Whole-Heart Histological and Electroanatomic Assessment of Postinfarction Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scar and Conducting Channels.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-defined ventricular scar and anatomic conduction channels (CMR-CCs) offer promise in delineating ventricular tachycardia substrate. No studies have validated channels with coregistered histology, nor have they ascertained the histological characteristics of deceleration zones (DZs) within these channels. We aimed to validate CMR scar and CMR-CCs with whole-heart histology and electroanatomic mapping in a postinfarction model. METHODS: Five sheep underwent anteroseptal infarction. CMR (116±20 days post infarct) was postprocessed using ADAS-3-dimensional, varying pixel intensity thresholds (5545, 6040, 6535, and 7030). DZs were identified by electroanatomic mapping (129±12 days post infarct). Explanted hearts were sectioned and stained with Picrosirius red, and whole-heart histopathologic shells were generated. Scar topography as well as percentage fibrosis, adiposity, and remaining viable myocardium within 3 mm histological biopsies and within CMR-CCs were determined. RESULTS: Using the standard 6040 thresholding, CMR had 83.8% accuracy for identifying histological scar in the endocardium (κ, 0.666) and 61.4% in the epicardium (κ, 0.276). Thirty-seven CMR-CCs were identified by varying thresholding; 23 (62%) were unique. DZs colocalized to 19 of 23 (83%) CMR-CCs. Twenty (87%) CMR-CCs were histologically confirmed. Within-channel histological fibrosis did not differ by the presence of DZs (P=0.242). Within-channel histological adiposity was significantly higher at sites with versus without DZs (24.1% versus 8.3%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postprocessed CMR-derived scars and channels were validated by histology and electroanatomic mapping. Regions of CMR-CCs at sites of DZs had higher adiposity but similar fibrosis than regions without DZs, suggesting that lipomatous metaplasia may contribute to arrhythmogenicity of postinfarction scar.

Accuracy of a Single-Lead ECG Device for Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias Compared Against Cardiac Electrophysiology Study.

BACKGROUND: Single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) devices may allow detection and diagnosis of cardiac rhythms. However, data on their accuracy for detecting cardiac arrhythmias beyond atrial fibrillation are limited. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the AliveCor KardiaMobile (AC) (AliveCor Inc, Mountain View, CA, USA) for the diagnosis of arrhythmias against gold standard cardiac electrophysiology study (EPS). METHOD: Patients undergoing clinically indicated EPS underwent simultaneous rhythm recording with an AC, standard 12-lead ECG, and EP catheters for intracardiac electrograms. Rhythms recorded during EPS were classified based on electrogram, 12-lead ECG, and clinical findings. Blinded reviewers provided differential diagnoses for the single-lead AC tracings; a separate reviewer compared diagnoses made between the AC tracings and EPS findings. RESULTS: In 49 patients, 843 cardiac rhythms were captured during 502 AC recordings. Analysis of tracings containing sinus rhythm (n=273) returned an overall accuracy of 92%, with sensitivity and specificity values of 93% and 92%, respectively. Accuracy for tracings per rhythm was atrial fibrillation 91% (n=51); supraventricular tachycardia accuracy was 89% (n=191), ventricular tachycardia 91% (n=198), ventricular fibrillation 98% (n=11), and asystole 100% (n=5). Accuracy for supraventricular ectopy was 93% (n=28) and for premature ventricular complexes was 91% (n=86). Overall accuracy was 94% for solitary rhythms and 93% in tracings from patients with baseline bundle branch block. CONCLUSIONS: When compared against the gold standard EPS diagnosis, the interpretation of arrhythmias recorded by an AliveCor single-lead ECG device had reasonable diagnostic accuracy.

Radiation therapy for ventricular arrhythmias.

