Remission of relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma induced by brentuximab vedotin and pembrolizumab combination after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case report.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with highly chemorefractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The CD30-targeting antibody-drug conjugate Brentuximab-Vedotin (BV) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blocking agents have demonstrated clinical activity with durable responses in relapsed/refractory (r/r) HL. However, patients with a history of allo-HSCT were frequently excluded from clinical trials due to concerns about the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We report the clinical history of a patient with refractory classical HL who underwent two allo-HSCTs (first from matched unrelated and second from haploidentical donor) after relapsing on BV and nivolumab and for whom durable remission was finally obtained using BV-pembrolizumab combination for relapse after haploidentical HSCT. Such treatment was associated with the onset of GVHD after only two cycles which led to treatment discontinuation. However, the side effects were rapidly controlled, and after 2 years of follow-up, the patient is still in remission. Our data support the feasibility and efficacy of combining PD-1 blockade with BV to enhance the graft-versus-lymphoma effect after allo-HSCT.

How to integrate CD19 specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells with other CD19 targeting agents in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?

About one third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a relapsing/refractory (R/R) disease after first line chemo-immunotherapy, with particularly poor outcomes observed in patients with primary refractory disease and early relapse. CD19 specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a game changer that results in durable and complete response rates in almost half of the patients with R/R DLBCL. Other emerging CD19-targeting therapies include monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies and targeting antibody-drug conjugates, which also show encouraging results. However, the timing and sequencing of different anti-CD19-targeting agents and how they might interfere with subsequent CAR T cell treatment is still unclear. In this review, we summarize the results of the pivotal clinical trials as well as evidence from real-world series of the use of different CD19-targeting approved agents. We discuss the effect of various therapies on CD19 expression and its implications for treatment sequencing.

Low Plasma Levels of Hyaluronic Acid Might Rule Out Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Background: Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) is a potentially fatal complication secondary to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) conditioning. Endothelial damage plasma biomarkers such as plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), hyaluronic acid (HA), and vascular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1) represent potential diagnostic tools for SOS. Methods: We prospectively collected serial citrated blood samples (baseline, day 0, day 7, and day 14) in all adult patients undergoing HSCT at La Paz Hospital, Madrid. Samples were later analyzed by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for HA, VCAM1, and PAI-1 concentrations. Results: During sixteen months, we prospectively recruited 47 patients. Seven patients (14%) were diagnosed with SOS according to the EBMT criteria for SOS/VOD diagnosis and received treatment with defibrotide. Our study showed a statistically significant elevation of HA on day 7 in SOS patients, preceding clinical SOS diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 100%. Furthermore, we observed a significant increase of HA and VCAM1 levels on day 14. Regarding risk factors, we observed a statistically significant association between SOS diagnosis and the fact that patients received 3 or more previous lines of treatment before HSCT. Conclusions: The early significant increase in HA levels observed opens the door to a noninvasive peripheral blood test which could have the potential to improve diagnosis and facilitate prophylactic and therapeutic management of SOS before clinical/histological damage is established.

Defibrotide Shows Efficacy in the Prevention of Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), also known as hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), is a well-known complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) associated with a mortality rate of up to 85%.  Defibrotide has shown efficacy in treatment of SOS/VOD. Moreover, evidence exists supporting the efficacy of defibrotide as SOS/VOD prophylaxis. We have previously reported our single center experience on 52 HSCT recipients receiving defibrotide as SOS/VOD prophylaxis, which has shown that the patients did not develop any SOS/VOD under this prophylaxis. The aim of the present study was to see if we can confirm the previous results, mainly on the decrease incidence of SOS/VOD, as well as improve event-free survival (EFS) on a larger study population. We extended our previous study in a single-center retrospective analysis to include 237 consecutive patients (248 transplantations) who underwent transplantation between 1999 and 2009 for hematological diseases and receiving intravenous defibrotide as prophylaxis. This cohort was compared to 241 patients (248 transplantations) treated before 1999 or after 2009 when defibrotide prophylaxis was not routinely used in our center. Median follow-up for the study group was 10 (range 2-16) years and for the control group 2.7 (range 1-18) years. None of the 237 patients in the defibrotide group developed SOS/VOD. The cumulative incidence (CI) of SOS/VOD was 0% in the defibrotide group as compared to 4.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-8%; P= .00046) in the control group. There was also a better 1-year EFS with 38% (95% CI, 32%-44%) in the defibrotide group versus 28% (95% CI, 22%-34%) (P= .00969) and decreased cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in the defibrotide group 31% (95% CI, 25%-37%) versus 42% (95% CI, 36%-48%) (P= .026). The 1-year overall survival, relapse incidence, and non-relapse mortality were not statistically different. Multivariable analysis, performed taking into account clinical factors known to influence the risk of SOS/VOD, confirmed the favorable impact of defibrotide on SOS/VOD (HR 1.38e-08 [95% CI, 3.28e-09-5.80e-08]; P< .00001). Conversely, multivariable analysis failed to confirm the impact of defibrotide on 1-year EFS or acute GvHD. This large retrospective study on SOS/VOD-prophylaxis with defibrotide suggests that this approach may be of benefit. These results need to be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.

