after adjusted estimates. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that bicuspid aortic valve patients have a significant high risk of native valve infective endocarditis. Large prospective high-quality studies are required to estimate more accurately the incidence of infective endocarditis, the relative risk and the potential benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis.

The effect of catheter-based sham renal denervation in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged in recent years as a possible treatment for hypertension. The first sham-controlled trial showed a small magnitude and non-significant in the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect, also due to a substantial decrease of BP in sham arm. Considering this, we aimed to quantify the magnitude of BP decrease within the sham arm of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) with RDN in patients with hypertension. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched since inception until January 2022 for randomized sham-controlled trials which assessed the efficacy in lowering BP of the sham intervention for catheter-based RDN in adult patients with hypertension. The outcomes were change in ambulatory/office systolic and diastolic BP. RESULTS: A total of 9 RCT were included in the analysis enrolling a total of 674 patients. Sham intervention showed a decrease in all evaluated outcomes. Office systolic BP had a reduction of -5.52 mmHg [95%CI -7.91, -3.13] and office diastolic BP of -2.13 mmHg [95%CI -3.08, -1.17]. Sham procedure for RDN also showed a reduction of -3.41 mmHg [95%CI -5.08, -1.75] in ambulatory systolic BP and - 2.44 mmHg [95%CI -3.31, -1.57] in ambulatory diastolic BP. CONCLUSION: Despite recent data indicating that RDN might be an effective treatment for patients with resistant hypertension when compared to a sham intervention, our results indicate that the sham intervention for RDN also has a significant effect on lowering Office and Ambulatory (24-h) Blood Pressure in adult patients with hypertension. This highlights that BP itself might be sensitive to placebo-like effect and also brings further difficulties in establishing the BP lowering efficacy of invasive interventions due to the magnitude of the sham effect.

Cardiovascular and Respiratory Safety of Sedation Strategies Used in Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Systematic Review Incorporating Network Meta-Analysis.

TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY (TEE) is carried out in various clinical settings, with an increasing importance, and sedation usually is required to perform it. Several sedative agents are available, and the authors aimed to compare the cardiovascular and respiratory safety of the strategies used for sedation in TEE through a systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA). The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and PsycInfo databases were searched in December 2020 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing sedation strategies for patients undergoing TEE. The authors assessed variations in systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), along with the incidences of hypotension, bradycardia, and desaturation. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed. Nine RCTs (N = 881 patients) with 20 active arms (5 dexmedetomidine; 4 propofol; 4 midazolam; 3 midazolam + opioid; 2 ketamine + propofol; 1 midazolam + ondansetron; 1 midazolam + metoclopramide) and 1 placebo arm were included. Dexmedetomidine was associated with decreases in SBP (mean difference [MD] = -18.78 mmHg; 95% CI [-26.27 to -11.28]) and HR (MD = -11.15 beats/min; 95% CI [-16.15 to -6.15]). Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the HR compared with ketamine + propofol (-16.90 beats/min; 95% CI: -33.21 to -0.58]) and midazolam + opioid (-24.15 beats/min; 95% CI: -42.67 to -5.63). Midazolam was found to reduce SBP (-12.09 mmHg; 95% CI: -20.43 to -3.74) and was shown to reduce SpO2 compared with the placebo (-1.00%; 95% CI -1.74 to -0.26). Based on the NMA, the drugs with a higher likelihood of decreasing both SBP and HR were dexmedetomidine and midazolam. All of the drugs led to a small decrease (only statistically significant for midazolam) in SpO2, with the systematic use of supplemental O2 in some trials. The risks of hypotension, bradycardia, or desaturation were not significantly different among the evaluated drugs.