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be life-threatening arrhythmias that result in significant morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) is an invasive treatment modality that can be effective in the treatment of VA where medications fail. Recurrence occurs commonly following CA due to an inability to deliver lesions of adequate depth to cauterise the electrical circuits that drive VA or reach areas of scar responsible for VA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a non-invasive treatment modality that allows volumetric delivery of energy to treat circuits that cannot be reached by CA. It overcomes the weaknesses of CA and has been successfully utilised in small clinical trials to treat refractory VA. This article summarises the current evidence for this novel treatment modality and the steps that will be required to bring it to the forefront of VA treatment.

The Current Landscape of Ventricular Tachycardia Trials: A Systematic Review of Registered Studies.

BACKGROUND: Although there are evolving techniques and technologies for treating ventricular tachycardia (VT), the current landscape of clinical trials for managing VT remains understudied. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide a systematic characterisation of the interventional management of VT through an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu, anzctr.org.au and chictr.org.cn databases. METHODS: We queried all phase II to IV interventional trials registered up to November 2023 that enrolled patients with VT. Published, completed but unpublished, terminated, or ongoing trials were included for final analysis. RESULTS: Of the 698 registered studies, 135 were related to VT, with 123 trials included in the final analysis. Among these trials, 25 (20%) have been published, enrolling a median of 35 patients (interquartile range [IQR] 20-132) over a median of 43 months (IQR 19-62). Out of the published trials, 14 (56%) were randomised, and 12 (48%) focused on catheter ablation. Twenty-two (18%) have been completed but remain unpublished, even after a median of 36 months (IQR 15-60). Furthermore, 27 (22%) trials were terminated or withdrawn, with the most common cause being poor enrolment. Currently, 49 (40%) trials are ongoing and novel non-ablative technologies, such as radioablation and autonomic modulation, account for 35% and 8% of ongoing trials, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed that many registered trials remain unpublished or incomplete, and randomised controlled trial evidence is limited to only a few studies. Furthermore, many ongoing trials are focused on non-catheter ablation-based strategies. Therefore, larger pragmatic trials are needed to create stronger evidence in the future.

Left atrial shape as a marker of atrial myopathy in embolic stroke of undetermined source.

AIMS: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) results in significant morbidity. A left atrial (LA) myopathy is implicated in a proportion of these patients. We hypothesized that LA shape varies by cause of stroke [CE (cardioembolic) vs. ESUS]. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 236 ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and controls were recruited prospectively. AF was classified as paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (PersAF). Stroke patients comprised CE stroke secondary to AF and ESUS. There were 81 AF (47 PAF, 34 PersAF), 50 ESUS, 57 CE patients [subdivided into CE with PAF (CEpaf) and CE with PersAF (CEpers)], and 48 controls. Echocardiographic parameters including LA volume, function, and shape/sphericity (3D LA sphericity and 2D-derived LA circularity, ellipticity, sphericity, and eccentricity indices) were evaluated. Increased LA volume and sphericity with LA dysfunction were present in CE, AF, and ESUS groups compared with controls. K-means cluster analysis demonstrated a spectrum of LA myopathy with controls at the lowest and CEpers and PersAF at the upper extremes, with ESUS, PAF, and CEpaf being similar and falling between these extremes. After adjusting for age, sex, and left ventricular (LV) and LA parameters, LA sphericity markers differentiated ESUS from controls (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Alterations in LA shape are present in ESUS, AF, and CE patients, particularly increased spherical remodelling. The novel markers of LA sphericity proposed may identify LA myopathy in ESUS patients and potentially guide management for secondary prevention.

Cardiac "hypertrophy" phenotyping: differentiating aetiologies with increased left ventricular wall thickness on echocardiography.