Evaluation of Disease Risk Comorbidity Index after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in a Cohort with Patients Undergoing Transplantation with In Vitro Partially T Cell Depleted Grafts.

Outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are influenced by comorbidities, disease type, and status at transplantation. Several prognostic scores can be used, such as the disease risk index (DRI) or the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI). Recently, a new prognostic tool, the disease risk comorbidity index (DRCI), combining the DRI and the HCT-CI, was published. The DRCI determines 6 patient groups (very low risk [VLR], low risk [LR], intermediate risk 1 [IR-1], intermediate risk 2 [IR-2], high risk [HiR], and very high risk [VHR]) with a significant predictive value for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse incidence (RI), and graft-versus-host disease-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). However, the DRCI has not been evaluated for patients allografted with partially in vitro T cell depleted (pTDEP) grafts. In our center, we offer pTDEP to reduce graft-versus-host disease for patients in complete remission at transplant time. In this retrospective study, we investigated the DRCI in 404 adult patients (including 37.6% pTDEP) undergoing a first HSCT for hematological malignancies from 2008 to 2018. Because of the small number of patients in LR, VLR and LR were combined for analysis. In the entire cohort, 2-year OS was 84.4% (95% CI, 71.6% to 97.2%) for LR, 61.6% (54.8% to 68.4%) for IR-1, 45.7% (33.3% to 58.1%) for IR-2, 31% (19.4% to 42.6%) for HiR, and 30.9% (14.5% to 47.3%) for VHR (P < .001). In addition, the DRCI was predictive of DFS, RI, and GRFS but not of nonrelapsed mortality and graft-versus-host disease. Our study confirms similar results with the original publication but gives less accurate prognosis information than the DRI and HCT-CI when used separately. In conclusion, the DRCI does not seem to offer more relevant information than the DRI and HCT-CI to help physicians and patients for the HSCT decision.

[Multiple myeloma in the elderly†: impact of a geriatric assessment]. / Le myélome multiple chez la personne âgée†: impact d'une évaluation gériatrique.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the third most common hematological cancer. MM is a proliferation of plasma cells Its incidence increases from 1 per 100 000 at 40 years to 40 per 100 000 at 80 years. Today, there are many treatment strategies for MM that go from simple care to self-transplantation. Choosing the most appropriate treatment can be challenging in geriatric patients. This population is heterogeneous and therapeutic decisions shouldn't be based on an age limit. Therefore, geriatric assessment is essential to help the clinician choose the best therapeutic strategy and assess the patient's specific needs.

Le myélome multiple (MM) est le troisième cancer hématologique le plus fréquent. Le MM est une prolifération de plasmocytes. Son incidence passe de moins de 1 pour 100 000 à 40 ans, à 40 pour 100 000 à 80 ans. Aujourd'hui, il existe de nombreuses lignes de traitement pour le MM, qui vont de simples soins d'accompagnement à l'autogreffe. La décision quant à la meilleure thérapie peut s'avérer délicate au sein de la population gériatrique. En effet, cette population est hétérogène et il est risqué de baser la décision thérapeutique sur une limite d'âge. L'évaluation gériatrique est donc fondamentale, car elle permet de catégoriser le patient afin d'aider le clinicien à choisir la meilleure stratégie thérapeutique et d'évaluer les besoins spécifiques du patient.