Reducing Failed Extubations in Preterm Infants Via Standardization and Real-Time Decision Support.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Failed extubations are associated with pulmonary morbidity in hospitalized premature newborns. The objective of this study was to use quality improvement methodology to reduce failed extubations through practice standardization and integrating a real-time extubation success calculator into the electronic medical record (EMR). METHODS: A specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound aim was developed to reduce failed extubations (defined as reintubation <5 days from primary extubation) by 50% among infants <32 weeks' gestational age (GA) or <1500 g birth weight by December 31, 2022. Plan-do-study-act cycles were developed to standardize postextubation respiratory support and integrate the EMR-based calculator. Outcome measures included extubation failure rates. Balancing measures included days on mechanical ventilation and number of patients intubated <3 days. Process measures were followed for guideline compliance. Statistical process control charts were used to track time-ordered data and detect special cause variation. RESULTS: We observed a reduction in failed extubations from 10.3% to 2.3%, with special cause variation noted after both plan-do-study-act cycle #1 and #2. Special cause variation was detected in both GA subgroups: <28 weeks' GA (22.0%-8.6%) and ≥28 weeks' GA (4.6%-0.3%). Additionally, the average number of infants intubated <3 days increased (60.2%-73.6%), whereas average ventilator days decreased (10.8-7.0). Finally, the time from infants' extubation score reaching threshold (≥60%) to extubation decreased (14.1-6.4 days) after launching the EMR-integrated calculator. CONCLUSIONS: Practice standardization and implementation of an EMR-based real-time clinical decision support tool improved extubation success, promoted earlier extubation, and reduced ventilator days in premature newborns.

Measuring practice preference variation for quality improvement in neonatal respiratory care.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to measure and compare practice preference variation in neonatal respiratory care within and between neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) using the Neonatology Survey of Interdisciplinary Groups in Healthcare Tool (NSIGHT). STUDY DESIGN: Eleven NICUs completed the NSIGHT between 2019 and 2021. Net preference was measured by mean response; agreement was ranked by standard distribution of response values. Heat maps showed comparisons between NICUs and disciplines. RESULTS: NICUs and individuals agreed most often on use of pressure support with mandatory ventilation and on use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for apnea. High preference variation surrounded decisions for invasive ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for extremely low birth weight infants. Preference difference was most frequent between neonatologists and nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of practice preference variation in neonatal respiratory care are specific to clinical scenario. Measuring preference variation may inform psychology of change and strengthen quality improvement efforts.

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: new becomes old again!

Despite the many advances in neonatology, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) continues to be a frustrating disease of prematurity. BPD is a disease which is defined oddly by its treatment rather than its pathophysiology, leading to frequently changing nomenclature which has widespread implications on our ability to both understand and follow the progression of BPD. As various treatment modalities for BPD were developed and a larger number of extremely preterm infants survived, the "old" BPD based on lung injury from oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation transitioned into a "new" BPD focused more on the interruption of normal development. However, the interruption of normal development does not solely apply to lung development. The effects of prematurity on vascular development cannot be overstated and pulmonary vascular disease has become the new frontier of BPD. As we begin to better understand the complex, multifactorial pathophysiology of BPD, it is necessary to again focus on appropriate, pathology-driven nomenclature that can effectively describe the multiple clinical phenotypes of BPD.