Nonpalpable breast lesions: impact of a second-opinion review at a breast unit on BI-RADS classification.

OBJECTIVE: To compare BI-RADS classification, management, and outcome of nonpalpable breast lesions assessed both by community practices and by a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) at a breast unit. METHODS: All nonpalpable lesions that were first assigned a BI-RADS score by community practices and then reassessed by an MTB at a single breast unit from 2009 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Inter-review agreement was assessed with Cohen's kappa statistic. Changes in biopsy recommendation were calculated. The percentage of additional tumor lesions detected by the MTB was obtained. The sensitivity, AUC, and cancer rates for BI-RADS category 3, 4, and 5 lesions were computed for both reviews. RESULTS: A total of 1909 nonpalpable lesions in 1732 patients were included. For BI-RADS scores in the whole cohort, a fair agreement was found (κ = 0.40 [0.36-0.45]) between the two reviews. Agreement was higher when considering only mammography combined with ultrasound (κ = 0.53 [0.44-0.62]), masses (κ = 0.50 [0.44-0.56]), and architectural distortion (κ = 0.44 [0.11-0.78]). Changes in biopsy recommendation occurred in 589 cases (31%). Ninety of 345 additional biopsies revealed high-risk or malignant lesions. Overall, the MTB identified 27% additional high-risk and malignant lesions compared to community practices. The BI-RADS classification AUCs for detecting malignant lesions were 0.66 (0.63-0.69) for community practices and 0.76 (0.75-0.78) for the MTB (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Agreement between community practices and MTB reviews for BI-RADS classification in nonpalpable lesions is only fair. MTB review improves diagnostic performances of breast imaging and patient management. KEY POINTS: • The inter-review agreement for BI-RADS classification between community practices and the multidisciplinary board was only fair (κ = 0.40). • Disagreements resulted in changes of biopsy recommendation in 31% of the lesions. • The multidisciplinary board identified 27% additional high-risk and malignant lesions compared to community practices.

Clinical impact of a new cone beam CT angiography respiratory motion artifact reduction algorithm during hepatic intra-arterial interventions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of recently developed respiratory motion correction software on contrast-enhanced cone beam CT angiography (CBCT-a) for intraprocedural image guidance during intra-arterial liver-directed therapy. METHODS: From 2015 to 2017, two groups of patients who underwent intra-arterial liver-directed therapy with (breathing, n = 30) or without (still, n = 30) significant respiratory motion artifacts were retrospectively included. All CBCT-a were processed with and without dedicated respiratory motion correction software. Four readers independently assessed the following in both reconstructions (motion correction ON and OFF): (1) overall image quality on a 0-to-5 point scale, and (2) presence of relevant peri-procedural information on tumor and vasculature (overall vessel geometry, visibility of extrahepatic vessels, target tumor conspicuity, visibility of tumor feeders). RESULTS: Motion correction increased the average image quality in the breathing group from 2.0 ± 0.9 to 2.9 ± 1.0 (p < 0.01). The visibility of vessel geometry, extrahepatic vessels, and tumor feeders was significantly improved for all readers, and tumor conspicuity was improved for three readers. The average image quality was not significantly different between reconstructions in the still group (motion correction ON and OFF), for any of the readers (4.0 ± 0.6 vs 4.2 ± 0.6; p = 0.12). There was no change in the visibility of vessel geometry, extrahepatic vessels, tumor feeders, or tumor conspicuity for the four readers using the respiratory motion correction software in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Using the dedicated respiratory motion correction software during intra-arterial liver-directed procedures increases the visualization of relevant peri-procedural information and image quality in CBCT-a corrupted by respiratory motion artifacts without affecting these elements in still CBCT-a. KEY POINTS: • The use of respiratory motion correction software could reduce the need for cone beam CT angiography acquisition retake. • Motion correction software significantly increases the visibility of vessel geometry, extrahepatic vessels, and tumor feeders, as well as tumor conspicuity in cone beam CT angiography corrupted by respiratory motion artifacts. • The use of respiratory motion correction software on cone beam CT angiography uncorrupted by respiratory motion artifact does not result in decreased image quality.