RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Focal laser ablation (FLA) serves as a targeted therapy for prostate cancer (PCa). Clinical studies have demonstrated significant variations in ablation volumes with consistent fiber configurations. Consequently, a prediction model is needed for the safe application of FLA in treating PCa. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of FLA-induced temperature profiles in controlled ex vivo experiments using clinical laser treatment protocols. Additionally, it sought to examine the effectiveness of the CEM43 model in predicting the zone of irreversible damage (ZID) and to compare these findings with outcomes derived from the Arrhenius model. METHODS: Freshly excised postmortem human prostate and porcine liver specimens were used for controlled ex vivo ablation. Tissues were secured in a Perspex sample holder for precise placement of the laser fiber and thermocouples. FLA was conducted with a 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser at 3 W in continuous-wave mode for 10 min. Pre- and post-FLA 3D T1-weighted 7 T MRI scans were obtained to assess the treatment area. Whole-mount hematoxylin and eosin histological slides were prepared and digitized. On histology, the ZID was defined as the total of vaporized, carbonized, and coagulated tissue. A 2D thermal development map was created from temperature data, using bi-cubic interpolation. The cumulative equivalent thermal isoeffect dose at 43°C in minutes (CEM43) model was applied to predict the ZID, with 240 equivalent minutes (240-CEM43) used as the damage threshold. Additionally, the Arrhenius thermal model was used for comparison of CEM43 results. Predicted ZIDs were compared to MRI and histology. RESULTS: FLA treatment was performed on ex vivo human prostate samples (n = 2) and porcine liver specimens (n = 5). For human prostate tissue, FLA did not result in an identifiable ZID upon histological macroscopic examination or a lesion on MRI. Ex vivo porcine liver samples showed a clearly demarcated oval-shaped hyperintense lesion surrounding the laser fiber tip on post-FLA MRI. The MRI lesion (range 1.6-2.1 cm2) corresponded with the shape and location of the ZID on histology, but was smaller (median 1.7 vs. 3.2, p = 0.02). Histological examination of porcine liver samples revealed ZIDs ranging from 2.1 to 4.1 cm2, whereas 240-CEM43-predicted ZIDs ranged from 3.3 to 3.8 cm2. Although the median 240-CEM43-predicted ZID was not significantly larger than the histology ZID (3.8 vs. 3.2 cm2, p = 0.22), it tended to overpredict the histological results in most experiments. The median Arrhenius-predicted ZID was similar to the histological ZID (3.2 vs. 3.2 cm2, p = 0.56), but varied in size when comparing individual experiments (range 2.5-3.2 cm2). CONCLUSION: FLA on ex vivo human prostate showed no thermal damage on histopathology or MRI. Ex vivo porcine liver FLA resulted in identifiable ZID on histology and lesions on MRI. 240-CEM43 generally overestimated the ZID and had less variability compared to histology. Results from the Arrhenius model were in better agreement with the histology findings, but still did not predict the individual FLA-induced histological thermal damage. Inter-experiment ZID variability underlines the need for developing a more comprehensive predictive dosimetry model for FLA in PCa treatment.
RESUMEN
Hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC)-whereby the bladder is heated to ± 43 °C during a chemotherapy instillation-can improve outcomes of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treatments. Experiments in animal models are required to explore new hyperthermia based treatments. Existing HIVEC devices are not suitable for rodents or large-scale animal trials. We present a HIVEC setup compatible with orthotopic rat models. An externally heated chemotherapeutic solution is circulated in the bladder through a double-lumen catheter with flow rates controlled using a peristaltic pump. Temperature sensors in the inflow channel, bladder and outflow channel allow temperature monitoring and adjustments in real-time. At a constant flow rate of 2.5 mL/min the system rapidly reaches the desired bladder temperature of 42-43 °C with minimal variability throughout a one-hour treatment in a rat bladder phantom, as well as in euthanised and live rats. Mean intraluminal bladder temperatures were 42.92 °C (SD = 0.15 °C), 42.45 °C (SD = 0.37 °C) and 42.52 °C (SD = 0.09 °C) in the bladder phantom, euthanised, and live rats respectively. Thermal camera measurements showed homogenous heat distributions over the bladder wall. The setup provides well-controlled thermal dose and the upscaling needed for performing large scale HIVEC experiments in rats.
