Assessable learning outcomes for the EU Education and Training Framework core and Function A specific modules: Report of an ETPLAS WORKING Group.

Article 23(2) of the European Union Directive 2010/63/EU, which regulates welfare provisions for animals used for scientific purposes, requires that staff involved in the care and use of animals for scientific purposes be adequately educated and trained before they undertake any such work. However, the nature and extent of such training is not stipulated in the Directive. To facilitate Member States in fulfilling their education and training obligations, the European Commission developed a common Education and Training Framework, which was endorsed by the Member States Competent Authorities. An Education & Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science (ETPLAS) Working Group was recently established to develop further guidance to the Learning Outcomes in the Framework, with the objective to clarify the levels of knowledge and understanding required by trainees, and to provide the criteria by which these Learning Outcomes should be assessed. Using the Framework document as a starting point, assessment criteria for the Learning Outcomes of the modules required for Function A persons (carrying out procedures on animals) for rats, mice and zebrafish were created with sufficient detail to enable trainees, providers and assessors to appreciate the level of knowledge, understanding and skills required to pass each module. Adoption and utilization of this document by training providers and accrediting or approving bodies will harmonize introductory education and training for those involved in the care and use of animals for scientific purposes within the European Union, promote mutual recognition of training within and between Member States and therefore free movement of personnel.

Classification and reporting of severity experienced by animals used in scientific procedures: FELASA/ECLAM/ESLAV Working Group report.

Directive 2010/63/EU introduced requirements for the classification of the severity of procedures to be applied during the project authorisation process to use animals in scientific procedures and also to report actual severity experienced by each animal used in such procedures. These requirements offer opportunities during the design, conduct and reporting of procedures to consider the adverse effects of procedures and how these can be reduced to minimize the welfare consequences for the animals. Better recording and reporting of adverse effects should also help in highlighting priorities for refinement of future similar procedures and benchmarking good practice. Reporting of actual severity should help inform the public of the relative severity of different areas of scientific research and, over time, may show trends regarding refinement. Consistency of assignment of severity categories across Member States is a key requirement, particularly if re-use is considered, or the safeguard clause is to be invoked. The examples of severity classification given in Annex VIII are limited in number, and have little descriptive power to aid assignment. Additionally, the examples given often relate to the procedure and do not attempt to assess the outcome, such as adverse effects that may occur. The aim of this report is to deliver guidance on the assignment of severity, both prospectively and at the end of a procedure. A number of animal models, in current use, have been used to illustrate the severity assessment process from inception of the project, through monitoring during the course of the procedure to the final assessment of actual severity at the end of the procedure (Appendix 1).

Pharmacological evaluation of a series of smoothened antagonists in signaling pathways and after topical application in a depilated mouse model.

The Hedgehog (HH) pathway has been linked to the formation of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), medulloblastoma, and other cancers. The recently approved orally active drugs vismodegib (GDC-0449) and sonidegib (LDE-225) were not only efficacious for the treatment of advanced or metastatic BCC by antagonizing the smoothened (SMO) receptor, but also produced important side effects, limiting their use for less invasive BCC. Herein, we compared a large series of SMO antagonists, including GDC-0449 and LDE-225, the clinically tested BMS-833923, CUR-61414, cyclopamine, IPI-926 (saridegib), itraconazole, LEQ-506, LY-2940680 (taladegib), PF-04449913 (glasdegib), and TAK-441 as well as preclinical candidates (PF-5274857, MRT-83) in two SMO-dependent cellular assays and for G-protein activation. We report marked differences in inhibitor potencies between compounds as well as a notable disparity between the G-protein assay and the cellular tests, suggesting that classification of drugs is assay dependent. Furthermore, we explored topical efficacies of SMO antagonists on depilated mice using Gli1 and Ptch1 mRNA quantification in skin as biomarkers of the HH signaling inhibition. This topical model rapidly discriminated drugs in terms of efficacies and potencies for inhibition of both biomarkers. SMO antagonists showed also a large variation in their blood and skin partition, suggesting that some drugs are more favorable for topical application. Overall, our data suggested that in vitro and in vivo efficacious drugs such as LEQ-506 and TAK-441 may be of interest for topical treatment of less invasive BCC with minimal side effects.

Cardioprotection of cariporide evaluated by plasma myoglobin and troponin I in myocardial infarction in pigs.

The cardioprotective effects of cariporide were investigated against myoglobin and troponin I elevation in a model of myocardial infarction in pig, and the possible relationship between these markers and myocardial infarct size. The left circumflex coronary artery was ligated for 60-min and then reperfused for 48-h. Plasma levels of myoglobin and troponin I were quantified during reperfusion. Vehicle or cariporide (2.5 mg/kg) were administered i.v. before ischaemia and infused throughout ischaemia and for the beginning of reperfusion. In vehicle-treated pigs, the infarct size represented 26% +/- 3% of the area at risk. Cariporide significantly decreased the infarct size by 66% +/- 9%, and significantly reduced plasma levels of myoglobin and troponin I. A strongly correlated linear relationship between myocardial necrosis and plasma levels of myoglobin (R = 0.966, P < 0.0001) or troponin I (R = 0.855, P < 0.0001) was clearly identified. In conclusion, in our porcine model of myocardial infarction, even with small infarcts (in the presence of cariporide), plasma levels of myoglobin and troponin I are predictive of the presence of necrosis and its extent.

The novel analgesic, F 13640, produces intra- and postoperative analgesia in a rat model of surgical pain.

F 13640 is a newly discovered high-efficacy 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist that produces exceptional analgesia in animal models of tonic and chronic, nociceptive and neuropathic pains by novel molecular and neuroadaptive mechanisms. Here we examined the effects of F 13640 and remifentanil (0.63 mg/kg with either compound) when injected i.p. either before or 15 min after rats underwent orthopedic surgery. Surgery consisted of the drilling of a hole in the calcaneus bone and of an incision of the skin, fascia and plantar muscle of one foot. During surgery, the concentration of volatile isoflurane was progressively incremented depending on the animal's response to surgical maneuvers. Other experiments examined the dose-dependent effects of F 13640 (0.04 to 0.63 mg/kg) on surgical pain as well as on the Minimum Alveolar Concentration of isoflurane. Both F 13640 and remifentanil markedly reduced the intra-operative isoflurane requirement. F 13640 also reduced measures of postoperative pain (i.e., paw elevation and flexion). With these postoperative measures, remifentanil produced short-lived analgesia followed by hyperalgesia. F 13640 significantly reduced both surgical pain and the isoflurane Minimum Alveolar Concentration from 0.16 mg/kg onward. F 13640 produced powerful intra- and postoperative analgesia in rats undergoing orthopedic surgery. Unlike the opioid, remifentanil, F 13640 caused no hyperalgesia with ongoing postoperative pain, and should remain effective with protracted postoperative use.