Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Oncol ; 24(8): 2005-11, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23878115

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This phase IB, open-label, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and optimally tolerated regimen (OTR) of lapatinib in combination with docetaxel and trastuzumab in patients with previously untreated stage IV metastatic breast cancer (MBC) tumors overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Evaluated dose regimens included lapatinib (500-1500 mg/day), docetaxel (triweekly; 60-100 mg/m²), and trastuzumab (weekly; 2 mg/kg fixed dose); prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was included with regimens with ≥750 mg/day lapatinib. End points included OTR and safety/tolerability (primary), overall response rate (ORR), and pharmacokinetics (secondary). RESULTS: None of the patients (N = 53) experienced dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs) at the highest dose level; thus, the OTR of lapatinib with 100 mg/m(2) docetaxel was not determined. Common adverse events included diarrhea, nausea, alopecia, fatigue, and rash; grade 3/4 (≥2 patients) were neutropenia, diarrhea, leukopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and rash. Seven patients had DLTs (cycle 1). In 45 patients with measurable disease confirmed by bone scan, investigator-assessed ORR was 31%; without bone scan, confirmation was 64%; 8 patients without measurable disease were evaluated as stable. Lapatinib/docetaxel plasma concentrations were positively associated with complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Lapatinib/docetaxel/trastuzumab is a feasible and well-tolerated treatment of untreated HER2-positive stage IV MBC. Two lapatinib/docetaxel OTR doses were recommended (1250 mg/75 mg/m²; 1000 mg/100 mg/m²). CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00251433.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel , Femenino , Filgrastim , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lapatinib , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Polietilenglicoles , Quinazolinas/sangre , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Taxoides/sangre , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Trastuzumab , Adulto Joven
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(11): 2133-40, 2004 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15169799

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Ki-67 staining index (Ki67-SI) has been associated with prostate cancer patient outcome; however, few studies have involved radiotherapy (RT) -treated patients. The association of Ki67-SI to local failure (LF), biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), cause-specific death (CSD) and overall death (OD) was determined in men randomly assigned to short term androgen deprivation (STAD) + RT or long-term androgen deprivation (LTAD) + RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 537 patients (35.5%) on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 92-02 who had sufficient tissue for Ki67-SI analysis. Median follow-up was 96.3 months. Ki67-SI cut points of 3.5% and 7.1% were previously found to be related to patient outcome and were examined here in a Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis (MVA). Ki67-SI was also tested as a continuous variable. Covariates were dichotomized in accordance with stratification and randomization criteria. RESULTS: Median Ki67-SI was 6.5% (range, 0% to 58.2%). There was no difference in the distribution of patients in the Ki-67 analysis cohort (n = 537) and the other patients in RTOG 92-02 (n = 977) by any of the covariates or end points tested. In MVAs, Ki67-SI (continuous) was associated with LF (P =.08), BF (P =.0445), DM (P <.0001), CSD (P <.0001), and OD (P =.0094). When categoric variables were used in MVAs, the 3.5% Ki67-SI cut point was not significant. The 7.1% cut point was related to BF (P =.09), DM (P =.0008), and CSD (P =.017). Ki67-SI was the most significant correlate of DM and CSD. A detailed analysis of the hazard rates for DM in all possible covariate combinations revealed subgroups of patients treated with STAD + RT that did not require LTAD. CONCLUSION: Ki67-SI was the most significant determinant of DM and CSD and was also associated with OD. The Ki67-SI should be considered for the stratification of patients in future trials.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Análisis de Supervivencia
3.
J Clin Oncol ; 21(10): 1904-11, 2003 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12743142

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This trial tested the hypothesis that combined androgen suppression (CAS) and whole-pelvic (WP) radiotherapy (RT) followed by a boost to the prostate improves progression-free survival (PFS) by 10% compared with CAS and prostate-only (PO) RT. This trial also tested the hypothesis that neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy (NCHT) improves PFS compared with adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) by 10%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility included localized prostate cancer with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 100 ng/mL and an estimated risk of lymph node (LN) involvement of 15%. Between April 1, 1995, and June 1, 1999, 1,323 patients were accrued. Patients were randomly assigned to WP + NCHT, PO + NCHT, WP + AHT, or PO + AHT. Failure for PFS was defined as the first occurrence of local, regional, or distant disease; PSA failure; or death for any cause. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 59.5 months, WP RT was associated with a 4-year PFS of 54% compared with 47% in patients treated with PO RT (P =.022). Patients treated with NCHT experienced a 4-year PFS of 52% versus 49% for AHT (P =.56). When comparing all four arms, there was a progression-free difference among WP RT + NCHT, PO RT + NCHT, WP RT + AHT, and PO RT + AHT (60% v 44% v 49% v 50%, respectively; P =.008). No survival advantage has yet been seen. CONCLUSION: WP RT + NCHT improves PFS compared with PO RT and NCHT or PO RT and AHT, and compared with WP RT + AHT in patients with a risk of LN involvement of 15%.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Massachusetts , Michigan , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Ciudad de Nueva York , Ohio , Pennsylvania , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Radioterapia Conformacional , Texas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Wisconsin
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...