Asunto(s)
Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Administración Intravesical , Animales , Femenino , Calor , Humanos , Masculino , Ratas , Vejiga Urinaria , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN: A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING: Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS: The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Oncología Médica/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Urología/normas , Técnica Delphi , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Oncología Médica/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Participación de los Interesados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Urología/métodosRESUMEN
Kidney-sparing surgery of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) requires a stringent follow-up with frequent ureteroscopies. Triage testing could reduce the number of follow-up ureteroscopies and hence minimize the invasiveness of follow-up. The use of urine-based markers for triage seems appealing but should be feasible with selective urine from outpatient cystoscopy to maximize the reduction of invasiveness. In this study, the feasibility of UroVysion® fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of UTUC in 1 mL of selective urine is investigated. Ten consecutive patients with biopsy-proven UTUC and five patients with negative diagnostic ureteroscopy findings were included in this case-control study. During ureteroscopy, 1 mL of selective urine was collected passively with a ureteral splint for Urovysion® FISH. The FISH rater was blinded to any clinical information. The results of FISH were compared to the findings of concomitantly collected selective urine cytology and the patients' UTUC status. FISH was feasible in all samples with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 80% for UTUC. In comparison, selective cytology resulted in a diagnostic yield of 87% with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 67%. In conclusion, UTUC detection is feasible with FISH in 1 mL of passively collected selective urine. Thus from a technical point of view, FISH could be used as an outpatient triage test to decide if follow-up ureteroscopy is necessary after kidney-sparing surgery of UTUC. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of FISH for the suggested pathway deserves further attention.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/orina , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urológicas/orina , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Following radical nephro-ureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT), the reported bladder recurrence rate of urothelial carcinoma is 22-47%. A single intravesical instillation of chemotherapy within 10 days following nephro-ureterectomy has the potential to decrease the risk of a bladder recurrence significantly. Despite recommendation by the European Association of Urology guideline to administer a single instillation postoperatively, the compliance rate is low because the risk of extravasation of chemotherapy. AIM: To reduce the risk of bladder cancer recurrence by a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin immediately (within 3â¯h) before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy. METHODS: Adult patients (ageâ¯≥â¯18 years) with a (suspicion of a) urothelial carcinoma of the UUT undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy will be eligible and will receive a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin within 3â¯h before surgery. In total, 170 patients will be included in this prospective, observational study. Follow-up will be according to current guidelines. RESULTS: The primary endpoint is the bladder cancer recurrence rate up to two years after surgery. Secondary endpoints are: a) the compliance rate; b) oncological outcome; c) possible side-effects; d) the quality of life; e) the calculation of costs of a single neoadjuvant instillation with Mitomycin and f) molecular characterization of UUT tumors and intravesical recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: A single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy may reduce the risk of a bladder recurrence in patients treated for UUT urothelial carcinoma and will circumvent the disadvantages of current therapy.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To codify the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the interrogation of prostate neoplasia (PCa) in clinical practice and focal therapy (FT). METHODS: An international collaborative consensus project was undertaken using the Delphi method among experts in the field of PCa. An online questionnaire was presented in three consecutive rounds and modified each round based on the comments provided by the experts. Subsequently, a face-to-face meeting was held to discuss and finalize the consensus results. RESULTS: mpMRI should be performed in patients with prior negative biopsies if clinical suspicion remains, but not instead of the PSA test, nor as a stand-alone diagnostic tool or mpMRI-targeted biopsies only. It is not recommended to use a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner without an endorectal or pelvic phased-array coil. mpMRI should be performed following standard biopsy-based PCa diagnosis in both the planning and follow-up of FT. If a lesion is seen, MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies should be performed for FT planning. Systematic biopsies are still required for FT planning in biopsy-naïve patients and for patients with residual PCa after FT. Standard repeat biopsies should be taken during the follow-up of FT. The final decision to perform FT should be based on histopathology. However, these consensus statements may differ for expert centers versus non-expert centers. CONCLUSIONS: The mpMRI is an important tool for characterizing and targeting PCa in clinical practice and FT. Standardization of acquisition and reading should be the main priority to guarantee consistent mpMRI quality throughout the urological community.