The sham effect of invasive interventions in chronic coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with chronic coronary syndromes undergo invasive procedures but the efficacy of such interventions remains to be robustly established by randomised sham-controlled trials (RCTs). PURPOSE: To determine the sham effect in patients with chronic coronary syndromes enrolled in RCTs by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: In April 2022, we performed a literature search for published patient-blind RCTs (CENTRAL, MEDLINE®, PsycINFO, and reference lists) with sham procedures, reporting the pre-post effects in the invasive sham arm among patients with Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) angina or angina equivalents. RESULTS: 16 RCTs were included with 546 patients in the sham arm. Pooled results showed that sham interventions were associated with: improvement of 7% (95% CI 2-11%; I2 = 0%) in exercise time; decrease of 0.78 (95% CI - 1.10 to - 0.47; I2 = 75%) in CCS angina class; decrease of 53% (95% CI 24-71%; I2 = 96%) and 25% (95% CI 20-29%; I2 = 0%) in anginal episodes and nitroglycerine (NTG) use, respectively. Pooled results also showed an improvement in the physical functioning, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and disease perception domains of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). CONCLUSION: Sham interventions in patients with chronic coronary syndromes were associated with a significant decrease in anginal episodes, NTG use, and CCS angina class and increased SAQ quality of life and exercise time. These results highlight the need for previous non sham-controlled trials to be interpreted with caution, and the importance of new invasive interventions to be evaluated versus a sham procedure.

Clinical effects of off-label reduced doses of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGOUND: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia among older patients, associated with thromboembolic events. Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) are the treatment of choice for most patients, but its use may have risks on standard dose. However, it is still unclear the effects related with the use of a lower dose off labelled DOAC. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of off-label underdose use of DOAC in patients with AF. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO databases and EMBASE were searched for observational longitudinal studies evaluating the outcomes on off label underdosed patients compared with standard dosed patients with AF. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95%Cis. RESULTS: Eighteen cohort studies evaluating 237,533 patients with AF were included. Off-label underdose DOAC use is associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality [HR = 1.27 (95%CI 1.09-1.48)] and cardiovascular composite outcomes [HR = 1.32 (95%CI 1.08-1.62)], when compared with standard dose DOAC use. The effects in thromboembolic events [HR = 1.14 (95%CI 1.00-1.31)], major bleeding [HR = 1.02 (95%CI 0.91-1.15)], and composite of ischemic and bleeding events [HR = 1.22 (95%CI 0.79-1.88)] were not statistically significant. The certainty in the evidence was low or very low. CONCLUSIONS: Off label underdose DOAC use is associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular composite outcomes, compared with standard dose.

Antithrombotic Therapy Recommendations in the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines: How Robust Are the Randomized Controlled Trials Underpinning Them?

Introduction Criticisms have been raised against the sole use of p -value in interpreting results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Additional tools have been suggested, like the fragility index (FI), a measure of a trial's robustness/fragility, and derivative measures. The FI is the minimum number of patients who would have to be converted from nonevents to events, in the group with the least events, for a result to lose statistical significance. Objective This study aimed to evaluate RCT supporting European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines regarding antithrombotics, using the FI and FI-related measures. Methods FI, fragility quotient (FQ), and FI minus LTF lost to follow-up (FI - LTF) were calculated for the RCT underpinning recommendations regarding antithrombotic therapy from the updated ESC guidelines. LTF was compared with FI. Results were calculated for the total group of studies, as per guideline and as per recommendation type. Results Overall, 61 studies were included. The median FI was 24.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 9.0-60.0) and median FQ was 0.0035 (IQR: 0.0019-0.0056). Median FI - LTF was 2.0 (IQR: 0.0-38.0). Twenty (32.8%) of the studies had one primary or main safety outcome with LTF exceeding FI. Peripheral arterial disease guideline and chronic coronary syndrome guideline had the lowest (2.5; IQR: 1.8-3.3) and the highest (48.5; IQR: 23.8-73.0) FI, respectively. Conclusion The median FI suggests robustness of clinical trials evaluating antithrombotic drugs cited in the guidelines, but about one-third of them had LTF larger than FI. This emphasizes the need for assessing trials' robustness when constructing guidelines.

Safety and tolerability of sacubitril-valsartan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Sacubitril-valsartan is a recently approved drug. However, there are few data regarding safety issues. We aimed to summarize the available evidence regarding sacubitril-valsartan's safety and tolerability.Methods: We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling patients receiving sacubitril-valsartan for any condition, compared with standard therapy or placebo. Database search was performed in October 2019. Outcomes were adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), discontinuation due to AEs, and five AEs of special interest. Data were reported using risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI).Results: We included 20 RCTs (22510 participants). When compared with active controls, there were no differences in SAEs (RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.86-1.01) and AEs (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.97-1.03). However, sacubitril-valsartan resulted in an 8% risk reduction in discontinuation due to AEs (95%CI 0.85-0.99) and an increased risk of hypotension (RR=1.45, 95%CI 1.27-1.67). The risk of angioedema was higher with follow-ups greater than 12 months (RR=2.36, 95%CI 1.29-4.33). There were no further significant differences in the remaining AEs' risk.Conclusions: Sacubitril-valsartan was at least as safe and tolerable as active control, with a similar need of administration cautiousness, except for a higher risk of hypotension. However, one should consider the study's limitations.