Aims: Differentiating phenotypes of cardiac "hypertrophy" characterised by increased wall thickness on echocardiography is essential for management and prognostication. Transthoracic echocardiography is the most commonly used screening test for this purpose. We sought to identify echocardiographic markers that distinguish infiltrative and storage disorders that present with increased left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, namely, cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD), from hypertensive heart disease (HHT). Methods: Patients were retrospectively recruited from Westmead Hospital, Sydney, and Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane. LV structural, systolic, and diastolic function parameters, as well as global (LVGLS) and segmental longitudinal strains, were assessed. Previously reported echocardiographic parameters including relative apical sparing ratio (RAS), LV ejection fraction-to-strain ratio (EFSR), mass-to-strain ratio (MSR) and amyloidosis index (AMYLI) score (relative wall thickness × E/e') were evaluated. Results: A total of 209 patients {120 CA [58 transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) and 62 light-chain (AL) amyloidosis], 31 AFD and 58 HHT patients; mean age 64.1 ± 13.7 years, 75% male} comprised the study cohort. Echocardiographic measurements differed across the three groups, The LV mass index was higher in both CA {median 126.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 106.4-157.9 g/m2]} and AFD [median 134 (IQR 108.8-152.2 g/m2)] vs. HHT [median 92.7 (IQR 79.6-102.3 g/m2), p < 0.05]. LVGLS was lowest in CA [median 12.29 (IQR 10.33-15.56%)] followed by AFD [median 16.92 (IQR 14.14-18.78%)] then HHT [median 18.56 (IQR 17.51-19.97%), p < 0.05]. Diastolic function measurements including average e' and E/e' were most impaired in CA and least impaired in AFD. Indexed left atrial volume was highest in CA. EFSR and MSR differentiated secondary (CA + AFD) from HHT [receiver operating curve-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.80 and 0.91, respectively]. RAS and AMYLI score differentiated CA from AFD (ROC-AUC of 0.79 and 0.80, respectively). A linear discriminant analysis with stepwise variable selection using linear combinations of LV mass index, average e', LVGLS and basal strain correctly classified 79% of all cases. Conclusion: Simple echocardiographic parameters differentiate between different "hypertrophic" cardiac phenotypes. These have potential utility as a screening tool to guide further confirmatory testing.

Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Treatment of Premature Ventricular Complexes: A Systematic Review.

There is variability in treatment modalities for premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), including use of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy or catheter ablation (CA). This study reviewed evidence comparing CA vs AADs for the treatment of PVCs. A systematic review was performed from the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, U.S. National Library of Medicine ClinicalTrials database, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register. Five studies (1 randomized controlled trial) enrolling 1,113 patients (57.9% female) were analyzed. Four of five studies recruited mainly patients with outflow tract PVCs. There was significant heterogeneity in AAD choice. Electroanatomic mapping was used in 3 of 5 studies. No studies documented intracardiac echocardiography or contact force-sensing catheter use. Acute procedural endpoints varied (2 of 5 targeted elimination of all PVCs). All studies had significant potential for bias. CA seemed superior to AADs for PVC recurrence, frequency, and burden. One study reported long-term symptoms (CA superior). Quality of life or cost-effectiveness was not reported. Complication and adverse event rates were 0% to 5.6% for CA and 9.5% to 21% for AADs. Future randomized controlled trials will assess CA vs AADs for patients with PVCs without structural heart disease (ECTOPIA [Elimination of Ventricular Premature Beats with Catheter Ablation versus Optimal Antiarrhythmic Drug Treatment]), with impaired LVEF (PAPS [Prospective Assessment of Premature Ventricular Contractions Suppression in Cardiomyopathy] Pilot), and with structural heart disease (CAT-PVC [Catheter Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Therapy of Premature Ventricular Contractions in Patients With Structural Heart Disease]). In conclusion, CA seems to reduce recurrence, burden, and frequency of PVCs compared with AADs. There is a lack of data on patient- and health care-specific outcomes such as symptoms, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Several upcoming trials will offer important insights for management of PVCs.