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Técnicas de Ablación , Biopsia , Criocirugía , Técnica Delphi , Electroquimioterapia , Ultrasonido Enfocado de Alta Intensidad de Ablación , Humanos , Terapia por Láser , Masculino , Patólogos , Fotoquimioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Radiólogos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , UrólogosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Hyperthermia is an established (neo)adjuvant treatment modality for a number of pelvic malignancies. Optimal treatment of these tumors requires robust treatment planning, but up until now, the urinary bladder was not modeled accurately, making current simulations less reliable. The authors improved the dielectric and thermophysical model of the urinary bladder in their treatment planning system, and showed the improvements using phantom experiments. METHODS: The authors suspended a porcine bladder in muscle tissue equivalent gel and filled it with 120 ml 0.9% saline. The authors heated the phantom during 15 min with their deep hyperthermia device, using clinical settings, and measured the temperature both inside and outside the bladder. The authors simulated the experiment, both using the clinically used treatment planning system, and using the improved model featuring correct dielectric properties for the bladder content and an enhanced thermophysical model, enabling the simulation of convection. RESULTS: Although the dielectric changes have an impact throughout the phantom, the dominant effect is a higher net heat absorption in the bladder. The effects of changing the thermophysical model are limited to the bladder and its surroundings, but result in a very different temperature profile. The temperatures predicted by the simulations using the new bladder model were in much better agreement with the measurements than those predicted by currently used treatment planning system. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling convection in the urinary bladder is very important for accurate hyperthermia treatment planning in the pelvic area.
Asunto(s)
Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Pelvis , Fantasmas de Imagen , Animales , Neoplasias Pélvicas/terapia , Porcinos , Vejiga UrinariaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two strategies to improve antibiotic use in patients with a complicated urinary tract infection. DESIGN: Multicentre cluster randomised unblinded trial. METHOD: The departments of Internal Medicine and Urology from 19 hospitals in the Netherlands took part in this trial. Based on retrospective patient record investigations we performed baseline measurements on the scores of a validated set of quality indicators for antibiotic use in a minimum of 50 patients with a complicated urinary tract infection per department in 2009. A similar post-trial measurement took place in 2012. In 2010 we randomised the hospitals between 2 improvement strategies: a multifaceted strategy that included results of the baseline measurements, education, reminders and assistance with optional improvement interventions, and a competitive feedback strategy, in which the departments only received results of the baseline measurements and non-anonymous results from the other departments in this study arm. The primary outcome measure was improvement of the quality indicator scores. Secondary outcome measures were determinants of improvement of the indicators. (Netherlands Trial Register: NTR1742) RESULTS: The baseline and post-trial measurements were performed on 1,964 patients and 2,027 patients, respectively. Post-trial measurements revealed a significant, but limited, improvement of several indicators compared with baseline measurements. We found no significant difference in improvement between the two strategies for any indicator. The intensity with which the departments implemented improvement strategies was mostly suboptimal, but intensive implementation of a strategy was associated with greater improvement. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of both improvement strategies was comparable, but limited. For real improvement in antibiotic use in patients with complicated urinary tract infections, improvement interventions should be developed and applied by local professionals themselves.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Irreversible electroporation is a tissue ablation modality that uses high voltage electric energy to induce an increase in cell membrane permeability. This causes destabilization of the existing cellular transmembrane potential leading to cell death, due to the inability to maintain cellular homeostasis. This phase I-II study was designed to evaluate the histopathological outcomes of irreversible electroporation to prostate and surrounding tissue in radical prostatectomy specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with prostate cancer underwent an irreversible electroporation ablation without curative intent, followed by radical prostatectomy scheduled 4 weeks later. For histopathological examination of the prostate, whole mounted tissue slices were examined by dedicated genitourinary pathologists. The borders of the ablation zone and residual tumor were outlined on the slides. RESULTS: The irreversible electroporation ablation zones were characterized as areas of fibrosis, necrosis and loss of epithelial tissue in terms of denudation in the glandular structures. The ablation zone was well demarcated, showing trenchant delineations between viable and nonviable tissue. The ablated tissue showed mild to moderate inflammation, with atrophic cells in 1 case. The area was surrounded by hemorrhage at the location of the electrodes. No skip lesions or viable tissue was seen in the ablation zone. Fibrinoid necrosis of the neurovascular bundle was observed in 13 patients and denudation of the urothelium of the prostatic urethra was seen in 9. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathological assessment of the prostate 4 weeks after irreversible electroporation ablation showed sharply demarcated fibrotic and necrotic tissue in the ablation zone. No viable tissue was observed in the irreversible electroporation ablation zone.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación/métodos , Electroporación/métodos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To reach standardized terminology in focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A four-stage modified Delphi consensus project was undertaken among a panel of international experts in the field of FT for PCa. Data on terminology in FT was collected from the panel by three rounds of online questionnaires. During a face-to-face meeting on June 21, 2015, attended by 38 experts, all data from the online rounds were reviewed and recommendations for definitions were formulated. RESULTS: Consensus was attained on 23 of 27 topics; Targeted FT was defined as a lesion-based treatment strategy, treating all identified significant cancer foci; FT was generically defined as an anatomy-based (zonal) treatment strategy. Treatment failure due to the ablative energy inadequately destroying treated tissue is defined as ablation failure. In targeting failure the energy is not adequately applied to the tumor spatially and selection failure occurs when a patient was wrongfully selected for FT. No definition of biochemical recurrence can be recommended based on the current data. Important definitions for outcome measures are potency (minimum IIEF-5 score of 21), incontinence (new need for pads or leakage) and deterioration in urinary function (increase in IPSS >5 points). No agreement on the best quality of life tool was established, but UCLA-EPIC and EORTC-QLQ-30 were most commonly supported by the experts. A complete overview of statements is presented in the text. CONCLUSION: Focal therapy is an emerging field of PCa therapeutics. Standardization of definitions helps to create comparable research results and facilitate clear communication in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Terapia Combinada/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative therapy with a low side-effect profile in prostate cancer. The objective was: 1) To compare the volumetric IRE ablation zone on grey-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with histopathology findings; 2) To determine a reliable imaging modality to visualize the IRE ablation effects accurately. METHODS: A prospective phase I-II study was performed in 16 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP). IRE of the prostate was performed 4 weeks before RP. Prior to, and 4 weeks after the IRE treatment, imaging was performed by TRUS, CEUS, and mpMRI. 3D-analysis of the ablation volumes on imaging and on H&E-stained whole-mount sections was performed. The volumes were compared and the correlation was calculated. RESULTS: Evaluation of the imaging demonstrated that with T2-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and CEUS, effects of IRE are visible. T2MRI and CEUS closely match the volumes on histopathology (Pearson correlation r = 0.88 resp. 0.80). However, IRE is not visible with TRUS. CONCLUSIONS: mpMRI and CEUS are appropriate for assessing IRE effects and are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone. The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination. KEY POINTS: ⢠mpMRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are appropriate imaging modalities for assessing IRE effects ⢠mpMRI and CEUS are the most feasible imaging modalities to visualize IRE ablation zone ⢠The imaging is concordant with results of histopathological examination after IRE ⢠Grey-scale US is insufficient for assessing IRE ablations.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Electroporación/métodos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel minimally invasive therapy for prostate cancer using short electric pulses to ablate prostate tissue. The purpose of this study is to determine the IRE effects in prostate tissue and correlate electrode configuration with the histology of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. We hypothesize that the area within the electrode configuration is completely ablated and that the area within the electrode configuration is predictive for the ablated area after treatment. METHODS: A prospective phase I/II study was conducted in 16 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed prostate cancer scheduled for RP. Focal or extended IRE treatment of the prostate was performed 4 weeks prior to RP. The locations of the electrodes were used to calculate the planned ablation zone. Following RP, the specimens were processed into whole-mount sections, histopathology (PA) was assessed and ablation zones were delineated. The area of the tissue alteration was determined by measuring the surface. The planned and the histological ablation zones were compared, analysed per individual patient and per protocol (focal vs. extended). RESULTS: All cells within the electrode configuration were completely ablated and consisted only of necrotic and fibrotic tissue without leaving any viable cells. The histological ablation zone was always larger than the electrodes configuration (2.9 times larger for the 3 electrodes configuration and 2.5 times larger for the ≥4 electrode configuration). These ablation effects extended beyond the prostatic capsule in the neurovascular bundle in 13 out of 15 cases. CONCLUSIONS: IRE in prostate cancer results in completely ablated, sharply demarcated lesions with a histological ablation zone beyond the electrode configuration. No skip lesions were observed within the electrode configuration. CLINICAL TRIALS: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01790451 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01790451.
