Multimodal imaging and electrophysiological study in the differential diagnosis of rest tremor.

Introduction: Distinguishing tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (tPD) from essential tremor with rest tremor (rET) can be challenging and often requires dopamine imaging. This study aimed to differentiate between these two diseases through a machine learning (ML) approach based on rest tremor (RT) electrophysiological features and structural MRI data. Methods: We enrolled 72 patients including 40 tPD patients and 32 rET patients, and 45 control subjects (HC). RT electrophysiological features (frequency, amplitude, and phase) were calculated using surface electromyography (sEMG). Several MRI morphometric variables (cortical thickness, surface area, cortical/subcortical volumes, roughness, and mean curvature) were extracted using Freesurfer. ML models based on a tree-based classification algorithm termed XGBoost using MRI and/or electrophysiological data were tested in distinguishing tPD from rET patients. Results: Both structural MRI and sEMG data showed acceptable performance in distinguishing the two patient groups. Models based on electrophysiological data performed slightly better than those based on MRI data only (mean AUC: 0.92 and 0.87, respectively; p = 0.0071). The top-performing model used a combination of sEMG features (amplitude and phase) and MRI data (cortical volumes, surface area, and mean curvature), reaching AUC: 0.97 ± 0.03 and outperforming models using separately either MRI (p = 0.0001) or EMG data (p = 0.0231). In the best model, the most important feature was the RT phase. Conclusion: Machine learning models combining electrophysiological and MRI data showed great potential in distinguishing between tPD and rET patients and may serve as biomarkers to support clinicians in the differential diagnosis of rest tremor syndromes in the absence of expensive and invasive diagnostic procedures such as dopamine imaging.

Neuroimaging correlates of postural instability in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Postural instability (PI) is a common disabling symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD), but little is known on its pathophysiological basis. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to identify the brain structures associated with PI in PD patients, using different MRI approaches. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled 142 PD patients and 45 control subjects. PI was assessed using the MDS-UPDRS-III pull-test item (PT). A whole-brain regression analysis identified brain areas where grey matter (GM) volume correlated with the PT score in PD patients. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) were also used to compare unsteady (PT ≥ 1) and steady (PT = 0) PD patients. Associations between GM volume in regions of interest (ROI) and several clinical features were then investigated using LASSO regression analysis. RESULTS: PI was present in 44.4% of PD patients. The whole-brain approach identified the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) as the only regions associated with the presence of postural instability. VBM analysis showed reduced GM volume in fronto-temporal areas (superior, middle, medial and inferior frontal gyrus, and STG) in unsteady compared with steady PD patients, and the GM volume of these regions was selectively associated with the PT score and not with any other motor or non-motor symptom. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant atrophy of fronto-temporal regions in unsteady PD patients, suggesting that these brain areas may play a role in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying postural instability in PD. This result paves the way for further studies on postural instability in Parkinsonism.

Development of a New Wearable Device for the Characterization of Hand Tremor.

Rest tremor (RT) is observed in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) and Essential Tremor (ET). Electromyography (EMG) studies have shown that PD subjects exhibit alternating contractions of antagonistic muscles involved in tremors, while the contraction pattern of antagonistic muscles is synchronous in ET subjects. Therefore, the RT pattern can be used as a potential biomarker for differentiating PD from ET subjects. In this study, we developed a new wearable device and method for differentiating alternating from a synchronous RT pattern using inertial data. The novelty of our approach relies on the fact that the evaluation of synchronous or alternating tremor patterns using inertial sensors has never been described so far, and current approaches to evaluate the tremor patterns are based on surface EMG, which may be difficult to carry out for non-specialized operators. This new device, named "RT-Ring", is based on a six-axis inertial measurement unit and a Bluetooth Low-Energy microprocessor, and can be worn on a finger of the tremulous hand. A mobile app guides the operator through the whole acquisition process of inertial data from the hand with RT, and the prediction of tremor patterns is performed on a remote server through machine learning (ML) models. We used two decision tree-based algorithms, XGBoost and Random Forest, which were trained on features extracted from inertial data and achieved a classification accuracy of 92% and 89%, respectively, in differentiating alternating from synchronous tremor segments in the validation set. Finally, the classification response (alternating or synchronous RT pattern) is shown to the operator on the mobile app within a few seconds. This study is the first to demonstrate that different electromyographic tremor patterns have their counterparts in terms of rhythmic movement features, thus making inertial data suitable for predicting the muscular contraction pattern of tremors.

Neuroimaging correlates of postural instability in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the brain structures associated with postural instability (PI) in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). METHODS: Forty-seven PSP patients and 45 control subjects were enrolled in this study. PI was assessed using the items 27 and 28 of the PSP rating scale (postural instability score, PIS). PSP patients were compared with controls using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). In PSP patients, LASSO regression model was used to investigate associations between VBM-based Region-Of-Interest grey matter (GM) volumes and different categories of the PSP rating scale. A whole-brain multi-regression analysis was also used to identify brain areas where GM volumes correlated with the PIS in PSP patients. RESULTS: VBM analysis showed widespread GM atrophy (fronto-temporal-parietal-occipital regions, limbic lobes, insula, cerebellum, and basal ganglia) in PSP patients compared with control subjects. In PSP patients, LASSO regression analysis showed associations of the right cerebellar lobules IV-V with ocular motor category score, and the left Rolandic area with bulbar category score, while the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) was negatively correlated with the PIS. The whole-brain multi-regression analysis identified the right IFG as the only area significantly associated with the PIS. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, two different approaches demonstrated that the IFG volume was associated with PIS in PSP patients, suggesting that this area may play a role in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying PI. Our findings may have important implications for developing optimal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation protocols targeting IFG in parkinsonism with postural disorders.

