Biological Drugs for the Treatment of Uncontrolled Severe Asthma in Children.

The introduction of biological drugs for the treatment of severe allergic asthma in children, almost twenty years ago, had a substantial impact on both the pathology's clinical course and the quality of life of the patients who receive treatment. Over the years, several molecules have been developed that inhibit molecular targets involved in the pathogenesis of the asthmatic disease. Biological drugs demonstrate a significant improvement in several key clinical parameters in patients with severe asthma. In this review, we provide a concise summary of the evidence on biological therapy for children and adolescents with severe asthma.

Time effect of dupilumab to treat severe uncontrolled asthma in adolescents: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a new biological drug approved for the treatment of type 2 inflammatory diseases, such as asthma. Dupilumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that acts against both interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 receptors. This study evaluated the time--dependent effect of dupilumab on asthma exacerbations and quality of life in adolescents with uncontrolled severe asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five adolescents suffering from uncontrolled severe asthma and treated with dupilumab were recruited. All subjects were evaluated for 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the first dose of dupilumab. Outcome measures included lung function, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, asthma control and quality of life assessed by validated questionnaires (Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Questionnaire). RESULTS: The quality of life improved quickly after 4 weeks of treatment and 80% of adolescents halved the dose of inhaled corticosteroids necessary to control asthma symptoms. These results were still maintained for 24 weeks after start of the therapy. None of the patients had any asthma exacerbation during the study period. CONCLUSION: Results of this study demonstrated that dupilumab was quickly effective to reduce asthma exacerbation and ameliorate quality of life in severe asthmatic adolescents.

Vitamin D status can affect COVID-19 outcomes also in pediatric population.

Background: vitamin D influences the immune system and the inflammatory response. It is known that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of acute respiratory tract infection. In the last two years, many researchers have investigated vitamin D's role in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 disease. Results: the findings obtained from clinical trials and systematic reviews highlight that most patients with COVID-19 have decreased vitamin D levels and low levels of vitamin D increase the risk of severe disease. This evidence seems to be also confirmed in the pediatric population. Conclusions: further studies (systematic review and meta-analysis) conducted on children are needed to confirm that vitamin D affects COVID-19 outcomes and to determine the effectiveness of supplementation and the appropriate dose, duration and mode of administration.

Mometasone furoate nasal spray in Italian children with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a comprehensive assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is a common disease of childhood and is characterized by type 2 inflammation, bothersome symptoms, and impaired quality of life (QoL). Intranasal corticosteroids are effective medications in managing SAR. In addition, mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) is a well-known therapeutic option. However, the literature provided no data about the effects of MFNS in European children with SAR. Thus, this study addressed this unmet requirement. METHODS: MFNS was compared to isotonic saline. Both treatments were prescribed: one drop of spray per nostril, twice a day, for 3 weeks. Nasal cytology, total symptom score (TSS), visual analogic scale concerning the parental perception of severity of symptoms, and the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) were assessed at baseline, after 7 and 21 days, and 1 month after discontinuation. RESULTS: MFNS significantly reduced eosinophil and mast cell counts, improved QoL, and relieved symptoms, as assessed by doctors and perceived by parents. These effects persisted over time, even after discontinuation. Both treatments were safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The present study documented that a 3-week MFNS treatment was able to significantly dampen type 2 inflammation, improve QoL, and reduce severity of symptoms in Italian children with SAR, and was safe.