Asunto(s)
Electrocirugia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Técnicas de Ablación , Adulto , Anciano , Electrodos , Electroporación , Electrocirugia/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Appropriate antibiotic use in patients with complicated urinary tract infections can be measured by a valid set of nine quality indicators (QIs). We evaluated the performance of these QIs in a national setting and investigated which determinants influenced appropriate antibiotic use. For the latter, we distinguished patient, department and hospital characteristics, including organizational interventions aimed at improving the quality of antibiotic use (antibiotic stewardship elements). METHODS: A retrospective, observational multicentre study included 1964 patients (58% male sex) with a complicated urinary tract infection treated at Internal Medicine and Urology departments of 19 Dutch university and non-university hospitals. Data of 50 patients per department were extracted from medical charts. QI performance scores were calculated using previously constructed algorithms. Department and hospital characteristics were collected using questionnaires filled in by an internal medicine physician and an urologist. Regression analysis was performed to identify determinants of QI performance. Clustering at department and hospital level was taken into account through inclusion of random effects in a multi-level model. RESULTS: Median QI performance of departments varied between 31% ('Treat urinary tract infection in men according to local guideline') and 77% ('Perform urine culture'). The patient characteristics non-febrile urinary tract infection, female sex and presence of a urinary catheter were negatively associated with performance on many QIs. The presence of an infectious diseases physician and an antibiotic formulary were positively associated with 'Prescribe empirical therapy according to guideline'. No other department or hospital characteristics, including stewardship elements, were consistently associated with better QI performance. CONCLUSIONS: A large inter-department variation was demonstrated in the appropriateness of antibiotic use. In particular certain patient characteristics (more than department or hospital characteristics) influenced the quality of antibiotic use. Some, but not all antibiotic stewardship elements did translate into better QI performance.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Departamentos de Hospitales , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Orina/microbiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Focal therapy can offer the middle ground for treatment between active surveillance and radical therapy in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Factors that prohibit focal therapy from being standard of care are numerous. Several consensus projects have been conducted to position the utilization of imaging and trial design in focal therapy. However, the literature is still scarce on patient follow-up after focal therapy. For these reasons, an international multidisciplinary consensus project was established in order to reach consensus about a uniform follow-up protocol after focal therapy. OBJECTIVE: To standardize patient follow-up after focal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature study was performed, and a questionnaire was constructed. The questionnaire was sent out to 76 participants (70 % urologists, 28 % radiologists and 2 % biomedical engineers) in three consecutive rounds according to the Delphi method. In each round, the panelists were presented with the results of the previous round. Participants each had the opportunity to adapt, delete or add questions. The topics discussed pertaining to follow-up after focal therapy were as follows: (1) general,(2) biopsies, (3) PSA, (4) digital rectal examination (DRE), (5) imaging, (6) quality of life (QoL) and (7) registration and pooling of data. The project was concluded with a face-to-face meeting in which final conclusions were formulated. RESULTS: The follow-up after focal therapy should be a minimum of 5 years. The following modalities should be included in assessing post-treatment outcomes: multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), biopsies, assessment of erectile function, QoL, urinary symptoms and incontinence. A systematic 12-core TRUS biopsy combined with 4-6 targeted biopsy cores of the treated area and any suspicious lesion(s) should be performed after 1 year, and thereafter only when there is suspicion on imaging. The ideal way to perform targeted biopsies is to use TRUS-MRI fusion technology. PSA should be performed for research purposes, in the first year, every 3 months, and after the first year, every 6 months. mpMRI is the optimal imaging modality for follow-up after focal therapy. On a 1.5T scanner, an endorectal coil is strongly advised by the panel, whereas on a 3T machine, it