Mortality after catheter ablation of structural heart disease related ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data describing mortality after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). OBJECTIVES: We describe the causes and predictors of cardiac transplant and/or mortality following catheter ablation of structural heart disease (SHD) related VT. METHODS: Over 10-years, 175 SHD patients underwent VT ablation. Clinical characteristics, and outcomes, were compared between patients undergoing transplant and/or dying and those surviving. RESULTS: During 2.8 (IQR 1.9-5.0) years follow-up, 37/175 (21%) patients underwent transplant and/or died following VT ablation. Prior to ablation, these patients were older (70.3 ± 11.1 vs. 62.1 ± 13.9 years, P = 0.001), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction ([LVEF] 30 ± 12% vs. 44 ± 14%, P < 0.001), and were more likely to have failed amiodarone (57% vs. 39%, P = 0.050), compared to those that survived. Predictors of transplant and/or mortality included LVEF≤35% (HR 4.71 [95% CI 2.18-10.18], P < 0.001), age ≥ 65 years (HR 2.18 [95% CI 1.01-4.73], P = 0.047), renal impairment (HR 3.73 [95% CI 1.80-7.74], P < 0.001), amiodarone failure (HR 2.67 [95% CI 1.27-5.63], P = 0.010) and malignancy (HR 3.09 [95% CI 1.03-9.26], P = 0.043). Ventricular arrhythmia free survival at 6-months was lower in the transplant and/or deceased, compared to non-deceased group (62% vs. 78%, P = 0.010), but was not independently associated with transplant and/or mortality. The risk score, MORTALITIES-VA, accurately predicted transplant and/or mortality (AUC: 0.872 [95% CI 0.810-0.934]). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac transplant and/or mortality after VT ablation occurred in 21% of patients. Independent predictors included LVEF≤35%, age ≥ 65 years, renal impairment, malignancy, and amiodarone failure. The MORTALITIES-VA score may identify patients at high-risk of transplant and/or dying after VT ablation.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation as first-line therapy for the management of ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) in line with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is highly effective in VT management; however, it is unknown if CA should be considered as first-line therapy. The aim of this study is to verify the efficacy and safety of CA as first-line therapy for the first VT presentation (as adjunctive to ICD insertion), compared to initial ICD insertion and anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. METHODS: Data from patients with the first presentation for VT from January 2017 to January 2021 was reviewed. Patients were classified as "ablation first" vs "ICD first" groups and compared the clinical outcomes between groups. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients presented with VT; 34 underwent CA as first-line therapy prior to ICD insertion, and 150 had ICD insertion/AAD therapy as first-line. During the median follow-up of 625 days, patients who underwent CA as first-line therapy had significantly higher ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival (91% vs 59%, log-rank P = 0.002) and composite of VA recurrence, cardiovascular hospitalization, transplant, and death (84% vs 54%, log-rank P = 0.01) compared to those who did not undergo CA. Multivariate analysis revealed that first-line CA was the only protective predictor of VA recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 0.20, P = 0.003). There were 3 (9%) peri-procedural complications with no peri-procedural deaths. CONCLUSION: Real-world data supports the efficacy and safety of CA as first-line therapy at the time of the first VT hospitalization, compared to the initial ICD implant and AAD therapy.

Contemporary updates on ventricular arrhythmias: from mechanisms to management.

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a group of heart rhythm disorders that can be life-threatening and cause significant morbidity. VA in the presence of structural heart disease (SHD) has distinct prognostic implications and requires a comprehensive and multifaceted approach for investigation and management. Early specialist referral should be considered for all patients with VA. Particular urgency is recommended in patients with syncope, nonsustained/sustained VA on Holter monitor and SHD on cardiac imaging because of the heightened risk of sudden cardiac death. Comprehensive phenotyping is recommended for most patients with VA, encompassing noninvasive cardiac functional testing, multimodality imaging and genetic testing in select circumstances. Management of idiopathic VA is guided heavily by symptom burden and the presence of ventricular systolic impairment. In SHD, guideline-directed heart failure therapy and device implantation are critical considerations. Whilst commonly used and well-established, antiarrhythmic drugs can be hampered by toxicity and failure of adequate arrhythmia control. Catheter ablation is increasingly being considered a feasible first-line alternative to medical therapy, where outcomes are influenced by disease aetiology and scar burden in SHD. Catheter ablation is associated with reduced arrhythmia recurrence and burden and improved quality of life at follow-up.

