Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention is Well-Tolerated Without Inducing Resistance: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) maximizes reoperation-free survival. We evaluated SAT after DAIR of acutely infected primary TJA regarding: 1) adverse drug reaction (ADR)/intolerance; 2) reoperation for infection; and 3) antibiotic resistance. METHODS: Patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) DAIR for acute periprosthetic joint infection at two academic medical centers from 2015 to 2020 were identified (n = 115). Data were collected on patient demographics, infecting organisms, antibiotics, ADR/intolerances, reoperations, and antibiotic resistances. Median SAT duration was 11 months. Stepwise multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify covariates significantly associated with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: There were 11.1 and 16.3% of TKA and THA DAIR patients, respectively, who had ADR/intolerance to SAT. Patients prescribed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (P = .0014) or combination antibiotic therapy (P = .0169) after TKA DAIR had increased risk of ADR/intolerance. There was no difference in reoperation-free survival between TKA (83.3%) and THA (65.1%) DAIR (P = .5900) at mean 2.8-year follow-up. Risk of reoperation for infection was higher among TKA Staphylococcus aureus infections (P = .0004) and lower with increased SAT duration (P < .0450). The optimal duration of SAT was nearly 2 years. No cases of antibiotic resistance developed due to SAT. CONCLUSIONS: Consider SAT after TJA DAIR due to improved reoperation-free survival and favorable safety profile. Prolonged SAT did not induce antibiotic resistance. Use trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole with caution because of the increased likelihood of ADR/intolerance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Bacterial Burden, Not Local Immune Response, Differs Between Acute and Chronic Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infections.

Background: Conducting gram stains in peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJI) is known to have poor sensitivity. However, the aims of this study were to use gram stain results of acute and chronic PJI to determine differences with respect to bacterial burden and levels of local innate immunologic response. Patients and Methods: Patients with acute and chronic PJI from January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 were identified by use of Current Procedural Terminology codes. Manual review of medical records for infecting organisms and gram stain results for stained bacteria and for local tissue inflammation (amount of polymorphonuclear leukocytes seen on high powered microscopic fields) were recorded. Statistical comparisons between acute (n = 70) and chronic (n = 134) PJI were analyzed with respect to gram stain sensitivity and amount of local tissue inflammation. Results: The ability to identify stained bacteria was statistically significantly higher in the acute cohort (61.4%) than the chronic cohort (9.7%; p < 0.0001). Interestingly, the amount of local inflammation was similar for acute and chronic PJI except in the subgroup analysis with chronic polymicrobial (p = 0.0229) and chronic culture negative (p = 0.0001) PJI. Conclusions: This study shows that both acute and chronic PJI had similar levels of local inflammation seen on gram stains, despite higher bacterial burdens in acute infections. This suggests that innate immune responses, and thus likelihood of infection eradication, is not solely dependent on bacterial burden. These findings should spearhead further research evaluating the different immunologic responses that occur in acute and chronic PJI to improve diagnostics, therapeutics, and infection-free implant survival.