is optional, however, it will improve image quality. The following sequences should be included: T2WI, DWI including high b values of >1,000 and ADC maps of DWI, DCE and T1WI. Imaging should be performed at 6 months and at 1 year following treatment; after the first year post-treatment, it should be performed every year until 5 years following treatment. All data should ideally be pooled in a common global database. CONCLUSION: Focal therapy is a relatively new form of treatment for prostate cancer. In order to include focal therapy as a standard of care treatment, consistent follow-up is necessary. By implementing the results of this consensus study, focal therapy users will be able to provide important and standardized outcome data.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Current surgical and ablative treatment options for prostate cancer have a relatively high incidence of side effects, which may diminish the quality of life. The side effects are a consequence of procedure-related damage of the blood vessels, bowel, urethra or neurovascular bundle. Ablation with irreversible electroporation (IRE) has shown to be effective in destroying tumour cells and harbours the advantage of sparing surrounding tissue and vital structures. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy and to acquire data on patient experience of minimally invasive, transperineally image-guided IRE for the focal ablation of prostate cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre pilot study, 16 patients with prostate cancer who are scheduled for a radical prostatectomy will undergo an IRE procedure, approximately 30 days prior to the radical prostatectomy. Data as adverse events, side effects, functional outcomes, pain and quality of life will be collected and patients will be controlled at 1 and 2 weeks post-IRE, 1 day preprostatectomy and postprostatectomy. Prior to the IRE procedure and the radical prostatectomy, all patients will undergo a multiparametric MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the prostate. The efficacy of ablation will be determined by whole mount histopathological examination, which will be correlated with the imaging of the ablation zone. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the ethics committee at the coordinating centre (Academic Medical Center (AMC) Amsterdam) and by the local Institutional Review Board at the participating centres. Data will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study will determine the safety and efficacy of IRE in the prostate. It will show the radiological and histopathological effects of IRE ablations and it will provide data to construct an accurate treatment planning tool for IRE in prostate tissue. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov database: NCT01790451.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Electroporación/métodos , Próstata/patología , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patologíaRESUMEN
We evaluated 800 hospitalized patients with a complicated urinary tract infection, from whom both a blood and a urine culture were obtained on the first day of antibiotic treatment. Urine cultures were positive in 70% of patients, and blood cultures were positive in 29%. In 7% of patients, uropathogens caused bacteraemia with a pathogen that was not isolated from urine. Receiving antibiotic therapy at the moment of hospitalization was the only factor independently associated with discordant culture results (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.18-3.61). For those receiving antibiotics at the moment of hospitalization, blood cultures have additional diagnostic value over urine cultures.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Sangre/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Orina/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Polyomaviruses are able to drive malignant transformation in rodent models, and have been implicated in the aetiology of a variety of human malignancies. However, the reports on this association in humans are strongly conflicting. Here we describe a renal transplant (RT) recipient with ureteral stenosis against the background of polyomavirus BK (BKV) activity. Six and a half years after transplantation, this patient developed metastasised bladder cancer. Prior to the diagnosis of cancer, atypical cells were detected in the urine that were denoted as 'decoy cells': virally infected epithelial cells that are frequently seen in the urine of RT recipients with BKV (re)activation, which may morphologically resemble malignant cells. Intriguingly, the primary urothelial carcinoma, as well as the mesenterial and two intestinal metastases, stained positive with antibodies against polyomavirus virus large T antigen protein, whereas the adjacent healthy tissue did not. This case suggests a role for BKV in the pathogenesis of bladder cancer, at least in the context of immunodeficiency.