Intracardiac echocardiography techniques to identify ventricular arrhythmia substrate.

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used to facilitate catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VA). It allows intraprocedural recognition of myocardial substrate, optimization of catheter-tissue contact, identification of anatomical barriers to ablation, and early recognition of complications. In the era where the 3-dimensionality of substrate for VA is increasingly recognized, ICE is invaluable in identifying scar topography in the endocardial, midmyocardial, and epicardial layers. ICE assists in identifying endocavitary structures that are a common source of VA in idiopathic and structural heart disease. Furthermore, as substrate imaging of the right ventricle has not been optimized with other imaging modalities, ICE offers a unique opportunity to visualize substrate in this chamber. Real-time substrate identification can be particularly useful where there are contraindications to use of other imaging modalities or the images are obscured by artefact in the presence of cardiac device leads. In this review we provide a step-by-step guide in the techniques used to image ventricular arrhythmia substrate with ICE. We also discuss the benefits and limitations of this technique in comparison to other imaging modalities.

Sex-Based Differences in Selected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Use: A 10-Year Statewide Patient Cohort.

Background Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) include pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and resynchronization therapy. This study aimed to assess CIED implantation and outcomes by sex and indication. Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with cardiovascular hospitalizations in New South Wales, Australia (2008 to 2018). CIED implantation in patients with arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and syncope were examined. Subcategories (complete heart block, atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest, sick sinus syndrome, and ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy) were investigated. Primary outcome was implantation of CIEDs in men versus women adjusted for age and comorbidities. Secondary outcomes were trends over time, time to implant, length of stay, emergency status, and 30-day survival. Of 1 291 258 patients with cardiovascular admissions, 287 563 had arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, or syncope and 29 080 (2.3%) received a CIED (22 472 pacemakers, 6808 defibrillators, 3207 resynchronization therapy). Women with arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, or syncope were less likely to have pacemakers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.76-0.80]), defibrillators (aOR, 0.4, [95% CI, 0.40-0.45]) and resynchronization therapy (aOR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.61-0.71]). Differences persisted across subcategories, including fewer pacemakers in complete heart block (aOR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.98]) and syncope (aOR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.63-0.79]); fewer defibrillators in ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest (aOR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.61-0.77]); and less resynchronization therapy in cardiomyopathy (aOR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.51-0.75]). Men and women receiving devices had higher 30-day survival compared with those who did not receive a device, and 30-day survival was similar between men and women receiving devices. Conclusions Lower CIED implantation was seen in women versus men, across nearly all indications, including complete heart block and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest. The underuse of cardiac devices among women may arguably reflect a sex bias and requires further research.

Predicting Patients With Troponin Positive Chest Pain and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries With Electrocardiogram, Troponin Kinetics and GRACE Score.

