Deciphering the "David Sign": Intersections in esthetic surgery and renaissance sculpture.

Spotlighting a 500-year-old detail in Michelangelo's "David," this paper delves into the intricate connection between technique and art in the medical field, especially in esthetic surgery. With rapid technological advancement, medical specialties are becoming increasingly segmented, leading to potential oversights in holistic human examination. Drawing from ancient Greek concepts, "Techne," "Ars," and "Episteme" are explored as symbolic representations of the convergence of skill and knowledge. Art, defined as a reflection of human creativity and emotion, was historically intertwined with science, as symbolized by the nine Muses. The Renaissance period, exemplified by works like "David," underlines the profound relationship between art and anatomy. Dr. Gelfman's observations on the "David sign" serve as a testament to the continuous dance between medical science and artistic representation. This paper underscores the timeless value of a comprehensive approach in medical practice, urging professionals to amalgamate technical precision with an artistic understanding of the human form. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, opinion expert.

The Promise and Pitfalls of AI-Generated Anatomical Images: Evaluating Midjourney for Aesthetic Surgery Applications.

BACKGROUNDS: The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems, such as Midjourney, has paved the way for their use in medical training, producing computer-generated images. However, despite clear disclosures stating that these images are not intended for medical consultations, their accuracy and realism are yet to be thoroughly examined. METHODS: A series of requests were addressed to the Midjourney AI tool, a renowned generative artificial intelligence application, with a focus on depicting appropriate systemic anatomy and representing aesthetic surgery operations. Subsequently, a blinded panel of four experts, with years of experience in anatomy and aesthetic surgery, assessed the images based on three parameters: accuracy, anatomical correctness, and visual impact. Each parameter was scored on a scale of 1-5. RESULTS: All of images produced by Midjourney exhibited significant inaccuracies and lacked correct anatomical representation. While they displayed high visual impact, their unsuitability for medical training and scientific publications became evident. CONCLUSIONS: The implications of these findings are multifaceted. Primarily, the images' inaccuracies render them ineffective for training, leading to potential misconceptions. Additionally, their lack of anatomical correctness limits their applicability in scientific articles. Although the study focuses on a single AI tool, it underscores the need for collaboration between AI developers and medical professionals. The potential integration of accurate medical databases could refine the precision of such AI tools in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Response Letter to "Testing ChatGPT's Capabilities for Social Media Content Analysis".

This editorial discusses the innovative application of ChatGPT in categorizing and analysing social media content, with a focus on aesthetic medical fields. It highlights the revolutionary capabilities of AI in enhancing efficiency and objectivity over traditional human-driven methods. Alongside the benefits, it also considers ethical concerns surrounding privacy, consent, and inherent biases within AI models. The article explores the complexity of categorization, the limitations in understanding human nuances, and the impact on human creativity, including specific applications such as SEO writing. It concludes by emphasizing the need for careful integration of AI in our interconnected world, balancing technological advancements with ethical considerations and a recognition of the unique attributes of human intellect. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Artificial Intelligence application in Aesthetic Medicine: How ChatGPT can Revolutionize the Aesthetic World.

Aesthetic medicine is witnessing a growing importance of ChatGPT and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, as highlighted by the pioneering work of Xie et al. in their article, "Aesthetic Surgery Advice and Counseling from Artificial Intelligence: A Rhinoplasty Consultation with ChatGPT." These advancements promise to revolutionize patient consultations, treatment planning, and follow-up care. AI-driven chatbots, such as ChatGPT, can enhance patient consultations by providing accurate and reliable information on aesthetic procedures, their risks, benefits, and potential outcomes, enabling well-informed decisions and improved treatment outcomes. Furthermore, AI can personalize treatment plans by analyzing patient data, leading to increased precision and satisfaction. AI-powered platforms can also streamline patient follow-up and monitoring, improving patient outcomes and resource utilization, while serving as a valuable educational tool for clinicians. Despite these benefits, AI integration in aesthetic medicine raises concerns about data privacy, security, and potential biases in AI algorithms. To address these challenges, the aesthetic medicine community must establish ethical guidelines, adopt stringent security protocols, and ensure diverse and representative datasets for AI training. Additionally, maintaining the personal connection between patients and providers is crucial for preserving the human touch in patient care.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266 .

Italian validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of validated Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires is useful in the standardization and interpretation process of pelvic floor patient symptoms, due to their functional nature and high prevalence. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory QoL questionnaire (PFDI-20) serves both as a symptom inventory and a measure of the degree of bother and distress caused by pelvic floor symptoms. It includes items related to pelvic organ prolapse and lower gastrointestinal and bladder dysfunction. METHODS: After consensus translation and a comprehension test, the Italian version of the questionnaire was submitted to patients reporting bowel, bladder, or pelvic disorders (cases) and to asymptomatic women (controls). Cases received the questionnaire once again 2 weeks later by email. RESULTS: A total of 254 patients answered the questionnaire. Construct validity was demonstrated by discriminating between cases and controls. Convergent validity was demonstrated for each domain (F < 0.001). In-ernal consistency reliability showed a satisfactory range (0.816-0.860). CONCLUSIONS: The PFDI-20 allows a comprehensive assessment of the effect of pelvic floor disorders on the quality of life of women. Moreover, the PFDI-20 represents a very solid QoL tool, since it has been extensively used in literature, and its use is highly recommended by the International Consultation on Incontinence. The present study demonstrated good features for the Italian version of the PFDI-20 questionnaire.

Botulinum toxin injection in vulva and vagina. Evidence from a literature systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Botulinum toxin (BoNT) administration has been proposed in the gynecologic field for pelvic, vulvar and vaginal disorders. On this regard, we aimed assessing the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of BoNT usage in the treatment of vaginal, vulvar and pelvic pain disorders. METHODS: We searched for all the original articles without date restriction until 31.12.2021. We included all the original articles which administered botulinum toxin in the vulva or vagina of women suffering from vaginismus, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain. Only English language studies and those performed in humans were eligible. We excluded all case reports and pilot study from the qualitative analysis, although we accurately evaluated them. 22 original studies were finally included in the systematic review. RESULTS: Botulinum toxin injection was found to be effective in improving vulvar and vaginal dyspareunia, vaginismus, and chronic pelvic pain. No irreversible side effects were detected. Major side effects reported were transient urinary or fecal incontinence, constipation and rectal pain. The risk of bias assessment proved original articles to be of medium quality. No metanalysis could have been performed since lack of congruency in the definition of pathology and methods of botulinum toxin administration. CONCLUSION: Data extraction pointed out different endpoints and different methods of analysis. Studies focus on different types of participants and use various techniques and timing. According to the best evidence available, different techniques provide evidence about positive outcomes, with the need for a standardized protocol.