Differentiating between common PSP phenotypes using structural MRI: a machine learning study.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating Progressive supranuclear palsy-Richardson's syndrome (PSP-RS) from PSP-Parkinsonism (PSP-P) may be extremely challenging. In this study, we aimed to distinguish these two PSP phenotypes using MRI structural data. METHODS: Sixty-two PSP-RS, 40 PSP-P patients and 33 control subjects were enrolled. All patients underwent brain 3 T-MRI; cortical thickness and cortical/subcortical volumes were extracted using Freesurfer on T1-weighted images. We calculated the automated MR Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) and its second version including also the third ventricle width (MRPI 2.0) and tested their classification performance. We also employed a Machine learning (ML) classification approach using two decision tree-based algorithms (eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost] and Random Forest) with different combinations of structural MRI data in differentiating between PSP phenotypes. RESULTS: MRPI and MRPI 2.0 had AUC of 0.88 and 0.81, respectively, in differentiating PSP-RS from PSP-P. ML models demonstrated that the combination of MRPI and volumetric/thickness data was more powerful than each feature alone. The two ML algorithms showed comparable results, and the best ML model in differentiating between PSP phenotypes used XGBoost with a combination of MRPI, cortical thickness and subcortical volumes (AUC 0.93 ± 0.04). Similar performance (AUC 0.93 ± 0.06) was also obtained in a sub-cohort of 59 early PSP patients. CONCLUSION: The combined use of MRPI and volumetric/thickness data was more accurate than each MRI feature alone in differentiating between PSP-RS and PSP-P. Our study supports the use of structural MRI to improve the early differential diagnosis between common PSP phenotypes, which may be relevant for prognostic implications and patient inclusion in clinical trials.

Magnetic Resonance Planimetry in the Differential Diagnosis between Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

The clinical differential diagnosis between Parkinson's disease (PD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is often challenging. The description of milder PSP phenotypes strongly resembling PD, such as PSP-Parkinsonism, further increased the diagnostic challenge and the need for reliable neuroimaging biomarkers to enhance the diagnostic certainty. This review aims to summarize the contribution of a relatively simple and widely available imaging technique such as MR planimetry in the differential diagnosis between PD and PSP, focusing on the recent advancements in this field. The development of accurate MR planimetric biomarkers, together with the implementation of automated algorithms, led to robust and objective measures for the differential diagnosis of PSP and PD at the individual level. Evidence from longitudinal studies also suggests a role of MR planimetry in predicting the development of the PSP clinical signs, allowing to identify PSP patients before they meet diagnostic criteria when their clinical phenotype can be indistinguishable from PD. Finally, promising evidence exists on the possible association between MR planimetric measures and the underlying pathology, with important implications for trials with new disease-modifying target therapies.

Cerebellar voxel-based morphometry in essential tremor.

BACKGROUND: Imaging studies investigating cerebellar gray matter (GM) in essential tremor (ET) showed conflicting results. Moreover, no large study explored the cerebellum in ET patients with resting tremor (rET), a syndrome showing enhanced blink reflex recovery cycle (BRrc). OBJECTIVE: To investigate cerebellar GM in ET and rET patients using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis. METHODS: Seventy ET patients with or without resting tremor and 39 healthy controls were enrolled. All subjects underwent brain 3 T-MRI and BRrc recording. We compared the cerebellar GM volumes between ET (n = 40) and rET (n = 30) patients and controls through a VBM analysis. Moreover, we investigated possible correlations between cerebellar GM volume and R2 component of BRrc. RESULTS: rET and ET patients had similar disease duration. All rET patients and none of ET patients had enhanced BRrc. No differences in the cerebellar volume were found when ET and rET patients were compared to each other or with controls. By considering together the two tremor syndromes in a large patient group, the VBM analysis showed bilateral clusters of reduced GM volumes in Crus II in comparison with controls. The linear regression analysis in rET patients revealed a cluster in the left Crus II where the decrease in GM volume correlated with the R2BRrc increase. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that ET and rET are different tremor syndromes with similar mild cerebellar gray matter involvement. In rET patients, the left Crus II may play a role in modulating the brainstem excitability, encouraging further studies on the role of cerebellum in these patients.

Evaluation of rest tremor in different positions in Parkinson's disease and essential tremor plus.

BACKGROUND: Rest tremor (RT) can be observed in several positions (seated, standing, lying down) but it is unknown whether the tremor features may vary across them. This study aimed to compare the RT electrophysiological features across different positions in tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor plus (ET with RT, rET). METHODS: We consecutively enrolled 90 tremor-dominant PD and 24 rET patients. The RT presence was evaluated in three positions: with the patient seated, the arm flexed at 90°, the forearm supported against gravity, and the hand hanging down from the chair armrest (hand-hanging position), in lying down supine and in standing position. RT electrophysiological features (amplitude, frequency, burst duration, pattern) were compared between the two patient groups and across the different positions. RESULTS: All PD and rET patients showed RT in hand-hanging position. Supine and standing RT were significantly more common in PD (67.8% and 75.6%, respectively) than in rET patients (37.5% and 45.8%, respectively). RT amplitude, frequency and pattern were significantly different between groups in hand-hanging position whereas only pattern was significantly different between PD and rET in both standing and supine positions. In each patient group, all RT electrophysiological features did not significantly vary across different recording positions (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: In our study, PD and rET showed RT in hand-hanging, supine, and standing positions. RT pattern was the only electrophysiological feature significantly different between PD and rET patients in all these positions, enabling clinicians to perform the RT analysis for diagnostic purposes in different tremor positions.