BACKGROUND: Troponin positive chest-pain with unobstructed coronary arteries (TPCP-UCA), occurs in 6% of cases of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Whilst TPCP-UCA patients are known to be younger with less cardiovascular risk factors when compared to obstructive coronary disease (MICAD), no validated methods exist to reliably delineate these two conditions prior to coronary angiography. METHODS: We analysed 142 patients with MICAD and 127 patients with TPCP-UCA from 2015 to 2019. Several key predetermined clinical, biochemical and electrocardiograph (ECG) parameters, as well as Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, were collected for all patients. All TPCP-UCA patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). RESULTS: Patients with TPCP-UCA were younger than MICAD (44 vs 68 yrs, p<0.01), and with less cardiac risk factors of hypertension (31% vs 68%, p<0.01), hypercholesterolaemia (23% vs 56%, p<0.01), diabetes (11% vs 45%, p<0.01), prior ischaemic heart disease (8% vs 42%, p<0.01) and smoking history (29% vs 50%, p<0.01). Peak troponin (MICAD 2,084.5 ng/L vs TPCP-UCA 847.0 ng/L, p=0.02), serial-to-initial troponin ratio (MICAD 13.5 vs TPCP-UCA 5.1, p<0.01), and peak-to-initial troponin ratio (MICAD 69.6 vs TPCP-UCA 14.0, p<0.01) were all higher in the MICAD group. GRACE scores were significantly different across the two cohorts (TPCP UCA 74 vs MICAD 106, p<0.01), with a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve statistic of 0.794 (95% CI 0.739-0.850). On ECG analysis, MICAD had greater prevalence and sum of ST depression (40% vs 19% p<0.01; 1.6 mm vs 0.44 mm, p<0.01) and T wave inversion (37% vs 17%, p<0.01), whilst TPCP-UCA had greater presence of PR depression (20% vs 3% p<0.01), and longer repolarisation (T wave peak to end 89 ms vs 83 ms, p=0.04; T wave peak to end/corrected QT 0.208 ms vs 0.193 ms, p=0.03). All TPCP-UCA patients underwent cMRI. Aetiology was found in 82% of cases, with the leading diagnosis being myocarditis (58%), followed by infarction (8%), whilst 18% had a normal cMRI. CONCLUSIONS: TPCP-UCA is an important differential for patients presenting with ACS, and has several key demographic, biochemical and electrocardiographic differences. The present findings are hypothesis generating, thus prospective studies are required to determine and validate potential clinical utility.

Remote magnetic navigation compared to contemporary manual techniques for the catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data comparing remote magnetic navigation (RMN) to contemporary techniques of manual-guided ventricular arrhythmia (VA) catheter ablation. OBJECTIVES: We compared acute and long-term outcomes of VA ablation guided by either RMN or contemporary manual techniques in patients with structural heart disease. METHODS: From 2010-2019, 192 consecutive patients, with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) underwent catheter ablation for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), using either RMN (n = 60) or manual (n = 132) guided techniques. Acute success and VA-free survival were compared. RESULTS: In ICM, acute procedural success was comparable between the 2 techniques (manual 43.5% vs. RMN 29%, P = 0.11), as was VA-free survival (manual 83% vs. RMN 74%, P = 0.88), and survival free from cardiac transplantation and all-cause mortality (manual 88% vs. RMN 87%, P = 0.47), both at 12-months after final ablation. In NICM, manual compared to RMN guided, had superior acute procedural success (manual 46% vs. RMN 19%, P = 0.003) and VA-free survival 12-months after final ablation (manual 79% vs. RMN 41%, P = 0.004), but comparable survival free from cardiac transplantation and all-cause mortality 12-months after final ablation (manual 95% vs. RMN 90%, P = 0.52). Procedural duration was shorter in both subgroups undergoing manual guided ablation, whereas fluoroscopy dose and complication rates were comparable. CONCLUSION: RMN provides similar outcomes to manual ablation in patients with ICM. In NICM however, acute success, and long-term VA-free survival was better with manual ablation. Prospective, multi-centre randomised trials comparing contemporary manual and RMN systems for VA catheter ablation are needed.