The Risk of Mortality Associated With Opioid Use in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

AIMS: The impact of opioids in acute heart failure (AHF) is unclear. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the mortality risk associated with opioid use in AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science Core Collection, and SCIELO (December 2019) for randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating the impact of opioids in in-hospital and 30-day mortality in patients with AHF. Data were screened, extracted, and appraised by 2 independent reviewers. A random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was performed and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistics. Six observational retrospective studies with 151,735 participants were included. Pooled results showed a statistical significant association between morphine and in-hospital mortality (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.01-3.13; I2 = 92%; 6 studies) and 30-day mortality (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.14-2.15; I2 = 0; 2 studies). Both outcomes were rated as having a serious risk of bias and had a very low Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids seem to be associated with an increased risk of short-term mortality in AHF patients; however, the confidence in the estimated effect is very low, which highlights the need of further research to evaluate this question.

The incidence of thrombotic events with idarucizumab and andexanet alfa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitors, apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban (DOACs/NOACs), are currently the first-choice drugs in some indications. Life-threatening bleeding occurring during DOACs treatment may benefit from the use of reversal agents, however there are some concerns regarding potential rebound thrombotic events. In this systematic review we aimed to estimate the incidence of thrombotic events in patients treated with idarucizumab or andexanet alfa. METHODS: This systematic review included all prospective and retrospective studies, enrolling patients that received specific antidotes (idarucizumab, andexanet alfa and cirapantag) for anticoagulation reversal, published until October 2019 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. Studies in healthy individuals and those with less than 10 patients were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of thrombotic events and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Studies screening and data extraction was performed in duplicate by reviewers. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using the Freeman-Tukey transformation of the data. The results are expressed in percentages, with 95%-confidence intervals (CI), limited between 0 and 100% due to the data transformation. RESULTS: Overall 16 studies with 1774 patients were included (13 studies enrolling 1384 patients that received idarucizumab; 3 studies enrolling 390 patients that received andexanet alfa; cirapantag studies were not found). The pooled incidence rate of thrombotic events in the patients treated with specific antidote was 5.5% (95% CI 2.0-10.1%) until 30-90 days. The incidence of all-cause mortality was 13.3% (95% CI 9.6-17.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring idarucizumab or andexanet alfa to reach haemostasis, our data shows that there were 5.5% thrombotic events. The causality of harm associated to antidotes remains to be established due to the design of studies without a control group.

Influenza vaccination in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the progression of treatments over decades, heart failure (HF) is a disease with high morbidity, mortality and economic burden. Influenza infection is an important trigger for cardiovascular (CV) events, including HF. Influenza vaccination has been seen to reduce the risk of CV mortality in patients with coronary disease, but the effect in patients with HF is still unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effect of influenza vaccination in the morbimortality of patients with HF. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Technology Assessment and PsycINFO databases (December 2018) were searched for longitudinal studies evaluating influenza vaccination compared with a non-vaccination control group in patients with HF. The risk of bias was assessed according to the ROBINS-I tool. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled HRs with 95% CIs, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistics. RESULTS: Six cohort studies evaluating 179 158 patients with HF were included in the meta-analysis. Influenza vaccination was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR=0.83; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.91; I2=75%). The effect of the influenza vaccination was not statistically significant in a pooled analysis of CV mortality (HR=0.92, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.15; 2 studies) and of all-cause hospitalisations (HR=1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.11; 2 studies). The majority of outcomes in the included studies had a serious risk of bias and almost all evaluated outcomes had very low Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination was associated with a significant decrease in all-cause mortality risk in patients with HF.

Aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease on diabetic patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: The publication of new trials brought additional data to the controversial topic of aspirin use in diabetic patients for primary prevention. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review all randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical impact of aspirin in this setting. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of aspirin in patients with diabetes in primary prevention, in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL (November/2018). The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and the composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A meta-analysis was performed deriving risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: All-cause mortality was not significantly reduced with RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.03; 7RCT; 27,595 patients). Regarding MACE, there was an 8% risk reduction (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-0.999; I2=0%; 8RCT; 29,814 patients). The risks of major bleeding (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10-1.53; 2RCTs, 18,019 patients), and major GI bleeding (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.08-1.80; 2RCTs, 18,019 patients) were significantly increased. The risks of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and amputation were not significantly different from control arm. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin use among diabetic patients in primary prevention appears was associated with increased risk of major bleeding, a modest decrease of MACE and lack of mortality benefit.

The association of influenza infection and vaccine with myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis of self-controlled case series.

Introduction: Influenza vaccination may be beneficial in coronary disease patients; however the infection and vaccination are associated with acute inflammation, a trigger of cardiovascular events. We aimed to review the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) associated with Influenza infection and the safety of vaccination in self-controlled case series (SCCS).Methods: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of SCCS studies to evaluate the risk of MI associated with Influenza infection/vaccination. Database search was performed in August/2018. The data were reported using the incident rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI).Results: three studies for Influenza infection and two studies for Influenza vaccination were eligible. The risk of MI following an Influenza infection was significantly increased in the first 3 days (IRR 5.79; 95%CI: 3.59-9.38) and between 4-7 days (IRR 4.52; 95%CI: 2.80-7.32). In the first 4 weeks following the Influenza vaccination, there was a significant decrease of MI risk (IRR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.78-0.91).Conclusions: Short-term MI risk in Influenza infection is significantly increased, with a low-to-moderate confidence in the pooled evidence. The Influenza vaccine was safe regarding the short-term risk for MI, and the risk reduction is possibly related to a healthy period bias.

Cardiotoxicity in Hematological Diseases: Are the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Imatinib and Nilotinib Safe?

Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity is a growing concern. The cardiotoxic impact of new drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors is unknown, especially the ones used for chronic myeloid leukemia. We aim to evaluate nilotinib- and imatinib-induced cardiotoxicity. Single-center prospective study of consecutive patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors was conducted during 2015. Patients underwent an initial clinical, laboratorial and echocardiographic evaluation, repeated after 1 year. Eleven patients were included [60.0 (11) years, 63.6% of males; seven patients treated with imatinib and four with nilotinib]. After 1 year of follow-up, all patients remained in functional NYHA class I, with a similar Minnesota quality of life score. Also there was no difference in the biomarkers evaluated (cystatin-C and NT-proBNP). Likewise, no modification in systolic or diastolic function evaluated by echocardiography was observed. All patients presented normal values of longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain in the baseline study, without changes during follow-up. In addition, there were no differences between the two tyrosine kinase inhibitors used, considering all the aforementioned variables. No clinical, laboratory or echocardiographic evidence of nilotinib- and imatinib-induced cardiotoxicity was observed. However, these results should be confirmed in multicenter studies given the low incidence of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Prospective ultrasonographic study of blood flow and testicular volume in patients submitted to surgical repair of inguinal hernia without using prosthesis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the behavior of arterial circulation and testicular volume in patients submitted to conventional inguinal hernia repair without the use of a synthetic prosthesis to reinforce the posterior wall. METHODS: A prospective observational clinical trial was performed on 26 male patients with unilateral inguinal hernia types I and II by the Nyhus classification, who underwent surgical correction using the modified Bassini technique. Bilateral Doppler ultrasonography was performed preoperatively, at the third and at the sixth postoperative month. The studied variables were: systolic peak velocity (SPV), diastolic peak velocity (DPV), resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI) and testicular volume. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant changes over time in the variables studied on the operated side: SPV (p = 0.916), DPV (p = 0.304), RI (p = 0.879), PI (p = 0.475), and testicular volume (p = 0.100). The variables on the control side also did not change statistically until the sixth postoperative month: SPV (p = 0.784), DPV (p = 0.446), RI (p = 0.672), PI (p = 0.607), and testicular volume (p = 0.413). CONCLUSION: Surgical correction of the inguinal hernia without the use of a prosthesis does not cause alterations in vascularization and testicular volume in the first six months postoperatively.