Asunto(s)
Virus BK , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/virología , Infecciones por Polyomavirus , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/virología , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We studied the safety and efficacy of multiple adjuvant apaziquone instillations in patients with high risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with high risk nonmuscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder underwent transurethral resection of all bladder tumor(s), and received 6 weekly adjuvant intravesical apaziquone instillations of 4 mg in 40 ml. Patients with carcinoma in situ received 3 further maintenance instillations at months 3, 6 and 12. Followup consisted of cystoscopy, urine cytology and observation of adverse events every 3 months for 18 months. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were enrolled in the study. Although all patients were high risk according to the definitions used when the study was initiated, according to most recent guideline criteria, 80% and 20% of these patients would now be considered intermediate and high risk for recurrence, and 50% and 44% would be considered intermediate and high risk for progression, respectively. Intent to treat analysis of 49 patients with papillary tumors showed recurrent tumors in 34.7% and 44.9% at 12 and 18 months, respectively. One patient had progression to T2 or greater urothelial carcinoma after 9 months. There were 4 patients with carcinoma in situ who had complete responses at 3 months but discontinued treatment due to cystitis, recurrent papillary disease, urinary incontinence and dysuria. Most other side effects were mild (grade 1 to 2). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant intravesical instillations of apaziquone are generally well tolerated. The recurrence rates of 34.7% after 12 months and 44.9% after 18 months in these patients can be considered encouraging, and warrant further study.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Aziridinas/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Indolquinonas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravesical , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Debate continues about the optimal management strategy for patients with renal injury. PURPOSE: To report the diagnostics and treatment applied in a level 1 trauma centre and to compare it to the recommendations of the European Association of Urology guidelines concerning blunt renal injury. METHODS: The management of all patients with blunt renal injury, admitted to the level 1 trauma centre of the Academic Medical Centre, between January 2005 and December 2009 was reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Median age and ISS of the 186 included patients were 40 and 17 years respectively. All but one haemodynamically stable patients with microscopic haematuria received nonoperative management. Sixty percent of the haemodynamically stable patients with gross haematuria underwent CT scanning. Patients with grade 1-4 renal injury received nonoperative management. Additionally, two patients with grade 3-4 renal injury received angiography and embolization (A&E). One patient with grade 5 injury underwent renal exploration and two A&E. Seven of the 8 haemodynamically unstable patients underwent emergency laparotomy and in 2 patients, haemodynamically unstable because of renal injury, A&E was performed as an adjunct to surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, violation of the guidelines increased with injury severity. A&E can provide both a useful adjunct to nonoperative management and alternative to surgical intervention in specialised centres with appropriate equipment and expertise, even in patients with high grade renal injury. We advocate an update of the guidelines with a more prominent role of A&E.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía/métodos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Hematuria/terapia , Riñón/lesiones , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Hematuria/epidemiología , Humanos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Centros Traumatológicos/normas , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The extent to which self-assessed work ability collected during treatment can predict return-to-work in cancer patients is unknown. In this prospective study, we consecutively included employed cancer patients who underwent treatment with curative intent at 6 months following the first day of sick leave. Work ability data (scores 0-10), clinical and sociodemographic data were collected at 6 months, while return-to-work was measured at 6, 12 and 18 months. Most of the 195 patients had been diagnosed with breast cancer (26%), cancer of the female genitals (22%) or genitourological cancer (22%). Mean current work ability scores improved significantly over time from 4.6 at 6 months to 6.3 and 6.7 at 12 and 18 months, respectively. Patients with haematological cancers and those who received chemotherapy showed the lowest work ability scores, while patients with cancer of urogenital tract or with gastrointestinal cancer had the highest scores. Work ability at 6 months strongly predicted return-to-work at 18 months, after correction for the influence of age and treatment (hazard ratio=1.37, CI 1.27-1.48). We conclude that self-assessed work ability is an important factor in the return-to-work process of cancer patients independent of age and clinical factors.