Catheter ablation of idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias with low intraprocedural burden guided by pace mapping.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data comparing ablation outcomes in patients with low intraprocedural burden of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) undergoing a pace mapping (PM)-guided strategy vs those with high burden guided by standard activation mapping strategy (non-PM). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if catheter ablation-guided by PM of low-intraprocedural-burden idiopathic outflow tract VA would be noninferior compared to non-PM-guided ablation. METHODS: Outcomes of catheter ablation of idiopathic outflow tract VA in 22 patients with a low burden of intraprocedural VA using PM-guided ablation were compared to 44 patients with a high burden of intraprocedural VA undergoing ablation using standard techniques. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included (age 46.5 ± 14.8 years; 68% female, left ventricular ejection fraction 59% ± 5%). Within the PM group, 24-hour preprocedure premature ventricular complex (PVC) burden was 9.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 4%-13.8%), number of pace maps 33.6 ± 18.5, surface area of ≥95% pace map correlation 1.9 ± 1.2 cm2, with best pace map correlation 96% (IQR 92%-97%). Within the non-PM group, 24-hour preprocedure PVC burden was 13.5% (IQR 6.6%-30%), earliest activation time -33.7 ± 9.9 ms. Procedural duration, general anesthesia administration, fluoroscopy dose, and complications were all comparable. Following final procedure, 24-hour VA burden (PM 0% [IQR 0-2.4%] vs non-PM 0% [IQR 0-4.2%], P = .98), along with VA-free survival at 6-month follow-up (PM 77% vs non-PM 71%, P = .77), were both comparable. CONCLUSION: In patients with low intraprocedural burden of outflow tract VA, PM-guided catheter ablation can accurately identify the VA site of origin, leading to outcomes comparable to those achieved with standard ablation techniques.

Clinical and Electrophysiological Characteristics of Ventricular Tachycardias From the Basal Septum in Structural Heart Disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study describes the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of basal-septal ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). BACKGROUND: The basal septum is a common source of VT in patients with SHD. METHODS: Data from 312 consecutive patients with SHD undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-three basal-septal VTs in 31 patients (mean age 67.4 ± 14.2 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 42% ± 15%) were identified. Patients with VTs with left ventricular basal-septal breakthrough were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy and lower LVEF; patients with right ventricular basal-septal VT were more likely to have sarcoidosis or right ventricular cardiomyopathy of unknown significance, with higher LVEF. Atrioventricular block was present in 45% of patients and intraventricular block including persistent biventricular pacing in 77%. Unipolar scar was larger than bipolar scar (area 18.8% ± 19.4% vs 12.7% ± 14.6%; P < 0.001). VTs with right bundle branch block configuration and S wave in lead V6 with positive V3/V4 polarity consistently indicated left ventricular basal-septal breakthrough. Inferior limb-lead discordance with right bundle branch block configuration and "reverse pattern break in lead V2" were identified in left ventricular basal inferior-septal origin in 3 patients. VT noninducibility was achieved in 55%, and VT recurred in 42% of patients after a single procedure, but VT burden was significantly reduced after ablation (59 episodes before vs 2 episodes after ablation; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Basal-septal VTs in patients with SHD have a distinct clinical, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiological profile depending on the breakthrough site, accompanied by a deep intramural septal substrate that limits procedural success after catheter ablation.

Prognostic significance of extensive versus limited induction protocol during catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Testing for inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) pre- and postablation forms the cornerstone of contemporary scar-related VT ablation procedures. There is significant heterogeneity in reported VT induction protocols. We examined the utility of an extensive induction protocol (up to 4 extra-stimuli [ES] ± burst ventricular pacing) compared to the current guideline-recommended protocol (up to 3ES, defined as limited induction protocol) in patients with scar-related VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (age: 64 ± 14 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 37 ± 13%, ischemic cardiomyopathy: 31, nonischemic cardiomyopathy: 31) with at least one inducible VT were included. An extensive testing protocol induced 11%-17% more VTs, compared to the limited induction protocol before, and after the final ablation. VT recurred in 48% of patients during a mean follow up of 566 ± 428 days. Patients who were noninducible for any VT using the limited induction protocol had worse ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival (12 months, 43% vs. 82%; p = .03) and worse survival free of VA, transplantation and mortality (12 months 46% vs. 82%; p = .02), compared to patients who were noninducible for any VT using the extensive induction protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Between 11% and 17% of inducible VTs may be missed if 4ES and burst pacing are not performed in induction protocols before and after ablation. Noninducibility for any VT after an extensive induction protocol after the final ablation portends more favorable prognostic outcomes when compared with the current guideline-recommended induction protocol of up to 3ES. This data suggests that the adoption of an extensive induction protocol is of prognostic benefit after VT ablation.