Prospective ultrasonographic study of blood flow and testicular volume in patients submitted to surgical repair of inguinal hernia without using prosthesis

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the behavior of arterial circulation and testicular volume in patients submitted to conventional inguinal hernia repair without the use of a synthetic prosthesis to reinforce the posterior wall. Methods: A prospective observational clinical trial was performed on 26 male patients with unilateral inguinal hernia types I and II by the Nyhus classification, who underwent surgical correction using the modified Bassini technique. Bilateral Doppler ultrasonography was performed preoperatively, at the third and at the sixth postoperative month. The studied variables were: systolic peak velocity (SPV), diastolic peak velocity (DPV), resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI) and testicular volume. Results: There were no statistically significant changes over time in the variables studied on the operated side: SPV (p = 0.916), DPV (p = 0.304), RI (p = 0.879), PI (p = 0.475), and testicular volume (p = 0.100). The variables on the control side also did not change statistically until the sixth postoperative month: SPV (p = 0.784), DPV (p = 0.446), RI (p = 0.672), PI (p = 0.607), and testicular volume (p = 0.413). Conclusion: Surgical correction of the inguinal hernia without the use of a prosthesis does not cause alterations in vascularization and testicular volume in the first six months postoperatively.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were approved for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) but this term may be misnomer. Thus, the term non-mechanical and rheumatic mitral valvular (non-MARM) AF was proposed to exclude patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) without contraindications for NOACs. We aimed to review the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF and VHD compared to Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA). We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42015024837) including data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved in November 2016. The efficacy and safety data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses using the hazard ratio (HR) with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed in statistical significant results to evaluate whether cumulative sample size was powered for the obtained effect. In 5 RCTs (with 12 653 VHD AF patients), NOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke and systemic embolism (HR 0.73, 95%CI:0.60-0.90; TSA showed estimate was robust - O'Brien-Fleming α-spending boundary crossed before reaching the estimated information size) and intracranial hemorrhage (HR 0.45, 95%CI:0.24-0.87) compared with VKA. Major bleeding risk was not significantly different. In patients with bioprosthesis (3 trials-280 patients) the risks of thromboembolism (HR 0.65, 95%CI:0.20-2.08) and major bleeding (HR 0.94, 95%CI:0.28-3.18) with NOACs were similar to VKA. NOACs are efficacious and safe in patients with non-MARM VHD AF, showing significant reduction in the risk of stroke and systemic embolism and intracranial hemorrage compared with VKA.

The prevalence of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation in Portugal: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is an effective treatment in the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this review was to estimate the prevalence of OAC therapy in patients with AF in Portugal. METHODS: MEDLINE, the Index of Portuguese Medical Journals and SIBUL (the Bibliographic Catalog of the Integrated Library System of the University of Lisbon) were searched for Portuguese observational studies reporting the proportion of anticoagulated patients with AF. The pooled estimated prevalence of anticoagulated patients and respective 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined by means of a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven studies were included for analysis, of which four were conducted in a hospital environment and three in the general community. These studies enrolled a total of 891 patients with AF. The pooled estimated prevalence of anticoagulated patients was 40% (95% CI: 32-48%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of OAC in Portuguese AF patients is low. There is a need to promote change in OAC prescribing habits for AF patients in Portugal, in accordance with international guidelines.

Branded versus generic clopidogrel in cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review.

In the United States, patent for branded Plavix has recently expired. Some studies have compared branded and generic clopidogrel in terms of pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy volunteers, but data on patients and clinical outcomes are scarce. We aimed to review efficacy and safety data from studies comparing Plavix with generic clopidogrel in patients with cardiovascular disease. Electronic databases were searched (from inception to May 2012) for prospective studies evaluating branded versus generic clopidogrel in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Studies' characteristics and data estimates were retrieved. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated through a random-effects model. Three studies evaluating 760 patients were included: 2 randomized controlled trials and 1 cohort study. The RR for major cardiovascular events was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.67-1.52). Incidence of adverse events was similar between Plavix and generic (RR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.49-1.48). The risks of mortality, bleeding, and drug discontinuation were also not different between groups. There are a limited number of studies comparing Plavix and generic clopidogrel in patients with cardiovascular diseases and reporting hard clinical end points. The available evidence is therefore limited and does not support the existence of differences in efficacy or safety between branded and generic clopidogrel.