Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ambio ; 53(7): 970-983, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696060

RESUMEN

The EU Nature Restoration Law (NRL) is critical for the restoration of degraded ecosystems and active afforestation of degraded peatlands has been suggested as a restoration measure under the NRL. Here, we discuss the current state of scientific evidence on the climate mitigation effects of peatlands under forestry. Afforestation of drained peatlands without restoring their hydrology does not fully restore ecosystem functions. Evidence on long-term climate benefits is lacking and it is unclear whether CO2 sequestration of forest on drained peatland can offset the carbon loss from the peat over the long-term. While afforestation may offer short-term gains in certain cases, it compromises the sustainability of peatland carbon storage. Thus, active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option for climate mitigation under the EU Nature Restoration Law and might even impede future rewetting/restoration efforts. Instead, restoring hydrological conditions through rewetting is crucial for effective peatland restoration.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Unión Europea , Agricultura Forestal , Suelo , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Agricultura Forestal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Agricultura Forestal/métodos , Suelo/química , Bosques , Secuestro de Carbono , Restauración y Remediación Ambiental/métodos , Cambio Climático , Ecosistema , Humedales
2.
Nature ; 619(7969): 252, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37433930
3.
Nature ; 601(7892): 191, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35017704

Asunto(s)
Unión Europea
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...